30 C
Singapore
Monday, July 7, 2025
Ads

EX-NUS DEPUTY DIRECTOR ALLEGEDLY TOOK UPSKIRT VIDEOS & DOWNLOADED PIAK PIAK MOVIES, CHARGED

In recent developments, a former deputy director at the National University of Singapore (NUS) and a former director at the Singapore University of Technology & Design (SUTD), Foo Siang Chi, finds himself entangled in a web of legal troubles.

Advertisements

On Thursday, November 23, Foo was charged with a series of offenses, including cheating and voyeurism-related acts, according to Channel NewsAsia.

Background of Foo Siang Chi

Before we dissect the charges, it’s crucial to understand Foo Siang Chi’s professional journey. Foo, a figure who once held a position as a deputy director at the Office of Facilities Management at NUS, later transitioned to SUTD, where he assumed the role of a director at the Office of Campus Infrastructure and Facilities.

Charges and Accusations

Cheating charges

Between April and July 2015, Foo Siang Chi is accused of deceiving his then-supervisor by borrowing a substantial sum, a whopping S$205,500 (US$153,000).

Advertisements

What makes this case particularly troubling is the alleged purpose of the borrowed funds—feeding his gambling habits.

Upskirting

The charges don’t stop at financial deceit. Foo is also accused of violating the privacy of women by taking upskirt photos and videos on at least 31 occasions between April 2018 and March 2020. These disturbing actions paint a picture of a blatant disregard for personal boundaries.

Possession of obscene films

Adding another layer to the charges, between September 2019 and December 2020, Foo allegedly possessed two obscene videos on his mobile phone, sourced from a pornographic website. This raises questions about the ethical standards expected of individuals in positions of responsibility.

Advertisements

Legal Consequences

As the legal proceedings unfold, Foo Siang Chi faces severe consequences if found guilty. For the charges of cheating, a maximum jail term of 10 years and a substantial fine await. Conviction on charges of insulting a woman’s modesty could lead to imprisonment for up to a year, a fine, or both. Additionally, the voyeurism accusations carry a potential two-year jail term and a fine. Importantly, due to his age, caning is not applicable.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Latest News

M’sia Collects Over S$17,000 From Singapore Vehicles in First Week of VEP Enforcement

In the first five days of enforcing its Vehicle Entry Permit (VEP) requirement, Malaysia has collected a total of...
- Advertisement -