Residents in Bangkok’s Phasi Charoen district were left shaken after a horrifying scene unfolded involving a man in a state of delirium who fatally shot two individuals before engaging in a tense standoff with Thai police.
The shocking incident quickly went viral across Thai social media platforms, garnering over 3 million views within hours. Videos captured the moment police attempted to apprehend the armed suspect, who had already taken the lives of two people. The chaotic scene sparked intense public reaction, with many questioning the police’s response and use of force.
Shooter Allegedly in Drug-Induced Psychosis
Witnesses reported that the man appeared to be suffering from a severe mental episode, believed to be induced by illicit substance use. The shooter reportedly opened fire without warning, resulting in two tragic deaths before barricading himself and prompting a swift law enforcement response.
Multiple police units were deployed to surround the suspect. However, the officers exercised extreme caution in subduing him, likely due to current human rights concerns and the potential for public backlash over excessive force.
Netizens Divided Over Police Tactics
Social media platforms were flooded with commentary. Many users expressed frustration at what they viewed as an overly passive police response, especially given the suspect was armed and had already killed two individuals.
Comments included sentiments like:
- “If this was America, he’d be in a body bag by now.”
- “Why talk to someone who already shot two people? Just end it.”
- “Our laws protect criminals more than the officers.”
- “These situations make the police look weak — four officers against one gunman?”
Some users defended the police, pointing out the challenges law enforcement faces when human rights groups frequently scrutinise their actions. Others argued that the legal framework in Thailand needs urgent reform to empower officers to act decisively in dangerous situations.
A Familiar Pattern of Criticism
Many drew comparisons to past incidents involving perceived excessive leniency, lamenting that officers are often caught between doing their job and avoiding media-fuelled controversy. There were even sarcastic jabs suggesting that police are only bold when issuing fines for minor infractions, like helmet violations.
Despite the criticism, some users did sympathise with the police, noting that officers risk their lives every day and are often underappreciated.
This incident reignites debate on Thailand’s legal and policing standards, especially in life-threatening situations. As public safety hangs in the balance, calls for clearer enforcement protocols and stricter criminal deterrents are growing louder.