Buy EV Lose Money? Not My Main Reason For Not Buying “I Don’t Want To Die I simply do not want to be trapped inside a burning cage”

Whenever I tell people I’m holding out on buying an electric vehicle (EV), the immediate assumption is financial. Everyone looks at Singapore’s astronomical Certificate of Entitlement (COE) prices, the shifting road tax structures, or the high depreciation rates of tech-heavy vehicles, and assumes I’m just worried about losing money.

Sure, the math matters. But it isn’t my main constraint.

My primary reason for sticking with internal combustion or standard hybrids has nothing to do with resale value, battery degradation, or charging logistics. It comes down to a much more fundamental human survival instinct: I simply do not want to be trapped inside a burning cage.

For me, the risk calculations shifted permanently after reading a sequence of high-profile global and local incidents.

1. The Post-Crash Trap: Where Seconds Decide Life or Death

The most alarming aspect of severe EV incidents isn’t just the fire itself—it is the speed of thermal runaway paired with the vulnerability of computerized vehicle entry systems.

When a lithium-ion battery pack suffers severe mechanical trauma, it undergoes a chemical chain reaction that generates its own heat and oxygen. It doesn’t need atmospheric air to burn, and it spreads with terrifying speed.

• Piedmont, California (November 2024): A Tesla Cybertruck carrying four young adults struck a tree at high speed and caught fire. Three passengers perished inside. Lawsuits filed by the families allege that while the initial physical impact was entirely survivable, the occupants could not escape because the vehicle’s electronic door latches failed when the electrical system died. Rescuers had to resort to smashing the windshield with a tree branch just to pull the single survivor out.
• Baytown, Texas (August 2024): Another Cybertruck veered off the road and hit a concrete culvert, instantly erupting into a fire so intense that emergency responders struggled to identify the vehicle or the occupant. The official autopsy confirmed the driver died from 100% thermal burn injuries.
• Dortmund, Germany (September 2025): A Tesla Model S crashed into a tree and burst into flames, claiming the lives of the driver and two young children. A witness who rushed to the scene with a fire extinguisher reported that the flush-fitting electronic exterior door handles failed to pop out, making it physically impossible to open the doors from the outside to rescue the family.

+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                     THE ELECTRONIC LATCH DILEMMA                       |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| High-Speed Impact / Severe Battery Damage                              |
|                                                                        |
| 12V Electrical Drivetrain Architecture Suffers Total Failure           |
|                                                                        |
| Electronic handles fail to extend -> Outside rescuers locked out       |
| Emergency interior mechanical overrides require multi-step actions    |
| (e.g., removing rubber pocket linings to find hidden release cables)   |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+

2. Spontaneous Combustion: The Stationary Threat

The worry isn’t restricted to high-speed collisions. The risk of thermal runaway exists even when a vehicle is completely stationary, parked, or idle—often driven by latent manufacturing defects or slow-growing internal cell shorts.

• The Incheon Basement Explosion (August 2024): A Mercedes-Benz EQE sedan sat parked in an underground apartment garage in South Korea. It had been stationary for three days and was not actively charging when it suddenly suffered a catastrophic battery failure and exploded. While no one died, the resulting thick, toxic smoke cloud hospitalized 23 people, forced 700 residents to evacuate their homes, and completely melted or destroyed 140 neighboring vehicles.
• The Teban Gardens Incident, Singapore (July 2025): We like to think Singapore is insulated from these issues due to our strict Technical Reference 25 (TR25) charging standards and rigid vehicle inspections. Yet, on July 11, 2025, a brand-new, stationary BYD Seal parked at a distributor lot along Teban Gardens Crescent suddenly began billowing thick white smoke from its undercarriage.

The Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) had to respond at 12:20 AM, using specialized water lances to inject water directly into the battery compartment to cool the cells down before an open blaze erupted.

3. The Reality of Fighting an EV Battery Fire

As an ordinary driver, what terrifies me most is the sheer logistical difficulty of extinguishing a compromised lithium-ion pack if things go wrong.

A standard internal combustion engine fire can usually be suppressed by a first responder using a few hundred gallons of water or a couple of standard dry-chemical extinguishers. An EV battery fire is an entirely different beast.

According to global fire safety data, suppressing a fully developed EV battery fire requires between 30,000 to 40,000 gallons of water applied continuously over several hours just to lower the internal core temperature. Even after the flames are visibly put out, the pack can spontaneously re-ignit hours or days later due to trapped internal heat.

This unique logistical nightmare is exactly why individual property management firms, luxury hotels, and commercial buildings across cities like Hangzhou, Ningbo, and Guangzhou have independently instituted their own private bans restricting EVs from parking in low-clearance underground basements:

• Standard fire engines cannot physically drive into low-ceiling basement levels.
• Enclosed spaces rapidly trap dense, lethal concentrations of hydrogen fluoride and carbon monoxide gas.
• Standard overhead garage sprinkler systems are completely ineffective against chemical battery fires.

Direct and Transparent Risk Assessment

Statistically, yes—EV fires occur at a lower frequency per capita than conventional gasoline vehicles.

But statistics matter very little if you happen to be the anomaly trapped inside an electronic cabin with dead door handles while a 1,000-degree chemical fire takes hold underneath your seat.

Until vehicle architectures universally mandate foolproof, highly visible, purely mechanical door releases—and until battery chemistry advances to a point where true thermal runaway is physically impossible—I will happily continue paying for petrol.

I can always make more money. I can’t get another life. Simple as that.