34 C
Singapore
Tuesday, August 25, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 4563

3 S’POREANS CAUGHT IN KL AFTER M’SIA POLICE RAID LUP SUP KTV

0

Malaysia (Kuala Lumpur) – An unlicensed nightclub KTV hired foreign girls to work, attracting tourists from Singapore, Hong Kong, Indonesia, China, etc., A raid was conducted leading to the arrested of 20 men and women, including 8 Vietnamese escort girls.

At 12:05 AM Sunday (June 12), the Kuala Lumpur Police Unit (D7) raided a nightclub in Fraser Business Park, Mid-Levels, KL City, revealing that the operator was operating without a license.

Kuala Lumpur Criminal Investigation Unit Director Habibie Senior Assistant Director said that the police arrested a total of 20 men and women, including a Chinese male guard, 11 Bangladeshi male employees, and 8 Vietnamese girls, aged between 26 and 58 years old.

He said in a statement today that the police also checked 85 people (aged 20 to 61), including 9 local Chinese male employees, 2 Chinese female employees, 2 Indian male employees and 2 Sabah male employees.

People from Singapore, Hong Kong, Indonesia, China and other places.

“There were also 46 local Chinese male customers, 17 Chinese female customers, 3 Singaporean male customers, 1 Hong Kong male customer, 1 Indonesian male customer, and 2 Chinese male customers.”

Habibie said police seized receipt books and audio equipment at the nightclub, citing Section 6(1), Section 39B, Section 55B of the Immigration Act 1959/63, and Section 4(1) of the Entertainment Act (Federal Territory) 1992. Articles to investigate the case.

$5.8 MILLION LOST TO SCAMS, 277 SCAMMERS UNDER POLICE INVESTIGATION

0

Officers from the Commercial Affairs Department and the seven Police Land Divisions conducted a two-week operation between 27 May and 9 Jun 2022.

A total of 197 men and 80 women, aged between 16 and 78, are currently assisting in investigations for their suspected involvement in scams as scammers or money mules. The suspects are believed to be involved in more than 767 cases of scams, comprising mainly bank-related phishing scams, internet love scams, business email impersonation scams, Government Officials impersonation scams, e-commerce scams, investment scams, job scams, and loan scams, where victims lost more than $5.8 million.

The suspects are being investigated for the alleged offences of cheating, money laundering or providing payment services without a licence. The offence of cheating under Section 420 of the Penal Code 1871 carries an imprisonment term of up to 10 years and a fine.

The offence of money laundering under the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act 1992 carries an imprisonment term not exceeding 10 years, a fine not exceeding $500,000, or both. The offence of carrying on a business to provide any type of payment service in Singapore without a licence under Section 5 of the Payment Services Act 2019 carries a fine not exceeding $125,000, an imprisonment term not exceeding three years, or both.

The Police take a serious stance against any person who may be involved in scams, and perpetrators will be dealt with in accordance with the law. To avoid being an accomplice to crimes, members of the public should always reject requests by others to use your bank account or mobile lines as you will be held accountable if these are linked to crimes.

For more information on scams, members of the public can visit www.scamalert.sg or call the Anti-Scam Hotline at 1800-722-6688.

Anyone with information on such scams may call the Police Hotline at 1800-255-0000 or submit information online at www.police.gov.sg/iwitness. All information will be kept strictly confidential.

MAN CHARGED AFTER OPENING MULTIPLE BANK ACCS FOR SCAMMERS

0

A 68-year-old man was charged in court on 10 June 2022 for allegedly conspiring with an unknown person to deceive three local banks into opening bank accounts for him, on the belief that the bank accounts would be used by him.

The man was also charged for allegedly abetting the unknown person to secure unauthorised access to the banks’ computer systems when he provided them with the Personal Identification Number (PIN) of ATM cards. The bank accounts were used by criminals to launder proceeds of crime derived from three reported cases of Internet Love Scams.

Three victims of Internet Love Scams had fallen in love with persons they met online on the social media platforms of Facebook and Instagram. Over time, the victims transferred a total amounting to S$20,300, at the request of their online lovers, for a variety of purposes. Some money was transferred purportedly to help ease cashflow problems; money was also transferred on the pretext of paying for fees needed to release parcels sent by their online lovers.

Police investigations revealed that the man had befriended an unknown person over the social media platform. At the request of the online persona, to help receive funds in Singapore for business purposes, the man allegedly cheated three local banks into opening the bank accounts in his name, by deceiving the banks into believing that he was the person using these bank accounts. The man then mailed the bank ATM cards to an address in Malaysia, and provided the PIN to the person he befriended online.

For conspiring to cheat the bank into opening the bank account, an act which is likely to cause harm to the reputation of the bank, the offence under Section 417 read with Section 109 of the Penal Code carries an imprisonment term not exceeding three years, a fine, or both. 

For abetting persons to secure unauthorised access to a bank’s computer system for a first-time offender, the offence under Section 3(1) read with Section 10 and Section 11A of the Computer Misuse Act carries a fine not exceeding $5,000, an imprisonment term not exceeding two years, or both.

To avoid becoming involved in money laundering activities, members of the public should always reject requests to share the use of their banking facilities to receive and transfer funds, as well as guard against disclosing their SingPass login details which can be misused for many transactions.

If you receive or are asked to receive funds from unknown or dubious sources, please contact the Anti-Scam Helpline at 1800-722-6688. Anyone with information on such scams may call the Police hotline at 1800-255-0000 or submit information online at www.police.gov.sg/iwitness.

MAN SAYS HIS UNDER-AVERAGE KUKU JIAO ALSO MAKES HIS GF HAPPY

0

You are fine. SG average is around 11cm only, so it is just 1 inch below average. Not that bad lah. I am here to give you an anecdotal experience as a previously small D dude, so you don’t need the stress.

For my first girlfriend, around 56kg at 1.68m, when I lost my V card to her, I was so excited that my hands were actually shaking sia. Then, I put on the rubber, and slipped myself into her. Just like that, it was so easy. Here comes the kicker, she actually asked me, if it was in.

I felt so paiseh, that I pretended that I have not entered yet, and tried to do it again more obviously. And that was when I realised I was in trouble. Apart from a very very very minute amount of pressure, I could not feel much besides the heat when I was inside. It was not the heavenly sensation that I thought S was supposed to be. Our first intimate encounter ended up with her crying, and me holding her because I could not get off; she had felt terrible about her inability, and was under the impression that men would get off very easily.

During one of our conversations, she told me that her ex was bigger, and it was another blow to my already destroyed ego. Throughout our relationship, I was almost always the one who could not keep my hands off her, but when go time came, neither party would be able to get off. I remembered thinking to myself, why people were, even so, obsessed with S, if all it amounted to was just an awkward tandem exercise session.

Considering how we were going at it for literal hours (I was 17, then), it is truly one of life’s greatest mysteries that I only ever got off with her once. I wanted it all the time, but just could not getoff.

At that point in time, S was just a bad memory, and I felt unconfident because of my below-average D size.

Along comes my 2nd girlfriend, weighing in at 48kg at a height of 1.58m. The first time we had intimacy, I could not fit my whole length into her.

Think about just how much cognitive dissonance I had in that moment, from throwing a hot dog down a hall way, to feeling like I was trying to jam a cucumber up a PET bottle. It was so tight that it was uncomfortable for both parties, and it actually hurt to try.

We failed on our first attempt, and since it was a staycay, tried again the next morning. Cue the fireworks explosion scene when Raimi from Ratatouille offered his rat friend a marvellous new taste.

S IS great, afterall. Throughout our time, it would always hurt or feel a little uncomfortable when we first slipped it in, and it would take time for her to accommodate, but it would almost always be incredibly enjoyable for both parties. In fact, she enjoyed it so much that she wanted it more than I could give. 5 minutes after finishing, panting and lying in sweat, she will start feeling me up all over again. It got to the point that I dreaded it, and wished that we had less.

At that point in time, S had gone from a bad memory to a good one, but it was starting to turn bad as well. One good thing was that she did make me feel amazing about my size. The size was still an issue, but in the opposite manner.

The point that I am trying to bring across to you is that size is really just down to a compatibility issue. Size does matter, ngl, but so long as its not 1cm is fine lah. 8cm is definitely workable. Hardness, endurance and all that is what you can realistically work on. You can forget about enhancement products or surgery, where a lot of it is just bro-science and you run the risk of disaster. Just workout regularly, eat healthy, and you will be better than like 90% of the unfit pot-bellied men.

Because you asked, I am almost 1cm when cold, super small, and my height is around 1.8m. Chin up, you are at the optimal preferred height already fyi, which can land you alot more partners than if you had a 20cm schlong, and 1.5m height. I know people who would not mind trading their d length for their height at a ratio of 1:1, so, you got that going for you at least. And you are on your 3rd girlfriend, whilst many guys still at 0!

It is summer now. SUN’S OUT, GUNS OUT!

27 Y.O MAN ARRESTED FOR SNATCH THEFTS OF GOLD NECKLACES

The Singapore Police Force said in a press release on 10 June that a 27-year-old man was arrested for allegedly being involved in a series of snatch thefts.

He had allegedly snatched a victim’s gold necklace worth about $3,000 along Paya Lebar Road, as well as three other snatch theft cases across Singapore.

He was charged in court on Saturday last week.

Here is what the police said

The Police have arrested a 27-year-old man for his suspected involvement in a series of snatch theft cases.

On 8 June 2022 at about 7.15pm, the Police were alerted to a case of snatch theft along Paya Lebar Road, where a victim’s gold necklace was allegedly snatched by an unknown man. The gold necklace was valued at $3,000.

Through extensive ground enquiries, follow-up investigations and with the aid of images from Police and CCTV cameras, officers from Bedok Police Division and Tanglin Police Division established the identity of the man and arrested him on 10 June 2022. Two gold chains were recovered and his clothing was seized as exhibits. The man is also believed to be involved in three other cases of snatch theft island-wide.

The man will be charged in court on 11 June 2022 for the offence of snatch theft under Section 356 of the Penal Code 1871. The offence carries an imprisonment term of not less than one year and not more than seven years, and caning.

The Police will not tolerate such brazen acts of crime and will spare no effort to apprehend such offenders and deal with them in accordance with the law.

20220610_man_arr_for_a_series_of_snatch_theft_cases_1
20220610_man_arr_for_a_series_of_snatch_theft_cases_2
20220610_man_arr_for_a_series_of_snatch_theft_cases_3
20220610_man_arr_for_a_series_of_snatch_theft_cases_4

PUBLIC AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
SINGAPORE POLICE FORCE
10 June 2022 @ 10:52 PM

28 Y.O ARRESTED FOR ALLEGEDLY USING KNIFE IN ASSAULT @ CUFF ROAD

The Singapore Police Force said in a press release on 11 June that three men were arrested following an alleged assault along Cuff Road on 4 June.

Two of the men, a 26 and 28-year-old, were arrested for voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapon, while the third man, a 34-year-old, was arrested for harbouring an offender, and possession of a scheduled weapon.

The police were alerted to an alleged assault case along Cuff Road involving a knife, with two male victims suffering laceration wounds and being sent to Tan Tock Seng Hospital.

Here is what the police said

On 4 June 2022 at about 2.33am, the Police were alerted to a case of alleged assault along Cuff Road. Two male victims suffered laceration wounds and were conveyed to Tan Tock Seng Hospital.

Through ground enquiries and the aid of images from CCTV and Police cameras, officers from Central Police Division and Criminal Investigation Department established the identities of three men suspected to be involved in the alleged assault.

On 4 and 7 June 2022, the Police arrested two of the men, aged 26 and 28, for the offence of voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapon with common intention under Section 324 read with Section 34 of the Penal Code 1871.

The 26-year-old man was charged in court on 6 June 2022. His 28-year-old accomplice, who had allegedly used a knife to cause multiple lacerations to the victims, was charged in court on 9 June 2022 for the same offence.

During the arrest of the 28-year-old man, another 34-year-old man was also arrested for the offences of harbouring an offender under Section 212 of the Penal Code 1871, and possession of a scheduled weapon under Section 7(1) of the Corrosive, Explosive Substances and Offensive Weapons Act 1958. He was charged in court for the two offences on 9 June 2022.

The offence of voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapon under Section 324 of the Penal Code 1871 carries an imprisonment term of up to seven years, a fine, caning, or any combination of such punishments. Under Section 34 of the same Code, when a criminal act is done by several persons, in furtherance of the common intention of all, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if the act were done by him alone.

The offence of harbouring an offender carries an imprisonment term of up to one-fourth of the longest term of imprisonment provided for the predicate offence, or a fine, or with both. The offence of possession of a scheduled weapon carries an imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, with caning of not less than six strokes; and in the case of a second or subsequent offence, to imprisonment for a term of not less than two years and not more than eight years, with caning of not less than six strokes.


PUBLIC AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
SINGAPORE POLICE FORCE
11 June 2022 @ 11:20 AM

2 MEN ARRESTED FOR CONTRABAND CIGGS & $15K OF SUSPECTED CRIMINAL MONEY

The Singapore Customs issued a statement on Facebook saying that two men were arrested for dealing with duty-unpaid cigarettes.

About $15,000 of suspected criminal proceeds were also seized by the authorities during an operation conducted near Jalan Gali Batu.

The two men, a 62-year-old Singaporean private hire driver, and an Indonesian believed to be 20-years-old were charged in court on 9 June.

Here is what Singapore Customs said

[Two men arrested for dealing with duty-unpaid cigarettes, $15,000 suspected criminal proceeds seized]

On 7 Jun 2022, during an operation conducted in the vicinity of Jalan Gali Batu, Singapore Customs officers checked on a Singapore-registered vehicle and found 100 cartons of duty-unpaid cigarettes. They arrested an Indonesian man, believed to be aged 20, and a 62-year-old Singaporean man who is a private hire driver, for dealing with duty-unpaid cigarettes.

A total of 100 cartons of duty-unpaid cigarettes, a Singapore-registered vehicle and suspected criminal proceeds amounting to $15,000 were seized.

Both men were charged in court on 9 Jun 2022.

May be an image of text that says "1 We Protect Revenue, and Make Trade Easy, Fair and Secure."
May be an image of car and text that says "SINGAPORECUSTOMS We Protect Revenue, and Make Trade Easy, Fair and Secure."
May be an image of text that says "We Protect Revenue, and Make Trade Easy, Fair and Secure."

YP USED STRAW TO DRINK TOILET BOWL WATER TO IMPRESS XMMS

A video emerged online showing a YP and a group of girls inside a toilet, with the former using a straw to drink water from a toilet bowl.

The YP appears to be drunk, judging by the redness on his body (or he could be blushing because got girls inside the toilet).

He was seen sucking the toilet bowl water through the straw and drinking it, much to the excitement of the XMMs watching, who went “WOOOOO!”

It is unclear whether he managed to impress the XMMs or not, but he is definitely gonna be impressing the toilet cleaner.

Toilet bowl

On average, a toilet bowl contains about 3.2 million bacteria per square inch, excluding the amount of bacteria in other parts of the toilet bowl like the toilet flush handle and seat.

Add that to the fact that the YP was drinking toilet bowl water from what appears to be a public toilet, God knows how much bacteria and germs he has consumed.

FULL VIDEO LOADING…

YOUNG MAN VS ELDERLY MAN, ARGUING WITH EACH OTHER, PUSH UNCLE’S HAND

A video emerged online showing a young man and elderly man having a heated confrontation in the streets.

The elderly man was seen seated on a bench, as the younger man stood over him and stared down at him.

They then exchanged words, with the younger man opening his arms, appearing to intimidate the elderly man.

He then got his face closer to the uncle as they continued exchanging words, and the uncle then raised his hand in front of the young man.

The young man then pushed the uncle’s hand away as they continued arguing, by which point a female passerby walked over to see what was happening.

The uncle then stood up and pulled the young man away, and the video then abruptly ended.

FULL VIDEO LOADING…

DRUNK MAN SHOUTING, WANT TO FIGHT POLICEMAN, TACKLED & ARRESTED

A video emerged online showing a drunk man shouting at a police officer, after allegedly getting into a fist fight with another man.

According to the netizen, the drunk man had gotten into a fist fight with another man before the police arrived.

The police then purportedly tried to talk to him but he refused to calm down, and was then seen in the video engaging in a shouting match with the police officer.

The drunk man was seen challenging the policeman to a fight, pushing his friend’s hand away and shouting at the officer “COME AH!”

He was eventually subdued and pinned down by a group of police officers, including other officers who arrived at the scene, before being arrested.

Potential penalties

Anyone convicted of using or threatening communication or behaviour against a public servant or public service worker is punishable under Section 6(3) of the Protection from Harassment Act

They face a possible imprisonment term not exceeding 12 months, or a fine not exceeding $5,000, or both.

The offence of using criminal force to deter a public servant from the discharge of his duty under Section 353 of the Penal Code, Chapter 224 is punishable with an imprisonment term which may extend to four years, or a fine, or both.

FULL VIDEO LOADING…