An anonymous source has come forward with troubling allegations involving a group of married men—some of whom are reportedly employed in reputable positions, including one at the International Air Transport Association (IATA). According to the source, the men regularly frequent KTV lounges at Singapore’s New World Centre and participate in S-tourism trips to Thailand, raising serious questions about moral responsibility, public health, and the secret double lives some individuals lead.
Here is the story:
I used to have a friend (37M) who currently works at the International Air Transport Association (IATA) in the ops department. Over time, I discovered that he frequently visited KTV lounges at New World Centre with his colleagues and friends, where he engaged in one-night stands. This behavior wasn’t limited to Singapore — they also took yearly trips to Thailand, seemingly with the same intentions.
What troubled me most was that many of these men were married with children. I couldn’t understand why, despite having families, they still felt the need to seek “fun” and companionship in such places. It struck me as not only morally irresponsible, but also incredibly reckless — especially considering the very real risk of contracting S-transmitted infections from S-workers. None of them seemed concerned about the potential consequences for their wives or the health risks they could be exposing their families to.
The more I learned, the more uneasy I became. It wasn’t just their behavior that troubled me — it was the underlying values that seemed to guide their choices. I found myself questioning how people could so easily separate their actions from the responsibilities they carried as partners, parents, and professionals.
It stirred a deep sense of moral conflict within me. I couldn’t ignore the fact that their decisions weren’t just private indulgences — they carried real risks, with potentially devastating consequences for the very people who trusted and depended on them the most. Watching them live these double lives made me reflect on integrity, accountability, and the quiet damage that can come from secrecy and self-interest.
Conclusion:
This account paints a sobering picture of how some individuals lead compartmentalized lives, maintaining the image of devoted family men while engaging in risky, clandestine behavior. While the specific claims remain allegations, they reflect broader societal concerns about fidelity, health risks, and personal integrity.
“I started questioning the values of the people around me,” the source said. “These weren’t just private choices — they had real consequences for innocent people. And that’s what haunted me the most.”
As Singapore continues to grapple with issues surrounding moral conduct and public health, stories like this serve as a stark reminder: the cost of secrecy is often borne by those who never consented to it.