The National University of Singapore has been in the limelight for continuous new reports of sexual misconduct in the past few years.
Recently, the school even published a summary of the complaint known as the Update on Complaints of Sexual Misconduct document. I wonder how many schools actually have this kind of documents publish as it is fairly uncommon to have such a large number of cases of sexual misconduct in a school.
The document itself listed 10 reports of sexual misconduct that were reported from Jan to June 2021.
There were cases related to the following
- sexual assault
- indecent exposure
- Voyeurism
- Ver or physical contact of a sexual nature
All of the following cases were reported to the Police
Jan 22 – The respondent was alleged to have committed an act of
indecent exposure at a common facility.
Jan 27 – The respondent was alleged to have touched the complainant
inappropriately without consent while they were in a hostel. The complainant is a member of the public.
Feb 10 – The respondent was alleged to have removed a condom without
the complainant’s consent during consensual sexual intercourse.
Feb 10 – The respondent was alleged to have had non-consensual sexual intercourse with the complainant while they were in a hostel.
March 9 – The respondent was alleged to have made unwanted sexual remarks towards the complainant while they were in a hostel.
March 19 – The respondent was alleged to have committed indecent exposure and obscene acts in public. The respondent then recorded the acts and uploaded them on social media
March 26 – The respondent was alleged to have touched the first complainant inappropriately without consent while they were in a hostel. The respondent was also alleged to have filmed the second complainant in the nude without
consent while they were in a hostel.
April 12 – The respondent was alleged to have had non-consensual sexual intercourse with the complainant while they were in a hostel.
May 5 – The respondent was alleged to have filmed sexual acts with the
complainant without consent while they were in a hostel. The complainant is a member of the public.
June 1 – The respondent had allegedly filmed the complainant while the
latter was showering at home. The complainant is a member of the public.