In a peculiar case that has drawn attention, a Chinese security guard in his sixties tragically passed away while engaging in intimate relations with his girlfriend during work hours. The incident occurred in a small factory where he was the sole security personnel, and it has since been classified as an “industrial accident,” allowing his family to seek compensation.
Circumstances Surrounding the Incident
According to reports from the South China Morning Post, the guard, identified as Zhang, was in the factory’s security room—a space he often used for rest—when he suddenly died. Authorities confirmed that his death was due to natural causes, with no signs of foul play.
Initially, Zhang’s family sought compensation from the Municipal Social Security Bureau, but their request was denied on the grounds that his death did not occur while he was performing work-related duties. This led Zhang’s son to take legal action against both the factory and the social security authority, arguing that his father’s death should be considered a workplace accident.
Legal Arguments and Court Ruling
Zhang’s son contended that his father was required to work around the clock without any days off, which left him with no choice but to meet his girlfriend at the factory. The lawyer representing the family argued that engaging in a relationship was a natural physiological need, especially given the circumstances of Zhang’s demanding job.
The court ultimately sided with Zhang’s family, ruling that his death occurred during work hours and at his designated work location. This decision was based on the country’s Industrial Injury Insurance Rule, which states that if an employee dies suddenly while on duty, it should be classified as an industrial accident. Despite appeals from the factory and the social security authority, a higher court upheld the initial ruling.
Compensation Confirmation
Following the court’s decision, the social security authority officially recognized Zhang’s death as an industrial accident. However, the specific amount of compensation that his family would receive has not been disclosed.
This unusual case raises questions about workplace policies and the rights of employees, particularly those in demanding roles that require them to be on duty continuously. It also highlights the complexities surrounding personal relationships in the workplace and how they intersect with labor laws.
Conclusion
The ruling in this case serves as a reminder of the importance of recognizing the rights of workers, even in unconventional circumstances. As the family navigates the aftermath of this tragic event, it underscores the need for clear guidelines regarding workplace conduct and the treatment of employees in similar situations.