26.8 C
Singapore
Wednesday, August 17, 2022
Ads

ST article blamed victim molested for dressing too sexy, NETIZENS STRIKE BACK

Screen-Shot-2016-07-10-at-10.58.08-768x474

“Sylvester Son Singapore So you are saying the victim is at fault for wearing shorts?”

“That’s exactly what it is saying, not only that, but also the author suggesting policing of another’s body as well.”

“The slightest hint of women in revealing clothes inviting molest is uncalled for. ”

Unless you’re a dog, it’s not acceptable to hump anything that you find remotely attractive.
Actually, we spay dogs to stop (or at least reduce the frequency of) them from doing that, so maybe we should do the same to you if you cant behave NB a human?

victim blaming much? Are you saying men cant self control? • Benjamin Sim, are you saying that you yourself have no control? Is that it?
uke Reply 9 hrs CISteven Kong • Woe. at Singapore A.ed Force. How can ST publish such an article that fully supports victim-blaming?

Mister Benjamin Sim, whoever you are, what we need is not a dress oode but a moral code for someone like you who turns to victim-blaming in.as of identifying the real .

What do you guys think?

Advertisements
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Latest News

COMPANY RAISES WORKERS’ SALARY BY 20%, THEN PASS OFF THAT INCREASE IN IN THEIR PRODUCT PRICES

A netizen posted a rant about an unspecified "clothing" company, revealing that they increased their employees' salaries by 20-30%...
- Advertisement -