A 51-year-old man has been arrested and is set to face charges over an alleged cheating scheme involving renovation payments, with police investigations indicating that the total losses across several cases exceeded S$100,000.
The man, who was working as an interior designer, allegedly persuaded a renovation customer to transfer payment directly to him rather than to the renovation company’s official account. He reportedly offered a discount on renovation services as an incentive for the customer to make the payment directly.
However, after receiving the money, the man allegedly failed to carry out the promised renovation works. The customer subsequently contacted the renovation company and was advised to make a police report.
Renovation Payment Allegedly Diverted
According to the Singapore Police Force, the initial police report was lodged on 29 June 2026 at around 7.30pm. Officers from the Bedok Police Division subsequently conducted follow-up investigations to establish the identity of the man.
The suspect was eventually arrested as a result of the investigations. Preliminary findings allegedly linked him to other cheating cases involving a similar method of operation.
Police said the total losses from the cases are believed to exceed S$100,000. Investigators also found that the man allegedly used the money obtained from the offences for gambling.
The case highlights the financial risks consumers can face when engaging renovation contractors or interior designers, particularly when substantial sums are involved. Renovation projects often require customers to make significant payments, making it important to verify where the money is being transferred.
Police Warn Homeowners To Check Contractors Carefully
Members of the public are advised to carry out due diligence before engaging renovation companies or individual representatives. This includes checking the credentials of both the company and the person handling the renovation project.
Homeowners should also be cautious when asked to transfer renovation payments to an individual’s personal bank account, particularly if the payment is presented as a way to obtain a special discount.
Large upfront payments can expose customers to substantial financial losses if the promised work is not completed. Consumers may wish to ensure that payment arrangements are clearly documented and that they understand who is receiving the money before proceeding with a renovation contract.
The man was charged in court under Section 420(1) of the Penal Code 1871. The offence of cheating carries a potential jail term of up to 10 years, as well as a fine, caning, or both.
The police said they take cheating offences seriously and will take action against individuals suspected of committing such offences. The case also serves as a reminder for homeowners to exercise caution when dealing with renovation contractors and to avoid making large payments before work begins where possible.