30 C
Singapore
Tuesday, June 16, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 2456

PRC MAN TRIED TO STEAL FROM 3 PEOPLE WHILE ON FLIGHT TO S’PORE, CHARGED & REMANDED

0

Yi Huaichun, a 44-year-old Chinese national, has been remanded in Singapore on charges of attempting to steal from passengers during a flight from Phnom Penh, Cambodia’s capital, to Singapore, according to a report by Channel NewsAsia.

Charges and Court Proceedings

Yi Huaichun faced three charges related to attempting theft from passengers on Cambodia Airways flight KR751 from Phnom Penh to Singapore on the morning of December 15. The charges allege Yi’s attempts to steal from different passengers’ belongings, including a black haversack, a black backpack, and a black leather bag.

Yi was initially charged on December 16 and has been remanded since. In his court appearance on December 22, when asked to indicate his plea, he declared his innocence. The charges against Yi fall under Section 3(2) of the Tokyo Convention Act, allowing Singapore to prosecute individuals for offenses committed on board an aircraft that subsequently lands in Singapore.

Legal Consequences

If convicted of attempted theft, Yi Huaichun could face a maximum sentence of up to three years in jail, a fine, or both. The case is set for a pre-trial conference in January, where further legal proceedings will be determined.

Similar Incident

This incident follows a recent case involving another Chinese national, Zhang Xiuqiang, who was charged with stealing approximately S$31,000 (US$23,260) from three passengers on a Scoot flight from Vietnam to Singapore. These incidents underscore the importance of airline security and the legal consequences for individuals attempting theft during flights.

MAN PLAYS PRANKS ON WIFE UNTIL SHE FED UP, SHOUT AT HIM IN PUBLIC

0

So my husband Caleb (31) is a prankster. He jokes about everything and pulls pranks of all types all the time. I hate them all and I made it clear to him that I will not tolerate any prank or joke no matter what his justification is. He’s always like “chill, it’s just a joke” or “that’s hella funny you should be laughing instead of yelling” and stuff like that.

Yesterday, We were going out to grab some stuff. He said he “was in the mood” to joke around today (then) and when I attempted to get in the car he began driving back and forth while laughing. I told him I’d go back inside if he did it again and he stopped.

We arrived to the location and he kept locking the door and then unlocking it preventing me to get out. I told him to stop it and he said “okay I’m sorry”. We got into the store and he kept returning the items I put inside the cart til I caught him in act and told him to stop. He stopped

After we got done we stood behind a long line to pay. I stand and he stands beside me laughing and mumbling stuff. I then suddenly feel something on my head. I reach out and find that he stuck a candy that he was eating on it which freaked me out I started screaming at him while everyone else watched.

He looked red in the face as I berated him for what he’s done and kept trying to get me to quiet down, repeatedly saying people were watching us. there was an officer nearby and he noticed the commotion and asked if there was something wrong. Caleb looked stunned but I told him he wanted to make a scene he just got one. Then I left him with the stuff and walked out.

Upon his return he started arguing with me saying I shouldn’t have screamed like a lunatic and drafting public’s attention and making a scene over a prank. He said this was not acceptable to him and it shouldn’t be to me as well since we have a reputation and what I did at the store made us both look bad. I shut the door and remained in the room til he went outside.

he still thinks I overreacted and embarrassed both of us by screaming.

S’PORE COVID WAVE HITS PEAK & WE MIGHT STILL SEE A SLIGHT SURGE – WEAR A MASK IF SICK

0

In a recent statement, Singapore’s Minister of Health, Ong Ye Kung, addressed the current surge in COVID-19 cases in the country, providing insights into the situation and outlining strategies to navigate the challenges.

He allayed fears that the worst is still to come, assuring the people that we are already seeing the peak of the current Covid wave, hence no mandatory wearing of masks is required at the moment.

Post-COVID Scenario

Minister Ong began by acknowledging the global increase in patient loads post-COVID, particularly affecting older individuals whose health may have deteriorated during the pandemic. Despite officially exiting the pandemic and entering DORSCON Green in February, Singapore, like many parts of the world, is grappling with the enduring impact of COVID-19 on healthcare systems.

Three Waves in 2023

Highlighting the timeline of events, Minister Ong noted three waves of COVID-19 in Singapore this year. The first occurred at the beginning of the year, followed by a second wave dominated by the HK.3 and EG.5 variants in October. Before the second wave subsided, a new wave, propelled by the JN.1 variant, emerged.

Current Status and Healthcare System Strain

Minister Ong reported a recent plateau in estimated infection numbers, indicating a potential peak in the current wave. However, with Christmas and New Year celebrations approaching, a slight surge is anticipated. Approximately 600 hospital beds are currently occupied by COVID-19 patients, constituting a significant workload on the 10,000-bed healthcare system.

Managing the Situation

Despite the strain, Minister Ong expressed confidence in Singapore’s ability to withstand the current situation without implementing additional safe management measures. He emphasized the importance of personal responsibility, urging individuals to wear masks when sick, stay at home, and continue getting vaccinated, particularly for seniors and those with underlying illnesses.

Snippet of Ong Ye Kung’s Speech

On COVID-19. In February this year, we came out of the COVID-19 pandemic officially and entered DORSCON Green. Post-COVID, patient loads have increased everywhere around the world. Older people are becoming more sick. I think during the three years of the pandemic, their health probably deteriorated. It is not just us but everywhere in the world. We all suffer from long COVID-19 as a healthcare system.

Post-COVID, the hospitals are getting a lot busier. COVID never really goes away. It is endemic, which means we will have to live with it. We had three waves this year. The first wave happened at the beginning of the year. The second wave happened in October, and was dominated by two variants HK.3 and EG.5. Before that wave subsided, a new wave was stacked on it, which was driven by another variant called JN.1.

In recent days, we have been reporting very high estimated infection numbers, but probably the actual numbers are much higher. The indications are that we have plateaued. For the past few days, the estimated infection numbers have come down so I think we have plateaued. However, we are coming to Christmas and New Year with lots of celebrations, family dinners and parties. We might have a slight surge, but more or less we are seeing the peak of this wave.

All in all, about 600 of our hospital beds are taken up by COVID-19 patients. About 10 to 20 ICU beds are taken, which is not high. For hospital beds, 600 or 700 hospital beds are quite a drain on our system which is a 10,000-bed strong system. To take up 600, 700 beds, at 6% or 7%, is not small. It is a significant workload on our healthcare workers and system. Nevertheless, I think our assessment remains that we can wear through this. We can withstand this.

There have been many members of the public who have written to me to say that many of their friends have been infected with COVID-19 and it is time to change the rules and impose mandatory mask wearing, especially on public transport. I have always assured people that in Singapore, when we have to implement a measure, we will do so if it is necessary. But for this wave, where we are now, based on the impact and the burden on our healthcare system, I think we can withstand this without additional safe management measures.

But we appeal to everyone: when you are sick, wear a mask and stay at home. If you have to come into contact with someone, wear a mask. Very importantly, continue to take your vaccinations once a year, especially if you are a senior or if you have underlying illnesses and are vulnerable. Whatever vaccine you have taken will wear off in about one to one-and-a half years. It is important you get it renewed because your antidote does not last forever.

To help with vaccinations, I think we need a new strategy.  We have been relying on Joint Testing and Vaccination Centres (JTVC). There are eight or nine around the island and gradually we are reducing to maybe five sometime next year. But I think at this stage, when people feel that COVID-19 is endemic and is part and parcel of life, not many people would want to purposely go to a big centre to get themselves vaccinated.

I think we need to rely on the GPs. Today, we have a couple hundred of GPs who administer COVID vaccinations. We have to work hard to increase that number and then put it as part of Healthier SG so that we roll it out very actively to as many seniors as we can, to get our vaccinations up. Next year, if we have another wave and we will, we will be much more prepared.

 I should make one more point about COVID, which is that we have finally completed a very long process of awarding all our COVID heroes. As you know, this is a crisis of a generation. It is a concerted national effort because so many people were involved. We have conferred recognition and awards to over 110,000 people, many of whom are healthcare workers. All of them are heroes who have worked together to help us overcome this crisis.

Unfortunately, we hear of news that people are selling their medals. I think it is a very small minority. I will say this: It is wrong to sell your medals. It is with great appreciation and respect that we selected the names and conferred the medals on these deserving people. Therefore we hope too, that you reciprocate the respect and cherish the medal and the recognition. There are others who wrote in too. Some are individual doctors or nurses who wrote in to say that I have contributed but somehow, I was left out. We will look into these cases. As you know, we try to be as inclusive as possible in recognising this national effort and everyone involved in this national effort. Over 110,000 recipients – that is how inclusive we have been.

We had a nomination process. We had an appeal process and one appeal after another, trying to include as many as possible. It is possible that we missed out some and if we do, that exercise is over but we will try our best to make it up as much as possible. There is however one anonymous group who apparently are doctors in isolation wards. They have claimed that they have also been missed out. But they are anonymous so I do invite them to please give us your names and the hospital you worked in, and we will certainly look at your cases objectively.

On manpower, we set out this year to recruit 4,000 healthcare workers, nurses in particular – 3,000 for the public sector and 1,000 for the private sector. It is important because we are expanding our facilities and healthcare capacity, and we need manpower to be able to operate them. It also makes up for the nurses that we lost during the pandemic due to international competition. I would say the number needs time to finalise, but I am very confident that we will exceed our target this year of 4,000 nurses. It is a very good encouraging sign that shows that Singapore is a place where people are willing to join healthcare and foreign nurses are also willing to work in Singapore, working side by side with our local nurses. We will continue this effort and not back down.

And finally, we are doing a lot more to expand our capacity. This year we opened two new polyclinics, one in Tampines North and one here in Sembawang. Next year, there will be more. All in all, by 2030, we hope to have more than 30 polyclinics. Hospitals take a longer time to build but painstakingly, after a lot of the hard work, we are seeing the first signs of expanding capacity and it starts here in the Woodlands Health Campus.

SCAMMER SHOWED UP AT ACTRESS XIANG YUN’S MUM’S FUNERAL, OFFERS “RITUAL” FOR $1.2K

0

In a distressing revelation, veteran Singaporean actress Xiang Yun shared her harrowing experience of almost falling victim to a heartless scammer at her mother’s wake.

The incident sheds light on the audacity of scammers who prey on vulnerable individuals, even during moments of deep grief and mourning.

The Scammer’s Scheme

Lianhe Zaobao reported that Xiang Yun, mourning the loss of her mother who passed away on Sept 21, faced an unexpected and troubling situation during the wake. A man claiming to be from a funeral services company arrived, asserting that the scheduled monk for the ritual had to attend another funeral due to the master’s demise.

The man proposed an earlier ritual, expressing a purported sincerity by donating the fees to the deceased master’s funeral. However, this apparent goodwill concealed malicious intent.

Attempting to exploit the situation, the scammer informed Xiang Yun that the ritual could be conducted earlier, requesting an immediate payment of $1,200 via PayNow. Sensing the suspicious nature of the encounter, Xiang Yun wisely decided to verify the man’s claims by contacting the funeral services company directly.

Swift Intervention and Disillusionment

Upon contacting the funeral director, Xiang Yun swiftly discovered the truth – the man’s claims were entirely false. The funeral services company had not sent anyone for an unscheduled ritual, and the entire scenario was a deceitful attempt to scam the grieving actress during a vulnerable moment.

Xiang Yun’s Response

Expressing her dismay, Xiang Yun questioned the morality of individuals who would exploit someone during a funeral. She emphasized the emotional toll such incidents take on grieving families and urged everyone to remain vigilant against scammers, especially in moments of vulnerability.

Images source: @xiang_yun_ on Instagram

GIRL’S PARENTS ARRANGED A MARRIAGE FOR HER, BUT THE MAN TURNS OUT TO BE SOT & PSYCHO

0

In my (20f) culture arranged marriages are very normal, 3 months ago.

I met a guy through my mother, and after the second meeting, my parents agreed to the marriage without even asking me first.

Whenever i told anybody at that time that I wanted to end it they would tell me to give him a chance, so i did just that because of either way i couldn’t tend it straight away.

Now 3 months later I absolutely hate him, I came to realize that he is a master manipulator, and whenever i talk to my mother we get into a huge fight that usually ends terribly.

Today I tried talking to my father and it did not end well, he says that my reasons to end things are very trivial and not the things that would break or make a relationship, I am now considering ending it personally, but the problem is i could shame both my parents if i do it.

How should I proceed from here?

if i stopped my forced arranged marriage which could lead to embarrassing my father??

Here are what netizens think:

  • Do it as an investment, divorce take his money and run away.
  • It’s your life, you were never given a choice when you are born to this world, but I think you should at least have the choice of choosing your life.
  • Tell your father straight to the face if they force it, you will end it. So don’t bother wasting everyone’s time.

WOMAN SAYS NO TO HUSBAND FROM ADOPTING HER SON FROM PREVIOUS MARRIAGE

0

I’m married to my husband of two years, “Devon”, I have a son named “Levi” from a previous relationship. Devon has known him his whole life, Levi’s father and I were together until he went missing before our son was born.

So about my ex… he went missing. MISSING. he didn’t abandon me, he didn’t walk out, he went missing. I don’t care about your theories or if you think he did so save it. That’s not what I’m asking here. Be respectful at least.

Devon loves Levi with all of his heart, and Levi loves him too, I know it. Levi looks a lot like his father and while I’ll always love him, I’ve moved on from the relationship. He was a big adventurer and I often talk about him with Levi, I show him photos and he visits his dad’s family pretty frequently, he knows he’s ”daddy” while Devon is ”papa” or ”Devon” depending on his mood, either way, he’s his father figure. We do receive money from my ex’s side, his father takes care of some of Levi’s expenses, but that’s not the issue here.

Three days ago, Devon asked me about adopting Levi, he wants to give him his surname and become his legal parent.

I said no. He was devastated by this, but I don’t think I’m ready or that it’s even fair. We can legally do it but I don’t wanna. I said he could hyphenate Levi’s last name with his, but he wants to fully adopt him, he said my ex’s parents can still be a part of his life, he doesn’t have any problem but I said he could ask when Levi was older and that if he says yes, then I’m okay with it, but in the meantime, my answer is no.

He’s been distant ever since and now and I might be wondering if I was crushing his hopes, I called my sister to ask her opinion and she said I was because this is the only father Levi has known all of his life and I’m taking something big from him.

Here are what netizens think:

  • your son should decide when he is older.
  • They just need to talk about it more and see where his need to adopt right now is coming from.
  • What would happen if something happened to you? Who would get custody of Levi? I wonder if Levi’s biological father has been declared legally dead.

MAN GOT $50K BONUS, WANTS TO BUY AN $18K WATCH BUT WIFE SAYS “GIMME HALF”

0

My husband and I have been married for 6 years.

He works in sales and I am a SAHM for our 1 and 3 year old.

We have always pooled our wages and assets (when I was previously working and including any extra bonuses / gift cards, we got during that time).

My husband has recently made a sale where a $50K gift card accompanies it (half to be paid upfront and other half to come in a few years time once the property is completed).

My husband has recently gotten into watches and wants to buy an expensive watch for $18K.

My husband has said I could have the remaining amount of $7K of the first gift card and the remaining amount (second gift card of $25K) in a few years will all go into our savings. He believes he deserves more because he made the sale – however, I feel everything spent should be equal as being a SAHM (which he likes me being) does not come with those sorts of opportunities so there would be no way to ever get that kind of money.

The conversation has also upset me, making me feel like he does not see us as equals in our marriage.

Am I the wrong for wanting an equal amount out of the $50K and getting upset by this?

When I asked him about this he said I didn’t deserve an equal amount because I didn’t do anything for the sale and thought that I was being ungrateful for what I was being offered. Therefore he has now said he won’t buy the watch at all, so now I also won’t get any money from the bonus, instead, it will all go into savings (which he won’t let me use for anything personal – although he will not use it for any personal items either).

(Note: It’s not exactly the amount that I specifically needed because if the watch was only $5K, I’d also only ask for $5K too. I just feel hurt that he thinks he deserves of more it and how he’s handled the situation)

ust to clarify – I am happy and want my husband to get the watch he really like from the first gift card – I had just hoped for the extra amount to make it equal, to have come out of the second gift card in a few years time.

DESPERATE MAN THINKS THAT LADYBOY IS A REAL LADY, END UP GOT MOUSTACHE

0

A man who tried to find girls during his trip to Thailand, Pattaya tried using dating apps but all he got were “ladies”.

He could not accept the fact that they are men as his desperation is surpass his logic.

Here is the story:

I was in Pattaya with my friends last weekend and one of them has always had trouble finding a girlfriend.

Previously, he was addicted to pubs and discos with hostesses and always used the easy way out by attracting the wrong girl with money.

So during the trip, we played the jet ski while he relaxes on the beach.

When we came back to shore, he said that he was able to contact multiple girls on Facebook dating and Tinder claiming that they are interested in him and that one of them will be joining us for the drinking session tonight.

He showed us the photo and we immediately knew that they were not girls but men. One of them looks over 180cm tall.

We tried to be a good friend and tell him that the girls he is talking to are not actually girls but he refused to believe us and thinks that they are interested in him.

I told him: “Firstly, there are like a gorilla, secondly, you think you, Andy Lau, ah. Many girls come to you ah”

He refused to listen to us and insist that they are women as he had “heard their voice messages”. It kind of sounds like a man pretending to sing opera while talking.

So we when for a drink and one of the ladyboys did turn up. She looks like she just shaved as there were small studs coming out from her top lip.

It was so obvious and my friend was happy and showing off to us that he found a girl.

The happiness was short-lived until she started to talk, she sounded more man than man more than me.

He tried to be polite and said he was drunk and went back to the hotel secretly.

Well, since the person he jio is already here we drank together.

When we got back to the hotel, he was hugging his pillows and his eyes were in tears.

For context, he is in his 30s.

CHOOSE BETWEEN A DREAM JOB THAT PAYS LESSER, OR A BORING & DEAD JOB THAT PAYS MORE

0

[Admin hope you post this soon!] I started my job hunt after grad late this year to rest up and somehow I managed to land on two relatively attractive offer: (I wish I was humble bragging but I really am not. Do read through and let me know what you think!)

1. 90k PA, job scope that’s relatively boring and ded (imho) with a decent worklife balance (introduced by my friend) [relevant to my degree CS related. No its not in any of the big companies youre thinking about. Its not a 996 cs work job]

2. 70k PA, job scope similar to my childhood dream (a job where I get to travel frequently). Not relevant to my degree at all, not CS related. But a job I always romanticised about. Work life balance is not the best (Interviewer was upfront due to nature of job- calls and meetings across timezones)

In terms of prospect, both job have relatively good prospect [in-demand skills] but frankly, the first job probably more cause its a HIGH demand skill [cause CS bro. Yall chose the right course if you want some money]

Alot of my friends say just go for the first one. The 20k difference is a no brainer. 20k can bring me to multiple trips to difference places a year. And fact is. If I don’t like it there. Its probably easier to make the switch. And frankly. I don’t HATE the job. I’m more of neutral with it.

The 2nd job though is so much more relevant to my interest (think of it as a dream childhood job that ends up paying less than you thought it would). Always wanted to do travelling for a job. However, Its absolutely irrelevant to my field. And I may perhaps be romanticising the work as well since i was never in the industry (yet another reason why I have been cautioned to chose the first one instead. I may end up hating jt after a year and give up the lucrative first option). Traveling for work is very different from leisure. And once I enter this field, I will not touch CS at all (so if I stay too long here, it’s really goodbye to my cs degree LOL cause cant rmb jacksht)

Practically speaking, the first option just makes more sense… but the second option….is hard to come by. I’m supposed to respond by Monday for the 2nd option [the first option gave me 2 weeks to think about it whew. Great company honestly]. If only my dream job pays as much…….

But it doesn’t. So now I really don’t know what to choose.

ANGMOH WHO MADE BOMB THREAT ON SCOOT FLIGHT, WANTED TO GET ARRESTED & LOCKED UP

0

In a disconcerting incident, an Australian man, Kevin Francis Hawkins, was sentenced to six months in jail for making a false bomb threat on a Scoot flight from Singapore to Perth in October

Despite suffering from a relapse of schizophrenia coupled with an episode of major depressive disorder, the judge ruled that Hawkins was aware of the consequences of his actions. 

He was subsequently sentenced to 6 months imprisonment on December 22, according to Channel NewsAsia.

The Background

Hawkins, 30, was on a Scoot flight (TR16) with his wife on 12 October, traveling from Phuket to Perth with a layover in Singapore. The court heard that Hawkins, an “active participant” in Telegram groups trading explicit material, made a false bomb threat to cabin crew members onboard the flight.

The Bomb Hoax Unfolds

Around 4:30 pm, shortly after the seatbelt sign was turned off, Hawkins, in a seemingly emotionless tone, informed a Singaporean air steward that he had a bomb. The steward, understandably alarmed, reported the incident to the chief of the cabin crew. Despite revealing a nasal inhaler instead of an explosive, Hawkins insisted that he had a bomb, pointing to his trouser pocket.

Following established protocols, the pilot reported a “Mayday,” and the plane initiated a turnback over the South China Sea. Singapore’s police were alerted, and Republic of Singapore Air Force fighter jets were activated to escort the plane back. The incident caused substantial disruptions, with airport and police staff mobilized, and the flight delayed by about seven hours.

Legal Proceedings and Sentencing

Hawkins pleaded guilty to making a false bomb threat, an offense under the United Nations (Anti-Terrorism Measures) Regulations. Despite Hawkins’ relapse of schizophrenia, the judge emphasized that he was fit to plead in court.

The defense argued for a lighter sentence, citing Hawkins’ mental health and the fact that he wanted to be arrested in Perth to escape perceived social problems.

His lawyer added that Hawkins made the bomb threat as he wanted to be arrested and locked up in a mental hospital for the rest of his life.

Judge’s Ruling

The judge acknowledged Hawkins’ mental disorders as contributing factors but highlighted the severity of the offense. He stressed that even with distorted understanding due to mental conditions, Hawkins knew the consequences of his actions. The sentence of six months in jail was handed down, with the judge urging Hawkins’ family to support his mental health treatment upon release.