30.4 C
Singapore
Thursday, May 7, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 2580

SHADY JOB TELLS INTERVIEWEE TO SPONSOR PRC “TOURIST” TO GET INTO SINGAPORE

n the world of job hunting, sometimes we come across opportunities that seem too good to be true. Such was the case for one individual who applied for a job, only to be met with a rather unusual request. In a WhatsApp screenshot shared with a news outlet, the prospective employer claimed to have partnered with overseas Chinese travel agencies to help tourists visit Singapore. The twist? The applicant was asked to sponsor these tourists for their visa application.

But is this request safe and legal? Let’s delve into the details to find

The initial communication from the prospective employer stated that the company had partnered with several overseas Chinese travel agencies to facilitate visa applications for tourists looking to visit Singapore for a 30-day free and easy tour. They explained that only Singaporeans above the age of 21 were permitted to become local sponsors for Chinese tourists and requested the applicant’s assistance as a local sponsor to help these tourists obtain their visa passes.

Red Flags

While this opportunity may sound appealing on the surface, several red flags immediately come to mind:

1. Lack of Transparency

The prospective employer’s communication does not provide clear information about the nature of the job or the responsibilities involved. The request to sponsor tourists for visa applications raises concerns about transparency.

2. Legality and Ethical Concerns

Sponsoring tourists for visa applications can be a legally complex matter. It’s crucial to ensure that such activities comply with Singaporean immigration laws. Additionally, one must consider the ethical implications of being involved in a potentially shady operation.

3. Unusual Recruitment Process

The mention of a Telegram group providing daily applications hints at an unconventional recruitment process. Traditional job offers typically involve more straightforward hiring procedures.

Here is what the interviewee said:

i applied for a job and they got back to me with this. is this safe and legal? thanks
local company and director is pte ltd from linkedin…

The screenshot wrote:

company has recently partnered with several overseas chinese travel agencies and we are applying visas on behalf of these tourists looking to visit Singapore for a 30-day free and easy tours.
As you know only Singaporeans above 21 are permitted to become a local sponsor for chinese tourists and they would need your help as a local sponsor to apply the visa for them in order for them to obtain this pass 🙂
We have a telegram group where we will provide new applications daily for you to complete and upon each

Is It Safe?

The safety of this opportunity remains questionable. Without a clear understanding of the company’s intentions and the legality of the request, one should exercise caution.

Is It Legal?

Determining the legality of such a request requires careful examination of Singaporean immigration laws. While being a local sponsor for tourists is permitted, it’s essential to ensure that all activities are in compliance with the law.

Conclusion

When considering job opportunities, it’s crucial to prioritize safety, legality, and ethical standards. The request to sponsor tourists for visa applications, as presented in this case, raises concerns about transparency and the potential for involvement in a dubious operation. It is advisable to seek legal counsel or consult with relevant authorities before proceeding with such offers.

BF MANIPULATES GF TO BREAK UP SO HE CAN FIND NEW “OYSTERS”

0

Im 22 and my boyfriend is 4 years older than me and we have been daring for 6 months now. We met through an app during lockdown, he moved to my home during this time as my mom is practically always not home and now he’s away from family and friends. He only really has me. As you can imagine, this makes my heart heavy with anxiety.

Recently, he’s having some serious problems in his family and I’m here to support him but when I’m already thinking about ending things because it’s no longer an enjoyable relationship for me, I can’t bring myself to give him the love and affection he needs right now.

Due to this I was so nervous and lost on what to do that I broke up (without success) with him during this bad time.

He kept saying that we have a really good relationship and kept trying to convince me that I was only focusing on the bad stuff, he was crying a lot then he wouldnt eat because if he did he would throw up. He told me in the past that he struggled a lot with mental illness and even thoughts of self harm. I asked, please promise me you are going to be ok, and you won’t do anything stupid, he said he couldn’t promise me that. With all this in mind, and him being here alone, it gets impossible for me to do it.

This is not my first try. I really don’t know what to do. I think he is addicted to me.

Then I found out that he has been taking a long time in the toilet, I climb the toilet’s window from the laundry area and I saw a pink app which looks kind of like Tinder.

Is he really finding an excuse to find other girls.

GUY ACCUSE GIRL OF CALLING HIM SHORT AFTER GETTING REJECTED

0

A girl posted on social media after she was rejected by a tall guy, the tall guy told her that he can get any girl he wants because of his height and the girl started complaining online

Here is the story:

I just rejected a desperate guy because we are not compatible nad his totally. He then accuse me that I rejected him because he was short and curse and swear at me “I’m not good enough for him.” bla bla bla.

Men under 183cm tall need to shut up. Seriously. If you were taller than 183cm, I would guarantee you, you would come up with some other excuse for why you are not getting women. Seriously. The amount of times I have heard “you are a waste of 183cm ” is ridiculous.

Women are not going to “do it” with you just because you are over 183cm. Let me reiterate, women are NOT going to do it with you, just because you are tall.

Stop complaining and stop comparing. Thank you.

Here is what netizens say:

  • It’s not long but it’s also very thin. They call me linguine for a reason.
  • What it lacks in length it makes up for in skinniness.
  • I’m 183cm and I suspect there are several women who don’t want to do it with me.
  • A buddy I work with is 170cm and not much to look at, and his wife is at least 178cm or 180cm and smoking hot. This guy is the nicest, funniest, most confident man I’ve ever met in my life. Personality supersedes everything.
  • Dont get me wrong but … women are usually more mature when it comes to choosing a partner that has a great personality vs a good looking 10/10 partner. Men never give normal looking women the same treatment, even if you look decent and dont wear make up or whatever your chances are lower in comparision with with the others. Personality doesnt always supersede everything.

PRC “INVEST” HIS WAY INTO GETTING SG CITIZENSHIP, KENA JAILED

0

In a recent case that has sent shockwaves through Singapore’s Ministry of Manpower (MOM), a foreign businessman, Zhang Qingqiao, found himself in hot water for making a false declaration to obtain an employment pass with ulterior motives.

“S$360,000 investment to get Singaporean citizenship”

Zhang Qingqiao, a 37-year-old Chinese national, had a long-term ambition – to migrate his entire family to Singapore and eventually attain permanent residency and Singaporean citizenship. However, his chosen path to achieving this goal was far from conventional.

A Shady Deal

Around July 2019, Zhang crossed paths with Wang Jue, who went by the name Jess. Wang, it turns out, had concocted a fraudulent investment scheme that piqued Zhang’s interest. Instead of opting for a straightforward investment plan of S$2 million, which could have purportedly granted him PR status within three years, Zhang decided to take the less laborious route.

The ‘Zero-Returns’ Investment

Under this dubious agreement, Zhang agreed to “invest” S$360,000 in a company known as MW Dynamics. In return, he would assume the role of an employment pass holder within the company, drawing a seemingly attractive monthly salary of S$10,000. The catch? He wouldn’t have to lift a finger or contribute any meaningful work to the company.

The Motive

The primary aim of this peculiar “zero-returns” investment was to legitimize Zhang’s stay in Singapore. The scheme allowed him to obtain an employment pass under MW Dynamics, even though he had no intention of actively working for the company.

The False Declaration

To set his plan in motion, Zhang submitted a deceptive declaration form for an employment pass to the Controller of Work Passes in September 2019. In this document, he falsely claimed that he would be employed by MW Dynamics as a business development director, earning the aforementioned S$10,000 monthly salary. Shockingly, this application was approved.

The Legal Battle

During the subsequent legal proceedings, the prosecution sought a sentence of four to six weeks’ jail for Zhang, while his defense lawyers, Mr. Sunil Sudheesan and Ms. Joyce Khoo of Quahe Woo & Palmer, requested a fine as an alternative.

Judge’s Remarks

Principal District Judge Victor Yeo presided over the case and delivered his verdict. He pointed out that the evidence clearly demonstrated Zhang’s intent to use the investment as a means to secure an employment pass. Judge Yeo found Zhang’s claims of not understanding English and placing unwavering trust in Wang unconvincing, considering his extensive experience as a businessman.

Implications on Immigration Policy

The deception carried on for approximately 18 months and directly contradicted MOM’s framework for issuing employment passes. Judge Yeo emphasized that this case had wider implications on immigration policy, which cannot be taken lightly.

Defense’s Argument

The defense argued that this case differed from typical instances under the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act, which typically involve false qualifications or unscrupulous employers seeking monetary gain. However, Judge Yeo countered this claim, citing that MW Dynamics had indeed received a substantial sum of money from Zhang.

The Appeal

Zhang Qingqiao has expressed his intention to appeal against his conviction and sentence, further prolonging the legal battle.

Potential Repercussions

Notably, Wang Jue, the mastermind behind the fraudulent investment scheme, could potentially face criminal proceedings for aiding Zhang in his employment pass application. As for Zhang, he faced a potential sentence of up to two years in jail, a fine of up to S$20,000, or a combination of both for making false declarations on his employment pass application.

In conclusion, Zhang Qingqiao’s case serves as a cautionary tale of the lengths some individuals may go to in their pursuit of residency and citizenship in a foreign land. It also highlights the importance of maintaining the integrity of immigration policies, ensuring that such loopholes are not exploited for personal gain.


DRAMA WIFE THINKS WFH HUSBAND MEANS HE FREE TO DO CHORES

0

I M32 am the sole income earner in our household and my wife is a housewife (she had a job but could no longer keep it due to health problems). We have a year daughter at home as well.

Ever since I started working from home my wife started treating me as if I was available to do whatever she needed me to do like fix this fix that, do laundry and etc. But I work long hours from home and I need to be committed and professional otherwise I’d risk losing my position.

She interrupted my work several times already. I had a conversation with her about it and asked that she stop asking me to do things until I’m done working and she said okay but it happened again days ago when she barged into my office with our daughter all of a sudden telling me to keep an eye on her while she visits the clinic.

I paused my work session because I was caught off guard she didn’t tell me beforehand. She said that she suddenly started feeling pain in her belly and needed to see the doctor asap. I explained that I had important work and could not stay with our daughter or keep her in the office while working. She said she won’t be long but I urged her to call her sister and let her come stay with our daughter. In my opinion, this seemed to be the one reasonable solution for both of us but she lashed out at me saying no because this was an emergency while my work could wait. She said she had no time to wait till her sister come over but I said I’d call her myself and tell her to come. I even suggested I pay here and all my wife had to do was wait a few minutes till her sister arrived.

She stormed out of the office with our daughter after calling me a selfish jerk with no empathy to keep her waiting longer before visiting the doctor. My sister-in-law came some 20 minutes later and my wife left then. I tried calling her to check on her but she purposely hung up on me a few times and when she got home she was still pretty pissed at me which I don’t get because I think that I provided a solution that allowed her to go to her dr appointment and allowed me to resume my work session but no.

She kept talking about what a horrible partner and father I was to refuse to provide help when she needed it and refused to sympathize with her difficult situation and making her wait for her sister when she needed to see the doctor asap. She’s now refusing to speak to me altogether. I think my compromise was reasonable, I don’t really get why she got so mad over it.

Here is what netizens think:

  • If her stomach pain was so serious, how the F she got the energy to argue with you. Sounds more like she is making a scene and being dramatic.
  • The problem is wife has been crying wolf. The end result is that when she may have really needed him, he thought it was more of the same.
  • I agree, providing it genuinely was an emergency. If that were the case, he ought to step up even if he wasn’t working at home.
  • Good luck for the rest of your marriage, you got a drama queen as a wife.

SIAO ZHABOR TEARS TISSUE & THROWS THEM ONTO CAR @ YISHUN, CAUGHT REDHANDED TWICE

In a world filled with everyday mundane occurrences, sometimes we stumble upon incidents that are nothing short of peculiar.

One such incident occurred at a multi-storey carpark at Block 461 Yishun Avenue 6, where a woman was caught tearing up tissue papers into pieces and throwing them onto a car.

She was purportedly captured twice on camera in the act, on 3 and 4 October.

The Mysterious Act

The story begins with the security cameras capturing the woman’s actions. The footage of her tearing tissue and tossing the bits at a parked car quickly made its way to the SG Road Vigilate’s YouTube page, where it garnered more than 15,000 views.

The inexplicable nature of her actions drew considerable attention and left viewers wondering about the motives behind this behavior.

The owner of the vehicle in question was taken aback by the incident. He had parked his car in what he believed was a regular corner lot within a public carpark.

However, things took an unexpected turn when he received a notification indicating a ‘suspicious person’ near his vehicle. Believing that reporting the matter to LifeSG would resolve the issue, he remained hopeful.

A Baffling Reoccurrence

To his dismay, the following day brought a shocking revelation. The same woman returned to the scene, repeating her unusual act of discarding tissue on his car.

What was even more perplexing was that she appeared angrier than before. The car owner found himself in a state of bewilderment, pondering why parking in a public carpark had led to such bizarre and repeated confrontations.

Here is what the car owner said

From the video can see that I had parked at the corner lot.

As I received a notification of suspicious person at the my car, just realise that a lady was dumping things infront of the car initially. I reported to LifeSG and thought things will be okay.

The next day, same lady again dump the tissues on my car, and looks angrier than before. I think I had parked “their” lot, but this public carpark, what is the problem there?

GUY ELOPES TO GET MARRIED WITH GF HE HARDLY KNOWS

0

Is it alright for me to skip the holidays with my parents because they are against my marriage?

To be more specific, I’m talking Christmas, Chinese New Years’ Eve/Day. I’m 23 and in September, I married a girl I met in March while on school holiday. We just hit it off and we stayed in touch, which led to lots of calls, face timing, texting, a few meet-ups halfway between each other. We decided that we were ” The One” for each other.

I took the marriage idea to my parents, she took it to hers, we went 0/4 with parents. We ended up eloping. Everyone was very upset and, we tried once again to help everyone see what we saw, tried to explain our feelings, but, we couldn’t get through to them.

I tried to treat things like ” Yup, I got married, its done, its in the books” with my parents. I tried discussing other topics with them but they always brought it back to her, and how they’re against her and against our marriage.

They fully expected me home for those holidays and were shocked when I told them I wasn’t coming home for any of it. They feel like I’m being bull-headed and avoiding the conversation. I feel like I tried the conversation, but, got nowhere.

Here are what netizens think:

  • I got married at 20 and it has lasted 49 years so far. Sometimes you get lucky very young. More concerning is that they only knew each other for six months, but even that is not an automatic deal-breaker.
  • Yes exactly. Boomer here who married at nineteen. Husband was 22 and a programmer. I worked after I got my degree but we saved my salary and lived on his. We were married for thirty happy years until he got sick and died. We were the last generation who expected to do better than our parents.
  • I got married at 19 and the marriage lasted 8 months. The relationship was 3 years total, all told. I’ve been divorced for almost 10yrs and only just thinking about the possibility of a second marriage one day.

PORSCHE DRIVER THINKS HE VERY BIG SHOT, PARKS HIS CAR IN ELECTRIC-VEHICLE LOT @ SUNTEC

0

In recent times, the global shift towards eco-friendly practices and electric vehicles (EVs) has been nothing short of remarkable.

However, this transition comes with its share of challenges, one of which is the limited availability of EV charging stations.

These stations are crucial for EV owners to refuel (or more accurately, recharge) their cars conveniently, ensuring a smooth and sustainable driving experience.

Unfortunately, not everyone respects the sanctity of EV charging spaces.

The Unexpected Intruder

A netizen by the name of King, who happened to be an EV owner himself, told STOMP that he chanced upon a Porsche Cayenne parked inside an EV charging lot, inconveniencing other EV owners who wanted to charge their cars.

King promptly shared photos of the Porsche occupying the coveted EV charging spot and expressed his discontent.

In his own words, he highlighted the inconvenience caused to fellow EV owners who were eager to charge their vehicles while enjoying a meal or shopping at Suntec City.

He said in his own words, “This type of inconsiderate and selfish people must make him famous! Who does he think he is, driving a lousy Porsche and hogging an EV charging lot?”

The Note of Disapproval

In an attempt to convey his message directly to the Porsche driver, King took matters into his own hands. He penned a concise but powerful note that read, “Please be considerate. This lot is for EV charging. Don’t be selfish.”

Placing the note strategically on the windshield, King patiently waited for the Porsche driver’s return.

As the Porsche driver emerged from the mall, the situation took an interesting turn. Rather than showing remorse or acknowledging the mistake, the driver casually discarded the note, his facial expression betraying a complete lack of remorse.

King described the driver’s attitude as “arrogant” and even went on to call him an “idiot.”

WOMAN’S HUSBAND HAS PROBLEM WITH LOCKING HOUSE DOOR, CAR DOOR, ETC

0

My husband asked me why I lock the car door when I’m sitting in the car.

My first instinct was to respond with ‘you wouldn’t understand.’ Instead I tried to explain to him that as a woman, we are taught to always lock the door behind us.

My husband has a problem with locking doors. It’s been a constant issue. He forgets to lock the front door, the car door, windows, etc.

It has contributed a huge part to my anxiety. Luckily I made him buy an electronic door lock that automatically locks our front door and I just shoulder the extra work to double check if the porch door is locked.

I’ve given up on the car. If someone breaks in then maybe he’ll learn or maybe not, but either way I’ve decided to preemptively and radically accept it, if that were to ever happen. Let’s hope not.

In the end, I explained to him that he was never taught to be wary or cautious because he was a boy. I told him that a big part of my anxiety is caused by his lack of caution.

That it’s the reason why I constantly used to ask him if the doors and windows were locked, even though it annoyed him. To him it was me overreacting, but to me it was just common sense.

He’s a wonderful partner and has been taking great strides to be more receptive. Hopefully now he’ll understand why I feel safer with the door locked.

Netizens’ comments

  • I thought it was common sense to lock your car door regardless of gender.

One time I had a prostitute try to get into my car.

M’SIA LORRY DRIVER ILLEGALLY SELLING DIESEL FOR $1.50 PER LITRE @ JURONG

A Malaysian lorry was recently spotted allegedly engaged in the illicit act of selling and loading illegal diesel into other lorries at Fourth Chin Bee Road, along Jurong.

This incident, captured by a vigilant eye-witness, has raised concerns about the presence of such illegal activities in the region.

The Eye-Witness Account

The incident in question purportedly unfolded on Oct. 5, when a vigilant individual noticed a man connecting a tube between the Malaysia-registered lorry and another vehicle.

The eye-witness managed to capture this suspicious act on camera and subsequently shared the footage on SG Road Vigilante.

A Worrying Trend

According to the netizen who took and shared the video, the Malaysian lorry driver had also done the same (selling diesel) to a couple more lorries.

The seller also had a price list, which priced his illegal diesel at about $1.50 per litre with a minium pump of 40 litres, which would net him about $60 per customer.

He even had a customer retention package where customers who pumped at least 10 times with him, would get a rebate of $50.

To put this into perspective, legal diesel in Singapore typically costs above S$2.70 per litre without any price cuts. Such a significant price difference undoubtedly incentivizes individuals to engage in these illegal transactions.

A Repeat Offense

Unfortunately, this isn’t the first time that such illegal activities have come to light. It wasreported earlier this year that there were people selling illegal diesel at heavy vehicle parks in Tampines and Pioneer to bus and truck drivers, and 6 offenders received fines for their offences.

According to the Fire Safety Act, Singapore’s fuel is required to be kept at a licensed place, and not doing so could see offenders face fines of up to $10,000 or a jail term of up to 6 months.