30 C
Singapore
Tuesday, July 14, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 2755

57 Y.O TUTOR MOLESTED 2 OF HIS PRIMARY SCH STUDENTS, LAO TIKO JAILED 53 MONTHS

0

In a shocking turn of events, Sou Kum Choi, a 57-year-old private tutor, was sentenced to 53 months in jail for his reprehensible actions against two of his male pupils, according to The Straits Times.

The case involves disturbing allegations of molestation, spanning several years and deeply impacting the lives of the victims and their families.

A predator

Sou Kum Choi had been introduced to the parents of the first victim by their neighbors. He began tutoring the boy in June 2015, covering subjects like English, mathematics, science, and Chinese during two to three classes a week at the victim’s home. The lessons took place in either the bedroom or the living room, and the victim’s grandparents were often present. From April 2016 to April 2018, the accused molested the victim at least 20 times. He also kissed the boy on the cheek at least four times, with additional failed attempts.

The horrifying truth came to light on June 22, 2019, just three days after the last molestation incident. The young victim, unable to bear the weight of the secret any longer, disclosed the traumatic experiences to his mother during a tuition lesson. It was a heart-wrenching moment, as the victim broke down in tears while recounting the harrowing events. The very next day, he, accompanied by his parents, filed a police report, setting the wheels of justice in motion.

The second victim, a student in Primary 4 to Primary 6, was under Sou’s tutelage. Their classes, held up to three times a week, took place in the boy’s room, with the door closed. The prosecutors pointed out that Sou Kum Choi, solely motivated by his own selfish desires, had made advances against the second victim. This included an incident where he stroked the boy’s thigh.

During the trial, the second victim, now a teenager, was asked why he did not call for help. His response, that he was confused and unsure of what was happening, is entirely understandable, given his age at the time.

Sou’s defense, represented by lawyer Kalaithasan Karuppaya, claimed that the contact with the second victim’s leg was merely a tap, meant to divert the boy’s attention from distractions like Pokémon cards or a mobile phone.

For each count of molesting a child below 14 years old, Sou Kum Choi could have been jailed for up to five years, fined, or both.

The Guilty Plea

Sou Kum Choi stood before the court and pleaded guilty on Friday to one charge of molesting an 11-year-old boy in 2018. Furthermore, he consented to having three molestation charges against the same victim considered during his sentencing. This marked the beginning of a legal process that would ultimately determine the fate of a man whose actions had caused significant pain and suffering to innocents.

In August, Sou Kum Choi faced a trial where he was convicted on two other charges of molestation against a second victim. This victim, aged between 10 and 12 at the time of the alleged offenses, endured these traumatic experiences between 2014 and 2016. The gravity of these offenses cannot be overstated, as it involved the misuse of trust and authority, leading to a lifetime of emotional scars for the young victims.

Deputy public prosecutors Jane Lim and Adelle Tai vehemently condemned Sou’s behavior, rightfully describing it as reprehensible. They sought a sentence ranging from 50 to 54 months in jail, in addition to 3½ months of imprisonment in lieu of eight strokes of the cane. However, Sou’s age, being over 50 years old, rendered him exempt from caning.

Past Convictions

It’s crucial to note that this is not Sou’s first brush with the law. In 2006, he was convicted on three counts of outrage of modesty for molesting another minor under the guise of private tuition. He had previously served a 10-month jail term for that case. The prosecutors emphasized the need for a sentence that reflects society’s disapproval of such actions, aims to deter potential offenders, and prevents Sou from harming another child in the future.

YOUNG PUNKS ARRESTED FOR DRUGS IN CNB RAID, MORE THAN 6.6KG OF DRUGS SEIZED

0

Five Youths Arrested for Suspected Drug Offences; Drugs Including More Than 5.4Kg of Cannabis Seized

03 Nov 2023

         Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) arrested five youths aged between 19 and 23 for suspected drug offences in an anti-drug operation conducted on 1 November 2023. During the operations, a total of about 5,487g of cannabis, 751g of ‘Ice’, 63g of heroin, 10g of LSD (lysergic acid diethylamide) stamps, 380g of ‘Ecstasy’ tablets and 590 Erimin-5 tablets, with an estimated street value of $507,000 were seized. The seizure of 5,487g of cannabis, 751g of ‘Ice’ and 63g of heroin can feed the addiction of about 1,240 abusers for a week.

2.        The first phase of the operation commenced in the afternoon of 1 November, where CNB officers arrested a 21-year-old Singaporean woman for suspected drug offences in a residential unit in the vicinity of Buangkok Crescent. Forced entry was effected as the suspect had refused to comply with the lawful orders of the officers to open the door. From within the residential unit, CNB officers recovered about 2,297g of cannabis, 216g of ‘Ice’, 63g of heroin, 10g of LSD stamps, 211g of ‘Ecstasy’ tablets and 260 Erimin-5 tablets.

3.        In a follow-up operation the same day, CNB officers arrested a 19-year-old Singaporean teenage boy and two foreign men, aged 20 and 21, for suspected drug offences in the vicinity of Duchess Avenue.

4.        In the second phase of the operation on 1 November, CNB officers arrested a 23-year-old Singaporean man for suspected drug offences in a residential unit in the vicinity of Petir Road. Forced entry was effected as the suspect had refused to comply with the lawful orders of the officers to open the door. CNB officers then escorted the suspect to a car and from within the car, recovered about 3,190g of cannabis, 535g of ‘Ice’, 169g of ‘Ecstasy’ tablets and 330 Erimin-5 tablets. 

Photo (CNB): Controlled drugs including cannabis, ‘Ice’ and heroin were seized in the vicinities of Buangkok Crescent and Petir Road in CNB operations conducted on 1 November 2023. 

5.        Under Section 5 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1973, it is an offence for a person, on his or her own behalf, or on behalf of any other person, whether or not that other person is in Singapore, to traffic in a controlled drug, offer to traffic in a controlled drug; or to do or offer to do any act preparatory to or for the purpose of trafficking in a controlled drug. If a person is found guilty of trafficking more than 250g of methamphetamine or 500g of cannabis, he or she may face the mandatory death penalty.

6.        DAC Chang Gim Fook, Deputy Director of Intelligence Division, said of the operations:

“Yesterday’s anti-drug operations saw large seizures of cannabis and other controlled drugs, and the arrests of young drug offenders. Drugs are highly addictive, can destroy lives and tear families apart, but syndicates have no qualms in getting young people addicted to drugs and involved in serious drug offences. CNB is committed to keeping up the pressure against drug syndicates and traffickers and will continue to target them to prevent harm to individuals and society.”

7.        Investigations into all arrested suspects are ongoing. 

CENTRAL NARCOTICS BUREAU
3 November 2023

MAN STOLE SISTER’S PANTIES TO SMELL TURN OUT IS HIS AH MA’S PANTIES

0

 I couldn’t believe what I had just heard. My sister had accused my brother of stealing her panties and then sniffing them like a pervert. To make matters worse, she had caught him in the act! I was in disbelief, but there it was – my brother had been caught red-handed.

My brother is an upstanding young man, or so I thought, and I couldn’t believe he would do something so strange and perverse. But then again, he had always been a bit of a weirdo, so I guess it didn’t come as much of a surprise.

At first, I was disgusted and I wanted to punish him for his actions. But then I started to think more about it and I realized that there must be more to the story than just what my sister had seen.

After some gentle questioning, my brother finally confessed to me that he wasn’t sniffing my sister’s panties at all. In fact, he had been sniffing our grandmother’s panties by mistake!

Now, this was a whole different level of weirdness, but I was relieved to find out that he hadn’t been sniffing my sister’s underwear. But I still needed to know why he had been doing such a strange thing.

My brother explained to me that he had been looking for something that would help him released.

He said that he had found a pair of our panties in her sister’s room and he had decided to keep them as a memento. But then one day, he had taken them out and he had smelled them, hoping that they would give him some comfort.

Now, I know this might sound strange to some people.

So, instead of punishing him for his strange behavior, I decided to talk to him and try to understand where he was coming from. I explained to him that he should look for other ways to release.

My brother was very thankful for my understanding, and he promised me that he would never do something like that again. And from that day on, he started finding different ways to be a “guy”.

MAN WANT TO BE INVESTMENT BANKER, BUT WORRIED ABOUT WORK LIFE BALANCE

0

I am thinking of studying biz finance and eventually be an investment banker cus I really enjoy the progression and the job scope but I also heard it can get really competitive and super shag

any seniors from biz or even better, IB a can enlighten me on the workload and working hours (apparently can go up to 100+ a week) and if it’s super tough objectively to study IB?

Here are what netizens think:

  • My father started out as an investment banker (he is in private equity now) and am on the track to follow a similar career path. Here are some things I learned about IB and fancy finance jobs -horrible work life balance (100 hours is pretty accurate) -very hard to get into, you need to do a stem major or econ in a prestigious university (in sg, NUS is pretty good) and do very well in said course. -network like a maniac to get certain interviews (helps if you are in a prestigious uni) -go overseas for MBA- Wharton, HBS, Oxbridge, LSE, Insead, haas and stern come to mind. -good thing about IB is the pay- you make insane money- my dad made about 350k a year in nyc around 20 years ago. He now makes around 4-5mil a year depending on bonus
  • I don’t think that having a passion to make money is necessarily a bad thing, but only as long as you’re still a good person while doing it. Some get lost in the sauce and others pull through
  • It’s not wrong to chase the money, it’s just nothing unique. There are tons of people every batch like OP – the qn is how many of them truly are able to qualify and stick it out till the end. Imo its those who find that the job demands aligns with their skillsets who will last, and OP’s reason for pursuing IB doesn’t quite cut it.
  • OP – even if you want to chase the money – you have to do something you’re really good at to create more value to earn more in the long-run. Chasing what nets you more money in the short-run doesn’t always mean high progression. If you do something you’re not super good at, sure maybe starting pay is relatively higher, but the big bucks only come in when you really know how to create more value

EVICTED: WOMAN OWES HDB OVER S$106,000 IN MORTGAGE ARREARS

0

A Woman’s Battle Against Eviction: The Complex Journey of Ms. Jasmine Gowrimani Daniel

In the heart of a legal tussle lies the gripping story of Ms. Jasmine Gowrimani Daniel, who faces the haunting reality of eviction from a flat she had purchased back in 2001. The Housing Development Board (HDB) took action against her due to alleged significant mortgage payment defaults amounting to a substantial sum of S$106,000 by May 2020. This eviction saga has unraveled through a series of events, legal notices, appeals, and judicial decisions, culminating in an ongoing battle for possession and justice.

Background of the Case

According to CNA, Ms. Daniel’s saga dates back to the early 2000s when she acquired the flat with financial assistance from HDB. Over the years, she encountered personal hardships leading to arrears in mortgage payments. Her plea for understanding due to her circumstances was met with temporary deferrals and reduced payments. However, as time progressed, her debts escalated, leading to notices of eviction.

HDB’s Notifications and Attempts at Resolution

The HDB, in attempts to address the situation, served multiple notices, granting options to settle the arrears or sell the property. Ms. Daniel engaged in negotiations with HDB and the Ministry of National Development (MND) seeking mediation and a feasible payment plan. Despite back-and-forth discussions, a mutual agreement remained elusive.

The Proceedings Over the Years

The case unfolded through various correspondences, offers, rejections, and demands for payment. With arrears mounting to a considerable sum, MND rejected Ms. Daniel’s proposed payment plan as inadequate, hinting at the uncertainty of her income to sustain monthly payments.

HDB’s Execution of Eviction

After extended back-and-forths, HDB proceeded with the eviction process, granting deadlines for Ms. Daniel to either sell the property or settle her dues. Subsequently, the scheduled eviction took place, leading to a standoff between Ms. Daniel and HDB, entailing legal action and requests for a judicial review.

Legal Proceedings and Judge Toh’s Decision

In a critical turn of events, Judge Toh dismissed Ms. Daniel’s application, stating that the court lacked jurisdiction over the matter. The court deemed her appeal frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of process, ordering her to pay costs to HDB. Despite her appeals against these orders, the legal battle persists.

Conclusion

The convoluted journey of Ms. Jasmine Gowrimani Daniel stands as a complex narrative of an individual’s struggle against eviction, intertwined with legal complexities, administrative decisions, and personal predicaments. The unresolved conflict continues, marking a precedent for legal interpretations and tenant rights.

Unique FAQs

  1. **Why did Ms. Daniel face eviction?
    • Ms. Daniel faced eviction due to significant mortgage payment defaults, accumulating to around S$106,000 by May 2020, as alleged by HDB.
  2. **Did Ms. Daniel receive any options before the eviction process?
    • Yes, HDB provided Ms. Daniel with options to either sell the property or settle the arrears to avoid eviction.
  3. **What was the Ministry of National Development’s role in this case?
    • The MND attempted to mediate and establish a payment plan but rejected Ms. Daniel’s proposed plan due to its inadequacy to settle the arrears within a reasonable time frame.
  4. **What led to Judge Toh’s decision against Ms. Daniel’s appeal?
    • Judge Toh’s decision was based on the lack of jurisdiction of the district court over the matter and deemed her appeal frivolous and an abuse of the court’s process.
  5. **Is the legal battle over for Ms. Daniel?
    • No, Ms. Daniel has appealed against all of Judge Toh’s orders, and the conflict is ongoing.

REFORM PARTY CHIEF K. JEYARETNAM GETS 5TH POFMA, COLLECTING THEM LIKE DRAGON BALLS

0

The leader of the Reform Party, Kenneth Jeyaretnam, has been issued his 5th POFMA correction order this year by the POFMA office under the instruction of Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance Lawrence Wong.

This is in relation to an article that Jeyaretnam posted on several platforms on 22 October about the Ridout Road issue and Net Investiment Returns Contribution (NIRC).

The POFMA order from the Ministry of Finance

Issuance of Correction Direction under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act 2019 to Mr Kenneth Jeyaretnam

  1. Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance Lawrence Wong has instructed the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) Office to issue a Correction Direction to Mr Kenneth Jeyaretnam in relation to his article on The Ricebowl Singapore, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and X, published on 22 October 2023.
  2. Mr Kenneth Jeyaretnam will be required to publish the correction notice on The Ricebowl Singapore, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and X.
  3. 3 For the facts of this case, please refer to the Factually article, “Corrections regarding false statements of fact in article, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and X posts published by Mr Kenneth Jeyaretnam on 22 October 2023” (https://www.gov.sg/article/factually021123)

    Issued by:
    Ministry of Finance
    Singapore
    2 November 2023

Govt’s clarifications

1. The article published on The Ricebowl Singapore by Mr Kenneth Jeyaretnam on 22 October 2023 and his subsequent reposts of the same on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and X (formerly known as Twitter) on the same date contain false statements of fact.

False Statements of Fact

2. First, the article states that most of the Net Investment Returns Contribution (NIRC) has been transferred into long term funds and therefore does not contribute to actual spending. This is untrue. 

  • The NIRC comprises the investment returns of our reserves, which supplement the annual Budget each year to fund public spending. [1] For the financial year which ended on 31 March 2023, the NIRC was approximately $22.4 billion. How our reserves and the NIRC have benefited Singaporeans has been highlighted at various platforms, including the MOF website [2] and the CNA documentary on reserves. [3]
  • NIRC, combined with operating revenue, form the total revenue that is used to meet annual public spending (i.e., the annual Budget), and contributes to the government’s overall fiscal position. The NIRC has provided an annual revenue stream of about 3.5% of GDP on average over the past 5 years. No proportion of the NIRC is earmarked for specific spending items, or for transfer into any specific fund(s). Instead, a portion of the annual Budget as a whole may be used to top up funds. Hence, it is incorrect to state that most of the NIRC has been transferred into long term funds.
  • Furthermore, it is false to imply that moneys transferred into such long term funds do not contribute to “actual spending”. Moneys transferred to all funds, including long term funds, contribute to the disbursements from such funds, and accordingly contribute to “actual spending” which benefit Singaporeans. Moreover, how the moneys set aside for funds to support the Majulah Package, the Pioneer Generation Package, and the Merdeka Generation Package entail real spending has been previously clarified in a Factually article published on 30 August 2023 – please see:

Corrections regarding false statements of fact in article and posts published by Mr Kenneth Jeyaretnam on 21 August 2023: https://www.gov.sg/article/factually300823-a

3. Second, the article claims that SLA had given preferential treatment to Minister K Shanmugam and Minister Vivian Balakrishnan by renting out 26 and 31 Ridout Road below market value while charging the Housing and Development Board (HDB) inflated prices for land. This is untrue

  • Mr Jeyaretnam made similar false statements of fact in earlier publications that have already been clarified: see https://www.gov.sg/article/factually020823 and https://www.gov.sg/article/factually300823-a 
  • He continues to make such statements with utter disregard for the facts. He repeatedly omitted the facts and clarifications, rather than provide them and let the readers draw their own conclusions. Mr Jeyaretnam’s campaign of posting false statements misleads Singaporeans on the way that SLA works, as well as on the State’s land sale and property rental policies. 
  • As established in the review conducted by Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean, the rentals for both 26 and 31 Ridout Road were based on fair market value and not below market valuation. There was no evidence that the Ministers were given favourable rental rates due to their position. Details on how the market value was arrived at have been given in Parliament. The rental paid by the Ministers for both 26 and 31 Ridout Road were not less than the respective Guide Rents for the properties, which were determined by professional valuers, who adhered to established principles and methods for valuation. Indeed, the professional valuer from SLA who determined the Guide Rent for 26 Ridout Road did not know the identity of the prospective tenant for 26 Ridout Road at the material time, and only learnt that the tenant was Minister Shanmugam after the matter was reported in the media. It was also stated in Parliament that Minister Shanmugam had recused himself, in respect of the rental transaction. The CPIB had found that no preferential treatment was given to the Ministers and there was no evidence to suggest any abuse of position by the Ministers for personal gain. 
  • SLA sells state land to HDB for the development of public housing at the fair market value. Fair market value is assessed by the Chief Valuer (and not SLA), who makes the professional assessment independently in accordance with established valuation principles. SLA does not charge HDB inflated prices for the land.
  • The underlying principle used by the Government for determining the value of land for sale to the public and for rental of the Ridout Road properties is the same – it is to transact at fair market value. Whether for short-term rental or longer-term sale, the valuation seeks to establish the price that the market is willing to pay in each case, so that the Government transacts at fair market value. 
  • The matter of the rental of the Ridout Road properties had been independently and extensively investigated by CPIB and SM Teo Chee Hean. The facts have already been clarified and published. Please see: 

a. For the Press Statement from the Prime Minister’s Office dated 28 June 2023: https://www.pmo.gov.sg/Newsroom/Rental-of-State-Properties-at-Ridout-Road-by-Min-Shanmugam-and-Min-Vivian-Balakrishnan

b. For the Reports by CPIB & SM Teo Chee Hean: https://www.pmo.gov.sg/-/media/PMO/Releases-PDFs/20230628-ridout-report-pdf.ashx

c. For the Ministerial Statement & Round up Speech by SM Teo Chee Hean: https://www.pmo.gov.sg/Newsroom/Ministerial-Statement-by-SM-Teo-Chee-Hean-on-Ridout-Road & https://www.pmo.gov.sg/Newsroom/Round-up-Speech-by-SM-Teo-Chee-Hean-on-Ridout-Road

d. For the Ministerial Statement by Second Minister for Law Edwin Tong: https://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/#/sprs3topic?reportid=ministerial-statement-2198

4. Third, the article states that of $17 billion in healthcare expenditure, only $8 billion was used as subsidies for Singaporeans. This is untrue.

  • There is no factual basis to state that of $17 billion in healthcare expenditure, only $8 billion was used as subsidies for Singaporeans. 
  • For example, over the last three financial years, healthcare expenditure has ranged from $16.88 billion to $17.32 billion per year, and subsidies for Singaporeans have ranged from $9.54 billion to $10.93 billion per year. This is reflected in the Government Budget Book which is publicly available on the Ministry of Finance’s website. Excluding COVID-19 expenditure which is transitory, more than 70% of total healthcare expenditure was spent on subsidies for Singaporeans.

5. The Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance, Lawrence Wong, has instructed the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act Office to issue a Correction Direction to Mr Kenneth Jeyaretnam in respect of his article and his Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and X posts.

Additional Clarifications

6. The article also states that the Government uses “subsidies from the Budget for HDB purchases to enable HDB to pay a higher price for land” and that Singaporeans pay “inflated prices for smaller and smaller HDB units”. The following clarifications are necessary. 

Land prices 

7. State land is disposed of at fair market value (FMV). In the case of land for public housing, the FMV is independently and professionally determined by the Chief Valuer (CV), using market valuation principles.   

8. The CV’s valuation does not factor in housing subsidies or grants provided to HDB. The intent of housing subsidies is to keep flat prices affordable, and not to increase land price.  

Pricing of BTO flats

9. HDB does not sell flats at “inflated prices”. BTO flats are not priced based on cost, instead they are priced to ensure affordability. HDB first establishes the market value of the flats by considering the prices of comparable resale flats nearby, which is influenced by prevailing market conditions, as well as the individual attributes of the flats. 

10. HDB then applies a significant subsidy to the assessed market values to ensure that new flats are affordable for flat buyers. 

HDB flat sizes

11. HDB flats are designed to provide a living environment that is functional and comfortable. HDB flat sizes have not changed since 1997, but average household sizes have decreased.

[1] See Q24 and Q25 in the Section on “How do Singaporeans benefit from our Reserves?” on the MOF website.

[2] For reserves-related FAQs on the MOF website, please see: https://www.mof.gov.sg/policies/reserves/how-do-singaporeans-benefit-from-our-reserves.

[3] For the CNA documentary series on reserves, Singapore Reserves Revealed, please see: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/topic/singapore-reserves-revealed.

BRIDE ANGRY EX-COLLEAGUE NO-SHOW AT HER WEDDING, “YOU ABSENT CAN, ANGPAO CANNOT”

0

In the realm of wedding etiquette, traditions and expectations often vary from one culture to another. One such custom is the exchange of “ang baos,” which are gifts of money typically given by guests to newlyweds.

But what happens when a guest misses the wedding, and the newlyweds believe that they should still receive an ang bao in return for a previous gift?

This unique scenario emerged in China, where one bride’s insistence on reciprocation sparked a heated debate.

The Story Unfolds

The tale begins in Sichuan, China, where a bride, surnamed Huang, was deeply upset by the absence of an ex-colleague from her wedding.

The reason for her distress was not merely the absence but rather the feeling of unfulfilled obligation. Huang had previously gifted this ex-colleague 400 yuan (SGD$75) when he got married, following the tradition of presenting ang baos. Her belief was that, since she had been generous on his special day, he was now obligated to attend her wedding.

The Quest for Reciprocation

To ensure her ex-colleague’s presence, Huang extended both a physical wedding invitation and a digital one via WeChat. However, despite her efforts, her ex-colleague did not grace her wedding with his presence, which left her vexed and disappointed.

Huang’s reaction was to send multiple messages to her ex-colleague, politely demanding repayment of the ang bao. In these messages, she emphasized her belief that reciprocation was only fair. Her ex-colleague’s no-show and lack of response were seen as a breach of wedding etiquette, which deeply bothered Huang.

The Dispute

In her messages, Huang expressed her frustration: “What do you mean by this? I have you a red packet of 400 yuan for your wedding, return it to me. You owe me this favour”.

Her ex-colleague, however, held a different perspective. He conveyed to Huang’s husband that he felt her wedding invitation was not genuine, explaining his absence.

Huang vehemently disagreed with her ex-colleague’s justification. In her view, his absence was tolerable, but not returning the ang bao was not. She emphasized the significance of the gift and the expectation that he reciprocate.

The Final Words

As the dispute escalated, Huang suggested that he should have had a better attitude and informed her if he couldn’t attend.

She then said that if he doesn’t have money, he can just tell her. “Apart from your absence on my wedding, your refusal to reply my messages is disrespectful to me. If you are broke, just let me know and I’ll let it go. Your rude attitude makes it seem like I’m the one who owes you instead.”

FULL VIDEO LOADING…

S’PORE’S PUBLIC HOSPITALS TARGETED IN CYBER ATTACK, SITES DISRUPTED FOR HOURS

0

In a recent incident on November 1st, Singapore’s public healthcare institutions faced an extensive disruption. This disruption was not a mere technical glitch but, in fact, a sophisticated cyber-attack in the form of a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack, according to Channel NewsAsia.

What is a DDoS attack?

A DDoS attack is a malicious act aimed at disrupting online services by overwhelming the target with an unusually high volume of data traffic. It is a common tactic used by cybercriminals to render websites and online services inaccessible.

The impact of the DDoS attack

The consequences of this DDoS attack were severe, with internet connectivity at public healthcare institutions being disrupted for hours. The disruption, which occurred from 9.20 am to 4.30 pm, affected a wide range of services, including websites, emails, and staff productivity tools.

During the attack, critical services that required internet connectivity were rendered inaccessible. However, it’s worth noting that despite this chaos, patient data and internal networks remained secure, ensuring that patient care was not compromised.

Synapxe’s response and security measures

Synapxe, the agency responsible for managing the technology infrastructure of Singapore’s public healthcare institutions, swiftly responded to the attack. They employ a layered defense mechanism designed to detect and respond to cyber threats, including DDoS attacks.

In addition to a layered defense, Synapxe utilizes redundancy and system backups to ensure resilience against such attacks. They also subscribe to services that can block abnormal surges in internet traffic before they can penetrate their public healthcare network.

Detecting the abnormal surge in network traffic

The attack commenced at 9.15 am when Synapxe detected an abnormal surge in network traffic. This surge managed to bypass the blocking service and overwhelmed the firewall behind the blocks. This ultimately resulted in the filtering out of traffic, rendering all websites and internet-reliant services inaccessible.

Once the cause of the attack was identified, Synapxe collaborated with service providers to implement measures to block the abnormal traffic, allowing legitimate internet services to resume. Services were progressively restored from 4.30 pm, alleviating the disruption that had persisted for several hours.

Synapxe statement

Investigations on the internet connectivity disruption for public healthcare institutions which happened on 1 November 2023 showed that the outage was caused by a Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attack, where the attackers flood servers with internet traffic to prevent legitimate users from accessing online services. Synapxe has found no evidence to indicate that public healthcare data and internal networks have been compromised. 

2. Internet connectivity at public healthcare institutions was disrupted between 9.20am and 4.30pm on 1 November 2023, with most of the affected services restored by 5.15pm. During the disruption, services requiring internet connectivity at public healthcare institutions, including websites, emails, productivity tools for staff, were inaccessible. 

3. Throughout the incident, Synapxe was able to sustain the mission critical systems needed for clinical services and operations at the public healthcare institutions, including access to patient records. Patient data and the internal networks remained accessible and unaffected. Patient care was not compromised. 

4. Synapxe’s networks are protected in a layered defence designed to detect and respond to cyber threats, including DDoS attacks. Our systems are also designed with redundancies for resilience, and these include system backups. To minimise the risks of being overwhelmed by higher-than-usual internet traffic, Synapxe subscribes to services which block abnormal surges in internet traffic before they enter our public healthcare network. In addition, once the traffic is cleared by the blocking service, firewalls are in place to allow only legitimate traffic into the network. 

5. On 1 November 2023, an abnormal surge in network traffic was detected at 9.15am. This surge circumvented the blocking service, and overwhelmed Synapxe’s firewall behind the blocks. This triggered the firewall to filter out the traffic, and all the websites and internet-reliant services became inaccessible. Once the cause was identified, Synapxe immediately worked with service providers to deploy measures to block the abnormal traffic in order to allow legitimate traffic required for internet services to resume. Services were restored progressively from 4.30pm.

6. The DDoS attacks are continuing, and we may see occasional disruptions in internet services as a result. Synapxe is working with relevant parties to actively defend against the attacks, and expedite the recovery processes. Investigations by Synapxe and the Cyber Security Agency (CSA) are also ongoing.

7. The measures put in place by Synapxe to protect our systems have enabled us to withstand the attacks with no compromise to healthcare data and internal networks. 

8. The incident is a stark reminder that DDoS attacks are on the rise, with changing attack methods. DDoS attacks cannot be prevented, and the defences against DDoS attacks will have to constantly evolve to keep up with advancements. 

9. The public healthcare sector will take this opportunity to review our defences against DDoS attacks, and learn from the episode to further strengthen our cybersecurity . It is important that we continue to remain vigilant against cybersecurity threats.

GIRL KISSES BF ON THE NECK & HE CANNOT TAHAN ANYMORE, PEW PEW LIKE FIREWORKS

0

I made him finish without even moving or doing anything, and it made me feel so attractive.

So I was with this guy and I like to give instructions, like when he can finish, when and how he’s allowed to touch me, etc. He was pretty into it, so I stopped leaned down and whispered him to him that I didn’t want him to finish just yet.

At first he wasn’t sure what was going on, but I whispered and to him and told him to hang on…if you can.

I kept him inside me and I just started slowly massaging him while he was inside of me. He’s breathing heavier but I’m completely motionless except for massaging him and squeezing my my glutes a little.

I can tell it’s driving him crazy. And all the sudden he’s “wait…ahh…hang on.”

So I leaned down and whispered “you better not.” Then I kissed his neck and gave him a couple of hard squeezes. I guess it was too much bc he absolutely exploded inside me.

I really didn’t think I was going to be able to make him shoot without moving at all but I did.

Netizens’ comments

  1. I think it’s something to do with us men, you tell us not to do something and it is somehow in our nature to do just the opposite.
  2. Brilliant. In my experience, when you say “you better not” is the perfect final trigger to send them over the edge lol.
  3. Ain’t nothing better than a woman who does her kegels religiously and knows how to milk a D with them. If you want to really develop this skill, pompoir is one of the names for that technique.
  4. My wife does something similar to me. The slightest move will set me off and she knows it!

WOMAN 1ST TIME PIAK BF FEELS LET DOWN – PUT IN ONLY, HIS “SEDIA” BECOME “SENANG DIRI”

0

I(38F) first time with my(38M) boyfriend was not what I was expecting.

I (38F) and my (38M) long distance boyfriend met about a year and 2 month ago on a online dating site. First time ever texting we spent all night till early morning hours talking about life and a little bit of flirting but nothing obscene, and since that night we never stopped talking.

Things started to get very real after four months when we said the ILY. Then came the next level texting, we would touch ourselves while texting each other and it was better than any s-x Ive ever had, never felt that connected with someone before, it was addicting to be honest.

We both have kids with a busy lifestyle and work so it was hard to find the time to meet him. It got to a point that we both couldn’t take it anymore and he finally booked his flight and we finally met a week ago, everything was great he’s an amazing guy we are very attracted to each other.

The time we had was nearly perfect the guy is perfect in my eyes, the conversations we had was even better than the ones we had over the phone, kiss was great, foreplay was out of this world, but when it come down to the actual f-ng (the ins and out) part i was a little disappointed.

He was hard the whole time but when he would get inside of me he would lose his hard on, we would always finish each other thought, and every time he was very apologetic, Saying that never happened with him.

We are both very attractive individuals, we f multiple times a day for the 5 days he was here. But I never had this happened with me before. I just don’t know what to think. What would you do in a situation like this?

EDIT: I was so full of emotions, nervous, the anticipation that I didn’t even realized that he was probably going through the same.

For the ones that mentioned they don’t understand LDR, and how can you say I love you to someone you never met in person, I won’t explain to you how that’s possible because it’s impossible to describe, all I can say is that it is the most beautiful pure thing and I hope someday one of you can have that experience if you get the chance.