29.1 C
Singapore
Tuesday, April 14, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 2778

600KG OF ILLEGALLY IMPORTED FOOD FROM THAILAND SEIZED BY SFA

0

The Singapore Food Agency (SFA) seized over 600kg of illegally imported food from Thailand, following raids conducted on 12 Jul 2023 at various food retail establishments across Singapore.

During raids conducted at eight food retail establishments across Singapore, SFA officers detected the sale of illegally imported processed and raw meat from Thailand at six of them. These include pork, chicken, beef, duck and fish products.
Three of the food retail establishments were also found to be operating without a valid licence.

SFA is following up with further investigations.

Illegally imported food products of unknown sources can pose a food safety risk. In Singapore, food imports must meet SFA’s requirements. Food can only be imported by licensed importers, and every consignment must be declared and accompanied with a valid import permit. In addition, meat and its products can only
be imported from accredited sources in approved countries that comply with Singapore’s food safety requirements.

Offenders found in possession of meat and seafood products for the purpose of selling, which were imported without a valid import permit shall be liable on conviction to a fine of not exceeding $50,000 and/or imprisonment of up to two years. In the case of a subsequent conviction, offenders shall be liable to a fine not exceeding $100,000 and/or imprisonment of up to three years.

Operation of unlicensed food establishments also poses a food safety risk.

In Singapore, all food establishments must be licensed and are required to meet SFA’s requirements and food safety standards. Offenders who operate food establishments without a valid licence shall be liable on conviction to a fine not
exceeding $10,000. In the case of a subsequent conviction, offenders shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $20,000 and/or imprisonment of up to three months.

Members of the public with information on such illegal activities are requested to provide feedback via our online feedback form (www.sfa.gov.sg/feedback) with details for our follow-up investigations. All information will be kept strictly confidential.

EMPLOYEE IN HIS 1ST JOB, COLLEAGUES THINK THEY ARE ALWAYS RIGHT & REFUSE TO LISTEN

0

Is this normal in the working world or should I find another company?

Hi guys, so 2 years into my first job and I realised things aren’t as rosy as I thought it would be. I know working world would be a cesspool of shit but my expectations were grossly overpositive.

Poor quality of work

So, we are an engineering company. Considered SME here but our parent company is in China. Those in Engineering would understand that there is no “agar agar” in Engineering. If there’s a limitation in the specs, say maximum load of maximum length of this beam, it has to be clearly stated. So here is where the problem starts. Whenever we ask China side for some specs, different people give us different specs. Its frustrating to be honest. So what I do ? I pull all the people who told me different things into one group and ask them collectively…And got told off for making trouble. At the end of the day, no one can provide a definitive answer to this, and many questions I have asked.

Its really frustrating and seriously goes against how I work. For me, its very simple. I see a problem, I fix the problem, I go home. But in this case, its really…frustrating. I see the problem but no one wants to address it. I was told this is quite normal in the working world but i really don’t know. Is it ? Is it really ? Or is this how SME / China companies work ?

No honestly / communication

I really laugh at the way we do things here. So we are supposed to market our parent company’s products and sell them overseas, basically an overseas branch. BUT, now here’s where it gets interesting. When we request for specs and important stuff like CAD Drawing, they dowan give. So our boss decides to use what we have and modify to make it ours. And cos of that, the end product ends up to be different from our parent company’s product. And the boss likes to go around promising customer this and that but when he comes back and tells the Engineering team we’re all like, bruh you got discuss with us first ?

Like, the cycle is like that. Find new customer -> propose a novel product that we don’t have -> come back tell Engineering team to do -> Engineering feedback that not feasible -> Boss say China can do -> Engineering reminds boss our product is heavily modified -> Boss gets angry

Colleagues that only know how to talk but not listen

Oh boy this one. My office is filled with people that like to think that they are always in the right. No matter how much you try to get them to see another opinion, they insist they are right. I’m not saying I’m right but would it kill you to listen to others? Nowadays I see someone doing it wrong I won’t tell them. Just sit by and watch them burn lol.

Now I’ve been asked this question many times, why am I still here ?

Main reason is that is quite lepak (cos everyone don’t care about all these specs lol) and more importantly gives me the extra time and emotional resource to try to solve the current problems I have in life right now… mainly mental health issues. I see the company as having no future, no chance to succeed, I acknowledge that. But so am I. I also gave up on myself already. So this place suits me well.

Even so I’m getting real tired of this shit hole. I just got an increment, and a pretty big one at that, and am waiting at least a few months so I can use it as leverage for better pay.

Maybe I just needed to rant on Monday, thanks…

NSF STOREMAN DULAN WITH ALL THE CHAO KENGS TAKING 3 DAYS MC EVERY WEEK

0

How do you all do quiet quitting?

Just for context, I’m an NSF who is a storeman.

For the past 1 year that I’ve been in NS, I’ve always tried to do things to the best of my ability (foolish of me, I know) and took over the duties of other NSFs whenever they go on MC.

However, there will always be a bunch of NSFs in my unit who will take at least 3 days of MC every bloody week.

The thing that really pisses me off is that I always have to take over their duties and basically work from book in timing to book out timing. This happens every fking time they go on mc. What were they doing while on MC? Going out and having fun while I’m slogging away in camp

I tried studying stuff in camp but I’m just so busy up to the point that i dont have the time to study, or I’m just tired af. I don’t really want to ck and go on MC for weeks on end cause my supervisors are really nice (they even gave me a few off days because of my work).

Can I have some suggestions from yall? I feel quite stressed out on those days because of this

Netizens’ comments

  1. Not a bad idea to have a chat with your commanders about how you’re feeling. If they are understanding, I’m sure they’d know what to do.
    Otherwise, do try to do the bare minimum that would let you do what you want, whilst also doing you are supposed to.
  2. I’m an ASA and I feel your pain man. It seems like your Superiors are nice though. The fact that they give you Offs for the work done. For me, I don’t get any offs despite booking out late on multiple occasions to get certain tasks completed.
    Because I was also stupid and foolish to do things to the best of my ability, I suffered 2 mental breakdowns till the point that I went nuts in the office. Threw stuff and yelled vulgarities.
    If you’re just not feeling it and you need a break, just take MC bro. Nobody is going to fault you and don’t even feel bad about doing it. Prioritise yourself first. Just take the MC but of course don’t go and take MC for 3 – 4 days consecutively
  3. Been there before, brother. Try talking to your direct superiors about it, and if nothing changes, go up the chain of command to your DY or something. See if you can have them arrange house visits to those ck people. If they really are out having fun while they’re supposed to be on MC, they’ll sure kena some punishment one. Might even go straight to DB iirc.

ELDERLY PARENTS SIGNED UP FOR 50GB DATA FOR $18, END UP GOT OVERCHARGED $600

0

Circles overcharged my elderly parents almost $600 and offered a $40 goodwill refund

Has anybody fallen for this before and could advice us?

Before I moved overseas, I ported both my elderly parents into Circles from M1. The offer at that time was $18 for 50GB of data. It worked pretty awesome for the first couple of months, everything was in order. I checked the bill and it was truly $18/month.

Recently, I came back and found out that after 6 months for my mum and 1 year for my dad, they were charged an extra $20 per month for unlimited data. I asked Circles what’s up with it and they said that it’s an automatic subscription which requires the consumer to opt out of. It seems that they sneaked this in to their “no-contract plan” at sign up and placed the burden of disputing it on the consumer.

Naturally, given that my parents use an average of 3GB a month, I told them there was no need for this and requested an adjustment. Months of this subscription came up to around $600 in total. They offered $40 as a goodwill refund… Do we have any options at all?

Netizens’ comments

  1. Not normally. Always read the T&C of the contract. For circles in particular their prices include a $10 “discount” for porting in your number, which is only valid for 1 year. Scummy but not illegal.
  2. Unfortunately this was probably sneaked into the T&Cs in the service agreement that I assume was legitimately signed. If your parents are illiterate you might have some kind of legal recourse but the time and effort taken to pursue the $600 will not be worth it at all.
    Posting your account on IG / Facebook / TikTok and tagging Circles’ accounts would be the more viable option – they might cave in to the negative publicity and offer a full refund.
  3. Auto subscription should be made illegal!
  4. Depending on the facts, including in particular whether you reasonably could have known of the extra charge, this may or may not amount to an “unfair practice” under the Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act 2003. Try complaining to CASE, and/or the Consumer and Competition Commission of Singapore.

SCAMMER ASKED S’PORE MAN TO GUESS WHO IS HE, GUY DON’T KNOW, SCAMMER SIGHS & HUNG UP

0

Weird (scam?) call

I had this weird call on Friday afternoon.

A guy with a thick Malaysian accent called my number using a local Singaporean number (no +65) and said he was my friend, had changed this number and asked me to guess who he was.

He was able to identify me by name. After refusing to identify himself and playing this game of asking me who he was, he sighed, and hang up. While I do have Malaysian friends, business associates and former classmates, this voice wasn’t familiar at all and I know my contacts won’t waste time on this sort of behaviour.

Wtf was that all about?

Netizens’ comments

  1. he got your name by keying your number into paynow.
    next time you get this kind of scam you say ” oh alex ah long time no see!”
    then he will say “ya la…im alex, how are you man?
    then you say” i dont know who is alex”
  2. Probably one of those that will name themselves whatever you remember them as then try to ask you to lend them money after a while
  3. I got the same call as well… after asking him 3 times and him telling me to guess who is he, i decided to ask him back “ so what is my name?” He froze and hung up.
    If he really knows my name ( as my friends experienced with their encounters) i am prepared to randomly drop a name and when he says yes he is that person, i will ask him “when u planning to return me my $1000 ? Look for you very long already..”
  4. Scam. I kena before also. He got your no from some sources so he knows your name. He will refuse to tell u who he is and probably he is waiting for u to blurp out a name, then he claim to be that person
    Another variant is he will tell u all kinds of stuffs like Macham he updating u like that. I dunno what follows this, but probably he is trying to impersonate someone u know also

FIERY ENDING AT GEYLANG – SHOPHOUSE ON FIRE, 50 FIREMEN DEPLOYED TO FIGHT FIRE

0

At approximately 7:30 am today, the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) sprang into action after being alerted about a raging fire at a shophouse unit located at 61, Geylang Lorong 27. The incident brought about a swift and efficient response from the SCDF, preventing a potentially major disaster.

Upon arrival, SCDF firefighters were met with a terrifying sight as flames engulfed the 3rd floor of the shophouse unit. The fire had already burned through the roof and was dangerously spreading to an adjacent unit via the rooftop. The situation called for immediate and robust action.

Recognizing the severity of the situation, the SCDF quickly deployed a total of 12 emergency vehicles and around 50 firefighters to the scene. The firefighting operation reached its peak intensity as four powerful water jets were employed to bring the blaze under control, battling against the destructive force that threatened the neighborhood.

The authorities sprang into action not only to combat the fire but also to ensure the safety of residents in the vicinity. Around 30 occupants from neighboring shophouse units were promptly evacuated by both the Police and SCDF personnel, ensuring their safety and minimizing the potential risk to life.

The combined efforts of the firefighters and emergency responders bore fruit as they managed to fully extinguish the fire within an hour of battling the flames. Thanks to their swift and efficient action, there were no reported injuries during the incident, averting what could have been a tragedy.

Following the successful containment of the fire, the SCDF initiated a damping down operation. This essential process involves applying water to the burnt surfaces immediately after the fire is extinguished. Its purpose is to prevent any potential rekindling of the fire from the still-hot burnt surfaces, ensuring that the area remains safe and secure.

As of now, the cause of the fire is still under investigation. The SCDF and relevant authorities are working diligently to determine the factors that led to the outbreak of the blaze. This investigation will be crucial in understanding the incident’s root cause and implementing measures to prevent similar incidents in the future.

SCDF’s statement

[Fire @ 61, Geylang Lorong 27]

At about 7:30am today, SCDF was alerted to a fire at the abovementioned location.

Upon SCDF’s arrival, fire was raging at the 3rd floor of a shophouse unit. The fire had burnt through the roof and was spreading to the adjacent unit via the rooftop.

SCDF deployed 12 emergency vehicles and about 50 firefighters to the incident. At the height of the firefighting operation, four water jets were used to bring the fire under control. About 30 occupants from the neighbouring shophouse units were evacuated by the Police and SCDF.

The fire was fully extinguished within an hour and there were no reported injuries. Damping down operation* is ongoing.

The cause of fire is under investigation.

*Damping down refers to the application of water to wet burnt surfaces immediately after a fire is put out. It is to prevent any potential rekindle of fire from the hot burnt surfaces.

RACIST MAN WHO INSULTED & KICKED WOMAN FOR NOT WEARING MASK, CONVICTED

0

In May 2021, a disturbing incident took place in Choa Chu Kang that left the community shocked and concerned about racial harmony.

A man, Wong Xing Fong, racially insulted a stranger, Madam Hindocha Nita Vishnubhai, and even kicked her in the chest.

According to The Straits Times, the prosecution has presented its case in court, urging the district judge to hand down a sentence of six to nine months’ jail, emphasizing the seriousness of the offenses and the importance of strong deterrence to maintain community harmony.

On the other hand, Wong’s defense lawyer has pleaded for a lighter sentence, portraying Wong as a kind and caring individual who acted out of character.

He is set to be sentenced on 7 August.

The Incident and Trial

Wong Xing Fong, 32, attacked Madam Hindocha Nita Vishnubhai near Northvale condominium in Choa Chu Kang in May 2021. He is scheduled to be sentenced on July 31.

Madam Nita, 57, testified that she was briskly walking to Choa Chu Kang Stadium, where she worked at a fast-food restaurant, with her mask down when she heard someone shouting.

She turned and saw Wong and his fiancee, Ms Chua Yun Han, who were unfamiliar to her. They told her to “mask up.”

In response, Madam Nita explained that she was exercising and sweating, gesturing to illustrate her point. However, instead of de-escalating the situation, Wong verbally insulted her.

In an attempt to diffuse the tension, Madam Nita responded with “God bless you.” Despite this, Wong kicked her in the chest before jogging away with his fiancee.

An eyewitness, unrelated to either party, helped Madam Nita to her feet and provided first aid for a wound on her left forearm.

She reported the incident to the police later that evening. The prosecution presented the testimony of the eyewitness, who confirmed witnessing Wong kicking Madam Nita.

The prosecution regarded Madam Nita as a truthful witness and dismissed the notion that she framed Wong without any provocation.

During the trial, Wong, represented by lawyer Sim Bing Wen, claimed that Madam Nita was sarcastic, aggressive, and used vulgar language towards him.

He also alleged that she spat at him and his fiancee, prompting him to push her. Although Wong admitted to using vulgar language, he denied using any racial insults.

The prosecution rebutted Wong’s claims, stating that the allegation of Madam Nita spitting at him was contradicted by the behavior of Wong and his fiancee.

It was deemed peculiar that Wong remained in close contact with Chua after the alleged incident, considering his concern about spreading illnesses to her immunocompromised parent.

Wong and his fiancee testified that he went to a washroom at the nearby Lot One mall to clean up after the incident.

However, the prosecution presented closed-circuit television footage that showed them ordering food together, contradicting their claim.

BEAR STANDING ON HINDLEGS IN CHINA ZOO, VISITORS SUSPECT IT’S A MAN IN A BEAR COSTUME

A video of a black bear at Hangzhou Zoo in China has taken the internet by storm. The viral footage shows the bear standing on its two hind legs on the edge of a rock feature, engaging with fascinated tourists by playfully waving its paws.

While this spectacle has been a popular tourist attraction, an intriguing debate has arisen about the bear’s true identity. Some netizens argue that the “talented” bear is not a bear at all but a human in a cleverly crafted costume.

Unveiling the Controversy

The video posted by an observant netizen immediately sparked curiosity and raised questions about the authenticity of the bear’s identity.

Hangzhou Daily reported that the individual behind the video firmly believed that the bear was, in fact, a human dressed in a bear costume.

As this speculation gained traction, Hangzhou Zoo issued a denial, countering the claims by stating that the temperature on the day the video was recorded reached a scorching 40 degrees Celsius. They asserted that a person inside a costume would not have been able to withstand such heat.

Human-like Gestures and Skepticism

In the face of the zoo’s defense, some people remained unconvinced and continued to support the idea that the bear was, indeed, a human imitating a bear.

A separate Chinese news outlet, Jimu News, reported on this ongoing skepticism. Observers pointed to the bear’s remarkably human-like movements while standing and waving to visitors.

Additionally, they observed what appeared to be pants-like folds around the bear’s rear when it stood upright.

Commenters on the Jimu article voiced their doubts as well. One commenter noted that the bear’s posture seemed even more upright than that of humans, fueling further intrigue.

Another skeptic claimed that bears’ forelimbs cannot spread out to the sides as the bear in the video was seen doing, further bolstering the “human in a bear suit” theory.

The Unresolved Mystery

As the debate rages on, the mystery surrounding the Hangzhou Zoo bear remains unresolved. The video’s viral nature has undoubtedly added to its intrigue, prompting both skeptics and believers to analyze the footage with fervor.

Whether this enigmatic bear is indeed a human donning a clever disguise or simply an exceptionally talented black bear remains a topic of speculation that continues to captivate audiences worldwide.

TOURISTS WALKED FROM WOODLANDS TO MBS FOR 12 HRS TO EXPERIENCE MORE OF S’PORE

American travel YouTubers, Kara and Nate, visited Singapore and made the decision to trek from Woodlands all the way to Marina Bay Sands on foot, in order to experience more of our little country.

From Woodlands to Marina Bay Sands

Kara and Nate had always dreamt of exploring Singapore beyond the usual tourist hotspots of Orchard Road and Marina Bay Sands. This walk was their opportunity to delve deeper into the country they had grown fond of since their first visit back in 2016.

A Hiking Plan

Starting their journey at Woodlands Park, the couple had planned a route spanning approximately 29.3 kilometers, as per Google Maps. However, they expected the journey to take longer due to numerous planned stops to experience Singapore’s diverse culture and savor its delectable cuisine.

Battling the Elements

As they set off, the blazing Singaporean sun proved to be their first challenge. Sweating profusely, they sought respite from the heat by briefly stepping into an unnamed school for some much-needed air-conditioning. Despite the scorching weather, their enthusiasm remained unwavering. Along the way, Nate shared that he had sweat dripping into his eyes, as he lamented about the scorching heat.

From Jaywalking to Hot Springs

With the goal of reaching their destination on time, Kara and Nate decided to jaywalk at one point, risking a potential fine. Curiosity led them to google other unusual fines in Singapore, including walking around the house naked and feeding birds. However, these distractions didn’t deter them from their adventure.

At 4.72 miles, they reached Sembawang Hot Springs, where they took a break and dipped their aching feet in the spring water. Though they intended to cook eggs in the hot spring, their culinary experiment didn’t go as planned. Nevertheless, the experience was an adventure in itself.

Rest Stops

With each mile covered, the couple’s hunger grew, and they eagerly indulged in local delicacies along the way. At Chong Pang City, they finally got to feast on traditional Singaporean dishes at a coffee shop.

The Missed Sunset

As their journey continued, they had to recalibrate their plans to catch the sunset at Marina Bay Sands’ infinity pool. Due to the distance covered and the multitude of experiences along the way, they realized they wouldn’t make it on time. However, they couldn’t resist stopping for some garlic naan, fondly recalling their first taste of Indian food in Singapore.

Diversity

Throughout their walk, Kara and Nate marveled at Singapore’s cultural diversity. From Hindu temples to beautiful mosques, the city presented a blend of different worlds in every corner.

Finish Line

Despite unexpected challenges and deviations from their initial plan, the couple’s spirits remained high. They pushed forward and celebrated the moment they set eyes on Marina Bay Sands’ iconic boat-shaped structure. The final mile was a joyful one, and their determination had brought them to their destination.

LANDLORD AND TENANT FIGHTING OVER 6 MONTHS OF UNPAID RENT, POLICE CALLED IN

0

The clash between a restaurant owner and her landlord has garnered attention due to allegations of unpaid rent and an altercation that occurred on the premises. The incident took place at a popular grilled fish restaurant located on Geylang Road, according to Shin Min Daily News.

Background of the Incident

The restaurant’s owner, Ms. Zhang, took over the establishment in September of the previous year and began operating the grilled fish business.

However, in April of the current year, she faced some financial difficulties that resulted in delayed rent payments.

She approached the landlord, seeking understanding and a temporary arrangement, with the intention of eventually catching up on the dues. Unfortunately, this led to an ongoing conflict with the landlord.

Financial Trouble and Delayed Rent Payment

Ms. Zhang’s restaurant encountered some financial setbacks in April, prompting her to request an extension for rent payment. She assured the landlord that she would eventually pay the overdue amount.

However, despite her efforts to communicate and make partial payments, the landlord continued to escalate the situation.

Landlord’s Reaction and Lock Changes

In May, the landlord decided to change the locks on the restaurant, leaving a notice stating that the establishment was closed due to delayed rent payments.

This action affected the restaurant’s operations and reputation. Ms. Zhang, alarmed by this move, immediately contacted the landlord and paid a fee to regain access to her restaurant.

The Altercation: Accusations and Confrontation

In July, the situation worsened when the landlord changed the locks again, preventing Ms. Zhang from entering her own business.

When she attempted to open the restaurant, the landlord’s wife physically restrained her and, according to Ms. Zhang, the landlord even brandished a stick, holding it against her neck to prevent her from entering.

Witnessing the altercation, nearby shop owners intervened and some even called the police. The presence of the authorities did not deter Ms. Zhang, and she continued to act defiantly. Eventually, the police had no choice but to arrest her for public disturbance.

Landlord’s Perspective on the Situation

Mdm Mary, the landlord’s wife, offered an explanation for their actions. According to her, Ms. Zhang had accumulated six months of unpaid rent, leaving them with no other option but to lock the premises.

Mdm. Mary emphasized that their intention was not to harass or inconvenience Ms. Zhang but to collect the overdue rent.