28.3 C
Singapore
Friday, July 31, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 4261

NETIZEN MISSES TIMES WHERE GRAB HAD UBER & OTHER PLATFORMS’ COMPETITION

0

A netizen recently posted online reminiscing the times where other there were many available PHV options other than Grab.

This was after the netizen faced a $40 fare from east to west in Grab and lamented that in the past (early 2010s), the fare from east to west was below $20.

It seems like the netizen is talking about the era where private hire vehicles first started and companies like Grab and Uber were still the main forces in the market.

Here is what the netizen posted

I havent’s take Grab in a long time and today, i witnessed what everyone’s been complaining about. i was travelling from East to West – fare was almost $40. that’s secondary.. the nearest driver was 10 mins away. and then he couldn’t find where my drop off was. he cancelled (i tried to call a few times/ texted him if he needs help, can call me. but no response) and then i rebooked and nearest one was 10 mins again. thinking that if i should go home and wait or just continue waiting at the drop off. decided to just stay at the dropoff as i dont wanna incur the 3 mins waiting fee. by the time i got into my 2nd Grab, i had waited for more than half an hour at the drop off

as i was waiting for all these to happen, i reminisced the early 2010s when we had Grab, Uber and Gojek. they were always very fast and cheap as well. i remember also travelling from east to west and it was below $20. sigh. and back then when the vouchers were non-stop coming our way. i know they were operating at a loss back then and prolly not viable.. but still.. sigh”

Replies and comments from netizens

  • COE and petrol are much higher now. The Grab drivers aren’t earning much more despite the increase in price.
  • When was the last time you guys remember keying a Grab promo code that actually meaningful discounts? All we have now is 20% off Grab rides capped at $3 which we have to redeem using our own points. IMO it’s a scam to even call it 20%, just call it $3 off la. Say until so nice.
  • No more drivers since the margins are going to the ride hailing app car rentals and oil and gas companies. Higher fare is needed to retain them and attract those Grab drivers who left to come back

Image source: Unsplash, Google Maps

GUY’S GF WORKS 15 HOURS A DAY AS A TEACHER AND ONLY SLEEPS 4.5 HOURS EACH DAY

0

I’m currently dating a teacher for about 2 years, who is 3 years into the job (after PGDE). While we really love each other and are serious about one another, I’m a bit uncertain about our future together due to her workload and commitment to work.

Here is a sample of her average day:

Wake up at 540am
Leave house at 630am
Reach school by 710am
Teach classes till 130-2pm
CCA/ remedials/ meetings/ misc things till 530pm, leave school
Dabao, Reach home at 630pm
Eat dinner and chill to 8pm
Marking from 8 to 1130pm
Shower, etc, till 1230pm
Catch up on emails till 1am then sleep

So based on that, she works maybe 14-15 hours every weekday with just 4.5hrs of sleep and a good day every weekend just to catch up on work that couldn’t be completed and lesson plans. Based on her salary, it’s just ridiculous how much she has to work for that – Retail and F&B workers are better paid hourly than her.

I’ve been getting into fights with her and telling her that her lifestyle and is unsustainable as it’ll lead to big burnouts and her health will suffer. On the flip end, she says that I’m not a teacher and I’d never understand her line of work.

Also, I realised that a lot of her teacher friends (female), are single well into late 30s and 40s – which I guess its due to their teaching lifestyle. On the flip end, most women I know from my line of work (private) are married by their late 30s.

I sincerely hope MOE can do something to lighten teacher’s workloads. While that is wishful thinking, I’m wondering if I could get any advice on how to move forward…or move on.

Frankly I although I love her a lot, she had made it clear that her priority is to be a good teacher. So at the back of my mind, there is always this feeling that she loves teaching more than me.

Also, although we both agreed on having children, based on her workload, I don’t see how we would be able to manage as I’m afraid she’ll leave majority of the child rearing to me while she continues her passion. My job is way less tiring than hers and honestly I’m earning more than double of her – and in order for me to climb more, I need her to do her fair share of child rearing. I’ve mentioned to her that if we got married, I’d like for her to take a step back from her overloaded schedule and this was utterly shot down and more quarrels ensured.

So now I’m at a crossroads – should I push on and try to make things work, or try to move on to find someone who able to be more family oriented?

FARRER PARK SHOPHOUSE SOLD @ $8 MILLION 5 MONTHS AFTER $4.3 MILLION PURCHASE

0

Months after a shophouse at Farrer Park’s Kitchener Road was bought at a value of $4.3 million, it was sold for a price of $8 million.

This transaction meant that the seller profited an amount of close to $3.7 million.

Initially bought in Jan 2022

In the month of January 2022, the shophouse which is located at 147 Kitchener Road was bought by Pack Wan, a company that was created in August 2021.

The then purchase price of $4.3 million was the price which was valued in August 2021.

History

The shophouse at 147 Kitchener road had been there since it was built in 1920, and is now currently facing City Square Mall and Residences.

City Square mall has an underground link to Farrer Park MRT station.

Who bought the shophouse?

The latest owner of the shophouse is revealed to be  Eng Teng Association, which is one of the more established Hakka associations.

Previously, it was located at 132 Neil Road in a double-story conservation shophouse at 132 Neil Road.

It was then sold for $10.5 million.

Image source: Google Maps

COMPANY RAISES WORKERS’ SALARY BY 20%, THEN PASS OFF THAT INCREASE IN IN THEIR PRODUCT PRICES

0

A netizen posted a rant about an unspecified “clothing” company, revealing that they increased their employees’ salaries by 20-30% in order to retain them.

They then passed on that salary increase to their customers by increasing the prices of their products as well, by about 20-30%.

Here is what the netizen said

Question, is it fair to increase employees’ salary by 20-30% to retain them and pass of that increase to consumers by raising prices of clothing by the same % once you have established yourself as the dominant clothing brand in Singapore?

I’m pretty sure your profits are so high that you can afford to raise prices less – which is what attracted people to buy from you in the first place.

Something that used to cost $20 before June now suddenly has the prices raised to $30, and $30 to $40, etc.

Guess I’ll be buying less from you in the future to save the environment more, or taking my business elsewhere.

Netizens’ comments

  • flipping the question back to you: would you be happy if your employer chose to reduce/ freeze your pay increment just so they could keep their products “affordable”?
  • Is it fair to reduce the price by 20-30% to retain customers and pass the reduction to employees by reducing their salaries by the same %?
  • Don’t buy if you not happy lah. How do u judge whether it’s fair or not? Maybe they underpaid their staff for the longest time so it’s fair to raise their salary to market rate now?

GUY GOES TO ROLEX DEALER, TOLD HE NEEDS TO SPEND 6 FIGURES

0

So here is my experience today at my local Rolex AD.….Now, I knew what I was getting into but this just makes you shake your head.

About a month ago I walked into a local Rolex AD and decided to “put my name on the list” for a Rolex Pepsi on an oyster bracelet. I was asked if I had purchase history there and as a matter of fact I did.

However, it was 24 years ago when I purchased my Rolex at the start of my law enforcement career. They told me that was too long ago so it wouldn’t be in the system. No big deal and I left.

Today I was going to be by the store and decided to go by and take my original receipt to see if they can add it to their notes in the system. The nice Rolex sales person that helped me out a month ago and again today said that she would pass the information (a copy of the receipt) to the manager.

Now here is the part that makes you shake head at the current times in which the watch world is in… the nice sales lady tells me “I don’t think that receipt is going to make much of a difference. You need to have like a 6 figure spending history for the Rolex watch that you want.” Again, I know exactly what I got into when I put my name on that “list” and I’m not in a real hurry for the watch, but it’s sad that someone who has the money to spend on this particular watch will probably never get it from this Rolex AD since I haven’t spent 6 figures to get it.

Some might say get it from the grey market, but this particular Rolex watch is still a little high compared to the retail price. Any other brand or model I would definitely consider the grey market instead of getting it from this Rolex AD.

Image source: Unsplash, Google Maps

ALLEGED 6-HOUR STANDOFF WITH DRUG SUSPECTS, WITH DRONES & AIR PACK DEPLOYED

According to Facebook page Singapore Incidents, which cited a netizen called Chaotic Panda, there was an alleged 6-hour stand-off between the authorities and 3 alleged drug suspects.

Firefighting vehicles from the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) and police vehicles were seen at the site, parked at an open carpark in the area.

Unidentified personnel were also seen in the open area between two HDB buildings.

Police officers were also seen walking into a HDB block, along with two men who were carrying bags of unidentified gears and equipment.

The SCDF’s air pack was also seen deployed at the foot of the HDB building, and a drone was also seen flying overhead in the air.

SCDF personnel were also seen inside a couple of HDB units with the windows open, and a net was also deployed, covering a unit that was between them.

At the time of writing, not much information regarding the incident has been revealed (yet), save for online chatter and alleged presumptions.

Stay tuned to this page for more updates.

FULL VIDEO LOADING…

JOSS PAPERS SEEN FLYING EVERYWHERE, EVEN LAND ON ROOFTOP, WHILE BURNING

A video emerged online showing a huge group of people burning joss paper for the Hungry Ghost Festival, at what appears to be a designated joss paper area.

However, joss papers could be seen falling on the ground all over the place, with the joss papers strawen all over the sidewalk and roads.

Some of the joss paper could even be seen landing on the roof of a building nearby, as the group threw the jass papers up into the air.

The joss papers were then carried by the wind and scattered everywhere, as netizen online expressed their disapproval.

Netizens’ comments

  • As if this does something for the dead. It creates more chores for the cleaners nia.
  • Their ancestors must be very proud of them.
  • You throw a single cigarette butt, you end up paying a fine and slapped with a CWO. But these people will get away with this massive littering.
  • I hope this culture where we Singaporean brothers and sisters too who believe in what they are holding faith as burning and make offering..they can give more hong bao to those cleaning workers..not to the company but the person who cleaned up. Tqsm respect all those cleaners too..who will clean up
  • Wow u see so many spirit taking the money thanks 

FULL VIDEO LOADING…

MORE RETIREES IN S’PORE RETURN TO WORK, DUE TO RISING COSTS OF LIVING & LACK OF MANPOWER

0

More retirees are returning to work in some sectors, with Singapore dealing with inflation and rising costs of living, due to circumstances around the world, according to Channel NewsAsia on 10 August.

A 65-year-old who works at a hotel as a kitchen steward told CNA that Singapore is “not a cheap place to live”, and added that he has to continue working to support his daily life and pay his bills.

He had previously retired from his last job 12 years ago and is now 3 months into his new job.

CNA reported that about 75% of older workers in Singapore intend to work past the retirement age of 63, citing a study by Milieu Insight.

The Ministry of Manpower also raised the retirement age to 63, and the re-employment age to 68; with employers being foreseen to be looking toward more experienced employees, according to The Straits Times.

They said that they believe older and skilled workers will be encouraged to rejoin the workforce due to a need for them.

CNA also reported that over 90% of eligible seniors have been offered re-employment at 62 years old.

6 TRAINEE LAWYERS WHO CHEATED IN BAR EXAMS, WITHDRAW APPLICATIONS TO PRACTICE LAW

0

It was previously reported earlier this year, that 11 trainee lawyers were revealed to have cheated in their Bar exams back in 2020.

Their applications to the Bar (which decides their eligibility to practice law in Singapore), were delayed by a judge.

Their actions were slammed and criticised, with even Minister of Law and Home Affairs, K Shanmugam, weighing in on the controversy.

Six of the eleven cheaters, have since withdrew their applications yesterday (15 August) to practice law in Singapore.

They were granted permission to do so by a High Court judge, who advised them to continue working in the legal industry, so that they can find a suitable mentor and see if they can reapply to the Bar in future.

The six cheaters are namely:

  • Lynn Kuek Yi Ting
  • Matthew Chow Jun Feng
  • Lionel Wong Choong Yoong
  • Monisha Devaraj
  • Kushal Atul Shah
  • Sreeraam Ravenderan

Recap

6 cheaters initially found at first

Six trainee lawyers who cheated in the bar exams in 2020, had their admission into the legal profession delayed.

Justice Choo Han Teck said in his grounds of decision on 18 April, that he will not be naming the 6 of them in the hope that they will not be prejudiced in the long run.

He said that dishonesty is a big problem but it would also be harsh to end their professional career before it has even begun.

The six cheaters were among 26 trainee lawyers who had applied for admission to the bar last Wednesday.

Law graduates have to pass a set of exams called Part B to be admitted to the bar, in order to practise law in Singapore.

Also, the lawyer who wants to be admitted into the bar must not have any objection from the Attorney-General, Singapore Institute of Legal Education (SILE) and Law Society of Singapore.

The six trainees’ application was objected to by the Attorney-General, citing their lack of honesty and integrity for cheating.

The six of them have since passed their required exams after retaking it.

5 more revealed to have cheated

It was previously reported that 6 trainee lawyers had cheated in their bar exams in 2020, and had their admission into the legal profession delayed.

However, the Attorney-General’s Chambers spoke to Straits Times on 19 April, saying that they are considering the applications by 5 other candidates who cheated in their bar exam in 2020.

This means that the total number of trainee lawyers who cheated in their bar exams now stands at 11.

The spokesperson who spoke to ST said that this is the first time the AGC has objected to applications for admission to the bar for cheating in the exams.

The spokesperson said that the Attorney-General feels that these trainee lawyers are not currently fit to be admitted to be solicitors of the Supreme Court.

She added that their misconduct demonstrates their lack of key qualities such as honesty and integrity that is required of every lawyer.

MAN UPSET AFTER BEING REJECTED BY 2 GIRLS, SLASHED THEM WITH KNIFE IN PUBLIC SQUARE

0

A 21-year-old man in China was arrested by the Chinese police after slashing two girls with a knife at a public square.

He was apparently upset at them for rejecting his advances.

A video of the horrific attack made the rounds on Weibo, a Chinese social media network, showing the man hacking away at a girl who was lying down on the ground, motionless.

He was seen in the video (wearing white) hacking the girl who was on the ground, while numerous bystanders stood and watch.

None of them stepped forward to help the victim or stop him, presumably afraid of getting attacked themselves.

According to Apple Daily, the two victims are aged just 13 and 14 years old.

The man, identified as Zhang, allegedly tried to strike up a conversation with them but was turned down, and he then got upset and attacked them.

The police rushed to the scene and subdued Zhang, with the help of some members of the public, and the girls were then sent to the hospital.

The two girls are in stable condition with no life-threatening injuries.

FULL VIDEO LOADING (warning: viewer discretion is advised)

Image source: Twitter and HK01