29.1 C
Singapore
Sunday, August 30, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 4669

WP’S SENGKANG TOWN COUNCIL HAD NO BIDS IN TENDER, TO MANAGE CONSTITUENCY DIRECTLY

0

Sengkang GRC said in a statement on Facebook that the Sengkang Town Council will transit completely to direct management in 2023 after receiving no bids in a managing agent tender.

The three-week tender exercise was held from 8 April to 29 April.

Here is what Sengkang GRC said

SENGKANG TOWN COUNCIL RECEIVES NO BIDS IN MANAGING AGENT TENDER, WILL TRANSIT COMPLETELY TO DIRECT MANAGEMENT IN 2023

After receiving no bids in a tender exercise for a Managing Agent (MA) in April, Sengkang Town Council (SKTC) will directly manage all divisions within Sengkang Town when the current management period of the remaining incumbent MA comes to an end in 2023.

As is publicly known, Sengkang GRC is a GRC formed shortly before General Election 2020. It comprises the Buangkok, Compassvale and Rivervale divisions, formerly part of Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC and Punggol East SMC (previously managed by EM Services under Pasir Ris-Punggol TC); and the Anchorvale division, formerly Sengkang West SMC (previously managed by CPG Facilities Management under Ang Mo Kio TC).

SKTC was established on 30 July 2020 and inherited the two MA contracts from the predecessor TCs. As announced earlier, Anchorvale division has been directly managed by SKTC since 31 October 2021, with day-to-day operations handled by staff hired directly by SKTC.

The other divisions of Sengkang GRC are being managed by EM Services, whose MA contract is due to expire on 31 January 2023. As a matter of prudence, SKTC called a tender for MA services for Buangkok, Compassvale and Rivervale divisions in April, well in advance of the expiry date. At the close of the MA tender on 29 April 2022, no bids were received.

Given the circumstances, Sengkang Town Councillors deliberated on this matter and voted to transit into direct management of SKTC, after the management period of EM Services comes to an end. Till the expiry of its contract, EM Services will continue to provide its services to SKTC. SKTC would like to convey its appreciation to EM Services for its years of service to Sengkang residents.

SKTC and in particular, the MPs for Sengkang GRC, would like to assure all Sengkang residents that continuity of services is an utmost priority. With the experience gained from directly managing Anchorvale division, and more than eight months to the handover of the Buangkok, Compassvale and Rivervale divisions from EM Services, SKTC is confident of a smooth transition, and its ability to deliver the standards of service that Sengkang residents have come to expect.

Sengkang Town Council

17 May 2022

WIFE WANTS TO LEAVE HUSBAND OVER CHEATING PRANK

0

Want to know if I am over reacting.

My husband told me a week ago that he has been cheating on me since the start of the year and is in love with someone else. I was very distraught. Wasn’t eating for days. Not proud of it but was self harming, which he was aware of because he caught me doing it.

Then he ended up showing me a video and he had recorded my reaction and called it a cheating prank! Turns out the messages he showed me he sent her were to another discord account he created. He was going to post it to youtube to try to get views but I threatened to sue him (fortunately he believed it) so he didn’t.

I want to leave him because he knew how much it hurt me, I even missed work for a few days and he knew I was self harming. He comes across as a sadistic person and even now he says I’m making a big deal and have no sense of humor.

Would you guys do the same in my shoes or should I try to move past this?

Here are what netizens think:

  • Pranks don’t last days and cause this much pain. That’s horrible that he would watch you agonize for days for “views”.
  • I would leave him. Don’t let him tell you that you are overreacting. He caused you great harm and was laughing about it, that’s really abusive in my opinion. He was aware that you did not eat and that you hurt yourself and he didn’t even then tell you it was a prank. He sounds batshit crazy and I wouldn’t be surprised if he actually also did cheat.
  • Christ, well this ‘prank’ went wrong. He let it go on way too long and is horrible. I don’t blame you leave the manchild
  • You aren’t overreacting. You are valid in your emotions. If this crossed a line for you, and you want to explore leaving as an option then go ahead. It sounds like he didn’t take your emotions into consideration at all, and the worst part is that he let it fester. Something definitely needs to be done even if you don’t leave. But you are not overreacting!

GLASS PANEL AT TAMPINES 1 SHATTERS INJURING ONE SHOPPER

An unfortunate incident happened at Tampines 1 where a glass panel shattered and injured one of the shoppers.

The incident happened at around 5.30PM on May 15, The glass panel near a bubble tea shop on level two of the shopping mall landed on the first floor.

The shop was located directly above Toast Box and it is believed that one person was injured by the glass shards.

A TikTok user who witnessed the incident said that the glass was quickly cleaned up and operation resume as per normal after 1 hour.

Full Video Loading…

@sharonebi

♬ Oh No (Instrumental) – Kreepa

Here is what the TikTok user said:

The glass broke around the evening at 5.30ish. There was a loud smash and it attracted a huge crowd. I don’t think anybody got hur. The shards were scattered across lvl 1 and b1 (toastbox area), but the store clerks & mall mgmt were quick to clear it up.

CYCLIST LEAVES NOTE FOR BICYCLE THIEF: “I GIVE YOU 2 DAYS TO RETURN”

A disgruntled cyclist apparently had his bicycle stolen by a thief and had “evidence” to back up his claims.

The cyclist then left a note with a warning message to the thief, giving the thief two days to return it to where it was stolen from.

Here is what the note said

“Hi, you stole my bike. Don’t deny, I have changed certain parts with evidence.

I give you two days to return to where you took it from, if not, since I know its here, I will provide info to the (police). 2 days max, don’t be a *word torn off*”

Potential penalties

The offense of theft under Section 379 of the Penal Code, Chapter 224 carries a jail term of up to 3 years, or a fine, or both.

TAXI BEATS RED LIGHT IN THE RAIN, BECAUSE RUSHING TO FETCH YAN LUO WANG

A video emerged online showing a red coloured TransCab taxi blatantly beating a red light at a traffic junction.

the incident happened along Woodlands Avenue 7 on 15 May, at about 4.11pm, and was captured on the dashcam of another car waiting at the red light.

The taxi was seen in the video powering through the red light, under the pouring rain, as other vehicles stopped.

Potential penalties

It is an offence to beat a red light in Singapore

Drivers found guilty of failing to conform to traffic light signals face a composition fine of $400 for light vehicles and $500 for heavy vehicles.

They also face 12 demerit points and if a driver accumulates 24 or more demerit points within 24 months, their license will be suspended.

Netizens’ comments

  • OMG! This is very very dangerous especially when it’s raining, why take risk? Damn it.
  • Send tp.this kind of cb don’t give him chance
  • Give this taxi driver to jiak sai

YET ANOTHER FIRE BROKE OUT AGAIN, THIS TIME AT JALAN BUKIT MERAH

A fire broke out earlier today at about 11.35pm at Block 117 Jalan Bukit Merah, with about 35 persons being evacuated from the neighbouring units as a precautionary measure.

Nobody was injured in the fire, and the preliminary cause of the fire has been indicated to be of an electrical origin.

Here is what the SCDF said on Facebook

[Fire @ Block 117 Jalan Bukit Merah]

Earlier today (17 May) at about 11.35am, SCDF was alerted to a fire at the abovementioned location.

Upon the arrival of SCDF firefighters, thick black smoke could be seen emitting from a unit on the 9th floor.

SCDF firefighters wearing breathing apparatus sets had to conduct forcible entry to gain access into the unit. No one was in the unit. The fire which involved the contents of a bedroom was extinguished with one water jet.

About 35 persons were evacuated from neighbouring units as a precautionary measure. There were no reported injuries.

Preliminary investigation into the cause of the fire indicates that it was due to electrical origin.

JAPAN TO START ALLOWING SINGAPORE TOURISTS TO ENTER FROM THIS MONTH

According to Tourism Minister Tetsuo Saito, the Japanese government will perform a test this month to evaluate if the country can safely admit foreign tourists in the midst of the COVID-19 outbreak.

Due to COVID-19 border regulations, foreign visitors are now not permitted to enter Japan. Foreign travellers in small groups on package trips will be permitted for the exam.

3 Vaccination dose

Visitors from the United States, Australia, Thailand, and Singapore who have gotten three vaccine doses will be permitted to visit the country for tourism purposes

Visitors must pay their own medical insurance and participate in government-approved packaged excursions with predefined itineraries. They will be escorted by a tour guide the entire time.

This will be Japan’s trial before opening up the country to the rest of the world.

POLICE WARN OF RANSOMWARE “MAGNIBER” THROUGH FAKE WINDOWS UPDATE

0

The Singapore Police and the Cyber Security Agency (CSA) would like to warn the public about a ransomware version known as “Magniber,” which is delivered via false Windows OS updates and results in the encryption of data on the victims’ devices (s).

Ransomware is a form of virus that encrypts files on a system and demands a ransom payment to recover the files. In recent weeks, the Police and CSA have received reports of victims’ data being encrypted with the “Magniber” ransomware after they downloaded and executed malware disguised as Windows OS updates. If the victims sought to recover access to their data, a ransom letter would be presented demanding payment in the form of cryptocurrency such as Bitcoin.

Early reports of the “Magniber” ransomware version revealed that the ransomware was spreading via Internet Explorer vulnerabilities. It began to spread over other Internet browsers such as Microsoft Edge and Chrome in late 2021 to early 2022. According to sources, the ransomware might be disseminated through websites that sell pirated or cracked software, i.e. warez and cracked sites. Inadvertently downloading and installing such software may expose victims to the following risks:

  1. Encryption of users’ data and demand for ransom to decrypt the data;
  2. Theft and subsequent misuse of personal data such as details of their bank accounts / credit cards, social media accounts, photos and videos stored in devices. Attackers can also use such data to access the victims’ financial and social media accounts to steal money and/or impersonate victims to commit credit card frauds, scams and extortion using information such as the photos and videos obtained;
  3. Allowing attackers to gain remote control of their devices, resulting in the loss of data and/or control over devices; and
  4. Slowdown of the devices’ performance due to possible unauthorised processes invoked by the malware infection (e.g. crypto-jacking).

How it looks like

111 WOMEN ARRESTED AFTER ANTI-VICE RAIDS AT MASSAGE & HOTELS

An islandwide operation was conducted by the Criminal Investigation Department and the seven Police Land Divisions against vice activities in Singapore.

The Police have arrested 111 women, aged between 20 and 50, and a 58-year-old man for their suspected involvement in vice-related activities.

Types of premise raided:

  • condominiums
  • massage establishments
  • hotels
  • residential units

Areas raided

  • Balestier Road
  • Bedok
  • Bukit Batok
  • Geylang
  • Jalan Besar
  • Lavender Street
  • Lorong Kilat
  • Sembawang Road
  • Upper Paya Lebar Road
  • Upper Serangoon
  • Yishun

Penalties:

Any person who, in the course of business, uses a remote communication service with a Singapore link to offer or facilitate the provision by a woman or girl to another person of sexual services in Singapore in return for payment or reward, shall be guilty of an offence and shall on conviction to a fine not exceeding $100,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years or to both.

Where the person is a repeat offender, he will be liable on conviction, to a fine not exceeding $150,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding seven years or to both.

139 ENTERTAINMENT ESTABLISHMENTS CHECKED, 4 BEING INVESTIGATED

0

Between 4 May 2022 and 10 May 2022, the Police, in collaboration with the Singapore Tourism Board (“STB”), Enterprise Singapore (“Enterprise SG”), and the Singapore Land Authority (“SLA”), conducted island-wide enforcement checks on 139 public entertainment outlets as part of ongoing efforts to ensure the safe resumption of nightlife businesses in Singapore.

During these operations, three licensed and unlicensed public entertainment establishments were discovered to have violated the Public Entertainments Act of 1958 and the Liquor Control (Supply and Consumption) Act of 2015. The operators of these establishments are being investigated.

Serangoon Road

An establishment on Serangoon Road was discovered to be operating with recorded music and supplying booze across two distinct premises. The operator, however, only had a legal public entertainment licence for one of these units and a legitimate liquor licence for the other.

The operator of the establishment is being investigated for offering public entertainment without a legal license under the Public Entertainments Act of 1958, as well as distributing liquor without a valid license under the Liquor Control (Supply and Consumption) Act of 2015.

Circuit Road

Another establishment on Circular Road was discovered to be playing recorded music loudly from a pair of speakers positioned on the roof of its outside sitting area.

The outlet’s public entertainment licence does not allow recorded music to be disseminated outside of its indoor facilities, the operator is being investigated for violating public entertainment license terms under the Public Entertainments Act 1958.

Penalties:

The offences of providing public entertainment without a valid licence and supplying liquor without a valid licence each carry a fine of up to $20,000, while the offence of contravening public entertainment licensing conditions carries a fine not exceeding $10,000.

For non-compliance with safe distancing measures under the COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) (Reopening – Control Order) Regulations 2022, individuals found guilty may be jailed for up to six months, fined up to S$10,000, or both.