29.1 C
Singapore
Saturday, September 5, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 4805

GAMBAS ACCIDENT SURVIVOR WANTED TO HELP OTHER VICTIM, DESPITE BEING INJURED

The now-infamous Gambas Avenue traffic accident saw 24-year-old Foodpanda rider, Jason Tan, killed after trying to evade a van that switched lanes abruptly and crashing into another motorcyclist, before being run over by another lorry.

The other motorcyclist, Muhammad Aliff, survived; and his mother, Sarah Widjaya, said in a Facebook post that according to witnesses, her son wanted to help Tan despite being critically injured himself.

According to MSNews, who spoke to Aliff’s cousin, Nur Sarah Norazam, Aliff is currently in the ICU following 3 major operations.

Here is what she said on Facebook

It took me some time before I made up my mind to write this down. My apologies but it’s going to be a really long post.

I am not being insensitive here but i need to say this aloud. Everyone is talking about the super 4 rider who passed on at Gambas Avenue.

Yes, I do feel sad for the family lost, the unborn child. My condolences.

What about the R15 rider who was conveyed to the hospital. All I see in every news is 20 years old man conveyed to hospital conscious. Nothing else about him, not even his name.

Did anyone even ask what happened to him? He was so at the wrong place and wrong time. Yes he did not have a wife nor an unborn child.

Let me pour my heart out. Muhammad Alif just had his birthday the day before. He comes from a sibling of 5. He is a nurse.

Witness of the accident told us when he arrived nobody attended to him and he was all alone on the road till these two kind soul came to help.

We even viewed the view cam. Even in such pain, all he keeps on mentioning is he wants to stand up and help the other rider. Paramedic took 25mins to arrive to render help.

Upon reaching the hospital, the doctor says he only has a 50-50 chance of survival as he has really bad internal bleeding, crushed left pelvic, broken ribs, broken wrist, a hole in his left elbow, lots of laceration n a torn lips.

He was warded in ICU. He has gone through 3 major surgery so far and many more to go. Surgery after surgery is mentally n financially heavy for the family. It’s not an easy thing for the family as we are really close to each other.

What happened to his career? Will he be able to perform his career anymore as he loves helping others? Will he be able to do normal simple chores like he used to? What will happen to his future? Did anyone even ask how he was doing?

He is taking it so hard to accept his fate. He is emotionally disturbed and traumatized. He is worried about being a burden to his family.

I am his mom. It breaks my heart to see my child in that situation. I rather it be me in that hospital bed suffering.

Every time he shouts in pain and cries, I try to hide my tears. It shattered all of us as Alif always put others above him and hide all his unhappiness.

He never wants to bother us about his pain or problems. We have been by his hospital bed day and night.

Even though I am very angry and sad, I thank god for giving us another chance to be with him.

Images source: Nur Sarah Norazam via MSNews

Recap

GANGSTERS FIGHTING AT GOLDEN MILE, FIGHT FROM ROAD TO THE MALL

A video emerged online showing a large group of gangsters fighting at Golden Mile, with the men fighting from the taxi stand to the entrance of the mall.

Two men were seen raining blows on a man in white, throwing him onto the ground before punching and kicking him on his head while he was down.

Humpty and Dumpty then raced towards the walkway of shops at the mall entrance to fight with another group of men.

One of them was then tackled down onto the ground as the group rained blows on him.

Potential penalties

According to Chapter 224 of the Penal Code, anyone who disturbs public peace by fighting in public is guilty of committing an affray.

Upon conviction, offenders could face a jail term of up to one year and/or a fine of up to $5,000.

According to Chapter 321 of the Penal Code, anyone who performs an act that causes hurt to a person is guilty of Voluntarily Causing Hurt.

Upon conviction, offenders could face a jail term of up to 3 years and/or a fine of up to $5,000.

FULL VIDEO LOADING…

MFA HELPING S’POREANS STUCK IN SHANGHAI LOCKDOWN WITH FOOD & ESSENTIALS

0

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) said in a press release that they are providing assistance to Singaporeans who are stuck in Shanghai amidst the city’s current lockdown.

MFA has been reaching out to Singaporeans there and responding to their concerns, and the Consulate-General is also helping them access food and essentials.

The MFA also urged Singaporeans in Shanghai to e-register with the MFA, as the Consulate-General is monitoring the situation very closely and keeping in touch with the local authorities there.

Here is what MFA said:

In response to media queries on the consular assistance to Singaporeans in Shanghai, the MFA Spokesperson said:

“The Singapore Consulate-General in Shanghai has been reaching out to Singaporeans and responding to their queries and concerns during the lockdown in Shanghai.  The Consulate-General is closely monitoring the situation and in touch with the local authorities. The Consulate-General has been updating Singaporeans regularly on the evolving COVID-19 situation in Shanghai, including through a list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), and has convened a virtual town hall meeting on 12 April 2022. The Consulate-General is also providing assistance to Singaporeans such as helping them source for essential supplies or replenish medication, sending food packs to those who are unable to obtain food on their own, and facilitating exit permits for Singaporeans to return to Singapore for urgent reasons.

Singaporeans who can still access delivery services may try purchasing essential supplies through online applications and participating in group buys within their residential compounds.  They may also seek assistance through their neighbourhood residence committees. Singaporeans can refer to the relevant Shanghai authority’s official WeChat account for information on available vendors for supplies. Singaporeans who are unable to obtain essential supplies despite these efforts can contact the Consulate-General for assistance.

The current COVID situation in Shanghai is rapidly evolving. While the Consulate-General remains under lockdown, Singaporeans in Shanghai who require consular assistance may reach the Consulate-General via the emergency hotline +86 138 0194 9439 or email address [email protected].  Singaporeans can also approach the 24-hour MFA Duty Office at +65 6379 8800/8855.  We urge all Singaporeans who are currently in Shanghai to e-register with MFA at https://eregister.mfa.gov.sg/ if they have not already done so.”

.     .     .     .     .

MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS

SINGAPORE

13 APRIL 2022

WOMAN ARRESTED FOR SELLING BRANDED BAG SCAM

0

A 32-year-old woman has been detained on suspicion of being involved in a number of e-commerce scams.

Between March 13 and April 11, 2022, the Police received several reports from individuals who claimed to have been duped by an internet merchant who offered the sale of cheap luxury bags. The merchant reportedly failed to deliver the goods after the victims made payment via bank transfers.

Officers from the Ang Mo Kio Police Division uncovered the woman’s identity and arrested her on April 13, 2022. According to preliminary investigations, the lady is reportedly implicated in other similar crimes.

On 14 April 2022, the lady will be accused in court of cheating under Section 420 of the Penal Code 1871.

Penalties:

If the woman is found guilty of cheating she can face a jail sentence of 10 years and a fine.

For more information on scams, members of the public can visit scamalert.sg or call the Anti-Scam Hotline at 1800-722-6688. Anyone with information on such scams may call the Police Hotline at 1800-255-0000 or submit information online at www.police.gov.sg/iwitness.

2 MEN WERE CHARGED WITH MONEY LAUNDERING OF S$300,000

0

Two men, aged 24 and 34, was charged in court yesterday (13 April 2022) for their suspected involvement in offences related to assisting another to retain benefits from criminal conduct and handling of benefits of criminal conduct.

24-year-old man

The Police were alerted in November 2018 that criminal proceeds arising from overseas investment fraud were credited into corporate and personal bank accounts in Singapore.

The personal bank account had received almost $300,000 in illegal profits. Preliminary investigations indicated that the 24-year-old man reportedly created a personal bank account but abandoned control of it in exchange for a fee, despite having grounds to think it would be used to maintain another person’s illicit profits.

The 24-year-old male was therefore charged with one count under Section 44 of Chapter 65A of the Corruption, Drug Trafficking, and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act.

34-year-old man

It was also found that part of the illicit gains in the personal account were allegedly withdrawn by the 34-year-old man, who obtained the 24-year-old man’s debit card despite the fact that they were strangers. He reportedly took $22,000 from his own bank account and gave money to unknown persons. He also allegedly withdrew $5,675 and spent it on fancy products.

The funds he had removed were thought to be the proceeds of illegal activity. As a result, he was charged with violating Section 47 of the Corruption, Drug Trafficking, and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act, Chapter 65A.

Money Laundering

The offence of entering into an arrangement having reason to believe that the retention of benefits of criminal conduct would be facilitated, under Section 44 of the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act Chapter 65A [1], carries a fine of up to $500,000 and/or a jail term not exceeding 10 years.

The offence of transferring or using property having reason to believe that the property is, or in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, represents another person’s benefits from criminal conduct, under Section 47 of the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act Chapter 65A [2], carries a fine of up to $500,000 and/or a jail term not exceeding 10 years.

FOOD DELIVERY RIDER ALLEGEDLY STOLE CUSTOMER’S FOOD FOR HIMSELF

A home-based food business, 6A’s Kitchen, shared on Facebook alleging that a food delivery rider took the food for his own consumption instead of delivering it to the customer.

Here is what they said

Im not sure if the rider who took our food is going to see this..

Im sorry if my following sentence is uncomfortable for anyone. But this rider is supposed to deliver our food that one of our customer purchase.

Instead of delivering them,he actually took them for his own consumption. Please don’t be an i—- to do so especially during Ramadan.

I can be nice. But at the same time im also nasty.

Don’t ask me to contact him personally as he gave a different number for me to contact. Its not nice to do this.

Don’t.. Just don’t be an i—- to do this kind of thing. My language can be much worst than this but yes my sentence is still nice enough.

We do understand some of you all are wondering maybe we are just trying to frame the rider. He could be just placing the food there or there is no proof stating he took the food.

And here we updated showing that he walk away with the food. We are using 3rd party service for our delivery.

Hence its always random people who come and collect the food from us to get our food sent to our customers.

No its not our intention to just happily shame or frame someone. But out of frustration as its our customer’s order. And customer actually paid for it and waited for the food for their break fast.

Imagine if you all place your order early and get your food late? It would have caused frustration to you guys as well.

And that is what our customer felt when he received notification that food was delivered,but they are just standing there waiting for their food still.

Called the number stated.. Yes we did.. But num stated is a chinese lady,while the rider is a malay guy.

We won’t say all the rider who help us delivered our food is the same as majority of them are nice people. Its just 1-2 who is unreasonable.

MAN ARRESTED AFTER BREAKING INTO HOME AT YISHUN

0

According to the Police media release, a 32-year-old man has been arrested for his suspected involvement in a case of housebreaking and theft.

The incident happened on 9 April 2022 at about 8.50 am, the Police were contacted to a case of housebreaking at a residential unit along Yishun Avenue 9. A handbag, mobile phone and cash amounting to about $500 were purportedly stolen.

Through ground enquiries and with the aid of Police cameras, officers from Woodlands Police Division established the identity of the man and arrested him on 11 April 2022.

The man will be charged in court on 13 April 2022 with housebreaking and theft under Section 451 of the Penal Code 1871. The offence carries an imprisonment term up to 10 years and a fine.

The Police would like to advise all property owners to adopt the following crime prevention measures:

  • Secure all doors, roller shutters, windows and other openings with good quality grilles and closed-shackle padlocks when leaving your premises unattended, even for a short while;
  • Install a burglar alarm, motion sensor light and/or CCTVs, to cover the access points into your premises. Ensure that the systems are tested periodically and in good working condition; and
  • Refrain from keeping large sums of cash in your premises.

$300K WORTH OF VAPES & COMPONENTS SEIZED AT TUAS CHECKPOINT

The Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) issued a joint press release with the Health Sciences Authority (HSA) earlier today detailing the seizure of more than $300,000 worth of vaporisers and components at Tuas Checkpoint.

Here is what ICA said

More Than $300,000 Worth of Electronic Vaporisers and Components Seized at Tuas Checkpoint

            On 5 and 7 April 2022, Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA) officers at Tuas Checkpoint detected 1,200 electronic vaporisers (e-vaporisers) and more than 49,000 e-vaporiser related components concealed in various compartments of three Malaysian-registered lorries entering Singapore. The street value of the seized e-vaporisers and components is estimated to be more than $300,000. 

Details of the cases 

2.          On 5 April, ICA officers foiled an attempt to smuggle 1,200 pieces of disposable e-vaporisers into Singapore via a Malaysian-registered lorry transporting resin.  The officers had directed the lorry for further checks and uncovered the disposable e-vaporisers hidden behind the driver and passenger’s seats, and below the passenger’s leg rest area.

3.          On 7 April, ICA officers foiled two other attempts to smuggle e-vaporiser refill pods into Singapore via two Malaysia-registered lorries.  In the first attempt, officers found black bags hidden behind the driver and passenger’s seats and uncovered a total of 36,270 e-vaporisers refill pods. In the second attempt, officers uncovered several bundles of black trash bags containing 13,125 pieces of e-vaporiser refill pods concealed underneath a blanket behind the driver and passenger’s seats.

4.          Please refer to the Annex for photos of the seized items.

5.          All three cases were referred to HSA for further investigation. Five Malaysian male subjects between the age of 21 and 51 years old are currently assisting HSA in the investigation. 

Penalties for such offences in Singapore              

6.          HSA would like to remind the public that the Tobacco (Control of Advertisements and Sale) Act prohibits the import, distribution, sale or offer for sale of imitation tobacco products. These include shisha tobacco, smokeless tobacco, chewing tobacco such as Gutkha, Khaini, Zarda, e-vaporisers and their accessories. Any person convicted of an offence is liable to a fine of up to $10,000, or imprisonment of up to six months or both for the first offence, and a fine of up to $20,000, or imprisonment of up to 12 months or both for the second or subsequent offence. All prohibited tobacco items will be seized and confiscated.

Consumer advisory

7.          The purchase, use and possession of e-vaporisers is prohibited. Information pertaining to prohibited tobacco products in Singapore is available on the HSA website and more details about the harms of e-vaporisers can be found in this HealthHub article.

8.          Members of the public who have information on the illegal import, distribution, sale or offer for sale of e-vaporisers can submit a report conveniently using the online form at www.go.gov.sg/reporttobaccooffences.  Alternatively, they can contact HSA’s Tobacco Regulation Branch at Tel: 6684 2036 or 6684 2037 during office hours (9:00am to 5:30pm, Monday to Friday).

9.          Safeguarding Singapore’s borders is the top priority for ICA. Similar concealment methods may also be used by terrorists to smuggle security items into Singapore. ICA will continue to conduct security checks to detect and deter smuggling attempts, to keep Singapore safe.

300,000 SIGNATURES WERE COLLECTED TO FREE SAM KE TING WITHIN 24 HOURS

0

Over 300,000 petition signatures has been collected in less than a day calling for the release and justice for Sam Ke Ting.

Sam is a woman who was sentenced to 6 years in jail after an accident after the court found her guilty and responsible for the death of 8 teenagers who wrote modified bicycles in Johor.

According to China Daily , the Johor Bahru High Court today overturned the acquittal verdict of the Magistrate’s Court and ruled that the defendant Shen Ke ting was found guilty. She was then taken away by the policewoman in handcuffs.

She was sentenced to 6 years in prison, fined RM6,000, and had her driver’s license will be suspended for 3 years from the time she is released.

Petition

At least 4 petitions appeared online at Change.org after the final judgement, one of the petitions were titled

Bebaskan Sam Ke Ting daripada pertuduhan memandu secara melulu #FreeSamKeTing

Malaysians were horrified by the sentence of Sam as Malaysian roads are not well known for being brightly lit and netizens are pointing out that the death of the children were because of bad parenting.

GF INSIST THAT WEDDING RING MUST BE MORE THAN 1 MONTH OF BF’S SALARY

0

In a world where people like to show off, people often spend more than they can afford in buying luxury items just because it is expensive and helps boost their ego.

But deep down they are just shallow people and manipulated by marketing and advertisements.

A man recently shared how his girlfriend demanded a wedding ring from him based on the price of the ring and not based on design or other reasons.

Here is what he said:

My girlfriend insists that her future wedding ring should cost at least 1 month of my salary (3k and above). I personally don’t think it’s worth to spend so much on a diamond ring. Would love to hear your opinions.

Hmm i’ve not thought about it that way, cutting the marriage budget for the ring. I have tried telling her how the money can be put to better use but she still wants 1 month salary worth.

Here are what netizens think:

  • on one hand you would want the ring to last a long time, on the other hand, no i don’t think setting a minimum price for how much your wedding ring should cost should be a hill to die on
  • We got cheapo rings back then. This year we are celebrating our 10th wedding anniversary and she has been my pillar of strength when the going gets tough.
  • Get married when you’re unemployed so your monthly salary at that time is $0. 5head
  • I think it’s definitely reasonable to suggest lab grown diamonds. There is no practical difference (besides the price) for the most part and most people won’t be able to tell them apart. Using value as a reason for your worth is nonsensical to me, you should already know your worth from day to day interactions with your partner. And, there are better things you can do with that money to feel your ‘worth’. And wanting a natural diamond ring essentially only benefits the corporations that have been marketing it for years, i think it’s nice to have a conversation diving deeper into it