31.5 C
Singapore
Friday, September 11, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 4896

VIETNAM WOMAN CUTS OFF “KKJ” OF HUSBAND AFTER DISCOVERING HE ASSUALTED DAUGHTER

As she claimed to have seen her husband sexually abusing her 15-year-old daughter on camera, a lady took a knife to his genitals, completely cutting his penis and testicles.

The 36-year-old lady, identified in local media as Ha Thi N., threw her husband’s cut genitals away and turned herself in to auth

Her husband, a 29-year-old male named Nguyen Van H., was rushed to Son La General Hospital for emergency care at 5.30 a.m. on Sunday, with his blood pressure rapidly dropping and a massive open wound in his crotch.

According to a post on the hospital’s Facebook page, he is presently in stable condition, although his injuries are complicated. His penis, as well as both testicles, were entirely lopped off around the base. Doctors think reattachment will be impossible due to the severity of the injuries and the fact that the severed components are still missing.

H. Yen Chau police are also clarifying information that Ms. N. believes that Mr. H. has abused her 15-year-old stepdaughter. This unit has seized the camera placed by Ms. N. in the bedroom, which is believed to contain important evidence when recording the image of Mr. H. abusing Ms. N.’s stepchild, to serve the investigation.

Common in Vietnam

Last year, a 40-year-old man in Vietnam successfully reattached his severed penis after his wife cut it off with scissors while he was sleeping. Penises being amputated by “jealous wives or girlfriends” was one of the top reasons for penis amputations handled in the hospital, according to a doctor involved in the case at the time.

MAN SHOUTS AT POLICE AT ION ORCHARD: “USE YOUR GUN AND SHOOT ME LA!”

A video emerged online showing the mayhem and commotion that took place at ION Orchard during the launch of the Omega x Swatch collection on 26 March.

The police were seen in the video trying to manage the crowd, when a man wearing a black t-shirt shouted at the police.

He said:

“From 4am together leh. Then you cut us out like that. And then shout at us. We cooperate with the bloody brand manager. He ask us to move back, we move back. That’s why we are behind. And then you cut us behind. Then you all doing what?”

He then added in Chinese “USE YOUR GUN AND SHOOT ME LAH?”

FULL VIDEO LOADING…

17 Y.O THREATENS TO BOMB MRT AT HOUGANG STATION

0

A 17-year-old teenager got himself a lot of trouble after he tried to threaten passengers in a train with a bomb hoax.

Straits Times reported that the incident happened back in 2019 and the teen carried a bag and proclaim that it contained a bomb.

“Allahu Akbar”

He then announced to the passengers:

“Guys, inside my bag the… bomb… So, we’re going to bomb the whole station, and everybody inside the traingoing to die.”

He then placed the bag under the seat of the MRT and shouted “Allahu Akbar”.

The incident was later reported to the Police.

He pleaded guilty in court for his actions and more crimes of the teen was revealed by the media.

In Jan 2020, he stolen a gold chain that is worth almost $7,500 from a jewelry shop and later pawn it for $6,500.

In May 2021, he assualted a man in Hougang. The victim was sent to the hospital after getting hit in the face.

He will be back in court in May 23 for his sentencing.

Image Source: Google Maps

SHANMUGAM – MAN WHO WAS SHOT DEAD BY POLICE, WAS WANTED BY CNB

K Shanmugam, the Minister for Law and Home Affairs, said in a Facebook statement that the knife-wielding man who was shot dead by the police on 23 March, was wanted by CNB.

He was told to drop his knife during the confrontation but he ignored the orders and continued moving towards the officers, who first used their tasers but the man was not incapacitated.

One of the officers then fired at the man.

Here is his statement

[Knife-wielding man shot dead]

A man was shot on Wednesday, when he moved towards Police Officers with a knife. He was told to drop his knife but he ignored the instructions, and continued.

Officers first used their Tasers, but he was not incapacitated, and continued to come at the officers with the knife. One of the officers then fired a shot, hitting the man. The man has passed away.

The man is wanted by CNB. He has a history of drug abuse, and suspected drug apparatus was found in his flat. He was also under investigations for several offences, including rash act and voluntarily causing hurt to a police officer.

Most people understand Police actions in this case. But some have asked, whether it was possible to shoot to injure, rather than kill. Our officers are trained to fire at the centre of the body to stop an imminent threat of grievous hurt or death. This offers a higher probability of hitting and reduces risk of injury to innocent bystanders.

2 MEN ARRESTED FOR USING FAKE $10,000 NOTES AT PLAZA SING DBS BANK

On March 24, 2022, the police charged two males, ages 66 and 39, for their alleged involvement in a conspiracy to possess and use five counterfeit Singapore $10,000 notes as genuine notes.

The two men were at the DBS Bank at Plaza Singapura, No. 68 Orchard Road #B1-25, Singapore, on March 22, 2022, about 11 a.m., when the 66-year-old man reportedly submitted three Singapore $10,000 notes and one Singapore $1,000 note to the bank teller for deposit into his business bank account. The bank teller believed the $10,000 notes were counterfeit upon receiving them and only credited the $1,000 note to the company account.

After preliminary investigations, police were notified and both guys were arrested. 

Penalties

The Police take a serious view of any person found criminally involved in counterfeit currency. Below are the punishments for the more common offences related to counterfeit currency:

  • Forging or counterfeiting currency or bank notes under Section 489A of the Penal Code 1871 – punishable with an imprisonment term of up to 20 years, and a fine.
  • Using as genuine counterfeit currency notes under Section 489B of the Penal Code 1871 – punishable with an imprisonment term of up to 20 years, and a fine.
  • Possession of forged or counterfeit currency or bank notes under Section 489C of the Penal Code 1871 – punishable with an imprisonment term of up to 15 years, and a fine.
  • Making or possessing instruments or materials for forging or counterfeiting currency or bank notes under Section 489D of the Penal Code 1871 – punishable with an imprisonment of up to 20 years, and a fine.

ONG YE KUNG – LET’S SHOW OUR HEALTHCARE WORKERS SUPPORT

0

Minister of Health Ong Ye Kung said in a statement on Facebook addressing the recent news about the woman who lost her baby.

Here is the statement

I have just returned from my work trip to Malaysia. While there, I have been watching the NUH issue with deep concern.

I am very sorry to hear about the loss of baby Titus. As a parent myself, I can fully understand the anguish of the family.

I have discussed the matter with DMS Assoc Prof Kenneth Mak. We know that NUH has been in contact with the family and extending full support to them. MOH will work with NUH on a thorough investigation of the matter. We take a serious view of such incidents, and any lapses or shortcomings will be rectified. Any lessons will be shared with the rest of the healthcare system to ensure such incidents do not happen again.

However, whatever the outcome of the investigations, it is very important that we continue to support our healthcare workers.

Unfortunately, there have been more reports of abuse of healthcare workers recently. I seek everyone’s understanding that in this pandemic crisis, healthcare workers have been going through a very challenging and difficult time. On top of taking care of COVID-19 patients and subjecting themselves to risk, they have been doing their very best to ensure all emergency cases are properly attended to. Let’s continue to show them support and understanding, even as NUH fully investigates the matter.

100 PEOPLE ARRESTED FOR DRUG OFFENCES AFTER ISLAND WIDE RAID

0

Central Narcotics Bureau posted a Facebook post on an operation the lead to the arrest of 100 individualds.

Here is what CNB said:

In an island-wide operation from 14 to 23 March, CNB arrested 100 suspected drug offenders across Singapore in areas including Choa Chu Kang, Macpherson, Seng Kang and Tampines. A total of about 279g of heroin, 404g of ‘Ice’, 6,308g of cannabis, 237g of ketamine, 2g of new psychoactive substances, more than 709g of ‘Ecstasy’ tablets, 197 Erimin-5 tablets, 19 LSD stamps and 200ml of liquid suspected to contain GHB (gamma-hydroxybutyrate) were seized.

These drugs have an estimated street value of about $382,000. The youngest arrested is a 16-year-old male Singaporean for suspected drug abuse.

At one particular location in the vicinity of Jalan Damai, a 22-year-old man was arrested for suspected drug-related offences. About 3kg of cannabis was seized, along with other drugs, as well as several knives, a chopper and an airsoft gun which were found in his room.

He was then brought to his official place of residence nearby where various drug paraphernalia and another airsoft gun were seized.

AC Lim Fung Suan, Director of Enforcement Division Sector 2, said of the island-wide operation:

“CNB has worked tirelessly to stem the flow of drugs to keep Singapore safe. Our officers have put in a lot of hard work to bring drug offenders to justice, even amidst dangerous and unpredictable situations involving offenders who may turn violent against them. At CNB and the Home Team, we believe that drugs have no place in Singapore, and we are committed to keep our streets safe from drugs.”

Under Section 5 of the Misuse of Drugs Act, it is an offence for a person, on his or her own behalf, or on behalf of any other person, whether or not that other person is in Singapore, to traffic in a controlled drug, offer to traffic in a controlled drug; or to do or offer to do any act preparatory to or for the purpose of trafficking in a controlled drug.

If a person is found guilty of trafficking more than 15g of pure heroin (diamorphine), 250g of methamphetamine or 500g of cannabis, he or she may face the mandatory death penalty.

Investigations are ongoing.”

MAN WHO LEFT DUCKLAND WITHOUT PAYING, HAS RETURNED TO PAY THE BILL

Tunglok Group said in an update on Facebook that the customer who left their restaurant at PLQ Mall has returned to pay the bill that he owed.

Here is what they said

𝗚𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗥𝗲𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗻𝘀 𝗧𝗼 𝗗𝘂𝗰𝗸𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗧𝗼 𝗣𝗮𝘆 𝗛𝗶𝘀 𝗕𝗶𝗹𝗹

The guest who walked away from Duckland at PLQ Mall on 23 March made a return today. He came back asking for his bill of the half duck which he had ordered (and left behind) on his previous visit.

The same manager attended to him. They had a cordial conversation where, this time, the guest provided his feedback on the duck. He recalled having visited another branch of Duckland about 2 years ago and remembered the Irish duck to be fattier then. Hence he doubted that the duck he ordered this time was from Ireland.

We are glad to acknowledge his feedback. Indeed, he is right in noting that Irish ducks are fattier. In fact, it is the higher amount of fats (good fats, that is) that makes the Irish duck special and more fragrant. Kudos to him! 

However, over time, with technology improvements in cooking equipment, we are now able to control and reduce the amounts of fats in the ducks we prepare. Based on regular feedback from our customers, we have regulated the amount of fats we retain in the duck during the cooking process.

For our customers who prefer to retain more fats in the cooked ducks, if you allow us advance notice, we will try to prepare them to your liking.

We appreciate the guest’s sincerity in returning to pay the bill. We were prepared to roast a half duck for him to take away but he declined as he was in a rush to leave.

Duckland continues to be committed to serving Irish ducks direct from Ireland as we proudly claim.

𝘗𝘚: 𝘛𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘯𝘰 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘥𝘦, 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩 𝘸𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘥𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘰.

WOMAN DOESN’T WANT TO INVITE STEPDAUGHTER TO HER SISTER’S BDAY

0

My husband, Chris, and I have been married for almost 10 years. He has three daughters with his ex-wife: Madison (F23), Adaleine (F17), and Lana (F10).   

Lana and Adaleine live with us, while Madison lives with her mother and she got into two extremely good schools.

I didn’t really care; we never really got along well. She resents her dad for moving on so fast while her mom was single for another 2 years.

I just want to add that me and my husband didn’t know each other until after they had divorced. We met at a support group.

They divorced because she had an affair with another man, and when she found out she was pregnant with Lana, she didn’t know who the father was and couldn’t lie about it, but Lana did end up being my husband’s.

which is fair because we got married after only dating for 3 months, but it doesn’t justify the constant awful behavior.

When I was pregnant, she refused to help me with simple tasks like going grocery shopping or cooking. and when my son was born, she would refuse to watch him.

I don’t expect much from her. I just want her to help with her brother. It’s not like she doesn’t want to watch him because anytime my husband asks her, she’s more than willing. 

We are having a birthday party for Lana and I’m planning everything. Her mother is coming to surprise her since she usually only sees her every once in a while.

While we were on the phone, she mentions Madison coming with her and I tell her she isn’t allowed to come.

She got extremely angry and started saying that Lana isn’t my child and I’m robbing her of having a relationship with her mother. I understand Lana isn’t my child, but I’m paying for everything, excluding the flight.

Madison and her see each other for 2 months every year, and according to Adaleine, she’s very rude the entire time.

I may be overstepping my boundaries, but I do feel like it is justified.

Also, adding that the person who hurt my husband was not his ex-wife, it was his ex-from before, around the time, and he and his ex-wife came to terms

SON STOP MOTHER FROM ATTENDING WEDDING FOR INSULTING FIANCEE’S SON

0

It’s a stupid thing to ask I know. But my mom’s been an important person in my life and I’m not sure if perhaps I overreacted. I (26m) met my soon-to-be wife Amy (25f) 7 years ago and she has an 11 months old son(Jason) and she broke up with his dad already. I love Jason as my own son and that’s how I see him.

He calls his dad “Dad/Daddy” and me “Pa.” My mom didn’t like the idea of me being with someone who already had a kid with someone else. We fought about that during the first 2 years of the relationship until I threatened to stop talking if she doesn’t accept Amy and Jason in my life. So she let it go and didn’t bring it up ever again.

I proposed 4 months ago. We’re supposed to get married in March. My mon offered to pay for half of the wedding and we accepted. The issue was my mom saying Jason shouldn’t be at the wedding because it would be just as weird as if her ex was there. We were both confused by that logic. Jason’s a huge part of our lives, it’s our wedding so of course he’s gonna be part of it. That was a hard no from both of us.

She tried to bring it up more times until finally she pulled the “I’m paying for your wedding so I’m allowed to decide ” card. That’s the part that got me the most. Is she wanted to use the fact that she’s helping to pay to keep our 8 year old from being there at our wedding. I paid her back the money she gave us for the wedding and told her she’s also not invited. Now she keeps calling crying that I’m her only son and it would be heartless keeping her from being part of this huge milestone in her life.

To her it’s not the same if Jason missed it because he’s a kid not a parent. My family is on my side about her going too far wanting to exclude my son but they do think I’m a bad son if she’s not invited since I already gave her the money back so she has no say in anything. I’m just so mad about it and don’t wanna see her after she tried to control things like that.

Did I do the right thing?

Here are what netizens think:

your mother is acting like a monster to a literal child. Hope she kicks the bucket soon, why would you want such a nasty and hateful person anywhere near your son or your future wife on such an important day? You did the right thing.

My first thought was I would never let her watch my child. If she acts like that to their face, imagine how she would treat him when it’s just her. I’m not suggesting she would physically abuse him, but he definitely wouldn’t enjoy being around her.

He is not and will not be safe around her. She cannot be allowed in his airspace at all, ever. She will do irretrievable harm. Please hear me.