30.9 C
Singapore
Friday, September 18, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 5079

MAN JAILED AFTER PAWNING FAKE ROLEX CHEATING $18,000 @ MARSILING

0

A man was sentenced to jail after cheating a pawnshop of $18,000 with a fake Rolex watch.

55-year-old Tan Kok Eng conspired with 33-year-old Aw Poh Heng (both Singaporeans) to play a role in using a fake watch to acquire money from a pawnshop located in Marisiling.

Aw told Tan that he had previously cheated the pawnshop twice and he did not want to arouse suspicion of the pawnshop by going a third time.

The first two cheats yielded Aw SGD$34,500.

Aw then sought Tan to do the sale for him, Tan went to the pawnshop and managed to exchange the watch for $18,000.

Tan has yet to make full restitution to the shop and items from his home such as gold, cash and jewellery were seized.

Tan pleaded guilty and received a 6 months sentence.

Tan requested for his sentence to begin at the end of Chinese new year which was accepted, his sentence will begin on 16 Feb 2022.

SILKIE CHICKEN SPOTTED AT BEDOK, LOOKS LIKE A FLUFFY PET

0

Every now and then we see cats and dogs in public and even chickens. However, a Silkie chicken is an uncommon sight.

A netizen spotted this fluffy looking animal at Bedok Reservoir Park.

The animal was seen on some grass with another regular chicken, netizens who commented on the photo wondered if it is the pet that has gone missing.

Community Cats

Regular park goers also state that there are several community cats in the area and wonder if the chicken will be safe or it could end up as a feline’s chicken dinner.

Unlike regular chickens, Silkies are considered great pets for their calm and friendly temperament. They are considered less aggressive.

Most silkies would even cuddle with their owners like a dog.

EMPLOYEES WHO ARE ART POSITIVE SHOULD GET SICK LEAVE WITHOUT MC: MOM

0

The Ministry of Man Power release an advisory stating that the MTF announced on 5 January 2022 a revised approach for managing individuals who test positive using the Antigen Rapid Test (ART) but are either mildly symptomatic or physically well.

Self Isolate

Employees who are physically well but self-test positive are advised to self-isolate at home for 72 hours.

no need for these employees to visit a General Practitioner (GP) clinic or hospital to undergo a PCR test

Employees who are symptomatic should see a doctor

No Need MC

MOM said that employees should immediately inform their employer when they test positive for COVID-19 and begin their self-isolation at home – they should not report to the workplace.

  1. Employees who are physically well should be allowed to work from home if they are able to do so. If working from home is not possible, employers should treat the period of absence as paid sick leave (either paid outpatient sick leave or paid hospitalisation leave) without requiring a MC.
  2. For employees with mild symptoms and a 5-day MC issued by a doctor, employers should similarly treat the period of absence as paid sick leave

Here are what netizens think:

  • MOM can say all they want but just how many employers really follow is another thing.
  • Sad to say that “closed-minded” bosses need such move from MOM to “enforce” such guidelines 
  • Later many many come out and complain forced to take no pay…Then reimburse again….
  • No MC company Not going to pay us salary
  • Should hv mandate these guidelines since the start of any pandemic & endemic. Well, late is always better than never.

BMW DRIVER ALLEGEDLY POINT MIDDLE FINGER, THEN HIDE INSIDE CAR WHEN CONFRONTED

A couple of videos emerged online showing a heated confrontation between a BMW driver and a taxi uncle, in an incident that happened on 28 January at about 9.45am.

In the first video that surfaced yesterday, the taxi uncle was seen confronting the BMW driver and calling him out for pointing middle finger and allegedly trying to knock him down.

The BMW driver then remained inside his car as his passenger filmed the taxi driver.

Another video of the same incident has since emerged, from the POV of the BMW driver, who attempted to explain his side of the story.

BMW’s side of the story

The BMW driver said:

“I am the driver of the white BMW vehicle in the video and would like to set the record straight on this matter.

On that day, I was driving my sister to school and had to switch lanes to turn left to a side road. I was in the second lane from the left and signaled left when we were waiting at a traffic light.

When the lights turned green, I switched lanes as intended when there was a gap between the uncle’s taxi and the vehicle in front of him.

The taxi accelerated, braked hard and horned incessantly, holding the horn down for lengthy periods. After turning left, I had to keep right to turn into the school.

The uncle accelerated rapidly in a school zone and cut from the left lane into my lane and braked hard in front of my car, causing me to apply emergency brakes to avoid hitting the taxi.  

The uncle aggressively rapped on my car window and continued haranguing and accusing me of being rude and showing him a middle finger.

By this time, the uncle also started taking a video himself and called my sister rude for taking a video of him. In a bid to resolve the matter, I apologised to the uncle but he said “sorry no cure” and continued shouting at us until the police arrived. 

I then sought advice on the phone regarding the situation and was advised to stay calm, not alight from the car, not engage with the uncle in any argument, let my sister respond to the uncle if necessary, take a video of what was happening and to wait for the police to arrive.

The 2 police officers spoke to both parties to understand the situation and after that, upon their advice, both parties decided not to pursue the matter further. The Police did not take any action against either party.

Not once did I attempt to run down the uncle with my car. He was standing by the driver’s side of the car the entire time making it impossible for him to have been in danger of being run over.”

Taxi Uncle’s POV

BMW Driver’s POV

HONDA SEEN DRIVING AGAINST FLOW OF TRAFFIC, WANT TO BE SPECIAL

A video emerged online showing a black Honda driving dangerously and against the flow of traffic.

The incident happened on 3 February along Fajar Road, at about 7.02 am, and the entire incident was captured on the dashcam of a car behind.

The Honda was seen filtering onto the opposite lane on the right, against the traffic flow with another car driving towards it.

It then turned back onto the correct side of the road, before later making a turn into a HDB estate on the right.

Potential penalties

Drivers who drive in a manner that is dangerous to the public is guilty of an offence under section 64(1) of the Road Traffic Act (RTA).

Persons found guilty face a jail term of up to 1 year and/or a $5,000 fine.

If the driver causes hurt, he faces a jail term of up to 2 years and a fine of $10,000.

If the driver caused grievous hurt, he faces a jail term of between 1 to 5 years and disqualified from driving for at least 8 years.

If the driver’s actions caused death, he faces a jail term of up to 2 to 8 years and disqualified from driving for at least 10 years.

OLD MAN BLEEDING AFTER FALLING DOWN STAIRS, ASKS “WHY HELP ME”

0

An old man had reportedly fallen down at the entrance of Chinatown MRT station and bled from his head, but when kind samaritans tried to help him, he scolded them.

According to Lianhe Zaobao, the incident happened on Thursday (3 February) at about 12.50pm, at the stairs of Chinatown MRT station, exit C.

The 70-year-old man had slipped and fallen down while traversing down the stairs, resulting in him bleeding from his face.

Unsteady

A passerby who witnessed the incident, told the Chinese paper that the old man was walking unsteadily down the stairs at the time, when he suddenly fell down and hit his face on the railing, resulting in the bleeding.

There were other passers-by around who tried to help the stricken old man, asking him if he needed help. One of the men wearing red called for an ambulance and opened an umbrella to shield the old man from the sun. Another kind samaritan also took out some tissue to help the old man wipe away the blood.

Scolded the kind samaritans

However, according to the witness, the old man then started shouting and scolding them, asking “why are you helping me?!” thrice.

The old man then pushed away the guy in red and refused everyone’s help, and about 5 minutes later when the ambulance arrived, he refused to be conveyed to the hospital. He even stood up and walked away towards the bus stop

YP SETS PAPER ON FIRE THEN THROWS IT DOWN HIGH RISE HDB BUILDING

A video emerged online showing a guy setting a piece of paper on fire before throwing it out of a window and down a high-rise HDB building.

The video was captioned “happy new year” followed by a GIF of a couple of wine glasses clanking together.

Potential penalties

Littering is an offence in Singapore and is defined as dropping, placing or throwing any article or t hing in a public place except a rubbish bin.

Persons caught littering face a fine of up to $2,000 for the first offence as well as the possibility of Corrective Work Order.

Repeat offenders face a fine of up to $4,000 for the second offence and a fine of up to $10,000 for the third and subsequent offence.

FULL VIDEO LOADING…

M’SIAN WHO DELIVERED HEROIN SENTENCED TO DEATH, S’POREAN JAILED

0

Kishor Kumar Raguan, a Malaysian who delivered a bag of more than 900g of powdery substance into Singapore via his motorcycle, was sentenced to death for drug trafficking.

The bag that he brought in was analysed to contain about 36.05 grams of heroin.

Under the law, if the amount of heroin being trafficked is more than 15 grams, it calls for the death penalty.

The recipient of the drugs, 61-year-old Singaporean Pung Ah Kiang, was sentenced to life in prison for possession of drugs for the purpose of trafficking.

Thought bag contained “stones”

High Court Justice Audrey Lim said in her written grounds released yesterday (4 February) that she found that both men knew that the bundles contained heroin.

She had rejected Kishor’s defence of thinking that the bag contained “stones”, and she said that he had failed to show that he genuinely believed the bundles contained something else.

Kishor was found to have been told that the items to be delivered were “kallu”, which he was aware referred to heroin.

Pung’s claim of not knowing what was in the bag and that he was merely keeping it temporarily for his brother-in-law was also rejected by Justice Lim.

Assisted CNB

She sentenced him to life imprisonment after being certified as having assisted CNB in disrupting drug trafficking operations.

In sentencing Kishor to death, Justice Lim said that “as the prosecution did not issue Kishor with a certificate of substantive assistance, I passed the mandatory death sentence on him”.

The bundles of drugs were brought into Singapore on 29 July 2016 and delivered to Pung near his home at a Paya Lebar condominium.

He was then arrested by CNB officers whilst en route back to his condo, before being escorted back to his home where officers found more drugs.

Kishor’s DNA was also found on the bundle of delivered drugs.

LAWRENCE WONG – BUDGET 2022 TO HELP S’POREANS WITH COST OF LIVING

0

Minister of Finance Lawrence Wong, said on 3 February that the upcoming Budget 2022 will help Singaporeans with the cost of living, as well as providing support for sectors that are having difficulties.

Wong was speaking at the Spring Reception 2022, organised by the Singapore Federation of Chinese Clan Associations and the Singapore Chinese Cultural Centre.

The Budget 2022 is set to be announced on 18 February, and it will be focusing on measures that will put Singapore in a stronger position following the pandemic.

It is also set to be Lawrence Wong’s first budget statement since being appointed the Minister of Finance and taking over from his predecessor, Heng Swee Keat.

Economy recovering

Wong said that the budget will be taking place in the midst of a strong and steady recovery of the economy, and that he is heartened.

However, with that being said, some sectors such as aviation and tourism are continuing to face difficulties, and the budget aims to provide support to these industries.

Wong said that the budget will “help Singaporeans manage concerns over more immediate issues like the cost of living.”

Looking ahead

He also said that Singapore needs to start looking ahead and get ready for a world after the pandemic, and the budget will include measures to build new capabilities and transform the economy to create “good jobs and opportunities for all Singaporeans.”

He said:

“We will strengthen our social support system, to give Singaporeans greater assurance to cope with life’s uncertainties. We aim to forge a fairer, more inclusive, and a greener home for us and our future generations, so that all of us can continue to be proud to call Singapore our home.”

Times of change

Wong also called the Year of the Tiger “typically signify times of change”, and that after the pandemic, Singapore faces uncertainties such as economic and geopolitical obstacles.

He also reflected on the shrinking of the economy by 5% in 2020, the worst since gaining independence.

“This year, we are experiencing the Omicron wave. The daily infected cases are higher than before. But fortunately, the vast majority of vaccinated persons only have mild symptoms. So, we will do our best to ride through this Omicron wave without having to tighten our existing measures.

With each wave, we have strengthened our defences and become more resilient. So, I am confident that in this Year of the Tiger, we will be able to make further progress in our journey towards living with Covid-19.”

EPIC 2V1 FIGHT BETWEEN WORKERS, MAN USE WOODEN STICK AS WEAPON

A video emerged online showing a fight breaking out between a couple of PRC men and a Bangladeshi man at what appears to be a renovation site.

The men were seen wearing safety vests, and one of the PRC men was seen climbing on top of the Bangladeshi man, throwing punches at him.

The Bangladeshi man was seen wielding a wooden stick, as the two PRC men tried to wrestle the stick away from him.

Another group of workers then stepped in to try to break apart the fight, as someone started shouting “OK LAH, OK LAH, OK LAH! ENOUGH! ENOUGH! ENOUGH! NO FIGHTING!”

Potential penalties

According to Chapter 224 of the Penal Code, anyone who disturbs public peace by fighting in public is guilty of committing an affray.

Upon conviction, offenders could face a jail term of up to one year and/or a fine of up to $5,000.

According to Chapter 321 of the Penal Code, anyone who performs an act that causes hurt to a person is guilty of Voluntarily Causing Hurt.

Upon conviction, offenders could face a jail term of up to 3 years and/or a fine of up to $5,000.

FULL VIDEO LOADING…