The goat’s owner, a 45-year-old woman, lodged a police report on Tuesday after finding a half-naked man in her goat pen at Kampung Buaya Serendah, Rawang.
She had heard bleating noises from the pen and saw a half naked man getting up beside her goat.
The man turned out to be someone she recognized, an acquaintance.
The man then escaped and the goat was pronounced dead by the owner after she checked on it.
The man was then found hiding among the bushes yesterday mornign at around 10.50am.
The auntie shouting at the guy because she said he works there all day never give her any bedtime action. She keeps shouting and expect him to have the performance of an 18-year-old young man.
The man kept quiet throughout the dispute. Lan Lan suck thumb.
Hi guys, I need some advice. I have gotten myself into this love scam and that guy cheated me S$ x amount of money. He blocked me everywhere and had gone MIA. I have already lodged a police report, however, I was advised to sue him in state court as this is a civil matter.
Thank God I know where he stays and sent my lawyer letter over, but he did not respond and continue to MIA. He is always not around when I went up to his place and look for him. His parent denied and don’t believe their son will do such things. The parent then made a police report and called me a scammer. Should I hire a debt collector or sue him in the state court?
But either way will require additional cost. Sigh, I was so naive back then, I shouldn’t have trusted him easily and his sweet talk. I hope by sharing this, more poeple will be aware of this scammer that even the police cannot do anything to help me seek justice.
I will end up spending more money if I hire a debt collector, or teach him a lesson if I want to sue him.
I would like to share an accident that happened on 25 Jun 2021/ 2331 hrs.
Location: East Coast Park. I was been hit by a cyclist which was cycling in ops direction of me. “He was trying to cut his front cyclists ” and cycling towards me which was against the flow of traffic.
I posted this post, which hopes this will never happen to any cyclists. I willing to take up any Legal action by the ops cyclist ” which hit me”.In here, I would also like to thanks the passerby a cyclist who witnesses the whole event and also did dressing for me.”
A woman who obviously is unsure about Singapore’s law wanted to share a device to check in the Singpost Paya Lebar with her husband and said that she is unhappy with the attitude of the ambassador.
However, many netizens were unsupportive of her post and even scolded her husband for not being responsible to charge his check-in device.
Here is the story:
Very bad attitude as an ambassador frontline. Chase customer away just because my husband phone is flat but my phone can still check-in as a group. Sarcasm remark was made with a mask under the nose not showing a good example as an ambassador. After showing check-in as a group still insists on asking my husband to provide token etc.
Never shop here again guys
Bad customer service. Ashanti or jeyanti not sure cause she sounded very boastful of thinking what she does is right and roll her eyes on us.
Making us malu.
No doubt is so quiet there. Cause someone is busy chasing people away.
Source: Siti Sarah Shamsudin
Here is what netizens said about the woman
Check-in is supposed to be individual. No such thing as sharing. That’s why individuals are an issue with the token. The officer can stop you from entering you fail to show the trace together apps or token not scan. If I were to be the officer, I don’t allow to enter too. Then you can wait for the safe distancing ambassador to come and you will get the same answer too. In short just use a token for mall entry. It’s easier if you know hp batt will always be flat. Logical thinking.
A netizen complained about many people who disregard the law and still gathers in big groups to play games.
Here is the story:
Photos were taken on continuous days ever since phase 2 HA returns This group of people gather at the badminton court between 190 & 189 Boon Lay Drive.
I have made multiple cases via one service and iTown app but nothing has been done. No wonder this group of people also don’t care about the law. I don’t know where else to report them for flouting the rules.
Currently, blk 189 is a place where the covid testing is taking place due to the few cases at happening Boon Lay Hawker Centre.
These few jokers still hanging around with their masks off.
A netizen sends in a story that he is worried about people abusing the loophole that there might be some who use the trace together tokens of others.
Here is the story:
I am concerned about a post I came across on a popular online forum “Hardwarezone” sharing how a user used another person’s TT token.
There was a discussion about the size of the TT token and the inconvenience of carrying it around.
A user by the moniker “razorlala” claimed that he overcame this by using his parent’s token from an earlier batch of tokens issued, which is smaller for him to carry around.
He went on to advise other users to claim they accidentally took the wrong token if caught and challenges the authorities to catch him.
The authorities trusts the people to use the TT token responsibly and I find it dangerous that such posts sharing hacks on the token and instigating others to abuse it are being shared online.
I have posted screenshots of the post for your reference.
I have already reported the matter to MOH and a relevant officer is already in touch with me on this matter.
A 33-year-old man was previously arrested by the police for a case of voluntarily causing hurt with a dangerous weapon on 27 April 2021.
Yesterday(July 29), He was sentenced to 18 months in jail and 3 strokes of the rotan
What happened?
Court documents revealed that the police were alerted on 27 April 2021 at about 4:25 pm of a case that a 33-year-old man had attacked a 35-year-old woman with a knife at a coffee shop located at Blk 155 Bukit Batok Street 11.
The defendant is Xie Binbin, a 33-year-old assistant at the fishball noodle stall. Yesterday, he admitted to a charge of deliberately injuring others with a kitchen knife. The victim was Zhang Wenhong, a 35-year-old colleague of the defendant.
At 2:30 PM on the day of the incident, the victim discovered that the defendant had prepared his own lunch with shrimps from the fishball noodle stall which lead to an altercation.
Later that day at around At 4:20 pm, the defendant was again irritated by the victim questioning why he had used food that was for sale to prepare lunch. As a result, he challenged the victim with a kitchen knife, grabbed the colleague’s hair in front of the customer, and chopped the colleague’s neck and head at least 7 times with the kitchen knife.
The victim was slashed suffered injuries on her hand area as well She was conscious when conveyed to the hospital.
Arrest
The police were able to identify the suspects using Police CCTV, Jurong Police Division and Woodlands Police Division arrested the man within four hours after they were alerted to the case.
A netizen posted a story online over a terrible experience at a dentist located in Tanjong Pagar.
Here is the story:
We had a horrible and disturbing experience at this dental clinic – Vincent Dental at Tanjong Katong yesterday. We had previously gone to the clinic on 23rd April 2021 to do two crown reattachments.
Subsequently, on the 13th of July, one of the crowns detached again and was lost. As I had just given birth the day earlier, we had to wait till yesterday 26th July to revisit the clinic to enquire about a crown replacement.
Having made an appointment, on entering the clinic, I was asked to enter the room and without asking any questions or giving me any information on what they were doing, they proceeded to do moulding(which I only realised when they were doing it). In the process, and to my horror, the clinic dislodged the existing crown next to the missing one. The clinic then proceeded to make me sit there while they prepared to reattach the crown they dislodged, all the while complaining that the tooth was too short and other comments. This crown was also previously reattached by the same dentist.
During the wait, we then asked the clinic how they caused the crown to be dislodged and they insisted that it was loose and not of their doing. We asked about the price of the new crown and they rudely said that it would be $850 where previously mentioned was $600. When queried, they insisted that they told us $850 previously and showed us a patient card that we only saw for the first time with the amount written there. This felt extremely ridiculous as they neither asked nor advised anything before taking it upon themselves to decide that we were doing the replacement crown with them.
Afterwhich the dentist came and did the reattachment. After reattaching, it felt extremely uncomfortable and misaligned, but despite my feedback, they insisted that that was all they could do. Given the bad experience and poor service as well as indifferent attitude, we did not want to continue to use their service anymore and decided to leave. On leaving, they even had the cheek to ask if we were going to do the crown replacement with them. When we said we wanted to consider, the clinic told us that they would charge us for the reattachment of the crown they dislodged as well as the mould for the crown replacement.
When I asked why they were charging us for their mistake, the dentist said that sometimes other crowns may dislodge when doing the mould if the job was not well done. I told him that the crown was attached by him. The dentist gave us an exasperated look and said that he was “helping” when he attached it the last time even though he had charged us for doing it and that there was no guarantee it wouldn’t drop again. When I reiterated that the crown was dislodged by them, he just insisted that the clinic was not responsible and asked us back why he should be liable for “helping” us.
When asked why the clinic didn’t tell us the price of the replacement crown before doing the mould, they even had the audacity to say that it was not a STANDARD practice for their clinic to inform patients of the price and drew our attention to an obscure pricelist pasted on their countertop which was covered by a table calendar insisting that MOH only required them to display the prices. When I asked them if it was they should at least inform the patient what they were going to do, they said rudely, “you lost your crown so must be coming to replace lah” making it seem their right to do as they wish without patient consent or information. First, they didn’t ask for consent, didn’t give any pricing information before performing a procedure. (So the charges will be up to them and we just have to pay what they say???). Unethical behaviour.
Secondly, they caused an existing crown to dislodge during their work and still insisted that it was not their responsibility, wasting my time and putting me through more distress and discomfort. No professional standards.
Thirdly, when questioned, shirked all responsibility on their part by blatantly declaring that the blame was on the previous work done. Irresponsible to patients.
Would you be willing to go to such a clinic for your dental needs????
A 25-year-old is facing investigations by the Police for allegedly running a pub at Ubi without any valid license at Ubi Road 1.
13 other people were caught on-premise drinking alcohol and partying.
According to a police statement, the police launched enforcement actions against 77 massage parlours and 59 public entertainment venues in a 4-day operation across Singapore.
The 25-year-old youth is investigated under the Public Entertainment Act and the Liquor Control Act on suspicion of operating illegal public entertainment venues.
For failing to comply with safe distancing measures under the COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) (Control Order) Regulations 2020, anyone found guilty can be jailed up to a maximum of and/or fined up to S$10,000.
If the 25-year-old is convicted of providing public entertainment and supplying liquor without a valid licence each carry a fine of up to S$20,000.