FACEBOOK POST BY: RDhaneshwary Sri

Beware of this psycho bitch near the surroundings of Blk 372 opposite Bukit Gombak MRT station.

This mornin ard 11am when my husband brought my son to the clinic , this psycho slapped my 21 mths boy on the head as she walked pass him near the pavement.

As a result, my son fell from his tricycle n hit the floor.My husband was shocked and shouted at her but she ignored.

He threatened to make a police report but she scolded vulgarities and ran away.He managed to run after her n take a snap of her at the MRT station.

FACEBOOK POST BY: RDhaneshwary Sri

This uncle was in a train today, NEL MRT Towards Punggol at about 7.40pm on 16th May and occupied 3 seats! He shooed a little boy and his mother out of their seat so he can have all the 3 seats to himself! Then he took out his can of beer and drank like nobody’s business… like seriously uncle???

Your attitude shows as though you own the train… He’s not disabled. He can walk but slow… He had a personal mobility scooter with him. The mother who was chased away was an Indian FT hence didn’t say anything much but was staring at the old man with full of unhappiness

Nina

The sprinklers set off by accident this afternoon. From far away it looks like a white wall covering.

After the local authorities verified that MCE did not have fire. The firefighting system was switched off.

As you can see in the picture, many bikers had to stop by the side to put on the raincoat. Some drivers on forums said that its like getting a free car wash.

(FACEBOOK POST BY : BEAR QIU)

Hi Marcus,

if u continue want to flirt and play with girl go ahead , but do u know something a true ? Ur ex gf did not went abortion , although is twin , one of ur child did not had heart so the doc decide to take away this child , but another child of ur is alive ! He is premature !

He still in Hospitals due premature and heart is weak too ! Ur ex gf lie to you say she abort because u are immature , only think of flirt and having sex with other girl ! Had you thought of ur child ? Do u know ur premature child is 99percent of DNA of ur ? Yes she is selfish dun let u know everything about her because u only care urself and other girl !

U know what ! I believe u know how to think …. there another thing I need let you know is during this few month u know why ur ex gf find u ? Real main reason is ur premature child need ur blood ! Because u are his child ! He not enough blood and need ur blood to survive !

His is ur child he need you urgently so when you saw this msg pls contact ur ex gf bear bear ! I know you are avoiding her ! But you never know is the more you avoiding her , u will lose ur premature child who is in hospital right now ! Ur child need you ! Pls contact ur ex gf bear bear !

Unless you really irresponsible dun even Want to save ur own child ?

If you see this msg pls call bear bear ! And those people who saw him outside , pls call because this child need his Father blood and his Father support !

Every one pls help to look for him ! His child need him urgently to save his own child lives

Dear Editors,

There is a shoe thief prowling in the Marsiling HDB estate stealing shoes which resident leave outside their homes. This thief is known to steal only new or branded shoes. CCTV finally caught the thief in the act on 13 May at around 4am at Blk 26 Marsiling Drive.

The thief was dress in black shirt, jacket, trousers and carrying a big backpack to store his steals. He would select the shoes he wished to steal, used a towel to cover the shoes before walking off with it.

Wee Kiong

Synopsis:

The story is about being victimised by an uber-partnered car rental company by being unfairly charged an exorbitant fee for third party insurance excess, which was due to an accident clearly involving negligible damages to the third party.
Story & details:

I began driving for uber as a partner in August last year in hopes of earning a side income to pay for my university fees. I’m not currently an uber partner anymore.

As with most uber partners, I rented a car from a company called LCR. Unfortunately, I was involved in an accident along Upper Bukit Timah road on 11 July (see attached pictures for reference). It was involving my car and a Comfort taxi.

As seen, the damage to my rental car was apparently severe, but damage to the bumper of the taxi I “crashed” into was practically non-existent.

Under the contract I signed with LCR, I was liable to pay insurance excesses of $2140 for personal damage (to my rental car), and $2140 for third party damage (which they refer to as “Section 2 excess”).

I paid LCR $2140 for personal damage and got my car fixed at their appointed workshop. The car was eventually returned to LCR after the 5-week contract ended.

Throughout this entire period (August 2016 till today), LCR did not inform me that there had been a claim (allegedly) against them by the taxi driver (whose taxi I knocked into). LCR have not submitted proof that the taxi driver did indeed file a claim against their insurer.

As a result, I was shocked to receive a letter in my mailbox from LCR today, demanding that I paid $2140 in third party damage chargers.

Remember that it had been more than 10 months from the date of accident until I got LCR’s notice today. Insurance claims of this triviality do not take 10 months to be settled, so one can reasonably suspect something fishy going on here.

I have not made this payment to LCR because I feel victimised and abused.

I don’t think any reasonable taxi driver would actually file an insurance claim for a few paint scratches on the bumper of his taxi. Notice the number itself itself was protected by an advertisement sticker, further negating the point that the bumper suffered damage, if at all.

On the day of incident, the taxi driver himself told me that he would not be claiming on LCR’s insurer because his taxi did not suffer any effective damage. We drive off from the scene after about 10 minutes. No traffic police was involved.

The highlight of this story is (and I’m sure most would agree to) that LCR acted immorally by clearly profiting of this case. They do so by charging me $2140 for what is essentially zero damage to the third party’s vehicle.

They do not even provide any proof of a claim. Even if they could, no claim would amount to $2140 for a few scratches on a stickers bumper.

The victimisation arises because I’m legally bonded to LCR’s contract, and therefore have little choice but to pay up.

This has been an issue amongst many uber drivers who rent from LCR, and I have myself read very similar articles in the past, where drivers were also victimised by LCR.

Again, I hope your team gives story consideration to be published on your site and social media outlets. I really want Singaporeans to be aware of the immorality this rental company is engaged in.

Thanks for taking the time to read this. Do email me if you need more information!

I’ve attached a few images below as proof to my stance.

Submitted via email: Jared

See how inconsiderate, unreasonable and selfish these people can be. I said ‘excuse me please’ as I needed to sit. She told me that her son’s legs would remain as they were and I should accept that with whatever disturbance that came with it, if I still wanted to sit.

She was occupying two seats unnecessarily and in adamantly refusing to move her son’s legs, she was depriving a senior of the right to a seat that was reserved for senior and other physically challenged people.

Facebook post by: Jenny Whing