28.9 C
Singapore
Thursday, June 11, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 2405

DOUBLE HOMICIDE: CCTVs UNPLUGGED, PETROL STATION EMPLOYEES DEAD

0

In a shocking turn of events, two employees of a petrol station in Nakhon Phanom were shot dead late Friday night, plunging the community into grief and leaving law enforcement grappling with an unsettling mystery. The incident took place at the Thai Laemthong petrol station in Lam Bon Ban Phuen of Muang district, raising concerns as all 13 closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras on the premises were found unplugged.

The Crime Scene

The grim discovery was made by Pol Capt. Pichanon Pluemsud, deputy investigation chief at the Muang police station, who received an alert around 10.30 pm on Friday. Upon reaching the station, law enforcement found the lifeless bodies of a man and a woman within the compound of the petrol station.

The victims, identified as Phorrchak Seesupha, a 33-year-old Lao national, and Wichuda Srisumang, a 50-year-old Thai woman, were both brutally attacked. Phorrchak suffered a fatal shot to the head, coupled with wounds from a sharp object on his body. Wichuda, on the other hand, was shot in the back of the neck, and a bullet pierced her face while she was on her motorcycle.

Disturbing Anomalies

The investigation took a perplexing turn as no spent bullets or other evidence that could provide clues to the assailants were found. Adding to the mystery, all 13 CCTV cameras on the premises were intentionally unplugged, suggesting a well-planned and deliberate act.

Victims’ Background

Both victims were employees of the petrol station, working the evening shift. Phorrchak, a Lao national, had been with the station for about a year and was unmarried. Wichuda, a divorced Thai woman, had worked for the station for an extended period.

Station owner Chatree Mombao, 61, expressed shock and disbelief, mentioning that the victims had no known issues with anyone. He revealed that the station operated from 5 am to 9 pm daily, employing four individuals. The victims were attacked as they were about to conclude their shift and head home. Notably, no cash or assets were reported missing from the station.

Puzzling Motive

The motive behind this heinous crime remains elusive, leaving the police in the dark. Chief of Muang police, Pol Col Phakphum Decharuangsil, highlighted the well-planned nature of the crime, considering the intentional disconnection of all CCTV cameras. Investigators are exploring various angles, including personal and business conflicts, as well as the possibility of fraudulent activities such as issuing fake petrol bills.

As the community mourns the loss of two lives, the quest for justice intensifies. The shocking circumstances surrounding this double homicide in Nakhon Phanom have raised concerns about the safety and security of businesses, urging both authorities and the public to remain vigilant in the pursuit of truth and justice.

“SCOOT, PLEASE WAKE UP YOUR IDEA”, PASSENGR’S PHONE GOES MISSING

0

In the bustling world of air travel, unforeseen incidents can turn a routine journey into a challenging experience. On the 29th of December 2023, aboard Scoot’s flight T467 from Kuala Lumpur to Singapore, a series of events unfolded, leaving passengers bewildered and dissatisfied.

Introduction

Air travel is not just about reaching a destination; it’s also about the service experience provided by the airline. Unfortunately, on this particular flight, the incident went beyond the usual inconveniences.

Flight Delay and Phone Incident

The journey began with a delay, a common occurrence in the aviation industry. However, what followed was anything but ordinary. While on the ground, a passenger’s phone slipped from her grasp, creating a moment of distress.

In the midst of chaos, the silver lining emerged in the form of helpful passengers. Quick to respond, fellow travelers seated nearby retrieved the phone and handed it over to the cabin crew.

Cabin Crew’s Handling

Here’s where the narrative takes a concerning turn. The cabin crew, perhaps overwhelmed by the situation, handed the phone to ground staff without proper verification. This oversight laid the foundation for subsequent disappointments.

Unfulfilled Promise

Assurances were made to the distressed passenger that her details would be collected, and arrangements would be made for the phone’s return on the next flight. Sadly, these promises remained unfulfilled.

Changi Airport Lost and Found Report

With hope dwindling, the passenger reported the incident to Changi Airport T1 Lost and Found. Regrettably, the lack of updates and communication left her in the dark about the status of her lost phone.

The disappointment and frustration felt by the passenger were exacerbated by the apparent lack of initiative and moral responsibility displayed by the airline and its staff.

Complaint Against Cabin Crews

In light of the negligence observed, a formal complaint is warranted against all cabin crews on board T467 on the mentioned date and time.

This incident underscores the critical importance of accountability in the airline industry. Customers entrust not only their time but also their belongings to the care of airline personnel.

Passengers have reasonable expectations of accountability and responsibility from airlines. This includes swift and transparent communication regarding incidents and a commitment to resolving issues promptly.

Conclusion

In conclusion, incidents like these highlight the need for airlines to reassess their customer service protocols and instill a sense of responsibility among their staff.

Source:

WOMAN WORRIED ABOUT BTO & ROM, USING AMOUNT OF YEARS TO GAUGE RELATIONSHIP

0

My bf and I have been together for close to 2 years. Today, he suggested that we apply for the May BTO launch. We have already tried for the Feb one this year but didn’t manage to get a number.

I felt a bit mixed if I am ready to apply for a BTO with him. If successful, we would be able to get the house in around 3 years, which means we have to ROM by then. I am having concerns because I felt that us being together for only close to 2 years might not be a good gauge to determine if we are really compatible? Or am I thinking too much?

Honestly, he treats me well and gives me a lot of security. He would constantly auto update me of his whereabouts, small things in his life and always initiate reflective/ feedback sessions in our relationship. However, some concerns I have are the time frame that we have been together. We clique really well and I feel there is really quite a lot of compromise between us in this relationship. We met online and although he did tell me about his past briefly, but I am still not sure if this 2 years are sufficient for me to fully know him as a person and to determine that I can spend my future with him.

We do talk about what we would be like in the future, but I am unsure if that can be a reality or just our dreams. Also, he does not really have a goal in life, like his current job is not really something he likes and he does not really have interest in any industry. Additionally, I feel that the way we spend money is really different, like he is ok with going to restaurants, eating a set for $15 while I don’t really feel comfortable doing these and prefer my hawker food, although he is also fine with hawker food.

I am not sure if the way we spend money will be a hindrance to our future finances. Any souls out there who have had similar experiences can give some insights here for me? Thanks a lot in advance!

Here are what netizens think:

  • I with my ex 5 years get married another 3 years also divorce. Time is nothing
  • You are not sure about everything…..Are you sure that guy you are talking about is your bf?
  • It’s seems like you have many doubts in this relationship. Did you really speak about it with your bf? I guess you haven. You should clear all of it before you make the right moves.
  • Even if you have 10 years to know him, human changes in every phase of their life, every age and environment change them. Even if you think you get a guy modelled after your dad also useless, cause human change.Change is forever.

GRAB DRIVER MAKING $5K BY ONLY DRIVING PART TIME, IF GO ALL OUT, $8K/MONTH NO PROBLEM

0

I drive grab on a part-time basis and I’m a student.

Here is the breakdown:

Monday – Friday: 7-8am (sporadically as it depends on how tired I am), 6-11pm
Saturday – Sunday: 2pm-3am
Total gross fares per week: $1100-1200
Commision to Grab: – $240
Incentive from Grab: $230
Car Rental, Season Parking (school & home), Petrol: $320 + $50 + $200
Total take home after accounting for everything: $620
Counting the hours put in, I’m effectively taking home $11-$15 per hour.

Currently studying in uni and doing this to feed my daily needs.

It can get really tiring at times when you have to drive after school and sacrifice your social plans. Usually your weekends with family are also burned. Renting a car also means that you feel guilty on days that you don’t drive. Its a $40-60 deficit for everyday you don’t drive. And every time your car is idling, that’s money down the drain. Well, you do get the car for personal use but honestly for me, theres no need for that as public transport suffice. I’m just doing this for the money.

They say that the main perks of doing private hiring is the flexibility, but that’s hardly true anymore because of how you get incentives to drive during peak hours. Grab has been cutting down on it’s incentive, the rate is almost half of what it was last month. We’re talking about $200+ lesser every week. But you just gotta live with it and make do with whatever you can get until the drivers reach their limit and do something collectively as a community.

All in all, there’s still money to be made. Even more so if you’re a full timer. If you go full out, 8k a month is not out of reach. But how sustainable is it to drive 12-14 hours every single day? Realistically, a disciplined full-timer who dedicates 8-10 hours with 1 rest day can aim for about 3-5k every month.

COURTROOM CLASH: MCDONALD’S M’SIA VS. BDS MOVEMENT IN S$1.73M DEFAMATION CASE

0

In a move that highlights the intersection of business, politics, and activism, McDonald’s Malaysia is pursuing legal action against the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) Malaysia movement. The fast-food giant alleges defamation, stating that the call for a boycott is based on false allegations linking the franchise to Israel’s actions in Gaza.

The Allegations

The legal action comes in response to a series of social media posts by BDS Malaysia that purportedly connect McDonald’s to Israel’s “genocidal war against Palestinians in Gaza.” McDonald’s Malaysia is seeking RM6 million (S$1.72 million) in damages, claiming that the movement’s actions led to a significant impact on its business operations.

Local Operation and Impact

McDonald’s franchises operate independently in different countries, and in Malaysia, it is locally managed by Gerbang Alaf Restaurants Sdn Bhd. The lawsuit asserts that BDS Malaysia’s call for a boycott has resulted in closures, shortened operating hours, and financial losses, leading to job cuts and other damages.

McDonald’s Stand and Contributions

In response to the situation, McDonald’s Malaysia emphasized its commitment to transparency and consistency in expressing that it does not support or condone the ongoing conflict. The company affirmed that it does not channel any funds from its operations to support political causes or conflicts worldwide.

Additionally, McDonald’s Malaysia highlighted its humanitarian efforts, mentioning a contribution of RM1 million (S$287,000) to the Palestinian Humanitarian Fund launched by the government. The company expressed sympathy for the innocent victims in Gaza and conveyed its hope for an end to the conflict and sustained peace.

BDS Malaysia’s Response

BDS Malaysia, in a swift response on social media, rejected the defamation claim made by McDonald’s Malaysia. They contested the notion that the movement is responsible for the business challenges faced by the fast-food chain. In a tweet on Dec. 29, BDS Malaysia stated that they categorically deny the defamation claim and asserted their intention to let the court decide on the matter.

The Complex Intersection

The legal clash between McDonald’s Malaysia and BDS Malaysia reflects the complex intersection of business operations, political activism, and public perception. As the case unfolds, it raises questions about the impact of social media movements on businesses and the responsibility of corporations to address geopolitical issues.

Conclusion

The legal action initiated by McDonald’s Malaysia against BDS Malaysia underscores the challenges faced by businesses navigating the complex landscape of political activism. The clash between narratives brings attention to the role of social media in shaping public opinion and the potential repercussions for multinational corporations operating in politically sensitive contexts.

GUY FOUND OUT GF SHARED ABOUT HIS BAD SKILLS IN BED WITH HER FRIENDS

0

So I (29M) have been seeing a girl (26F) for a couple of months now.

We started hanging out in mid March, and things have started to feel pretty serious. I’ve been seeing her exclusively since we started a relationship, We’re hanging out 2-3 times a week, including staying over. She is popping by my job to say hi, bringing food for me and my coworkers, and she’s pretty much been on track to meet my friends. Every time we hang out it’s tons of laughs, smiles, and lots of physical attention. She’s mentioned several times telling her friends and family about me, and she has met a couple of my friends. We text or talk on the phone every day.

There’s been some weird red flag stuff though, for example I’ve never been to her apartment and she pretty much refuses to let me see it. She always just comes to my place. The other is, we haven’t really ever had a “real” conversation. Any time relationship level conversations come up, the subject is changed or we go into jokes. We have had lots of other conversations, and we talk a lot, but it’s always avoided when it goes there. Whatever I suppose, she wants to take it slow?

Well I’ve been feeling strange about the whole relationship. Today she fell asleep and her phone was next to me. I know I shouldn’t have looked through it. I feel really guilty, I know it’s an invasion of her privacy, and it’s an overall lame move. But, I picked up her phone and searched my name in her texts.

There were a hand full text threads that had my name mentioned, but I picked the most recent one and a second one from a friends name I recognized from her stories.

The first one was two weeks ago. The girl I’m seeing sent a screenshot of a guy hitting on her, and I guess it’s a long time crush of hers. Her and the friend she sent it to make lots of lewd jokes, and she said something like “I like OP, but let me know if you bang ___”

The other thread was at the end of March, right around the time we started seeing each other and the first time she stayed the night at my place. Basically, she was describing our intimacy as extremely awkward, she was telling her friend that my manhood was small, and they laughed about my lack of game. Then the friend asks “Do you like OP?” To which she replied, “As a person, yeah. But I’m not into it.” Then they both casually mentioned the few other guys she’s been seeing and sleeping with and how they’re bad.

I feel embarrassed, but also extremely confused. I put her phone back immediately after reading the second thread and shut it. There was more to read, but my hands were shaking and I felt so stupid.

That conversation was a month and a half ago, clearly she’s continued to see me, and she is always extremely enthusiastic about intimacy and she’s often the one initiating. We’ve had conversations about our intimacy, and she has always been overwhelmingly positive to me.

I’m feeling neutral about her seeing other people. We’ve never had a conversation about this being exclusive, so I didn’t expect her to be, but I also didn’t expect what I saw. More than anything, my jaw dropped about how she was talking about me. I couldn’t imagine speaking about an intimate experience that way to my friends, let alone being so derogatory.

I’m trying to sort out if this was just an instance of her talking shit with her friends, but it also seems so unlike the person I’ve been seeing for the past couple of months.

I know it’s not fair of me to judge someone based on an isolated text that wasn’t even meant for me, but I am also feeling incredibly insecure and hurt over this. In equal amounts, I’m feeling large pangs of guilt for going through her phone.

After a few minutes of trying to process, it was midnight and she said she had to leave at that time. So I woke her up and walked her to her car. She mentioned twice that she was upset I didn’t wake her up earlier, because she wanted to get down to it. That made my stomach sink, and I laughed it off. I was obviously being really weird.

She sent me a text apologizing for sleeping so long, and asked if I wanted to see her Wednesday.

I don’t know what to do. I’m not sure how to feel, and I’m not sure how to approach a conversation with her about this, or even if I should at all.

Thanks for reading, sorry it’s so long. Typing on mobile if format is poor. Throwaway because I’m embarrassed

S’POREAN MAN SHOT BY GUNMAN IN PRAGUE SHOOTING, 14 PEOPLE KILLED & 25 INJURED

0

In what was supposed to be a joyous family trip to Europe, Singaporean Sofea Musa and her family found themselves in the midst of a nightmare in Prague. The picturesque surroundings of Charles University turned into a scene of chaos and tragedy when a 24-year-old student went on a shooting spree on December 21, leaving 14 people dead and 25, including Sofea’s husband, injured, according to The Straits Times.

A Fateful Afternoon in Prague

Sofea’s husband, Mr. Peter Vendel, a 47-year-old Singapore permanent resident from the Netherlands, was enjoying the sights with his family when tragedy struck. As they strolled along Charles Bridge towards Old Town Square, the peaceful ambiance was shattered by the sound of sirens, signaling the unfolding of a horrifying incident.

Panicked bystanders started running in the opposite direction, and Sofea, along with her husband and two children, joined the desperate attempt to seek safety. The family ran for about 500 meters before stopping, thinking they were out of harm’s way. Unfortunately, it was at this moment that Mr. Vendel was struck by a bullet, causing him significant injuries.

A Swift Response Amid Chaos

Quick-thinking bystanders came to the aid of the family, pulling Mr. Vendel out of harm’s way before an ambulance rushed him to the hospital. Left alone with her two children, Sofea described the traumatic experience of not knowing if the shooter was still a threat. The situation was chaotic, and everyone around was seeking cover.

The Aftermath and Ongoing Recovery

As of December 30, Mr. Vendel has undergone two surgeries to address the injuries sustained during the shooting. The bullet, having pierced his thigh and passed through the bone, ended up embedded in his rib. The subsequent surgeries aimed to remove the bullet and shrapnel, along with a portion of his pelvis. The final procedure involves the placement of an implant, yet to be scheduled.

Sofea’s daughter has since returned to Singapore, accompanied by her former husband, but her five-year-old son remains by her side, displaying signs of trauma. The young boy associates broken glass with the shooting and finds solace in ice cream, a small comfort amidst the ongoing turmoil.

Uncertain Future and Support from Loved Ones

The family faces an uncertain future as doctors in Prague recommend Mr. Vendel be airlifted to the Netherlands for the final surgical procedure. Singapore is deemed impractical due to the distance and Mr. Vendel’s medical condition. As they navigate this challenging situation, Sofea is grateful for the support of her sister-in-law and mother-in-law, who have traveled from the Netherlands to be with her.

Despite the physical distance, friends and family from around the world have reached out, offering their support and prayers. The couple, known for their home-based business “Manis En Zo,” specializing in Dutch snacks and desserts in Singapore, shared the ordeal on social media, apologizing for their inability to fulfill orders due to Mr. Vendel’s injuries.

Awaiting Normalcy

As Sofea waits for her husband’s recovery and contemplates the logistics of an uncertain future, her primary hope is for her family’s life to return to normalcy. The unexpected tragedy in Prague has left a lasting impact on the family, emphasizing the resilience required to overcome such traumatic experiences.

THAI POLICE OFFICER IN DEBT SO HE SHOOTS AND KILLS MAN ON EXPRESSWAY

0

In a shocking incident on a Friday night in Wang Thonglang district, Bangkok, a police officer stands accused after a businessman was shot to death on the Chalong Rat expressway. The arrest came after the suspect revealed his motive, citing anger over unpaid debts. This article unravels the details surrounding the tragic event that unfolded at kilometre marker 10.

The Incident

The fatal shooting occurred late at night when Pol Capt Ouaychai Srisong, deputy investigation chief at the Wang Thonglang police station, was alerted about the incident. The victim, identified as Krit Saruwaranon, 30, lay in a pool of blood on the expressway, having sustained five gunshot wounds.

Disturbing Details

Dressed in black jeans and a polo T-shirt, Krit had 50,000 baht in cash and valuables on his body. Forensic officers collected five cartridges from the scene, providing crucial evidence for the investigation.

Eyewitness Account

An expressway employee witnessed the altercation between two men near a parked van. One man was assaulted, falling onto the road, while the other, identified as Pol Lt Narongwat Thachada, 25, held a gun. After two gunshots, the assailant fled in the van, leaving the wounded victim behind.

Desperate Pleas and Tragic Outcome

The injured victim, in a desperate phone call to the expressway staff, pleaded for assistance in contacting his wife. During the conversation, he urged his wife to take their children and flee, fearing reprisals from the gunman. Tragically, the assailant returned, fired more shots at Krit, and fled the scene.

Arrest and Confession

A few hours later, investigators located and arrested Pol Lt Narongwat in Don Muang district. The suspect, facing charges of murder and carrying a weapon in public, confessed to shooting Krit out of anger. The motive stemmed from unfulfilled promises of debt clearance and promotion.

Complex Background

As investigations unfolded, it was revealed that the suspect had accumulated 2 million baht in debts from a failed business venture. Despite assurances from Krit to clear the debts and aid in professional advancement, the suspect felt deceived. The incident escalated when the officer demanded a large sum of money, leading to a fatal confrontation.

Previous Suspicion

Sources familiar with the investigation disclosed that Krit had a history of changing names and had been suspected in fraud cases. Presenting himself as a businessman with connections to senior police and military officers, he allegedly engaged in fraudulent activities, using luxury cars and claims of real estate investments to deceive victims.

Conclusion

The Wang Thonglang expressway shooting leaves a community in shock and raises questions about the complexities surrounding debt, promises, and personal vendettas. As the legal process unfolds, this tragic incident serves as a reminder of the human stories that often lie beneath the surface of such shocking events.

$500 CDC VOUCHER COMING ON 3RD JAN 2024, REMB TO GO CLAIM AND USE IT

0

Singaporeans are in for a treat in 2024 as Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Lawrence Wong announced an increase in the Community Development Council (CDC) vouchers. The new amount of S$500, up from the previous S$300, brings exciting opportunities for households across Singapore. This article delves into the details of this announcement, how to claim the vouchers, and additional perks that await Singaporean residents.

The Generous Increase

In a significant move, the government has increased the CDC vouchers from S$300 to S$500, providing a substantial boost to households. This increase aims to further support Singaporeans and enhance their quality of life.

Utilizing the Vouchers

Breaking down the voucher allocation, $250 can be utilized at participating heartland merchants and hawkers, fostering support for local businesses. Simultaneously, the remaining $250 can be spent at participating supermarkets, catering to the diverse needs of households.

Digital Claims for Convenience

To streamline the process, Singaporeans can conveniently claim their vouchers digitally at go.gov.sg/cdcv starting January 3, 2024. This digital initiative aims to enhance accessibility and ensure a hassle-free experience for all eligible households.

Expiry Date Alert

It’s crucial to note that the new set of vouchers comes with an expiry date. Residents must utilize these vouchers before the end of 2024 to maximize the benefits offered by this government initiative.

Donate Your Unspent Vouchers

For those with unspent CDC vouchers from January 2023, there’s an admirable option available until January 31, 2024. Singaporeans can contribute to the community by donating their unutilized vouchers to participating charities. This not only supports charitable causes but may also offer tax deductions in the Year of Assessment 2025.

How to Donate

  1. Visit the CDC Vouchers Donation Scheme website.
  2. Select your preferred charity.
  3. Login via Singpass to pledge the entire balance of your household’s CDC Vouchers 2023.
  4. Receive an email confirmation of your declaration if preferred.

Additional S&CC Rebate

Beyond the CDC vouchers, Singaporeans residing in Housing and Development Board (HDB) flats can anticipate an additional one-off 0.5-month service and conservancy charges (S&CC) rebate. This rebate, disbursed in January 2024, aims to alleviate financial burdens and enhance the well-being of 950,000 households.

U-Save Rebates to the Rescue

In tandem with other support measures, there’s more good news for 950,000 Singaporean HDB households. From January 2024 to December 2025, an extra S$20 per quarter of U-Save rebates will be provided. These rebates aim to cushion the impact of carbon tax and water price increases in 2024 and 2025, providing much-needed relief to residents.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the increase in CDC vouchers and additional rebates exemplify the government’s commitment to supporting Singaporeans. The user-friendly digital claiming process, donation options, and various rebates collectively contribute to a more resilient and thriving community.

GIRL BUYS CONDOM FOR BF, BUT MONTHS LATER FEW PIECES ARE MISSING

0

I need serious intellectual advise here.

I bought my partner a box of condom consist of 12 pieces in it as my partner kept complaining each time we are doing it there’s an bad odor. Which I thought it would helped. But it didn’t, and my partner did not like the feel of using condoms during the intercourse. So in totality 4 pieces were used out of 12 during this whole phrase.

Moving forward, as couples we tend to have quarrels and arguments. So happened that when I was at my partner’s place, I asked casually where are the condoms that I purchased, my partner replied due to the arguments that we had, it was thrown away.

Subsequently, a few months later passed, I was searching for something and chanced upon the exact condom box kept in a table drawer which was not used frequently and I realized the balance pieces are only left with 6pieces. I have yet exposed or confronted my partner about it till now.

Now tell me, what would you advise or do if you’re in my position?

Here are what netizens think:

  • Poke tiny holes in it and soak it in chilli pepper oil. In time the truth shall surface…
  • The correct question is how many times your partner has been doing it without a condom.
  • Leave him since he lied to u that he never use, somemore on someone else
  • Maybe he used it on others to see if the bad odor was present.Maybe he wore it for fun.
  • Never trust a person who lie if you confirmed is the same box.
  • He makes animal air balloon out of it
  • Maybe He chew it like bubblegum
  • Buy a new box in case not enough for next runs.
  • You should turn out all the lights and ask if he’s got a flashlight.