30.1 C
Singapore
Monday, April 27, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 2702

ANYTIME FITNESS “SORRY” FOR CHARGING MAN $60 ENTRY BECAUSE SOMEONE TAILGATE HIM IN

0

A man aired his grievances with Anytime Fitness @ Bugis after being unjustly charged $60 by the gym for allowing another person to enter after him.

The woman, seen in the video “tailgating” the man, Alan, into the gym without him knowing, and after the incident went viral online, the gym has since issued a public apology.

Unfair Charges

The controversy arose when Alan visited the Anytime Fitness Bugis outlet. On the day, he entered the gym, inadvertently leaving the door open behind him.

This action allowed another individual to enter the premises without scanning her key fob, raising concerns of unauthorized entry or “tailgating.”

Anytime Fitness took a strict stance on the matter, considering Alan responsible for the unidentified person’s entry due to his failure to ensure the door was closed behind him.

The man posted a video on Tiktok explaining that he was unfairly charged $60 by Anytime Fitness Bugis outlet for “allowing” someone to tailgate him into the gym.

The gym had reportedly told the man that he would be charged a $60 fee for tailgating if he can’t verify if the person behind him was a gym member, but the man said that he didn’t see the woman.

Anytime Fitness’ public apology

The management of AF Bugis was made aware of an issue that was highlighted by members of the public about the enforcement of tailgating policies.

Our tailgating policies exist in order to protect members as well as ensure a safe environment for all gym users. However, it is clear after review that the interpretation of the incident was erroneous, and the subsequent action taken by the staff of AF Bugis was a mistake. Members in good standing should not be penalised for a lapse in our security systems.

The management of AF Bugis would like to sincerely thank the members of the public and express our gratitude for bringing this lapse in protocol to our attention. Incidents like this are what will ensure we improve our systems and we will continue to work towards providing even higher standards of service to all our members.

The management will take all necessary steps to ensure proper reparations are made for the wrongful actions taken against the member in good standing and take all necessary measures to ensure no such incidents occur in the future. We express our sincere apologies to the member in good standing.

GIRL SAYS CAN’T WAIT FOR PARENTS TO PASS AWAY TO GET INHERITANCE, “I WON’T ME SAD”

0

A woman shared how she wouldn’t be too sad if her parents died because they mistreated her over the years and still expects her to do everything for them.

Here is the story:

I wouldn’t be too sad if my parents died

If my parents died, I would be sad, but I’d get over it quickly. I don’t think I’d miss them at all.

Some days, I imagine life without them and I think I’d be happier. No one around to make passive-aggressive comments towards me, no one pestering me for money, no one belittling me.

I always feel down after I have to spend too much time with them. I wish they’d just…. disappear.

I don’t see eye to eye with them on anything. They’re alien to me. They mistreated me physically and emotionally, but pretend like they did nothing wrong.

I can’t wrap my head around it. How can they put me through that much violence and still expect me to do everything for them?

I just nod and go along with whatever they say, but deep down inside, I want nothing to do with them.

I hope they can get what’s coming for them in the afterlife, I hope karma gets to them and they are punished for it.

But because of them, I know I’m a good mom because I know what children need… unconditional love.

Netizens comments

Oh, man. Don’t wait for their death to separate yourself from them. Can you separate now?

Unless there are ties that bind you, there’s no reason to stay (or stay in contact) and let them continue to treat you like crap. You deserve better.

I’ve cut off manipulative family members. It was like ripping off a bandaid…a bit painful for just a bit, but then it was done and I’ve been free from that BS ever since.

SCAMMERS PRETENDING TO BE YOUR FRIEND, THOUSANDS FALL PREY & $15.7 MILLION LOST

0

POLICE ADVISORY ON PERSISTENT SCAM VARIANT INVOLVING FAKE FRIENDS

The Police would like to remind members of the public about a persistent trend observed in relation to the fake friend scam variant, which involves scammers contacting victims through text messages (e.g. via WhatsApp) or phone/WhatsApp calls, pretending to be someone they know, and thereafter asking for financial assistance. Since January 2023, at least 4,800 victims have fallen prey, with total losses amounting to at least $15.7million.  

In these cases, victims would receive phone/WhatsApp calls from unknown numbers (with or without the “+65” prefix). In some cases, victims would receive text messages instead of phone/WhatsApp calls. The scammer would claim to be a friend or acquaintance and asked the victims to guess his or her real identity. In response, the victims would then provide the name of a friend whom they believed the caller could be. The scammer would then assume the identity of the said friend and ask the victims to update their contact details.

The scammer would subsequently contact the victims to ask for a loan and would claim that he or she is unable to perform a banking transaction or is experiencing financial difficulties. Victims would then be provided with a local bank account to transfer the money. Victims would only discover that they had been scammed after contacting their actual friends or acquaintances whom the scammers had impersonated, or when their loan was not returned as promised. 

The Police would like to advise members of the public to adopt the following precautionary measures:

  1. ADD – ScamShield App and set security features (e.g., enable two-factor (2FA) or multifactor authentication for banks, social media, Singpass accounts; set transaction limits on internet banking transactions, including PayNow).
  2. CHECK – for scam signs with official sources (e.g. ScamShield WhatsApp bot @ https://go.gov.sg/scamshield-bot, call the Anti-Scam Helpline on 1800-722-6688, or visit www.scamalert.sg). Verify whether the request is legitimate by checking with your family, friends and acquaintances through alternative means such as physical meet-ups, video calls or email other than using the new contact details on your phone.
  3. TELL – authorities, family, and friends about scams. Beware of unusual requests from someone purporting to be someone you know via text messages or phone/WhatsApp calls. Report the number to WhatsApp to initiate in-app blocking.

If you have any information relating to such crimes or if you are in doubt, please call the Police Hotline at 1800-255-0000, or submit it online at www.police.gov.sg/iwitness. All information will be kept strictly confidential. If you require urgent Police assistance, please dial ‘999’. 

For more information on scams, members of the public can visit www.scamalert.sg or call the Anti-Scam Helpline at 1800-722-6688. Fighting scams is a community effort. Together, we can ACT Against Scams to safeguard our community!

Examples – Conversation between a scammer and victim on WhatsApp

23 Y.O MAN THINKS HE’S A NINJA, CAUGHT WITH KARAMBIT KNIFE & TRY TO FLEE FROM POLICE

0

A 23-year-old man was arrested by the Singapore Police Force on 29 August for possession of offensive weapons, namely a karambit knife and a knuckle duster.

The police were conducting a check on him on 29 August at about 8.30pm along Victoria Street at the time, and the man tried to flee but was immediately detained by the officers.

He was then found to be in possession of the weapons, as well as suspected illegal drugs.

THe man was subsequently charged in court yesterday (31 August) with possession of an offensive and scheduled weapon punishable under Section 6(1) and Section 7 (1) under the Corrosive and Explosive Substances and Offensive Weapons Act 1958 respectively.

As for his alleged drug offences, the Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) are currently conducting investigations into the matter.

S’pore Police Force’s Statement

MAN TO BE CHARGED FOR POSSESSION OF OFFENSIVE AND SCHEDULED WEAPONS

Police have arrested a 23-year-old man for his suspected involvement in a case of possession of offensive and scheduled weapons in a public place.

On 29 August 2023 at about 8.30 pm, police officers conducted a check on a man along Victoria Street. While being checked, the man attempted to flee from the officers but was immediately detained. The man was subsequently found to be in possession of a karambit knife and a knuckle duster. He was also found in possession of substances believed to be controlled drugs.

The man will be charged in court on 31 August 2023, with possession of an offensive and scheduled weapon punishable under Section 6(1) and Section 7 (1) under the Corrosive and Explosive Substances and Offensive Weapons Act 1958 respectively. The offences of carrying an offensive and/or scheduled weapon in a public place otherwise than for a lawful purpose carries an imprisonment term of up to five years and at least six strokes of cane.

The Central Narcotics Bureau is investigating into the drug-related offences. Investigations are on-going.

The Police have zero tolerance towards such brazen acts and will not hesitate to act against those who blatantly disregard the law.

Annex

Weapons Seized as Case Exhibits ▼

PUBLIC AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
SINGAPORE POLICE FORCE
30 August 2023 @ 8:20 PM

CCK: MAN UNHAPPY THAT RESIDENTS BURN JOSS PAPER & LEAVE A MESS BEHIND

0

In a tranquil corner of 667 Choa Chu Kang Crescent, a serene neighborhood in Singapore, an incident unfolded that shed light on the intersection of cultural customs and the responsibility to maintain clean public spaces. A man, armed with a camera, captured the moments leading up to an event that would leave him disheartened and concerned for the environment.

The Unfortunate Scene: Joss Paper Scattered Everywhere

The man, anticipating a scenario that has become all too familiar, decided to film a gathering of people engaged in the age-old practice of burning joss paper. Known for its significance in many Asian cultures, joss paper burning is a tradition rooted in honoring ancestors and departed loved ones. However, what caught the man’s attention wasn’t the act itself, but the aftermath that followed.

Understanding Joss Paper Burning

Joss paper, also known as ghost money, is an intricate part of various religious and cultural practices. It’s believed that when burned, these symbolic papers reach the spirit world, providing the deceased with resources and comforts. The act is often accompanied by prayers and rituals, demonstrating the strong connection between the living and the departed.

Cultural Practices vs. Environmental Responsibility

The incident at Choa Chu Kang Crescent raises a pertinent question: How do we balance the preservation of cultural heritage with the responsibility to maintain a clean and hygienic environment? While joss paper burning holds immense sentimental value, it’s essential to find ways to conduct such practices without causing harm to the surroundings.

The Impact on Public Spaces

One of the key concerns arising from incidents like these is the impact on public spaces. The scattering of joss paper not only detracts from the visual appeal of the area but also poses a threat to the local ecosystem. Striking a balance between upholding cultural practices and protecting the environment is crucial for maintaining the charm and cleanliness of neighborhoods.

Legal Ramifications: Environmental Public Health Act

Singapore, known for its strict regulations, has laws in place to ensure public hygiene. The Environmental Public Health Act outlines the consequences of littering and leaving waste in public spaces. This act ensures that individuals who disregard their responsibility to keep the environment clean can face legal action.

Potential Penalties:

Previously, for an incident of a similar nature, NEA said: “We should also be considerate when observing religious practices as it’s our shared responsibility to keep public spaces clean,”.

It is an offence under the Environmental Public Health Act for leaving litter behind.

Under the Act, first-time offenders for such offences are liable on conviction to a maximum court fine of S$2,000. 

MAN HATES WORKING IN HOME FOR DISABLED, SAID THEY ARE “BURDENS”

0

A man shared how he hates working in a home for the physically and intellectually disabled, and he says that they add nothing to society and that they are a burden.

Here is the story:

People think I’m a good person because of my job

For a living, I manage a home for individuals with physical and mental disabilities. When I tell people what I do they typically say something like “Oh that takes a really caring and compassionate person to do what you do.” OR “That must be so rewarding.”

I actually hate my job but I’m good at what I do and I’ve been doing it for 11 years. So it would be difficult to get into a new field. When I tell people I hate my job they then ask why…

I personally believe that the types of individuals I take care of serve no purpose. They’re not adding anything to society either. If anything they’re a burden. They just shouldn’t exist.

Once I tell people that, they say something like I’m evil and that I shouldn’t exist.

Well, my mother who is mentally disabled herself but is very high functioning tried to get rid of me but things didn’t work out, so here we are.

Netizens comments

Your soul has been branded and tarnished with the horror of rejection by your mother – this has caused you to seek to experience that original rejection and betrayal in your life – by working in a domain that to you in a sense contains some portion of the original essence which violated you.

You have needed to be continually familiar with it. Your personal sense of the validity or value of your clientele has not prevented you from rendering professional treatment to them.

There is no problem as far as I can see. Your destiny unravels before you as it does for all of us.

GF SECRETLY GOES OFF PILL & FORCES BF TO MARRY HER BY GETTING PREGNANT

0

Hello, me and my gf have been dating for a little while now. She just recently informed me that she is pregnant. She was on birth control and i thought it was safe, so i thought, apparently she lied to me, she will not give me a straight answer on why or how long she stopped taking it.

I believe, along with other reasons, that she purposely got pregnant without my permission.

But, pregnant nonetheless. I have not approached her on this and have only supported her so far. She is very anti-abortion and obviously wants to keep it. I personally, am not against kids, but seeing the way she did it, I don’t want to be with her.

She also has a condition called PCOS which makes miscarriages higher and getting pregnant hard to begin with. I guess im just looking for advice on how to move forward with this as its a lot to take in.

Here are what netizens think:

  • This is a big breach of trust. Are you absolutely sure she was on BC and then stopped? You should definitely approach her on this. While you might have a kid with her, that does not mean you have to be with her. The fact that she would lie and misdirection about something this big and life changing is giant red flag. She is willing to lie to and manipulate you to get what she wants.
  • Get rid of her, She decided that her wish to be pregnant was more important than your consent.
  • So did the conversation start with, “did you get pregnant on purpose?” Or “when did you do off birth control?” Cause I can see why you might not get an answer.
  • Did she say she was ever off her bc? Bc, while highly effective does still have a failure rate. If she accidentally skips a day or takes it at a different time or even takes it while on antibiotics can affect the effectiveness.

19 Y.O SI GINNA ARRESTED FOR LOANSHARK HARASSMENT, LOCK PEOPLE’S HOUSE & LEAVE NOTE

0

A 19-year-old man has been arrested by the police for loanshark harassment, he had allegedly locked a debtor’s unit at Bedok North Avenue 4 and left behind a note that was pasted at the waterpipe beside the unit.

The police arrested him on 30 August and seized 4 bicycle locks, 2 debtor’s notes, 1 red marker and 1 mobile phone as case exhibits.

S’pore Police Force’s statement

MAN ARRESTED FOR LOANSHARK HARASSMENT

The Police have arrested a 19-year-old man for his suspected involvement in a case of loanshark harassment.

On 26 August 2023, the Police were alerted to a case of loanshark harassment along Bedok North Avenue 4, where the gate of a residential unit was secured with a bicycle lock and a debtor’s note was pasted at the waterpipe beside the unit. Through ground enquiries and with the aid of images from Police cameras, officers from Bedok Police Division established the identity of the man and arrested him on 30 August 2023. Four bicycle locks, two debtor’s notes, one red marker and one mobile phone were seized as case exhibits.

Preliminary investigations revealed that the man was allegedly involved in other similar cases of loanshark harassments.

The man will be charged in court on 31 August 2023 under the Moneylenders Act 2008. For first-time offenders, the offence of loanshark harassment carries a fine between $5,000 and $50,000, with imprisonment of up to five years, and caning of up to six strokes.

The Police have zero tolerance against loanshark harassment activities. Those who deliberately vandalise properties, cause annoyance or disruption to public safety, peace and security, will be dealt with severely in accordance with the law.

Members of the public are advised to stay away from loansharks and not to work with or assist them in any way. The public can call the Police at ‘999’ or the X-Ah Long hotline at 1800-924-5664 if they suspect or know of anyone who could be involved in loansharking activities.

PUBLIC AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
SINGAPORE POLICE FORCE
30 August 2023 @ 10:55 PM

GUY TRAUMATISE BY DAD AS A KID, NOW STILL FLINCHES WHEN HE SEES BELTS

0

Was just having a discussion with my mother where she was lamenting about her student who was very spoilt.

I get her resentment of him but she thinks that the parents should slap him to have him reform. she refused to accept my argument that there are better and less archaic ways to help a child behave better than hitting them.

I then told her about how my dad belted me when I was 15 for drinking and smoking and how even at 24, when he takes off his belt after coming home from work it makes me flinch in fear.

The kicker is that I still drink and smoke so the punishment didn’t work.

If I was sat down and talked to and perhaps asked why I was doing those things as a teen (I felt like crap every day, and wanted to fit in), perhaps I wouldn’t have done those things.

My opinion is that hitting your children in any amount is mistreating them. you shouldn’t have to fear your parents I feared mine. what do you think?

Some other punishments I remember, spoonful of chili powder and not allowed to swallow; that was kinda wtf. twisting ears, spanking, slaps, hair pulling, pinching, of course the caning, sometimes metal end of belt was used….

Netizens’ comments

Yup. Caned on the palms and sometimes hit my thighs when my parents were really upset with me. My dad believed in the old ways because that was how he was raised. But he stopped by the time I entered secondary school.

He said that I can rationalize things by then and would instead try to talk to me. He used to be so stubborn and still is a disciplinarian.

There is quite a bit of years between my brother and I, and by that time, he had mellowed considerably.

The father that raised me is different personality-wise than the father that raised my brother. Age made him softer and kinder in his approach.

My mum never hit me but she certainly used the wait till your father get home and prepared the cane.

Was I traumatised by it? Nope. I understood why he did what he did and to be fair, he only used it sparingly when I crossed a certain line.

And it was bonding experience with your friends when you complained that you got the cane from your parents cause received complaint from teacher

Would I physically punish my children? Nope

Editor’s note: I was also caned mercilessly by my parents when I was a child and although I hated it at the time, I thought I needed it. They say spare the rod, spoil the child. I still grew up to me a horrible person though, so maybe they should’ve caned me harder.

46 Y.O CHIKOPEK FILMED XMMs OUTSIDE SCHOOLS, HARASSED & STALKED THEM, JAILED

0

46-year-old Fong Poh Kuan, a serial stalker and repeat offender, was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment after he had filmed students near school as well as conducted a fake survey to get the information of more than 500 schoolgirls in 1 day, according to The Straits Times.

He also secretly filmed the school girls outside their schools by wearing a pair of glasses with pinhole video recording cameras embedded in them, also known as spy-glasses.

Serial stalker

On January 8, 2020, while Anglo-Chinese Junior College hosted an open house for potential students, Fong operated in a public area nearby, equipped with blank forms. He approached students, claiming that the forms were for an education survey.

Using the data collected under the guise of a survey, Fong embarked on a campaign of stalking. Among his victims was a 16-year-old girl who later became paranoid and felt harassed after realizing Fong’s true intentions.

Fong’s stalking extended to multiple students from various institutions, including Temasek Junior College, Tampines Meridian Junior College, Dunman High School, and Nanyang Technological University.

Fong’s tactics escalated when he began capturing video footage of students. He concealed his actions by placing his phone in his breast pocket or holding it at chest height, capturing unsuspecting students in uniform. These intrusive images were then hidden in a password-encrypted app disguised as a calculator, named Vault.

Fong’s behavior took an even more sinister turn as he continued his harassment. Standing near bus stops or within the vicinity of educational institutions, he filmed students with his hidden camera.

His actions were perceived as threatening, and he even prompted one institution, Tampines Meridian Junior College, to issue warnings to students and parents, advocating for increased caution and arranging for students to leave the school in pairs.

Fong’s methods extended to the use of fake surveys, where he would falsely represent himself as a member of an educational institution or government body. These surveys provided him with opportunities to film students using hidden cameras, and he would then use the collected information to stalk and harass them through text messages and surveillance.

Fong’s actions finally came to an end when he approached a victim, a 19-year-old girl from Temasek Junior College, and began soliciting personal information. Despite using tactics to imply authority from institutions like Nanyang Technological University, the victim grew suspicious.

Fong’s history of harassment and stalking culminated in his arrest and prosecution. A former student of Nanyang Technological University himself, Fong’s familiarity with the institution’s system allowed him to access victim information.

After a previous conviction for similar offenses, Fong received a prison sentence, underscoring the seriousness of his actions.

S’pore Police Force’s statement

MAN CONVICTED AND JAILED FOR MULTIPLE OFFENCES OF ILLEGALLY OBTAINING PERSONAL INFORMATION, UNLAWFUL STALKING AND HARASSMENT

On 30 August 2023, Fong Poh Kuen (“Fong”), a 46-year-old man, was convicted and sentenced to  eighteen months’ imprisonment for the following offences:

  1. three counts of illegally obtaining personal information under Section 416A of the Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed);
  2. one count of public nuisance under Section 268 of the Penal Code 1871 punishable under Section 290(b) of the Penal Code 1871;
  3. three counts of causing harassment, alarm or distress under Section 4(2) of the Protection from Harassment Act, Revised Edition 2015, punishable under Section 8(1)(b) of the Act; &
  4. six counts of unlawful stalking under Section 7(1) of the Protection from Harassment Act, Revised Edition 2015, punishable under Section 8(1)(e) of the Act.

Fong consented to having eight other charges, including five counts of causing harassment, alarm or distress under Section 4(2) of the Protection from Harassment Act, Revised Edition 2015, and three counts of unlawful stalking under Section 7(1) of the Protection from Harassment Act, Revised Edition 2015, to be taken into consideration for sentencing.

Fong was previously convicted of similar offences in 2019.Between 2020 and 2022, the Police received multiple reports informing that Fong had either recorded videos of students in the vicinity of educational institutions using his mobile phone or spectacles containing pinhole cameras, or had conducted surveys on female students under false pretenses by claiming that he was a representative of educational institutions or government agencies. Investigations further revealed that Fong had stalked multiple young female students who had provided their personal information in these surveys. 

Fong was arrested and remanded on 31 August 2022. On 29 August 2023, Fong pleaded guilty to the thirteen charges in [1] above. He consented for the eight other charges in [2] to be taken into consideration for the purposes of sentencing. 

The offence of illegally obtaining personal information under Section 416A of the Penal Code 1871, is punishable with an imprisonment term of up to three years, a fine up to $10,000, or both. The offence of public nuisance under Section 290 of the Penal Code 1871, carries a fine of up to $2,000, an imprisonment term of up to three months, or both. Those found guilty of causing harassment, alarm or distress under Section 4(2) of the Protection from Harassment Act 2014, shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $5,000. Repeat offenders under Section 8(1)(b) of the Protection from Harassment Act 2014 shall be liable on conviction to an imprisonment term not exceeding 6 months, a fine up to $10,000, or both. The offence of unlawful stalking under Section 7(1) of the Protection of Harassment Act 2014 is punishable with an imprisonment term not exceeding 12 months, or a fine up to $5,000, or both. Repeat offenders under Section 8(1)(e) of the Protection from Harassment Act 2014 shall be liable on conviction to an imprisonment term of up to two years, a fine up to $10,000, or both.

The Police take a stern view against any illegal behaviour targeting minors and/or students, and will take firm action against perpetrators of such offences.

PUBLIC AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
SINGAPORE POLICE FORCE
31 August 2023 @ 10:00 AM