32.1 C
Singapore
Tuesday, June 23, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 3831

51 Y.O JOBLESS MAN TAKES ALLOWANCE FROM YOUNGER BROTHER FOR 9 YEARS

0

My [45m] older brother [51m] lives with me. He’s never really been “good at life”.

He’s had a few jobs here and there, but mostly just stuff like supermarket, McDonald’s, and he delivered pizzas or doing GrabFood for about a month.

He’s never held down a job for more than 60 days. He dropped out of school, and never bothered to get a diploma or degree. He mostly just sits in his room drinking my booze, smoking my cigarettes, and eating my food while he plays whatever JRPG he’s currently obsessed with.

I don’t mind this, I truly don’t. I did well in life, and my wife invested our money very well. So we’re comfortable. I have more than enough resources to support him fully for the rest of our lives, and I intend to do so. He’s not taking food out of my kid’s mouths, he’s not cutting into their university funds.

It’s literally extra money that I would just be squirreling away if I didn’t spend it on him.

Last night at dinner, my wife told me that her brother lost his job (he worked for a company that recently had MASSIVE layoffs, so it was due to no fault of his own), and asked me if we could float him some cash for bills and stuff while he finds a new job. I told her to have him send me an estimate of how much he needs to cover 6 months, and that was that (or so I thought).

My brother proceeded to head over to Facebook and post a rant about how people need to be more self-reliant and not ask for handouts they didn’t earn. He didn’t mention my BiL by name, but it was pretty clear that that’s what triggered his rant.

I commented on his post, and I asked him how living off of me for the past 9 years was “self-reliant”. I told him that he is in an incredibly privileged position because not everyone has a millionaire brother to pay all their bills for them. I also asked how the allowance I give him every week is not a “handout”.

Anyway, a bunch of his friends from his video game started clowning on him in the comments (apparently he tells people online that he’s an investment banker). He deleted the post, and has not come out of his room since (there is an en-suite bathroom, don’t worry).

My wife says it was F up for me to call him out publicly like that, and that I could have been more respectful about it, and my aunt is FURIOUS with me for “airing the family laundry”.

So I kinda think I might be the asshole here. Not for what I said, but for the fact that I said it publicly.

But at the same time, I don’t feel like the asshole, because his rant was public too.

NEIGHBOUR PLAYS MUSIC AT 12AM THEN ACCUSED THOSE WHO COMPLAIN AS ‘THREATENING’

0

I live in a small building. I believe there are eight a floor. I live with my sister, and then my youngest sister lives on the first floor with her husband (referred to hereafter as BIL) and their four-month-old daughter. The apartments are pretty soundproof, with most sound transfer happening through windows and doors.

I am currently job searching and doing Grabfood to make ends meet, so I tend to work odd hours. I often get home around 10 P.M.

When I got home tonight, I noticed the apartment across from mine was playing some really loud music. Not thinking much of it, I went home. At around 10:45, the music got louder, and I could hear the bass in my bedroom. My bedroom is on the other end of the building from them. I decided to try and wind down with some video game time in my living room, so I heard my BIL calmly knocking on their door at 11:30. When they finally answered their door, he very politely asked them to turn it down because they were having a hard time getting my niece to sleep because of the music.

Whoever answered closed the door in his face and told someone else in the apartment to turn it up.

Around midnight, I texted my BIL, which is when he reported his encounter with them. I decided to go and ask them as well.

I walked up to their door, and sharply knocked five times. I heard them turn down the music a little bit, and then one of them answered the door.

“Hi,” I said while smiling politely, “I was wondering if you could please keep it down.”

They rolled their eyes at me and closed the door in my face. I stood there dumbfounded for around thirty seconds while they complained about my rudeness. I was just confused, and I think they interpreted my shock as malice because after 30 seconds I heard one of them say, “Oh my God, she’s still there!” And the sound of the chain lock being put in to place.

“Leave! Go to sleep!” Someone told me through the door.

“I’m trying,” I responded, “That’s why I asked you to keep it down.”

“Okay, we’ll keep it down! Go to sleep!”

Even more confused, I went back to my apartment. I think they found me threatening, even though this whole encounter was maybe 1.5 minutes long.

WOMAN WARN OTHER WOMEN WHO HAS A GAMBLER BF, “DESTROYS FUTURE”

0

I used to have a boyfriend who gambles.

I left him after 2 years as I could no longer see a future with him. And the reason was not just about the gambling but also a collective pattern in his behavior that made me decided to leave him.

He is with friends with people who gamble. His family members also gamble. They moved houses a few times because of loan sharks.

He told me he hated his dad for gambling and making his mum suffer and being forced to work 2,3 jobs to keep the house running. They gamble in hundreds and thousands per session depending on the game. He has a bad temper but has never flared up at me in those 2 years of being together but I have seen him get angry at his friends and family and it was an ugly side of him.

I wouldn’t dare to make him angry. He uses and abuse his weaker friends and sucks up to friends who are more powerful and richer than him. I hated the way he treated service staff. He uses index and middle finger to pass card or cash. Soon I realised his entire family member does that so it’s a learnt behavior.

I spent hours and hours watching him play. Some days he lose some days he win. He plays with people he hate and also with people he like. Sometimes someone will accuse him of owing them $500 or $1000 when he don’t even remember and he would just pay even when his bank account is left with $50. When he wins he splurge and treats everyone for a meal or drinks. He gambles not only the weekends but also during weekdays after work. Sometimes I pay for meals, dates and transport when he is broke. He has never tried to borrow money from me and I’ve never offered.

One day I just had a revelation. I want out and I started to spend less and less time with him. I got no balls to tell him to his face that I do not want to become his mother and suffer. The week when we broke up he took a while to realise why I left without me saying the truth. He told me he quit gambling but I never believed him.

This happened in my early 20s. 2.5 years is enough of a time for you to decide if your bf is worth sticking around for. From the way you talked about him, I think you know the answer already. Gambling aside, you would not want a gaslighting husband. Good times everyone can be nice. Don’t be blinded. Look at everything as a whole. What matters more is during the hard and bad times, what does he choose to do?

Your future children can’t choose who their father is but you can. Choose wisely.

ST SPORTS DESK CALLED OUT BY NETIZENS TO EAT HIS OWN SHORTS & SHAVE BALD

In a Tweet posted by ST Sports Desk, the person behind the social media account of the company posted is getting roasted by netizens.

The account made a number of “forfeits” stating that: “I’ll eat my shorts. And shave bald. And sing an Argentina song. Maybe all at the same time”

What they posted on Twitter

“For the uninitiated, Argentina are unbeaten in 36 games and are chasing Italy’s record of 37. What’s the craziest forfeit you can think of if they lose tonight? I’ll eat my shorts. And shave bald. And sing an Argentina song. Maybe all at the same time #FIFAWorldCup 16? #Qatar2022”

Netizens called the person behind the account to do it:

  • Have to rethink where WC stands in today’s context. The country with more Zua Ji!
  • According to rumours, Andy’ Dad do not wish to share his prediction this Wcup for fear of heavy boat. Hahaha
  • ST Sports Desk curse. Now can bet agnst whatever they are writing. Lol
  • Lets keep a lookout for a shorts eating bald guy tomorrow
  • Guess to win, you either bet against what whorejinx placed upon. You bet upon what those shorts eat shaved heads of shittime sports desk undermined. It the Germany “story” all over again. Bunch of laughingstock indeed
  • Who is the fool who said want to eat his shorts.now where r u.
  • Does “Don’t Cry for Me Argentina” considered an Argentinian song?
  • Guess how much the Arabs paid the Argentinians for this loss
  • I doubt whoever wrote that will now go in hiding and will not admit. So much for courage and bravado.

FOUNDER OF MALAYAN COUNCIL MADE WORKERS LIE TO M.O.M ABOUT SALARIES, CHARGED

0

37-year-old Mohamad Hafiz Salim Alkhatib, the founder of The Malayan Council (a popular chain of restaurants) is facing 41 charges under the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act.

He had allegedly falsely declared the salaries of his workers to MOM, and told 13 of his workers to lie to the ministry in 2019.

The Straits Times reported that Hafiz had allegedly falsely declared his workers’ salaries in their work pass applications.

He also made 13 of his workers, who were holding positions like managers, supervisors, and customer service executives, lie to MOM in 2019.

Hafiz is being accused of paying one of the 13 workers $200 lesser than the declared salary, between the months of February and August 2019.

He is also being charged with instigating Ms Sheikhah Mumtaz Sheikh Mustafa, the director of The Malayan Council, to lie to the authorities on three occasions about the workers’ work passes.

He is also being charged with employing two foreign workers without valid work plasses in 2019, at their Bussorah Street outlet.

Hafiz is currently out on bail of $15,000, and his case has been adjourned to 27 December.

S’PORE POLICEMAN CHARGED FOR ALLEGEDLY TAKING BRIBES & HELPING SUSPECTS SIAM AUTHORITIES

0

45-year-old police officer Poo Tze Chiang, allegedly took bribes totalling $32,500, and was charged with 7 counts of corruption and 3 counts of obstruction of justice on 22 November.

He had allegedly received bribes of about $32,500 from Cordell Chan Yuen Kwang and Wang Huate on 7 occasions, from 2019 to 2020.

He was allegedly given the bribes so that he would provide information to Chan and Wang, relating to the police investigations against them.

51-year-old Ng Chuan Seng also allegedly aided Chan and Wang in September 2019 by giving Poo a $2,000 red packet – Ng was charged with one count of corruption on Tuesday.

Poo allegedly told Chan on 5 August 2020 that Wang would be detained if he reported for bail.

The three of them were at a void deck in Bukit Batok when Poo purportedly flashed his police warrant card at 2 police officers who were patrolling in the area so that they wouldn’t perform checks on Chan and Wang.

On 25 November, Poo then allegedly told Chan that he had spotted a colleague’s car, and told Chan to head to a coffeeshop nearby.

The CPIB said that Singapore has zero tolerance towards corruption, and if convicted, Poo faces a jail term of up to 5 years and a fine of up to $100k, for each charge.

MAN FOUGHT WITH COFFEESHOP PATRON WHO WAS UPSET AT BEING LOCKED INSIDE TOILET, JAILED

0

60-year-old Yieh Kan Wah, was sentenced to 12 weeks imprisonment earlier today (22 November) for one count of voluntarily causing hurt, he had 2 other charges taken into consideration during his sentencing.

What happened?

Yieh was with his friends at a coffeeshop at Block 1 Beach Road on 21 April 2021, while the 63-year-old victim was also with his friends at the time.

The victim went to the toilet at about 9.15pm but was accidentally locked inside, before being released about 20 minutes later.

He then went to confront the owner of the coffeeshop and expressed his unhappiness, and Yieh (who was sitting 2 tables away) stepped in to try and calm him down.

However, the two men then got into an argument with Yieh getting increasingly agitated, before passing his phone to his friend and approaching the victim.

A fight then broke out and Yieh punched the victim in the face twice before the two got separated; the victim’s nose was bleeding but Yoieh then continued to approach him as he picked up a glass beer bottle.

The two men were then kept apart from each other and Yieh then started retreating, but this time the victim started approaching him.

Yieh then dropped the glass bottle and it shattered into pieces, and he then picked up a piece of glass fragment and hit the victim in the face when the latter lunged at him, resulting in the victim suffering a 7cm cut on his face.

The victim then fell onto a few chairs before falling to the ground, as Yieh continued to attack him, before his firned pulled him away.

The incidents were caught on CCTV cameras, and the victim ended up needing surgery for multiple facial lacerations and bruising.

The victim incurred medical expenses of $968.55, to which Yieh compensated him $970.

77,500 PACKS OF ILLEGAL CIGGS & 1,360KG OF CHEWING TOBACCO SEIZED @ TUAS CHECKPOINT

0

The Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) said in a Facebook video yesterday (21 November) that they foiled one of the largest attempts to smuggle 77,500 packets of duty-unpaid cigarettes and 1,360kg of chewing tobacco into Singapore via a Malaysia-registered lorry.

Here is what they said

𝙈𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙣 𝙖𝙣𝙮𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙘𝙖𝙣 𝙨𝙢𝙤𝙠𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙖 𝙡𝙞𝙛𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚… 🤔

On 20 Oct 2022, ICA officers at Tuas Checkpoint foiled one of the largest attempts to smuggle 77,500 packets of duty-unpaid cigarettes and 1,360kg of chewing tobacco into Singapore via a Malaysia-registered lorry.

Watch how our eagle-eyed officers detect and extract the large amount of prohibited items.

The case was referred to Singapore Customs and the Health Sciences Authority for further investigations.

As guardians of our borders, ICA will continue to keep a watchful eye to thwart smuggling attempts through Singapore’s borders.

MAS – “WE CONSISTENTLY WARNED ABOUT DANGERS OF UNREGULATED ENTITIES” LIKE FTX

0

MAS Statement to Address Misconceptions in the Wake of Collapse of FTX

Singapore, 21 November 2022… The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) would like to address some questions and misconceptions that have arisen in the wake of the FTX.com (FTX) debacle.

2.  A first misconception is that it was possible to protect local users who dealt with FTX, such as by ringfencing their assets or ensuring that FTX backed its assets with reserves. MAS cannot do this as FTX is not licensed by MAS and operates offshore [1] . MAS has consistently warned about the dangers of dealing with unregulated entities.

3.  A second question is why MAS treated Binance.com (Binance) differently from FTX, specifically why it was placed on the Investor Alert List (IAL) while FTX was not. 

4. While both Binance and FTX are not licensed here, there is a clear difference between the two: Binance was actively soliciting users in Singapore while FTX was not. Binance in fact went to the extent of offering listings in Singapore dollars and accepted Singapore-specific payment modes such as PayNow and PayLah.

5. MAS received several complaints about Binance between January and August 2021. There were also announcements in multiple jurisdictions [2]  of unlicensed solicitation of customers by Binance during the same period.

6. With regard to FTX, there was no evidence that it was soliciting Singapore users specifically. Trades on FTX also could not be transacted in Singapore dollars. But as in the case of thousands of other financial and crypto entities that operate overseas, Singapore users were able to access FTX services online.

7. MAS placed Binance on the IAL because it had solicited Singapore users without a licence. Further, on MAS’ referral, the Commercial Affairs Department commenced investigation into Binance for possible contravention of the Payment Services Act (PS Act). There was no reason to place FTX on the IAL as there was no evidence that it had contravened the PS Act.

8. MAS required Binance to stop soliciting Singapore users [3] . To assure MAS that it was no longer doing so, Binance put in place various measures including geo-blocking of Singapore IP addresses and the removal of its mobile application from Singapore app stores. These measures were intended to demonstrate beyond doubt that Binance had ceased soliciting and providing services to Singapore users. Should Binance decide now to dismantle some of these restrictions, it has to continue to comply with the prohibition against soliciting Singapore users without a licence. 

9. A third question is whether MAS should exhaustively list on the IAL and provide information on all the offshore crypto exchanges in the world. There are hundreds of such exchanges, and thousands of other entities offshore that accept investments in non-crypto assets. It is not possible to list all of them and no regulator in the world has done so.

10. The purpose of the IAL is to warn the public of entities that may be wrongly perceived as being MAS-regulated, especially those which solicit Singapore customers for financial business without the requisite MAS licence. It does not mean that the thousands of other entities operating offshore, which are not listed on the IAL, are safe to deal with.

11. In addition to maintaining the IAL, MAS publishes a Financial Institutions Directory on its website that is an exhaustive list of all MAS-regulated entities.

12. The most important lesson from the FTX debacle is that dealing in any cryptocurrency, on any platform, is hazardous.

13. Crypto exchanges can and do fail. Even if a crypto exchange is licensed in Singapore, it would be currently only regulated to address money-laundering risks, not to protect investors. This is similar to the approach currently taken in most jurisdictions. MAS has recently published a consultation paper proposing basic investor protection measures for crypto players who are licensed to operate in Singapore [4] .

14. Further, even if a crypto exchange is well-managed, cryptocurrencies themselves are highly volatile and many of them have lost all value

15. The ongoing turmoil in the crypto industry serves as a reminder of the huge risks of dealing in cryptocurrencies. As MAS has repeatedly stated, there is no protection for customers who deal in cryptocurrencies. They can lose all their money.

***

RSAF LIEUTENANT-COLONEL CHARGED FOR ALLEGEDLY MOLESTING WOMAN @ NTU DORM

0

45-year-old Neo Aik Chiao, a lieutenant-colonel from the Republic of Singapore Air Force who had flown helicopters including a Chinook, allegedly trespassed into a dormitory at Nanyang Technological University and molested a woman there.

The incident allegedly happened on 13 November at about 2am.

MINDEF said in a statement to Straits Times that Neo has been suspended from all his duties by the SAF, and that they will carefully assess the eventual findings before deciding on further actions to take against him.

They added that they hold their service personnel to “high standards of discipline and integrity”.

What happened?

Neo was charged on 15 November with 2 counts of criminal trespass, as well as one count of molestation.

He had allegedly trespassed into the dormitory rooms of two women aged 18 and 21 on 13 November, where he allegedly molested the 21-year-old by touching her left thigh.

NTU said that the police were immediately called to the scene and that they have since stepped up security at the campus and provided support to the victims.

Neo’s case has been adjourned to next Tuesday (29 November).