29.4 C
Singapore
Wednesday, July 29, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 4255

FARRER PARK SHOPHOUSE SOLD @ $8 MILLION 5 MONTHS AFTER $4.3 MILLION PURCHASE

0

Months after a shophouse at Farrer Park’s Kitchener Road was bought at a value of $4.3 million, it was sold for a price of $8 million.

This transaction meant that the seller profited an amount of close to $3.7 million.

Initially bought in Jan 2022

In the month of January 2022, the shophouse which is located at 147 Kitchener Road was bought by Pack Wan, a company that was created in August 2021.

The then purchase price of $4.3 million was the price which was valued in August 2021.

History

The shophouse at 147 Kitchener road had been there since it was built in 1920, and is now currently facing City Square Mall and Residences.

City Square mall has an underground link to Farrer Park MRT station.

Who bought the shophouse?

The latest owner of the shophouse is revealed to be  Eng Teng Association, which is one of the more established Hakka associations.

Previously, it was located at 132 Neil Road in a double-story conservation shophouse at 132 Neil Road.

It was then sold for $10.5 million.

Image source: Google Maps

COMPANY RAISES WORKERS’ SALARY BY 20%, THEN PASS OFF THAT INCREASE IN IN THEIR PRODUCT PRICES

0

A netizen posted a rant about an unspecified “clothing” company, revealing that they increased their employees’ salaries by 20-30% in order to retain them.

They then passed on that salary increase to their customers by increasing the prices of their products as well, by about 20-30%.

Here is what the netizen said

Question, is it fair to increase employees’ salary by 20-30% to retain them and pass of that increase to consumers by raising prices of clothing by the same % once you have established yourself as the dominant clothing brand in Singapore?

I’m pretty sure your profits are so high that you can afford to raise prices less – which is what attracted people to buy from you in the first place.

Something that used to cost $20 before June now suddenly has the prices raised to $30, and $30 to $40, etc.

Guess I’ll be buying less from you in the future to save the environment more, or taking my business elsewhere.

Netizens’ comments

  • flipping the question back to you: would you be happy if your employer chose to reduce/ freeze your pay increment just so they could keep their products “affordable”?
  • Is it fair to reduce the price by 20-30% to retain customers and pass the reduction to employees by reducing their salaries by the same %?
  • Don’t buy if you not happy lah. How do u judge whether it’s fair or not? Maybe they underpaid their staff for the longest time so it’s fair to raise their salary to market rate now?

GUY GOES TO ROLEX DEALER, TOLD HE NEEDS TO SPEND 6 FIGURES

0

So here is my experience today at my local Rolex AD.….Now, I knew what I was getting into but this just makes you shake your head.

About a month ago I walked into a local Rolex AD and decided to “put my name on the list” for a Rolex Pepsi on an oyster bracelet. I was asked if I had purchase history there and as a matter of fact I did.

However, it was 24 years ago when I purchased my Rolex at the start of my law enforcement career. They told me that was too long ago so it wouldn’t be in the system. No big deal and I left.

Today I was going to be by the store and decided to go by and take my original receipt to see if they can add it to their notes in the system. The nice Rolex sales person that helped me out a month ago and again today said that she would pass the information (a copy of the receipt) to the manager.

Now here is the part that makes you shake head at the current times in which the watch world is in… the nice sales lady tells me “I don’t think that receipt is going to make much of a difference. You need to have like a 6 figure spending history for the Rolex watch that you want.” Again, I know exactly what I got into when I put my name on that “list” and I’m not in a real hurry for the watch, but it’s sad that someone who has the money to spend on this particular watch will probably never get it from this Rolex AD since I haven’t spent 6 figures to get it.

Some might say get it from the grey market, but this particular Rolex watch is still a little high compared to the retail price. Any other brand or model I would definitely consider the grey market instead of getting it from this Rolex AD.

Image source: Unsplash, Google Maps

ALLEGED 6-HOUR STANDOFF WITH DRUG SUSPECTS, WITH DRONES & AIR PACK DEPLOYED

According to Facebook page Singapore Incidents, which cited a netizen called Chaotic Panda, there was an alleged 6-hour stand-off between the authorities and 3 alleged drug suspects.

Firefighting vehicles from the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) and police vehicles were seen at the site, parked at an open carpark in the area.

Unidentified personnel were also seen in the open area between two HDB buildings.

Police officers were also seen walking into a HDB block, along with two men who were carrying bags of unidentified gears and equipment.

The SCDF’s air pack was also seen deployed at the foot of the HDB building, and a drone was also seen flying overhead in the air.

SCDF personnel were also seen inside a couple of HDB units with the windows open, and a net was also deployed, covering a unit that was between them.

At the time of writing, not much information regarding the incident has been revealed (yet), save for online chatter and alleged presumptions.

Stay tuned to this page for more updates.

FULL VIDEO LOADING…

JOSS PAPERS SEEN FLYING EVERYWHERE, EVEN LAND ON ROOFTOP, WHILE BURNING

A video emerged online showing a huge group of people burning joss paper for the Hungry Ghost Festival, at what appears to be a designated joss paper area.

However, joss papers could be seen falling on the ground all over the place, with the joss papers strawen all over the sidewalk and roads.

Some of the joss paper could even be seen landing on the roof of a building nearby, as the group threw the jass papers up into the air.

The joss papers were then carried by the wind and scattered everywhere, as netizen online expressed their disapproval.

Netizens’ comments

  • As if this does something for the dead. It creates more chores for the cleaners nia.
  • Their ancestors must be very proud of them.
  • You throw a single cigarette butt, you end up paying a fine and slapped with a CWO. But these people will get away with this massive littering.
  • I hope this culture where we Singaporean brothers and sisters too who believe in what they are holding faith as burning and make offering..they can give more hong bao to those cleaning workers..not to the company but the person who cleaned up. Tqsm respect all those cleaners too..who will clean up
  • Wow u see so many spirit taking the money thanks 

FULL VIDEO LOADING…

MORE RETIREES IN S’PORE RETURN TO WORK, DUE TO RISING COSTS OF LIVING & LACK OF MANPOWER

0

More retirees are returning to work in some sectors, with Singapore dealing with inflation and rising costs of living, due to circumstances around the world, according to Channel NewsAsia on 10 August.

A 65-year-old who works at a hotel as a kitchen steward told CNA that Singapore is “not a cheap place to live”, and added that he has to continue working to support his daily life and pay his bills.

He had previously retired from his last job 12 years ago and is now 3 months into his new job.

CNA reported that about 75% of older workers in Singapore intend to work past the retirement age of 63, citing a study by Milieu Insight.

The Ministry of Manpower also raised the retirement age to 63, and the re-employment age to 68; with employers being foreseen to be looking toward more experienced employees, according to The Straits Times.

They said that they believe older and skilled workers will be encouraged to rejoin the workforce due to a need for them.

CNA also reported that over 90% of eligible seniors have been offered re-employment at 62 years old.

6 TRAINEE LAWYERS WHO CHEATED IN BAR EXAMS, WITHDRAW APPLICATIONS TO PRACTICE LAW

0

It was previously reported earlier this year, that 11 trainee lawyers were revealed to have cheated in their Bar exams back in 2020.

Their applications to the Bar (which decides their eligibility to practice law in Singapore), were delayed by a judge.

Their actions were slammed and criticised, with even Minister of Law and Home Affairs, K Shanmugam, weighing in on the controversy.

Six of the eleven cheaters, have since withdrew their applications yesterday (15 August) to practice law in Singapore.

They were granted permission to do so by a High Court judge, who advised them to continue working in the legal industry, so that they can find a suitable mentor and see if they can reapply to the Bar in future.

The six cheaters are namely:

  • Lynn Kuek Yi Ting
  • Matthew Chow Jun Feng
  • Lionel Wong Choong Yoong
  • Monisha Devaraj
  • Kushal Atul Shah
  • Sreeraam Ravenderan

Recap

6 cheaters initially found at first

Six trainee lawyers who cheated in the bar exams in 2020, had their admission into the legal profession delayed.

Justice Choo Han Teck said in his grounds of decision on 18 April, that he will not be naming the 6 of them in the hope that they will not be prejudiced in the long run.

He said that dishonesty is a big problem but it would also be harsh to end their professional career before it has even begun.

The six cheaters were among 26 trainee lawyers who had applied for admission to the bar last Wednesday.

Law graduates have to pass a set of exams called Part B to be admitted to the bar, in order to practise law in Singapore.

Also, the lawyer who wants to be admitted into the bar must not have any objection from the Attorney-General, Singapore Institute of Legal Education (SILE) and Law Society of Singapore.

The six trainees’ application was objected to by the Attorney-General, citing their lack of honesty and integrity for cheating.

The six of them have since passed their required exams after retaking it.

5 more revealed to have cheated

It was previously reported that 6 trainee lawyers had cheated in their bar exams in 2020, and had their admission into the legal profession delayed.

However, the Attorney-General’s Chambers spoke to Straits Times on 19 April, saying that they are considering the applications by 5 other candidates who cheated in their bar exam in 2020.

This means that the total number of trainee lawyers who cheated in their bar exams now stands at 11.

The spokesperson who spoke to ST said that this is the first time the AGC has objected to applications for admission to the bar for cheating in the exams.

The spokesperson said that the Attorney-General feels that these trainee lawyers are not currently fit to be admitted to be solicitors of the Supreme Court.

She added that their misconduct demonstrates their lack of key qualities such as honesty and integrity that is required of every lawyer.

MAN UPSET AFTER BEING REJECTED BY 2 GIRLS, SLASHED THEM WITH KNIFE IN PUBLIC SQUARE

0

A 21-year-old man in China was arrested by the Chinese police after slashing two girls with a knife at a public square.

He was apparently upset at them for rejecting his advances.

A video of the horrific attack made the rounds on Weibo, a Chinese social media network, showing the man hacking away at a girl who was lying down on the ground, motionless.

He was seen in the video (wearing white) hacking the girl who was on the ground, while numerous bystanders stood and watch.

None of them stepped forward to help the victim or stop him, presumably afraid of getting attacked themselves.

According to Apple Daily, the two victims are aged just 13 and 14 years old.

The man, identified as Zhang, allegedly tried to strike up a conversation with them but was turned down, and he then got upset and attacked them.

The police rushed to the scene and subdued Zhang, with the help of some members of the public, and the girls were then sent to the hospital.

The two girls are in stable condition with no life-threatening injuries.

FULL VIDEO LOADING (warning: viewer discretion is advised)

Image source: Twitter and HK01

MAN FOUND DEAD AFTER FIRE BROKE OUT @ JURONG HDB, 3 PEOPLE RESCUED & 1 EVACUATED

0

A man was found and pronounced dead by SCDF paramedics after a fire broke out on the 9th floor of an HDB unit at Block 236 Jurong East Street 21.

The fire happened at about 2.50am on 16 August, and SCDF firefighters conducted forcible entry to rescue three residents of an adjacent unit.

Another occupant in the affected unit had self-evacuated before the SCDF arrived.

SCDF’s update

[Fire @ Block 236 Jurong East Street 21]

Earlier this morning (16 Aug) at about 2.50am, SCDF was alerted to a fire at the aforementioned location.

Upon SCDF’s arrival, the fire was raging inside a unit on the 9th floor.

Firefighters from Jurong and Clementi Fire Stations donning breathing apparatus sets, penetrated into the heavily smoke-logged unit to conduct firefighting operations. Concurrently, another crew of firefighters conducted forcible entry into the adjacent unit to rescue three occupants.

Firefighting operations are currently still ongoing.

Second update

[Final Update: Block 236 Jurong East Street 21]

At about 2.50am today (16 Aug), SCDF was alerted to a fire at the above-mentioned location.

Upon SCDF’s arrival, the fire was raging inside a unit on the 9th floor. Firefighters penetrated into the heavily smoke-logged unit to conduct firefighting operations. In addition, a Combined Platform Ladder was deployed at the rear of the block for external firefighting.

SCDF firefighters extinguished the fire using three water jets. As a result of the fire, the entire unit was affected by heat and smoke damage.

An occupant in the affected unit self evacuated before SCDF’s arrival.

Due to the close proximity of an adjacent unit, SCDF firefighters conducted forced entry into this unit and rescued three occupants.

A body was found in the affected unit and pronounced dead by an SCDF paramedic.

Damping down operations* are currently ongoing.

The cause of the fire is under investigation.

*Damping down refers to the application of water to wet burnt surfaces immediately after a fire is put out. It is to prevent any potential rekindle of fire from the hot burnt surfaces.

WOMAN ADVERTISES “DRIVER JOB”, BUT IS ACTUALLY TO SMUGGLE ILLEGAL CIGGS TO S’PORE

A netizen shared a “job listing” that was listed in the Facebook group SG Driver Job Lobang, with a woman, Suannie Ng, posting that she was looking to hire a driver to deliver seafood.

Job ad

She wrote in her “job” ad (SIC):

“Hiring Class 3 Driver (Delivery Seafood)
Salary $4000
Office hour, Flexible time
Part Time or Full time
Vehicle Provided
***Welcome Malaysian, Singaporean and others***”

A netizen then contacted her, expressing interest in her “delivery job” and asking for more information regarding her job offer.

Exchange on Whatsapp

The hirer said: “Hello I’m Mr Lim, may I have your basic details or resume? I got your contact number from our colleague on Facebook.

Name?
Age?
Race?
Singaporean, PR or WP?
Possess Class 3/3A driving license?”

The man then told him that before he gives him his information, he wants to know the job scope. to which “Mr Lim” then told him:

“Commission per trip $600, job scope is delivery duty paid cigarettes from JB to SG. Our company will provide car and cash payment after job done, interested in this job?”

The man then told him “no thanks, take care, all the best, god bless you.”