i dont know if this is a universal experience amongst all NS GFs but….
my boyfriend used to be super clingy and emotional when he first entered OCS. he would always need me to call him to comfort him as he cried because of how he couldn’t cope with the change.
everytime he needed me, i would drop everything and divert my attention to him. including writing long paragraphs to reassure him almost everyday. and with that, he would always say how i am the best, how he wants to marry me , im his favourite person and that he would give me all the time i want once he ORDs.
now that hes in his second year, the time we have together is very limited. from calling everyday to texting a few times a day.
and not gonna lie, its been hard coping and i did give him a hard time over the fact that he didnt have alot of time for me.
we even went through a rough patch over the matter. but nonetheless ive learnt from my mistakes and i completely understand when he says he doesnt have enough time. and also been finding things to do when hes busy.
i always give him the benefit of the doubt when hes active on social media and hasn’t replied to my texts and i always try to do something nive for him whenever he books out (care packs, baked goods and hand made items!)
he has also found really awesome friends in camp and hes really enjoying his time in NS despite the fact that hes very very tired most of the time (which makes me very relieved).
but i cant help ignore the fact that he has been very impatient with me. although he says he loves me, he would be very disinterested when i tell him about my week.
it makes me feel bad whenever i ask for reassurance from him because he always looks so pissed when i do so. i don’t even know if he will uphold the promises he made when he needed me the most…
Hi, this happened at blk 10 chai chee road. between level 6 and level 5. This inconsiderate neighbour always burned and choked up the whole staircase whenever he burned at the staircase.
Not only that, but he also blackened the whole staircase. What should I do next? feedback to town council before but things are still like that.
Full Video Loading…
Penalties
Under the Fire Safety Act, a Fire Hazard Abatement Notice (FHAN) serves as a warning. When the hazard is not abated, a Notice of Composition (NOC) between $300 and $500 would be issued – with court action being taken for serious cases. A Fire Safety Offence (FSO) is normally issued when the contravention is of a serious nature and warrants a heavier penalty than when a FHAN is served.
Here are what netizens think:
This kind report 100% sure get fine one
This kind of people cannot go downstairs die die must do upstairs, the bin downstairs don’t know for what.
Speaking during his annual May Day rally at D’Marquee, Downtown East; Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong addressed the leadership renewal of Singapore and Lawrence Wong taking up the leadership of the 4G team.
Here is what he said
Tripartism is the result of our long history of collaborative trade unionism, and the deep bonds of trust that we have forged through successive crises. Tripartism must always be a stabilising and anchoring force for Singapore. We must continually reaffirm the bonds, and sustain them from one generation to the next.
Leadership renewal is crucial to this. At the national level, in the political leadership, our succession preparations recently took a major step forward. This issue has been on my mind ever since my timeline for succession was disrupted by the virus.
Last year, after DPM Heng Swee Keat decided to step aside, the 4G team asked me for more time to reach a consensus on the matter. I said, “don’t take too long”. Once the COVID-19 situation started coming under control, I resumed the process.
I asked Mr Khaw Boon Wan to help facilitate it, and I am very happy and relieved that the process has been successful. As you know, Brother Lawrence Wong emerged as the overwhelming consensus choice, and has been unanimously endorsed by all his Cabinet colleagues and then by all the PAP MPs as the leader of the 4G team.
I congratulated Brother Lawrence, I told him you will be in the hot seat. He is taking on a very heavy responsibility. He will have to lead Singapore in a very different and uncertain world.
He will need the full support of his Cabinet colleagues, and also must be able to rely on all our brothers and sisters to work with him and his team, and to continue partnering them to take Singapore forward.
Brothers and Sisters, this is your team, I ask you to give Brother Lawrence Wong and his team your fullest support.
Among the points that he addressed, he said that the government is doing all it can to cushion the impact of rising food prices on Singaporeans and alleviate the cost of living pressures.
Here is (a snippet) of what he said during his speech
The Government is doing all it can to cushion the impact on Singaporeans and alleviate the cost-of-living pressures. This year’s Budget included the Household Support Package which contained many direct measures to help households.
There are U-Save rebates, there are CDC vouchers, there are S&CC rebates; these will reduce the out-of-pocket expenses for nearly all households. Lower- and middle-income households, who need more help, will get more.
MAS has tightened our monetary policy to reduce imported inflation. That is why the Singapore dollar has appreciated, and that is why when you go overseas for weekend shopping trips, you find that it is attractive because the Singapore dollar has gone up.
Fairprice is also making special efforts, I see they are having eggs at a discount so as to make a difference to the cost of living. And we are taking steps to secure our food and energy supplies, just in case the supplies are disrupted by the ongoing war.
All this will help, but we must be prepared for more economic challenges in the year ahead. Inflation will remain high. Central banks in the developed countries are tightening their monetary policies, raising interest rates. Global growth will be weaker, and there may be a recession within the next two years.
We have to face up to these realities. Singapore is tightly integrated into the global economy. Given our small size, in world markets, we are always a price taker, we have very little bargaining power. If the prices go up, our prices go up; if supplies are short, we are squeezed. We cannot avoid these global headwinds.
Take energy for example. We import nearly all the energy we use, except for the solar electricity that we generate ourselves. HDB rooftops and other buildings, but that is maybe 5% of our electricity consumption at most. When oil prices were around US$50 per barrel, every year our annual imports of crude oil and natural gas cost us about S$30 bn.
When the oil prices doubled to US$100 per barrel, which they have done since the beginning of last year, we have to pay double too – which means we all have to pay an extra S$30 bn a year for our crude oil and gas. We can recover part of this because some of it is transformed, we refine the oil, we make petrochemicals, we sell it overseas, and we charge more. But the rest we consume, we turn on the lights, we turn on the air conditioner, we drive our cares, we have to bear that cost –Singapore households, businesses, and the government.
How much is that part which we have to swallow? MTI’s estimate is our hit is about S$8 bn a year. That is 1.5% of our GDP. That means that in Singapore, we have become collectively S$8 bn poorer off every year. There is no escape from this.
In the short term, government support schemes will help to share the burden fairly, and ease the hardship on households but in the long term, this does not really solve the problem. We can share the burden, but the burden is still upon us.
We must address the fundamental issue: which is that higher energy and food prices have made us collectively worse off. And the fundamental solution to this is to make ourselves more productive, to transform our businesses, to grow our economy, to uplift everyone. Then our incomes can go up, and that can more than make up for higher prices of energy and food. Then we can all become better off, in real terms.
There are limits to what Singapore can do to influence broader international trends. We will push back against deglobalisation, we will speak up to encourage the US and China to constructively engage each other. But ultimately all these matters depend on the major powers themselves, and the relations between them, and how the war in Ukraine unfolds. We have speaking rights, but we are a small voice. Singapore has to take the world as it is, and develop a strategy that works for us in this troubled environment. Bigger countries can turn inwards, they can rely more heavily on their domestic markets, and produce more things onshore.
The Chinese talk about double circulation (双循环) – circulation within their country, circulation doing business overseas. We only have the overseas part, but they can do it because it will cost them economically, but it is a viable strategy for them. However, that is not a choice open to Singapore.
Our strategy can only be one – and that is to stay open, to make our economy stronger, more resilient, and to keep on seizing opportunities for growth, developing new capabilities and becoming a more competitive economy. Because if we do that, then despite the uncertain climate, despite the pressures against globalisation, investors will still find it worthwhile to put their projects in Singapore, our exports will still find foreign markets, and we can still earn a living for ourselves in the world.
But economic success alone is not enough. Our growth must be matched by social and political cohesion. There is war in Europe, there are major troubles in the world, and great power rivalry in our region. Facing all these external troubles, if Singaporeans are not strong and united, if we allow ourselves to be split and divided, we will be done for.
The annoying fake police scammers are still active.
The scammers said his from “Singapore Police Force” claiming that his CID and he received a complaint from the bank stating that her card was declined. *Follows by showing his fake Police ID*.
He then said that her IC is expired and demanded to see the woman’s IC
The woman told the fake police to remove his mask but he refused to do so and the called ended.
A civil servant is normally expected to perform at the highest moral standards but an unfortunate incident occurred between a Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) officer and a suspected drug offender.
Venkatesh Raj Nainar Nagarajan was suspended back in 2019 after he drank alcohol and beat a suspected drug offender to force a confession.
According to Straits Times, 34-year-old Sivabalan Kanniappan (Malaysian) got assaulted by Vegedesh.
Sivabalan was eventually found guilty of drug offences and jailed for 15 years and received 13 strokes of the rotan. (April 29)
Vegedesh was found guilty of 3 counts of voluntarily causing hurt and was sentenced to 5 years in jail.
Separate incident – Drinking Beer
In a separate incident, he was also fined $4,000 for hurling vulgarities at a Police officer.
Before work, Vegedfesh was drinking beer with his friends at a void deck in Sembawang on March 14, 2020, and got drunk, the Police approached Vegedesh and told them to leave the premise as they were not allowed to drink alcohol in the public as it passed the permissible time for drinking alcohol in public.
Instead of leaving, Vegedesh decided to hurl vulgarities at the officers leading to his arrest.
A confrontation took place between a Nissan van driver and a Comfort DelGro taxi driver on 30 April at about 3.40pm.
The two drivers were seen hurling vulgarities at each other and pointing middle fingers, before spitting at each other.
The van driver had spat at the taxi driver, and the taxi driver then spat back at the van driver without realising that his mask was still on, and ended up sitting inside his own mask.
Here is what the netizen said
“Both drivers had an argument. both started showing finger signs at one another then Nissan driver spit at the comfort driver uncle’s face inside the cab while me and my wife were in the cab. (SIC)”
Potential penalties
Spitting at a person deliberately constitutes an offence of assault, and under section 352 of the Penal Code, it is a punishable offence with a jail term of up to 3 months and/or a fine of $1,500 for the use of criminal force without provocation.
For the use of criminal force on another person on grave and sudden provocation, convicted persons face a fine of up to $1,000 and/or a jail term of up to 1 month.
Spitting in public is also an offence, with guilty persons facing a fine of up to $1,000 for first-time offenders.