27.2 C
Singapore
Saturday, June 13, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 2376

THAI COUPLE HID TODDLER’S DEAD BODY IN FRIDGE, FOUND ANTS CRAWLING INTO HIS EYES, ARRESTED

0

A harrowing incident in Nonthaburi province, Thailand, has left the community in shock as Thai police charged a couple, 31-year-old Harnnarong Praiphanom and 25-year-old Marisa Thong-iam, with concealing the body of a toddler in a refrigerator, according to Thaiger.

The tragic event unfolded amid disturbing circumstances, raising questions about the welfare of the child and the responsibilities of those entrusted with their care.

Background of the Couple

Harnnarong and Marisa found themselves entrusted with the care of a two-year-old child whose parents, friends of Harnnarong, struggled with drug addiction.

The couple’s role as caretakers took a dark turn when they failed to report the child’s death to the police, as disclosed by the Bangkok Post.

Claimed Cause of Death

According to the couple, the toddler succumbed to choking on sticky rice. The claim received confirmation through autopsy results on January 7.

However, skepticism arose as the boy’s aunt expressed doubt about the findings. The police, too, noted multiple bruises on the child’s arms and legs, casting a shadow over the initial narrative.

Marisa recounted the distressing events of January 2 when she discovered ants crawling into the child’s eyes and observed his hands and mouth filled with sticky rice.

In fear and uncertainty, the couple decided to place the child in a bag upon Harnnarong’s return home. Subsequently, the toddler’s body found its way into the refrigerator, marking a tragic attempt to conceal the distressing incident.

Unveiling the Tragedy

The shocking revelation came to light when Harnnarong’s grandmother, residing in the same house, alerted the police to a foul smell emanating from the premises.

On January 6, law enforcement discovered the lifeless body of the toddler in the refrigerator, unraveling a distressing tale of neglect and attempted concealment.

While the claimed cause of death was choking on sticky rice, the boy’s aunt and the police questioned the autopsy results, highlighting numerous bruises on the child’s body.

The discrepancy between the initial explanation and the visible signs of harm adds complexity to an already tragic narrative.

Legal Consequences

The couple now faces legal repercussions for their failure to report the child’s death and the subsequent attempt to conceal the body.

ANTI-SCAM CENTRE & BANKS PREVENTED LOSS OF $69.43M FROM 15,000 VICTIMS

0

The Anti-Scam Centre (ASC) of the Singapore Police Force, in collaboration with four partnering banks, have leveraged Robotic Process Automation (RPA) technology to identify job, investment and other scam victims. Employing a proactive approach, the ASC promptly alerts potential scam victims through SMS notifications, mitigating the risk of further financial losses. The partnering banks are DBS Bank, UOB Bank, OCBC Bank and Standard Chartered Bank.

Throughout the collaborative operation conducted between 16 September and 31 December 2023, the Police and its partnering banks sent out more than 48,000 SMSes to over 15,000 scam victims who are customers of the banks. This resulted in the successful disruption of over 5,300 ongoing scams and prevented potential financial losses of more than $69.43 million. 

RPA Technology

The joint operation is part of the continued efforts by the Police and its partnering banks to safeguard bank customers and mitigate victims’ losses through innovation. RPA technology has enabled the Police to automate information sharing, information processing, and the mass distribution of SMS alerts. The collaboration between the Police and its partnering banks has also significantly improved their outreach to promptly alert a larger number of victims within a short period of time and prevent further losses. Many of these victims only realised that they had fallen prey to scams after receiving SMS alerts from the Police, advising them to immediately cease further monetary transfers.
ACT Against Scams
The Police urge members of the public to “ACT” against scams. The ACT acronym outlines how members of the public can Add security features, Check for signs, and Tell the authorities and other about scams.

  1. ADD – Add security features such as the ScamShield application and two-factor authentication for personal accounts, such as banks, social media, and Singpass accounts. Transaction limits for internet banking, including PayNow, could also be set up to limit the amount of funds that can be lost in the event of a scam. 
  2. CHECK – Check for potential signs of a scam by asking questions, fact-checking requests for personal information and money transfers, and verifying the legitimacy of online listings and reviews. Take the time to pause and check. If it is too good to be true, it is probably untrue, and a scam.
  3. TELL – Tell the authorities and others about scam encounters by reporting to the bank, ScamShield, or by filing a Police report. Tell others about ongoing scams and preventive steps they can take. Report the fraudulent pages and/or monikers to the respective platforms.

For more information on scams, members of the public can visit www.scamalert.sg or call the Anti-Scam Hotline at 1800-722-6688. Anyone with information on such scams may call the Police hotline at 1800-255-0000 or submit information online at www.police.gov.sg/iwitness. All information will be kept strictly confidential.

INDIA WOMAN STABS HUSBAND IN HIS SLEEP BECAUSE HE REFUSE TO BRING HER TO S’PORE

0

In a shocking incident in Bengaluru, India, a 52-year-old woman was arrested after allegedly stabbing her 56-year-old husband. The catalyst for this gruesome act was reported to be a marital dispute revolving around the husband’s decision not to take his wife to Singapore, according to The Times of India.

The incident, which unfolded on January 6, has sparked discussions about the complexities of long-distance marriages and the emotional toll they can take.

Marital Dispute Escalation

The couple who have been married for more than 2 decades, since 2002, faced a growing rift exacerbated by the husband’s frequent visits to Singapore for work over the last 25 years.

Despite their two-decade-long union, he reportedly visited his wife and 20-year-old son only a few times each year. The strain on their relationship reached a breaking point when, in September 2023, the wife and son joined him in Singapore, intending for the son to pursue higher education there.

The tensions climaxed on January 5 when the family returned to India. The husband, intending to return to Singapore on January 19 with only his son, informed his wife of this plan on the morning of January 6. This revelation triggered a heated argument, setting the stage for the violent turn of events later that day.

The Violent Confrontation

In a disturbing act, the woman allegedly attacked her husband with a knife while he slept in their bedroom. The assault included stabbings to the head, hand, and back, as well as a chilling act of splashing chilli powder mixed with water on his face. The husband, providing an account to The Times Of India, revealed the severity of the attack that left him requiring 14 stitches in the hospital.

The violent encounter escalated to the point where both the father and son had to physically remove the woman from the bedroom. Recognizing the severity of the situation, they promptly called the police, who arrived at the scene and took the woman into custody.

Police Suspicions and Fallout

A senior police officer hinted at a possible motive behind the attack, suggesting that the husband might have excluded his wife from his plans due to her “lacking his modern outlook.” This statement raises questions about the dynamics within the marriage and the impact of changing lifestyles on long-term relationships.

25 Y.O ARRESTED: SNATCH HANDBAG FROM WOMAN AT MARINE TERRACE

0

The Police have arrested a 25-year-old man for his suspected involvement in a case of snatch theft.

On 8 January 2024 at about 7.15am, the Police were alerted to a case of snatch theft along Marine Terrace, where an unknown man had purportedly snatched a handbag from a female victim. 

Through ground enquiries and with the aid of images from Police cameras, officers from Bedok Police Division established the identity of the man and arrested him within seven hours from the time of the report. The stolen handbag was recovered and seized as case exhibit. 

The man will be charged in court on 10 January 2024 with the offence of snatch theft under Section 356 of the Penal Code 1871. The offence carries an imprisonment term of not less than one year and not more than seven years, and caning.

The Police will not tolerate such brazen acts of crime and will spare no effort to apprehend such offenders and deal with them in accordance with the law.

TIK TOK “JOB OFFERS” TURNS OUT TO BE A SCAM, 180 LOSE OVER $2.6 MILLION

0

The Police would like to alert members of the public to a job scam variant where scammers impersonating as representatives of well-known platforms or online marketing companies, would entice victims by giving them commission for the completion of simple social media tasks to generate social media traction. In December 2023, at least 180 victims have fallen prey, with losses amounting to at least $2.6m. 

Approach 1 



In this scam variant, victims would receive unsolicited job offers from scammers after being added into chatgroups on WhatsApp or Telegram. In some cases, scammers may also claim to represent TikTok or online communications/marketing companies when they approached victims with job offers. Victims would be given tasks involving generation of social media traction. To perform these task, victims will be asked to follow influencers’ accounts on TikTok or Instagram, liking and subscribing to YouTube channels/videos, boosting accounts by following/liking/commenting on accounts and/or posts, or liking songs on Spotify. Upon completion of the “tasks”, the  victims would receive a small commission. After victims were convinced that they could earn more commission, the scammers introduce more rewarding tasks to perform. In some cases, scammers would provide victims with fake employment contracts to reinforce the deception. To perform these tasks, victims had to create accounts on scam websites and then transfer increasingly large sums of monies to bank accounts or crypto wallets provided by the scammers. Victims would only realise that they had been scammed when their website account showed a negative account balance, and they were told to pay additional funds in order to “upgrade their accounts” or when they failed to withdraw their “earnings”. 

Approach 2

Victims would receive unsolicited WhatsApp or Telegram messages, claiming that they had “won a giveaway” prize and would receive a small commission by completing “easy tasks” such as following an account on Instagram. After victims were convinced that they could earn money easily, scammers would introduce them to advanced tasks. Victims would be added to chatgroups where tasks involving generation of social media traction or transfer of monies as “investment” would be discussed. Victims would have to create accounts on scam websites and transfer monies to bank accounts or crypto wallets provided by the scammers. These are done with the pretext of earning higher commission. Victims would only realise that they had been scammed when they encountered a negative account balance on their job website and were told to pay additional funds to “upgrade their accounts” or when they failed to withdraw their “earnings”. 
 
The Police would like to advise members of the public to adopt the following precautionary measures: 

  1. ADD – ScamShield App to protect yourself from scam calls and SMSes.  Set security features (e.g. set up transaction limits for internet banking transactions, enable Two-Factor Authentication (2FA), Multifactor Authentication for banks and e-wallets). Do not send money to anyone whom you do not know or have not met in person before.
  2. CHECK – For scam signs with official sources (e.g. ScamShield WhatsApp bot @ https://go.gov.sg/scamshield-bot, call the Anti-Scam Helpline on 1800-722-6688, or visit www.scamalert.sg). Always verify the authenticity of job offers through official channels/sources and do not accept dubious job offers that offer lucrative returns for minimal effort. Do not engage or believe claims made in any messaging app group chats that you are randomly added or invited into and do not click on suspicious URLs or download apps from unknown sources. 
  3. TELL – Authorities, family, and friends about scams. Report the scammers or group chat using the in-app reporting function to WhatsApp and Telegram! 

If you have any information relating to such crimes or if you are in doubt, please call the Police Hotline at 1800-255-0000, or submit it online at www.police.gov.sg/iwitness. All information will be kept strictly confidential. If you require urgent Police assistance, please dial ‘999’.

For more information on scams, members of the public can visit www.scamalert.sg or call the Anti-Scam Helpline at 1800-722-6688. Fighting scams is a community effort. Together, we can ACT Against Scams to safeguard our community!

MAN FINDS OUT ALL 4 OF HIS KIDS ARE NOT HIS, CHEATING WIFE SAYS: “I DON’T THINK I BETRAYED HIM”

0

In a shocking revelation during a divorce hearing in Jiangxi province, China, Chen Zhixian, a husband of 16 years, has claimed that none of the four children born to his wife, identified only as Yu, are biologically his, according to a report by the South China Morning Post.

This unprecedented case, unfolding at the end of last year, has captivated public attention.

Wife slept around outside with other meen

Dubbed the “Most Pitiful Man in China” by online netizens, Chen shared 16 years of marriage with his wife, but signs of estrangement surfaced in early 2022. The situation escalated when Chen discovered his wife’s infidelity in February of the same year.

Filing for divorce, Chen presented evidence that Yu gave birth to a baby girl in November outside their hometown. Hospital documents indicated a man named Wu, suspected by Chen of having an affair with his wife, was present at the birth.

Chen’s initial discovery of his wife’s affair occurred when he followed her to a hotel in February 2022. This prompted him to conduct DNA tests, confirming his suspicions about the youngest daughter.

Unraveling the Truth

Driven by the revelation, Chen embarked on a quest to confirm the paternity of his other three daughters. The emotional toll was immense as he grappled with the shocking reality that none of the children were biologically his own.

Confrontations at the mother-in-law’s home escalated dramatically, leading to the hospitalization of Chen’s father. The family dynamics reached a breaking point amid the revelation.

Chen, once a father figure, now faces public humiliation and emotional pain as his relationship with the estranged daughters becomes strained. The situation is akin to rubbing salt into an open wound.

Chen filed a lawsuit against Yu, seeking guardianship of the three girls and compensation for the cost of raising them. He also demands spiritual compensation for the emotional distress caused.

Wife: “I don’t think I betrayed him, is blood relation so important?

In an interview, Yu denied the allegations of infidelity, questioning the validity of the paternity tests. She defended her actions, asserting that blood relationships might not be as crucial as Chen believes.

She vehemently maintained “I don’t think I betrayed him, is blood relations all that important? Other families who are sterile and cannot have children has no issues raising adopted kids who are not related to them by blood.”

She then called Chen an “animal” for taking them for a paternity test, saying that the kids have been calling him “dad” for years,

Despite the ongoing legal proceedings, Chen continues his search for the truth about the paternity of the children. His emotional struggle is exacerbated by his wife’s reluctance to provide answers.

Chen expresses a desire for a swift resolution to the case, hoping that the ‘immoral people’ involved will face appropriate consequences. The complexity of the situation raises questions about the final outcome.

WOMAN WHO NEVER CARES FOR STEP-SON KPKB CAUSE NEVER BRING HER TO HOLIDAY

0

So my father turns 65 later this year and is planning to retire, for a birthday/retirement gift my wife and I have decided to take him on a 12 day vacation to Greece. The trip is a 7 day tour of the country and a 5 day cruise of the islands. My dad has always wanted to know to Greece because that is where his family is from, but he could never afford it. My wife and I are in good shape finically and can afford it no people.

The thought never crossed my mind to invite my stepmother, I kind of forget she even exist. I have not seen her since I was 19, I am in my 40s now. She just chose not to attend any family functions on my dads side, when I got married, she did not come, when my grandparents died she did not go to the funeral.

So after I gave everything to my dad I got a text from a family friend a day or so later. saying that I’m a bad person for not inviting her and that they have been married for over 25 years and I should treat her better.

So am I a bad person for not inviting her?

people asked why she did not get along with my grandparents.

The family legend is she and my grandmother did not get along. I guess she showed up Drunk to Christmas when they first started dating and got in an argument because my grandmother got my presents for me, than her kids. She may have also peed on their couch while drunk.

CASUARINA CURRY FINED & SUSPENDED FOR INFESTATION & SALE OF UNCLEAN FOOD

0

Suspension of Casuarina Curry the Food Shop at 138 Casuarina Road, Sembawang Hills Estate, Singapore 579526, under the Points Demerit System

1          The Singapore Food Agency (SFA) will be suspending the licence of Casuarina Curry, the Food Shop at 138 Casuarina Road, Sembawang Hills Estate, Singapore 579526, under the Points Demerit System. The period of suspension is two weeks from 09/01/2024 to 22/01/2024 (both dates inclusive).

2          The licensee has accumulated 12 demerit points within a 12-month period and was fined a total of $800 for the following offences:

No.OffenceDemerit Points
(1)Failure to keep licensed premises free of infestation6
(2)Sale of unclean food6

3          Based on track records, a licensee who accumulates 12 or more demerit points within a 12-month period may have his licence suspended for a period of either two or four weeks, or cancelled. All food handlers working in the suspended premises would also be required to re-attend and pass the WSQ Food Safety Course Level 1, before they can resume work as food handlers. The licensee is also required to ensure that all food hygiene officers working in the suspended premises, if any, re-attend and pass the WSQ Food Safety Course Level 3.

4          SFA takes a serious view of these offences and would like to remind food operators to observe good food and personal hygiene practices at all times, and to engage only registered food handlers. SFA will not hesitate to take firm action against anyone found to be in violation of the Environmental Public Health Act.5          In the interest of maintaining a high standard of food hygiene at all eating establishments, we would also like to advise members of the public who come across poor food safety practices in food establishments not to patronise such outlets and provide feedback via the online feedback form (https://www.sfa.gov.sg/feedback) or to call our SFA Contact Centre at 68052871 with details for our follow-up investigations.

MAN’S ICE-CREAM OWNSELF TOPPLED, HE SCREAMS AT WAITER: “OI, IS THIS HOW YOU SERVE FOOD!”

0

Are Singaporeans generally rude/entitled?

Was dining at genki, a couple ordered ice cream parfait. I guess the cup toppled when the train was making its turn (although tbh, all the contents remained inside and it was still edible, just have to pick up the cup).

Could already see the guy getting abit agitated (which I’m sure he’s entitled to, no problem, wanted to take a photo of the parfait)

I think the server noticed it and returned the train immediately. Subsequently a server came out and passed them the parfait.

To be honest, could have been the same parfait from before, couldn’t really tell, but in my POV, still totally edible and within the limits of proper food presentation.

Guy totally flips out and raises his voice at the waiter “OI, THIS IS HOW YOU SERVE FOOD ONE AH?” In a super condescending tone.

At this point my partner and I feel super sorry for the waiter, not really his fault also. Which made us think, are Singaporeans generally this easily ticked? Why did he have to be so rude to the waiter unnecessarily?

Netizens’ comments

  1. Instead of NS, should make all Singaporeans work in F&b for 2 years.
    Then u see the real Singapore.
  2. You can find rude people in all corners of the world. But, from my (limited) experience, I find that people do tend to be a bit more impatient (snappy/rude) in faster paced societies.
  3. Wait till you work in healthcare. Even more entitled patients and their entitled next of kins to deal with.
  4. Because the polite ones never make a ruckus.
  5. Everyone should work in F&B, retail or any service-related jobs for at least a month.
  6. I think Singaporeans, especially older aunties tend to be a more unforgiving lot. Something about how they treat service staff / construction workers / domestic helpers. Very short fuses and poor tone, as if they were talking to a child.

GIRL CONTINUES SEEING EX FOR “FUN TIME” DESPITE ALREADY HAVING A BF

0

A girl shared how her boyfriend is unhappy with her still seeing and being friends with her former “friend with benefits” – she says that she “really don’t get it”.

Here is the story:

“Hi, I’m at wit’s end with my boyfriend.

I’m in my early 20s and I’ve been with him for a loyal 3 years. we’ve had our ups and downs but we have recently been arguing over one issue.

He has repeatedly asked me to cut ties with one of my longest guy friends. I’ve other guy friends too, but the only thing is that this particular guy was my first fwb back in my wilder days and the one I lost my V-card to.

I’ve known him for 8 years vs my boyfriends of only 3 years. I’ve been completely platonic with this guy even since before I’m met my bf.

I admit I was pretty promiscuous when I was younger and it took a while for my BF to get over that, but I really don’t get it, he’s just a friend now, and I dress modestly when I’m not with my bf.

I really dont understand what I’m doing wrong.

Is it really reasonable to be asked to cut ties with a friend? I’ve already done everything in my power to please him and gain his trust…”

Editor’s note: Girl if you “don’t get it” then you’re a lost cause.