27.7 C
Singapore
Wednesday, June 24, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 2525

GIRL DOESN’T KNOW HOW TO THANK BF AFTER SHE VOMITED ON HIS FLOOR AT 2AM

0

I (28f) threw up all over my boyfriend’s (31m) floor. I got so sick and I couldn’t even make it to the bathroom.

I was laying on the bathroom floor afterwards and couldn’t move. He checked on me and cleaned it all up. At 2am.

Then he cuddled me to sleep. In the morning he made sure I drank plenty of water, gave me Advil and even made me breakfast while I showered.

I would also like to mention he JUST moved into this place and everything is shiny and new. And I threw up all over it. I was mortified.

Later that day I had to work late. He came to my place and washed my sheets for me so I’d have a comfy bed to sleep in, and he stayed with me to make sure I was okay.

I just… really want to show him how much it means to me. I’m making him dinner tomorrow night, but it doesn’t seem like enough. I love how kind he is. I hope I can be his wife someday.

Netizen’s comments

  • Cooking a meal is a good idea. Give him food poisoning so that he throws up and you can return the favour.
  • He seems like a very understanding and simplistic person. I think dinner and just saying thank you is plenty. Being kind is often an expression of love, Im sure he was more then happy to help you.

GIRL CALLED “BAOBEI” AT WORK BY SUPERIOR, ASKED HER INTRO GIRLS

0

My girlfriend is being called “bao bei” at work.

Have you guys personally experienced this? She’s working as a PA part time and the colleague of her direct superior has jokingly called her baobei. Is this a sign of worse things to come? And is this acceptable at all from a girl’s POV?

For the non-chinese, baobei is the equivalent of babe in english.

He (the colleague) has also asked my gf to introduce girls of her age to the direct supervisor who is single (there is an 8 year age gap) and he (my gf’s direct supervisor) casually retorts that age is just a number.

Netizens’ comments

  • It is cringy and borderline harassment if it is from a male supervisor. I would feel extremely uncomfortable.
  • Imo this is kinda unprofessional? But it all comes down to whether your girlfriend is comfortable with it. Does her direct supervisor not say anything though? I would imagine that they don’t like that.
  • That’s something can be reported to HR in my current company
  • If you are not comfortable with it, you can tell your gf. If she is not comfortable with it too and she knows your stand on it, she can tell the supervisor. If he does not listen, escalate.
  • Just laying down boundaries so that it it stops somewhere. You backing her up helps her to enforce those boundaries.

WOMAN’S HUSBAND TOLD HER THAT HE HAD A WET DREAM ABOUT HER LAST NIGHT

0

A woman shared about how her husband told her that he had a wet dream about her the night before and now she is going to reward him by making it a reality.

Here is the story:

My husband told me that last night he had an amazing wet dream about … me.

Well, doesn’t that make me feel some kinda way.

He said that we had the best intercourse of his life, during which he came all over my face. He told me that he woke up afterward to see if he had a wet dream.

A wet dream! About his own wife. Well, I’ll be …

This is particularly exciting because his libido is so far behind mine. We rarely argue or fight, but when we do it most often stems from a (perceived?) lack of desire to be intimate.

I wish he had just woken me up then and there and taken me for a ride.

Suffice it to say, someone’s getting their dreams turned into reality tonight.

Well played, husband. Well played.

FORMER THAI OLYMPIC CHAMP TOOK 17 Y.O GIRL TO HOTEL AFTER PICKING HER FROM PUB

0

In a developing controversy, former Olympic boxing champion 50-year-old Somluck Kamsing is facing serious allegations of sexual assault brought forth by a 17-year-old girl. The incident has sparked an investigation that delves into the details of the encounter and the circumstances surrounding it.

Investigation Status and Legal Action

Delay in Charging

As of Tuesday, Somluck Kamsing has not been called to face charges related to the alleged sexual assault. The investigators, led by Pol Col Yosawaj Kaewsuebthanyanij, chief of the Muang Khon Kaen police station, have completed the case details. However, the legal proceedings have not commenced as the girl is not yet ready for interrogation.

Legal Action Against Pub Operator (CCTV footage of the 17 year old entering the pub)

At this stage, the legal focus has shifted to the operator of the pub where the encounter took place. The pub operator faces charges for allowing entry to customers under 20 years old. This legal avenue has been pursued while awaiting developments in the main case.

Contextualizing the Incident

Pub Encounter and Police Investigation

The girl, currently at the Khon Kaen Shelter for Children and Families, entered the pub with friends from her school. The police are actively investigating rumors related to gang blackmail and potential ID card forgery to gain access to entertainment venues.

The Alleged Assault

The 17-year-old, hailing from Nong Kung Si district of Kalasin province, filed her complaint on Sunday. She claimed to have met the 50-year-old Somluck at a pub in Muang district, Khon Kaen province, on a Saturday night. Allegedly, the sexual assault took place in Mr. Somluck’s hotel room around 3:30 am on Sunday.

Conflicting Narratives

Somluck’s Version

Somluck Kamsing provides a different account of the events. While at the pub, he asserts that he was befriended by the girl, who requested a selfie photograph. After some intimacy, he accompanied her to the hotel. Both parties undressed, but upon learning the girl’s age (17), Somluck claims to have ceased any further advances, going to sleep.

Activist’s Perspective

Activist Kanthat Pongpaiboonvej, known as “good Samaritan” Kan Chompalang, has conversed with the 17-year-old. According to him, the girl went to the hotel believing Somluck’s children were there. She possessed a key card for the hotel, and a security guard at the pub escorted her there on a motorcycle. The activist emphasizes that the girl had no intention of blackmailing anyone.

Somluck Kamsing’s Sporting Legacy

Muay Thai to Boxing

Before the controversy, Somluck enjoyed success as a Muay Thai fighter before transitioning to boxing. His achievements include a bronze medal at the 1989 King’s Cup and a gold medal at the 1995 event.

Olympic Glory

Somluck’s pinnacle in sports came at the 1996 Summer Olympics in Atlanta, where he secured a gold medal in the men’s featherweight division. Notably, he was the first Thai athlete to achieve this historic feat.

Conclusion

The controversy surrounding Somluck Kamsing’s alleged sexual assault is complex, with conflicting narratives and legal proceedings yet to unfold. As the investigation progresses, the public awaits clarity on the truth behind the allegations.

CHINA CAT VISITS NOODLE SHOP EVERY DAY TO TAKE NOODLE HOME TO EAT WITH CAT FOOD

0

In the heart of China, there exists a feline sensation named Popsicle. Unlike your typical cat, Popsicle has a peculiar and delightful obsession – noodles. This fluffy adventurer has captured the hearts of many, embarking on a daily quest for his beloved dish.

Popsicle’s Daily Noodle Quest

Popsicle’s routine is nothing short of charming. Each day, he fearlessly ventures into the outside world, driven by an insatiable craving for noodles. His destination? A humble noodle shop conveniently located just opposite his residence.

Douyin Fame

Popsicle’s noodle escapades haven’t gone unnoticed. Thanks to his owner’s creative documentation on Douyin, a popular Chinese video-sharing platform, Popsicle has become an internet sensation. The clips showcase his undeniable charm as he meanders through the streets in pursuit of his favorite treat.

The Noodle Shop Connection

The noodle shop, a pivotal part of Popsicle’s story, becomes a focal point. It’s not just a place to satisfy a cat’s cravings; it’s a community hub where a four-legged foodie has formed an unexpected bond.

Popsicle’s Journey

Picture this: Popsicle, with purpose in his step, navigating the uneven terrain of the road like a seasoned explorer. Sometimes, he even tails the restaurant owner, perhaps dropping subtle hints about his culinary desires.

The Kind Lady Boss

One cannot help but appreciate the generosity of the noodle shop’s lady boss. She never fails to indulge Popsicle’s request, leaving him with strands of noodles dangling from his mouth like a triumphant bird with its prized worm.

Popsicle’s Daily Routine

Popsicle’s routine is a spectacle. Twice each day, he makes his way to the noodle shop, a testament to his unwavering commitment to the pursuit of happiness, in noodle form.

Homecoming Ritual

Back home, Popsicle adds his noodle haul to his food bowl, creating a unique fusion of kibbles and noodles. It’s a ritual that showcases the cat’s endearing and slightly quirky habits.

Double Daily Visits

Consistency is key for Popsicle. His daily noodle quest involves not just one but two visits to the noodle shop, emphasizing the intensity of his noodle passion.

Clips Showcasing Popsicle

For a visual delight, here are some clips capturing Popsicle in action, transporting his noodles with an air of feline determination.

AMERICAN MAN MURDERS PREGNANT THAI WIFE AFTER HE SETTLES IN THAI WITH HER

0

In the quiet northern city of Nan, Thailand, a once seemingly ordinary life took a dark turn as Jason Balzer, a 32-year-old American fugitive, stands accused of brutally stabbing his pregnant wife, Pitchaporn Kidchob, 32, and dumping her lifeless body in a trash bin. This article delves into the disturbing details surrounding this tragic incident, exploring the events that led to the shocking crime and the subsequent arrest of Balzer.

Argument

The serene streets of Nan were disrupted by an escalating argument over a new motorbike, setting the stage for a heinous crime that unfolded within the walls of Jason and Pitchaporn’s home.

Balzer, allegedly driven by rage, repeatedly stabbed his wife, leaving her body concealed in a bin miles away. The subsequent escape and arrest in Chiang Mai added another layer of complexity to this chilling tale.

Background

Hailing from the United States, Balzer’s arrival in Thailand after purportedly jumping bail in Colorado raises questions about his past and the motive behind his actions.

The gravity of the murder charge against Balzer, carrying the maximum penalty of death, reflects the severity of the crime. The ongoing police investigation aims to gather sufficient evidence before formal charges are leveled.

In a shocking revelation during a police interview, Balzer claimed he killed his wife due to incessant nagging and complaints about the new motorcycle he had purchased.

Relationship Struggles

The troubled dynamics of Jason and Pitchaporn’s relationship unfolded, revealing a tumultuous marriage marked by a lack of affection and communication.

Balzer’s escape to Chiang Mai and the meticulous tactics employed to hide the evidence shed light on the perpetrator’s desperate attempts to evade justice.

The man said: ‘I quit my job and sold everything to settle down in Thailand with her. But lately she showed me no affection, refusing to sleep with me and telling me to return to my country.’

Alerting the Authorities

The turning point came when Pitchaporn’s mother, unable to reach her daughter, discovered bloodstains at the couple’s house, prompting her to alert the authorities.

Details emerge about Balzer’s initial meeting with Pitchaporn in 2017, their subsequent marriage in the US, and Balzer’s life-altering decision to settle in Nan.

Police Lieutenant General Prachuab Wongsuk emphasized the need to gather all evidence before charging Balzer, highlighting the complex nature of the case.

Did not know she is pregnant

Balzer’s claim of ignorance regarding his wife’s pregnancy adds a perplexing layer to the unfolding tragedy, raising questions about the depth of their relationship.

WOMAN REFUSED TO TAKE CARE OF AUNT’S DOG WHILE SHE GOES ON TRIP

0

So my aunt is going on a trip in a couple of weeks.

She has 3 dogs, a lab, a chocolate lab and a poodle. She asked me to dog sit at her house for a week. The problem is all her dogs are one year old so they’re pretty much puppies.

I don’t have the best experience with dogs, i have one but she’s always been a very calm dog her whole life.

All my aunt’s dogs are super hyper and not very well trained. They’re so much work as i’ve heard and i just don’t think i can handle it.

I told her that and she asked me to reconsider. She said she’d pay me $400. I strongly reconsidered after that but once again i just don’t think i could handle it.

I told her sorry but no again. She called my mom afterward and tried to make my mom make me dog sit.

My mom told me that she called again and said she was desperate. I told her to just find someone else and she said she can’t find someone in such short notice.

My mom told me i was being a little selfish for telling my own aunt no. We left it at that.

Last night my aunt called me again and said that she’s reconsidering me as a dog sitter but she’s lowering the price to 300.

I told her that i said no was my final answer and she said that she’s going to have to cancel her trip because of me and my “irresponsibility”.

Usually i wouldn’t feel bad but she was looking toward to this trip apparently

BUS COMPANY OFFERS $5,000 SALARY AND $10,000 SIGN-UP BONUS

0

In the often overlooked realm of public transport, bus drivers play a vital role, providing an indispensable service that keeps societies moving. In an unexpected turn, a Singaporean bus company, Westpoint Transit, is set to redefine the narrative around this profession with an extraordinary hiring initiative.

Unveiling Westpoint Transit’s Vision

Westpoint Transit has recently announced a groundbreaking initiative geared towards shattering prevailing stereotypes associated with bus driving. The company aims to recruit 30 bus drivers by May 2024, revolutionizing the perception of this essential occupation.

The Unprecedented Offer: S$5,000 Monthly Salary

Central to this initiative is Westpoint Transit’s commitment to providing an “unprecedented” gross monthly salary of S$5,000 to each enlisted driver. This remarkable compensation package is exclusive to those operating 45-seater buses or larger vehicles.

Joining Bonus Extravaganza: S$10,000 Awaits Successful Applicants

Breaking down the S$5,000 gross salary, drivers will receive a combination of basic pay, a mobile phone allowance, and a performance allowance. The performance allowance, capped at S$1,250 per month, serves as a reward for adherence to safety standards, conduct, and meticulous vehicle maintenance.

In addition to the generous monthly pay, successful applicants will be welcomed with open arms and a substantial S$10,000 joining bonus. The hiring process will commence on 15th December, with the first round closing its doors on 15th January 2024.

Flexible Shifts for Work-Life Balance

Enlisted drivers can anticipate a 44-hour workweek, offering flexibility with shifts falling either on Mondays to Saturdays or Sundays to Fridays. Westpoint Transit prioritizes work-life balance, recognizing its significance in creating a fulfilling career for its employees.

Addressing the Crisis: A Critical Driver Shortage

Westpoint Transit’s initiative is not just about remuneration; it’s a response to a critical shortage of bus drivers in Singapore. Factors contributing to this shortage include an ageing workforce, the physically demanding nature of the job, and a diminishing interest in driving careers.

The Timely Demand Surge

The shortage is exacerbated by recent events such as the return of foreign drivers to their home countries during the pandemic and the resurgence of events and tourism post-pandemic. The demand for bus drivers has spiked, underscoring the urgency of Westpoint Transit’s hiring initiative.

Application Process and Contact Information

For those intrigued by this revolutionary opportunity, Westpoint Transit invites interested parties to reach out via email at [email protected]. The company wishes all applicants the best, hoping for successful hires that will embark on fulfilling careers.

Conclusion: Driving Change, One Route at a Time

In conclusion, Westpoint Transit’s innovative approach to bus driver recruitment goes beyond remuneration. It’s a strategic move aimed at transforming societal perceptions, addressing the current driver shortage, and providing financial stability to employees. As the wheels of change set in motion, the bus company hopes for a brighter future for both drivers and the communities they serve.

GIRL’S BF COMPLAINS THAT SHE WEARS PAJAMAS AT HOME, NOT “ATTRACTIVE”

0

Do most women change into their pajamas or comfy (unflattering) clothes as soon as they get home?

When I get home from work the first thing I do is change into my pajamas. Take my bra off. Get comfy.

My boyfriend has recently complained about this, saying that it isn’t “attractive.” Like the other day I was getting into bed and he just looked at me and said “that is the least attractive outfit I’ve ever seen.”

It really hurt my feelings. I mean it was just an oversized gray t shirt and shorts. Why does it matter what I wear at home? Is this normal?

Netizens’ comments

  • A friend of mine once wisely told me that “home is where the bra isn’t”. Ever since it’s the first thing I take off when I get home
  • I work from home most days so I’m usually in sweats or my pjs when my boyfriend comes over. I used to apologize for my unkempt appearance but he repeatedly told me that he loves how I look no matter what and he’s glad that I’m comfortable.
  • Does your boyfriend bother to be appealing at all times or nah?
  • I would love to know what HE was wearing at the time he made that comment.

FALSE TRADING SAGA: MARKET MAKER & 4 EX-EXECUTIVES OF TEE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED & AGV GROUP LIMITED FACE FURTHER CHARGES

0

On 12 December 2023, the Prosecution filed additional charges under the Securities and Futures Act (“SFA”) against Huang Yiwen (“Huang”). 

These charges were for conspiring with two former executives of TEE International Limited (“TEE International”), and with two former executives of AGV Group Limited (“AGV Group”), to create misleading appearances with respect to the prices of the respective companies’ securities between 2017 and 2019. Huang was the sole director of GTC Group Pte Ltd (“GTC Group”) when it was engaged by the companies to provide market making services at the material time. TEE International and AGV Group are listed on the Mainboard and the Catalist board of SGX respectively. The four former executives of TEE International and AGV Group face similar charges.

Huang was also charged for conspiring with two other individuals to create a misleading appearance of active trading in the securities of four SGX-listed companies, namely TEE International, AGV Group, Mencast Holdings Ltd (“Mencast Holdings”) and BRC Asia Limited (“BRC Asia”), as well as the units of one SGX-listed real estate investment trust (“REIT”), Sasseur REIT, between 2017 and 2020.

Huang had earlier been charged for engaging in a conspiracy with three former management executives of New Silkroutes Group to create a misleading appearance with respect to the price of New Silkroutes Group securities in 2018. 

Charges in relation to Price Rigging and False Trading 

Misleading appearance with respect to the price of TEE International securities

Huang and two former executives of TEE International, Phua Chian Kin (“Phua”) and Neo Weng Meng, Edwin (“Neo”), are alleged to have placed orders and executed trades in TEE International securities to push up the price of TEE International securities on 50 trading days between 6 March 2018 and 26 April 2019. At the material time, Phua was the Group Chief Executive and Managing Director of TEE International, and Neo was the Managing Director of a subsidiary of TEE International. Arising from this, Huang, Phua, and Neo were each charged with 50 counts of offences under Section 197(1)(b) of the SFA read with Section 109 of the Penal Code (“PC”), for engaging in a conspiracy to create a misleading appearance with respect to the price of TEE International securities.

Misleading appearance with respect to the price of AGV Group securities

Huang is also alleged to have placed orders and executed trades in AGV Group securities to push up the price of AGV Group securities on four trading days between 13 October 2017 and 14 November 2017. He also allegedly conspired with two former executives of AGV Group, Albert Ang Nam Wah (“Ang”) and Sim Teck Chye (“Sim”) to push up the price of AGV Group securities on 13 other trading days between 23 November 2017 and 5 February 2018. At the material time, Ang and Sim were the Chief Executive Officer and Investor Relations Executive of AGV Group respectively. Huang, Ang, and Sim were each charged with 13 counts of offences under Section 197(1)(b) of the SFA read with Section 109 of the PC , with Huang facing an additional four charges under Section 197(1)(b) of the SFA.

Sim faces two more charges for offences in connection with the alleged false trading. He is alleged to have placed orders and executed trades in another person’s trading account without the authorisation of the relevant securities trading firm, in contravention of Section 201(b) of the SFA, and which is also an offence under Section 204(1) of the SFA. He is also alleged to have attempted to pervert the course of justice by telling Huang to delete messages between them, which is an offence under Section 204A read with Section 511 of the PC. 

Misleading appearance of active trading in five SGX listed counters

Huang was further charged with 14 counts of offences under Section 197(1)(a) of the SFA read with Section 109 of the PC, for conspiring with two other individuals, Tay Sze Chien (“Tay”), a fund manager and Tan Wei Liang (“Tan”), a trading representative, to create a misleading appearance of active trading in five SGX listed counters. These charges are amalgamated under Section 124(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (“CPC”). Tay and Tan face similar charges. The alleged false trading was conducted during the following time periods:

CountersTime Period
TEE InternationalBetween 8 January 2018 and 18 March 2019
AGV GroupBetween 10 October 2017 and 11 July 2018
Mencast HoldingsBetween 13 September 2017 and 5 February 2020
BRC AsiaBetween 1 December 2017 and 5 February 2020
Sasseur REITBetween 21 September 2018 and 26 December 2018

Tay and Tan also face further charges in connection with alleged false trading. Tay was charged with five counts of offences under Section 201(b) of the SFA, for placing orders and executing trades in his family members’ trading accounts without the authorisation of the relevant securities trading firms (“Unauthorised Accounts”). As for Tan, he was the trading representative for one of the Unauthorised Accounts and allegedly knew of Tay’s unauthorised use. Despite this, he failed to prevent Tay from trading, in contravention of Section 201(b) of the SFA, which is an offence under Section 204(1) of the SFA read with Section 109 of the PC.

Details of the charges faced by all ten accused persons (including those from the earlier prosecution) are set out in Annex A.  

The SFA charges above arose from a joint investigation carried out by the Commercial Affairs Department (“CAD”) of the Singapore Police Force, and the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Further charges against Phua, former Group Chief Executive and Managing Director of TEE International  

Phua was charged with four counts of offences under Section 408 of the PC for dishonestly misappropriating a total of $3.75 million from two subsidiaries of TEE International on four occasions between February and March 2019.

He also faces three counts of offences under Section 402(1)(a) of the Companies Act (“CA”) for making a false statement to the directors and an external auditor of TEE International on three occasions in July 2019.

The PC and CA charges above arose from investigations carried out by the CAD and the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority.

If convicted, an individual faces:

  1. For each charge under Section 197(1)(a), Section 197(1)(b), and Section 201(b) of the SFA, an imprisonment term of up to seven years, a fine of up to $250,000 or both. For each amalgamated charge, an individual potentially faces two times that punishment if convicted, pursuant to Section 124(8)(a)(ii) of the CPC.
  2. For each charge under Section 204A of the PC, an imprisonment term of up to seven years, a fine or both.
  3. For each charge under Section 408 of the PC, an imprisonment term of up to 15 years, and shall also be liable to a fine.
  4. For each charge under Section 402(1)(a) of the CA, an imprisonment term of up to two years, or a fine of up to $10,000, or both.

Annex A

S/N[1]Accused PersonCharges
1Huang Yiwen, sole director of GTC Group Pte Ltd, a commercial market maker31 counts of Section 197(1)(b) of the SFA read with Section 109 of the PC for engaging in a conspiracy to create a misleading appearance with respect to the price of New Silkroutes Group securities on 31 trading days between 1 March 2018 and 27 August 201850 counts of Section 197(1)(b) of the SFA read with Section 109 of the PC for engaging in a conspiracy to create a misleading appearance with respect to the price of TEE International securities on 50 trading days between 6 March 2018 and 26 April 2019Four counts of Section 197(1)(b) of the SFA for creating a misleading appearance with respect to the price of AGV Group securities on four trading days between 13 October 2017 and 14 November 201712 counts of Section 197(1)(b) of the SFA read with Section 109 of the PC for engaging in a conspiracy to create a misleading appearance with respect to the price of AGV Group securities on 12 trading days between 23 November 2017 and 30 January 2018One count of Section 197(1)(b) of the SFA read with Section 120B and 109 of the PC for being a party to a criminal conspiracy to do acts for a purpose of creating a misleading appearance with respect to the price of AGV Group securities on 5 February 201814 counts of Section 197(1)(a) of the SFA read with Section 109 of the PC for engaging in a conspiracy to create misleading appearance of active trading in the securities of TEE International, AGV Group, BRC Asia, and Mencast Holdings, and units of Sasseur REIT
2Goh Jin Hian, former Chief Executive Officer of New Silkroutes Group31 counts of Section 197(1)(b) of the SFA read with Section 109 of the PC for engaging in a conspiracy to create a misleading appearance with respect to the price of New Silkroutes Group securities on 31 trading days between 26 February 2018 and 27 August 2018Eight counts of Section 197(1)(b) of the SFA for pushing up the price of New Silkroutes Group securities on eight trading days between 31 August 2018 and 4 December 2018
3Oo Cheong Kwan Kelvyn, former Chief Corporate Officer of New Silkroutes Group31 counts of Section 197(1)(b) of the SFA read with Section 109 of the PC for engaging in a conspiracy to create a misleading appearance with respect to the price of New Silkroutes Group securities on 31 trading days between 26 February 2018 and 27 August 2018
4Teo Thiam Chuan William, former Finance Director of New Silkroutes Group31 counts of Section 197(1)(b) of the SFA read with Section 109 of the PC for engaging in a conspiracy to create a misleading appearance with respect to the price of New Silkroutes Group securities on 31 trading days between 26 February 2018 and 27 August 2018
5Phua Chian Kin, former Group Chief Executive and Managing Director of TEE International50 counts of Section 197(1)(b) of the SFA read with Section 109 of the PC for engaging in a conspiracy to create a misleading appearance with respect to the price of TEE International securities on 50 trading days between 6 March 2018 and 26 April 2019Four counts of Section 408 of the PC for dishonestly misappropriating a total of $3.75 million from two subsidiaries of TEE International on four occasions between February and March 2019Three counts of Section 402(1)(a) of the CA for making a false statement to the directors and an external auditor of TEE International on three occasions in July 2019
6Neo Weng Meng, Edwin, former Managing Director of a subsidiary of TEE International50 counts of Section 197(1)(b) of the SFA read with Section 109 of the PC for engaging in a conspiracy to create a misleading appearance with respect to the price of TEE International securities on 50 trading days between 6 March 2018 and 26 April 2019
7Albert Ang Nam Wah, former Chief Executive Officer of AGV Group12 counts of Section 197(1)(b) of the SFA read with Section 109 of the PC for engaging in a conspiracy to create a misleading appearance with respect to the price of AGV Group securities on 12 trading days between 23 November 2017 and 30 January 2018One count of Section 197(1)(b) of the SFA read with Section 120B and 109 of the PC for being a party to a criminal conspiracy to do acts for a purpose of creating a misleading appearance with respect to the price of AGV Group securities on 5 February 2018
8Sim Teck Chye, former Investor Relations Executive of AGV Group12 counts of Section 197(1)(b) of the SFA read with Section 109 of the PC for engaging in a conspiracy to create a misleading appearance with respect to the price of AGV Group securities on 12 trading days between 23 November 2017 and 30 January 2018One count of Section 197(1)(b) of the SFA read with Section 120B and 109 of the PC for being a party to a criminal conspiracy to do acts for a purpose of creating a misleading appearance with respect to the price of AGV Group securities on 5 February 2018One count of Section 201(b) of the SFA for engaging in practices which were likely to operate as a deception on a securities trading firmOne count of Section 204A read with Section 511 of PC for attempting to pervert the course of justice
9Tay Sze Chien, then a fund manager14 counts of Section 197(1)(a) of the SFA read with Section 109 of the PC for engaging in a conspiracy to create misleading appearance of active trading in the securities of TEE International, AGV Group, BRC Asia, and Mencast Holdings, and units of Sasseur REITFive counts of Section 201(b) of the SFA for engaging in practices which were likely to operate as a deception on three securities trading firms
10Tan Wei Liang, then a trading representativeOne count of Section 197(1)(a) of the SFA read with Section 109 of the PC for engaging in a conspiracy to create misleading appearance of active trading in the securities of BRC AsiaTwo counts of Section 201(b) of the SFA read with Section 109 of the PC for intentionally aiding Tay Sze Chien in engaging in practices which were likely to operate as a deception on a securities trading firm

[1] Goh Jin Hian, Oo Cheong Kwan Kelvyn, and Teo Thiam Chuan William were charged in court on 20 September 2023. Huang Yiwen was first charged in court on 20 September 2023 with 31 counts of Section 197(1)(b) SFA read with Section 109 PC, alongside the aforementioned accused persons. Further charges were tendered against him on 12 December 2023. The rest of the accused persons were also charged on 12 December 2023.