28.9 C
Singapore
Tuesday, June 30, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 2606

5 DAY ISLAND WIDE ENFORCEMENT BY TP, 3 ARRESTED 159 SUMMONSES ISSUED

0

A five-day island-wide enforcement blitz conducted by Traffic Police (TP) against errant road users from 13 to 17 November 2023 resulted in three arrests and 159 summonses being issued.

The 159 summonses were issued for traffic violations such as speeding, red-light running, failing to wear a seatbelt, using a mobile communication device while driving, wearing an unapproved helmet and using a helmet fitted with a visor not of an approved type. Two motorists were placed under arrest for offences such as driving a motor vehicle without a valid driving licence and/or driving a motor vehicle without insurance coverage. The third motorist arrested was wanted by the Police for failing to attend court to answer for his actions in committing traffic offences such as failing to conform to red light signal, careless driving without due care and attention, failing to wear a seatbelt, permitting another person to use a vehicle without a valid driving licence and failing to stop after an accident.  

Owners of vehicles should take responsibility to check that the driver using their vehicles are holding valid driving licences. This can be done online via ‘Status of Driving Licence’ under E-Services of the Singapore Police Force’s (SPF) website. The offence of permitting another person to use a vehicle without a valid driving licence under Section 35(2) of the Road Traffic Act 1961 carries a maximum fine of $10,000, a jail term of up to three years, or both. Repeat offenders may face a maximum fine of $20,000, a jail term of up to six years, or both. 

Motorists may also check for records of outstanding traffic summonses issued by the Traffic Police online via ‘Status of Outstanding Traffic Offence and Payment of Fines’ under E-Services of the SPF website. A warrant of arrest may be issued against offenders who ignore their traffic summonses. 

Commander of Traffic Police, Senior Assistant Commissioner of Police Daniel Tan said, “The Traffic Police will continue to take firm action against motorists and pedestrians who choose to flout traffic laws and endanger the safety of other road users. Road safety is everyone’s responsibility and everyone must abide by the traffic rules to keep the roads safe for everyone.”.

Annex A

Penalties of Mentioned Offences

Driving Without a Valid Driving Licence
The offence of driving without a valid driving licence under Sec 35(1) of the Road Traffic Act 1961 carries a maximum fine of $10,000, a jail term of up to three years, or both. Repeat offenders are liable to a maximum fine of $20,000, a jail term of up to six years or both. The vehicle may also be forfeited. 

Using a Motor Vehicle Without Insurance Coverage
The offence of using a motor vehicle without insurance coverage under Sec 3(1) of the Motor Vehicles (Third-Party Risks and Compensation) Act 1960 carries a maximum fine of $1,000, a jail term of up to three months, or both.

Taking a Motor Vehicle Without the Owner’s Consent
The offence of taking a motor vehicle without the owner’s consent under Sec 96(1) of the Road Traffic Act 1961 carries a maximum fine of $1,0000, a jail term of up to three months, or both.

Speeding
The offence of speeding under Sec 63(4) of the Road Traffic Act 1961 carries a maximum fine of $1,000, a jail term of up to three months, or both. Repeat offenders are liable to a maximum fine of $2,000, a jail term of up to six months or both.

Failing to Conform to Red Light Signal
The offence of failing to conform to red light signal under Rule 11(f)(i) of the Road Traffic (Traffic Signs) Rules carries a maximum fine of $1,000, a jail term of up to three months, or both.

Failing to Wear a Seatbelt
The offence of failing to wear a seatbelt under Rule 4 of the Road Traffic (Motor Vehicles, Wearing of Seat Belts) Rules 2011 carries a maximum fine of $1,000, a jail term of up to three months, or both.

Using a Mobile Communication Device While Driving
The offence of using a mobile communication device while driving under Section 65B(1) of the Road Traffic Act 1961 carries a maximum fine of $1,000, a jail term of up to six months, or both.

Using a Helmet With a Visor of Not an Approved Type, Failing to Secure the Helmet, and Using an Unapproved Helmet
The offences of using a helmet with a visor of not an approved type, failing to secure the helmet, and using an unapproved helmet under Sec 74(1) of the Road Traffic Act 1961 carry a maximum fine of $1,000, a jail term of up to three months or both. Repeat offenders are liable to a maximum fine of $2,000, a jail term of up to six months or both.

316 SCAMMERS UNDER INVESTIGATION, YOUNGEST AT 15 YEARS OLD

0

Officers from the Commercial Affairs Department and the seven Police Land Divisions conducted a two-week operation between 10 November 2023 and 23 November 2023. A total of 229 men and 87 women, aged between 15 and 73, are assisting in investigations for their suspected involvement in scams as scammers or money mules. The suspects are believed to be involved in more than 1,100 cases of scams, comprising mainly job scams, malware-enabled scams, phishing scams, Government Officials Impersonation scams, Internet love scams, e-commerce scams, where victims reportedly lost over $8.5 million.

The suspects are being investigated for the alleged offences of cheating, money laundering or providing payment services without a licence. The offence of cheating under Section 420 of the Penal Code 1871 carries an imprisonment term of up to 10 years and a fine. The offence of money laundering under the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act 1992 carries an imprisonment term of up to 10 years, a fine of up to $500,000, or both. The offence of carrying on a business to provide any type of payment service in Singapore without a licence under Section 5 of the Payment Services Act 2019 carries a fine of up to $125,000, an imprisonment term of up to three years, or both. 

The Police take a serious stance against any person who may be involved in scams, and perpetrators will be dealt with in accordance with the law. To avoid being an accomplice to crimes, members of the public should always reject requests by others to use your bank account or mobile lines as you will be held accountable if these are linked to crimes.

For more information on scams, members of the public can visit www.scamalert.sg or call the Anti-Scam Helpline at 1800-722-6688. Anyone with information on such scams may call the Police Hotline at 1800-255-0000 or submit information online at www.police.gov.sg/iwitness. All information will be kept strictly confidential.

OPERATION AGAINST SMUGGLERS AT CHANGI AIRPORT, TWO MEN MOVED $1.2M INTO SGD

0

Officers from the Commercial Affairs Department (CAD) of the Singapore Police Force (SPF), the Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA) and Singapore Customs (Customs) conducted a multi-agency enforcement operation at Singapore Changi Airport on 16 November 2023

The enforcement operation is part of a series of operations conducted at the various immigration checkpoints since September 2023. Investigations are ongoing against the persons following enhanced checks conducted at the airport during the enforcement operations:

  1. Two male foreigners, aged 37 and 48, were separately found to have moved into Singapore, an assortment of currency notes, which amounted to more than S$20,000, without declaration; 
  2. Two male foreigner cash couriers, aged 39 and 53were found to have moved into Singapore an assortment of currency notes, which exceeded S$20,000, and to have made false declarations. The two men had moved into Singapore physical currency amounting to S$1.2 million, of which S$120,000 were under declared;
  3. Ten other travellers were found with Customs offence of failure to declare and pay taxes on (i) dutiable cigarettes/tobacco products, (ii) liquors in excess of their duty-free allowance or (iii) new articles, souvenirs, gifts and food items exceeding their Goods and Services Tax (GST) import relief allowance. 

CAD oversees the Cross Border Cash Movement Reporting Regime (CBCRR) to curb money laundering, terrorist financing and other criminal activities. The public is reminded that while there are no restrictions on the amount of Cash or Bearer Negotiable Instruments (CBNIs) that can be moved into or out of Singapore, it is a statutory requirement to report the cross border physical movement of the CBNIs if the total value exceeds S$20,000 (or its equivalent in foreign currency). Failure to accurately report the movement of CBNIs exceeding S$20,000 is an offence punishable under Section 60(2) of the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act 1992. 



Offenders are liable to a fine not exceeding S$50,000 or to an imprisonment term of up to three years, or both. A confiscation order may also be sought for any part of the cash, in relation to which the offence was committed, that exceeds S$20,000 (or its equivalent in a foreign currency). More information on Cross Border Cash Movement Reporting can be found on SPF’s website (www.police.gov.sg/Advisories/Crime/Commercial-Crimes/Suspicious-Transaction-Reporting-Office).

Under the Customs Act, any person who is in any way concerned in any fraudulent evasion of, or attempt to fraudulently evade, any customs duty or excise duty shall be guilty of an offence and will be liable on conviction to a fine of up to 20 times the amount of duty and GST evaded. It is the responsibility of arriving travellers to make accurate and complete declaration of the dutiable and taxable items in their possession. To avoid the hefty penalties and for their own convenience, travellers or returning Singaporeans are strongly encouraged to make an advance declaration and payment for their dutiable or GST goods up to three days prior to their arrival in Singapore, using the Customs@SG Web Application

Safeguarding Singapore’s borders remains top priority for ICA. ICA will continue to conduct security checks and work with relevant authorities to detect and deter smuggling attempts so as to keep Singapore safe. 

All travellers are reminded that the authorities will not tolerate any illegal activities as we strive to safeguard our land, air and sea borders against crime and security threats, including smuggling activities and non-compliance with our regulations. 

S’PORE WORKERS TO GET 0.6-MONTH YEAR-END BONUS, ON TOP OF UP TO $1.2K LUMP SUMS

0

Civil servants to receive 0.6-month year-end bonus
Officers up to MX13(I) get additional lump sum of up to $800

This follows close consultation with public sector unions

                In close consultation with the public sector unions, the Government will pay all civil servants a year-end Annual Variable Component (AVC) of 0.6 month. Civil servants in grades equivalent to MX13(I) and MX14 will receive an additional lump sum of $400 while those in grades equivalent to MX15 and MX16, and those in the Operations Support Scheme (OSS) will receive a higher lump sum of $800. This year-end payment takes into consideration that Singapore’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is expected to come in at around 1.0 per cent in 2023, as well as the latest National Wages Council (NWC) guidelines.

Economic and Labour Market Outlook

2.               The Ministry of Trade and Industry has narrowed the GDP growth forecast of “0.5 per cent to 1.5 per cent” to “around 1.0 per cent” for 2023. The revised forecast takes into consideration the labour market outlook, subdued external demand for the rest of the year and continued downside risks arising from geopolitical tensions.

Progressive approach to year-end payment

3               Against this backdrop, the Government will pay all civil servants a year-end AVC of 0.6 month. In line with the NWC’s recommendations, the Government will continue to adopt a progressive approach in determining the AVC for civil servants. Thus, civil servants in grades equivalent to MX13(I) and MX14 will receive an additional lump sum of $400 while civil servants in grades equivalent to MX15 and MX16, and those in the OSS will receive a higher lump sum of $800.

4               In total, civil servants will receive 0.9 month in full-year AVC for 2023.  Officers up to MX13(I) and equivalent will receive an additional lump sum of up to $1,200 in 2023. The Government will continue to pay the Non-Pensionable Annual Allowance (13th month) of 1.0 month to all civil servants.

DINERS EATING HOTPOT HALFWAY, RAT FELL FROM CEILING & ALMOST DROPPED INTO SOUP

0

In a shocking incident reported by Liberty Times on Sunday (Nov 26), diners at a popular hotpot restaurant in Taiwan had an unexpected visitor—a rodent that fell from the ceiling, almost landing in their hotpot.

Diner’s Shocking Experience

Imagine enjoying a hotpot meal with friends when suddenly, a sizable rodent plummets from the ceiling, landing perilously close to your bubbling broth.

This was the harrowing experience shared by a diner on the I am Banqio Resident Facebook group. The shock was palpable as the diners, mid-bite, leapt out of their seats in terror.

The eyewitness account describes the chaos and the immediate decision to abandon their meals and exit the restaurant.

Restaurant’s Response

The parent company, Chien Tu, issued a swift apology, attributing the incident to the rodent seeking refuge from fumigation on the building’s first floor.

They assured the public of a two-day closure for thorough cleaning and disinfection of the affected area. This response aimed at mitigating concerns about hygiene and safety within their establishment.

Health Inspection Findings

However, Taiwanese health authorities painted a different picture during their inspection. They identified lapses in hygiene measures at the back door of the kitchen and noted staff negligence regarding closed rubbish bins. These findings could potentially lead to legal consequences for the restaurant.

The restaurant now faces the specter of fines ranging from NT$60,000 to NT$200 million if they fail to meet health standards upon re-inspection. This financial consequence underscores the gravity of lapses in maintaining cleanliness and adhering to health regulations.

Unsurprisingly, the incident ignited a flurry of reactions on social media. This incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of rigorous hygiene standards in the food industry. From regular pest control measures to diligent staff training, establishments must prioritize cleanliness to ensure the safety and satisfaction of their patrons.

S’PORE MAN GOT TESTICULAR CANCER & ENDS UP WITH ONLY ONE BALL, SHARES HIS STORY

0

In the realm of social media, where vulnerability is often masked by curated content, YouTuber James Rainier broke the mold by sharing a deeply personal struggle—his battle with testicular cancer.

The revelation, made in a candid YouTube video on July 12, 2022, not only shed light on Rainier’s health journey but also sparked a conversation about transparency and body image.

The Candid Conversation

During a recent podcast appearance on the Men, Explain podcast, radio DJ Sonia Chew delved into Rainier’s post-treatment experiences. The conversation took an unexpected turn when Chew asked about Rainier’s intimate life after cancer.

In his characteristically open manner, Rainier shared that the inquiries were more in his mind than from others.

What stood out in Rainier’s narrative was the pivotal role his partner played in the early detection of cancer. Rainier expressed gratitude for a partner who noticed abnormalities and urged him to seek medical attention.

Post-Surgery Reflections

Following the surgery, Rainier confronted both real and perceived questions about his changed physical appearance.

Admitting to initial overthinking, he humorously acknowledged the unspoken curiosity around having “only one ball.”

Rainier’s openness extended beyond physical health to his struggles with body image. He candidly admitted feeling “less of a man” due to existing body issues, including height insecurities.

In a surprising revelation, Rainier connected his height insecurities to his self-perceived masculinity. The cancer diagnosis became a catalyst, intensifying these feelings.

Family Planning

Looking to the future, Rainier discussed his thoughts on having children. He emphasized the necessity of open communication with a partner and acknowledged the ease that comes with public awareness. His video serves not only as a personal journey but also as a catalyst for destigmatizing discussions around fertility and masculinity.

2 Y.O BOY WENT MISSING IN HEAVY RAIN, DEAD BODY LATER FOUND INSIDE DRAIN

0

In the midst of what is typically a season of increased rainfall in our region, a heartbreaking incident unfolded in Malaysia due to the October-November inter-monsoon period. Sadly, the heavy downpour resulted in the tragic death of a two-year-old boy, Muhammad Danish Mohd Faizal.

The Disappearance of Muhammad Danish

On a seemingly ordinary day, Muhammad Danish and his four-year-old sister were playing in the rain while their parents managed a nasi kerabu stall nearby, according to Berita Harian.

However, what started as innocent play turned into a nightmare when his mother, Nor Amiza Che Kar, noticed he was missing.

Fueled by panic and desperation, Nor Amiza took to Facebook to seek help, sharing the details of her son’s disappearance. The heart-wrenching plea included information about the circumstances surrounding Danish’s vanishing act during the heavy downpour.

The Tragic Discovery

Despite efforts by the parents and the community, Danish’s body was tragically found in a drain the next morning. The search and rescue operation, led by the Fire and Rescue Department, spanned through the night and into the following day.

Nor Amiza documented every step of the harrowing experience on her Facebook profile, sharing updates during the search and expressing her hope for Danish’s safe return. The post-mortem at Melaka Hospital revealed the grim details of the two-year-old’s untimely demise.

Coping with Loss

In the midst of unimaginable grief, Nor Amiza dedicated a heartfelt tribute to her son on social media. Her posts reflected not only the pain of losing a child but also the additional burden of enduring a similar loss earlier in the year – that of her own mother.

Throughout the ordeal, Nor Amiza pleaded with the public to handle the situation with sensitivity, requesting the removal of videos depicting Danish’s lifeless body. She also shared the last video she took of her son, transforming it into a poignant memory.

Image source: Jabatan Bomba dan Penyelamat Malaysia (Fire and Rescue Department of Malaysia) via Berita Harian

RACIST AUNTIE YELLS “BAS–RD INDIANS” & WHACKED PEOPLE @ TAMPINES HUB, POLICE INVESTIGATING

0

An alarming incident occurred at Our Tampines Hub during a live screening of the English Premier League game between Liverpool and Manchester City.

A deranged looking elderly woman was seen screaming racist insults and allegedly assaulting other patrons during the live-screening of the football match, before security had to intervene.

The Incident Unfolds

Last Saturday, football enthusiasts gathered at Our Tampines Hub for a live screening of the much-anticipated English Premier League clash. The atmosphere was electric as fans eagerly anticipated the showdown between two football titans.

The Instagram page @sgfollowsall captured the incident on video, showcasing the auntie’s offensive language and gestures. Her derogatory comments targeted the spectators, branding them as “b*stard Indians” and questioning their right to be in a public space.

The catalyst for this disturbing event was a simple act – two men deciding to watch the football match at a railing, unknowingly obstructing the view of an older auntie seated behind them.

What began as a minor inconvenience escalated rapidly when the auntie resorted to physically hitting the spectators on their backs before unleashing a barrage of racist comments.

She was also heard screaming at them “they think their father place ah! bloody bas–tards!”

Amidst the escalating tension, a white-haired security guard stepped in to address the situation. The auntie, undeterred, continued her tirade, pointing accusing fingers at the targeted individuals. The security personnel, in an attempt to defuse the situation, engaged in a dialogue with both parties.

She was also caught on camera incriminating herself, telling the guard that she “just knock him like that” as she gestured with her fist.

Aftermath

The severity of the incident prompted the security staff to report the matter to the police. Our Tampines Hub confirmed the incident and said that they had reported the incident to the police and investigations are currently underway.

MAN FORCES GRANDMA INTO A RETIREMENT HOME TO GET AWAY FROM RESPONSIBILITIES

0

My grandmother (GM) was kicked out of my aunt’s house went she caused so many marital problems my uncle threatened to divorce my aunt if she didn’t. She lived for a few years in a nursing home before the pandemic but during the pandemic there were tons of nursing home deaths so my aunt and mom got her out. I’m the oldest of my mother’s children so I got so much pressure to take care of my grandma during the pandemic.

I didn’t mind too much initially because the deal was I didn’t pay rent and lived with her to cook, clean and help her with her diabetes. I don’t know my GM well so I thought it might be a good bonding experience and I worked remote so it would be so bad. Well the first problem came when I told them I was bringing my dog. My GM freaked out telling me she would never let a filthy animal in her house. It was the one dealbreaker I had and I told my aunt or mom Oliver (my dog) had to come with but they never told my GM for fear of her reaction. I put my foot down saying if he isn’t coming I’m not either and I guess my GM gave up because she didn’t want to go back to the nursing home but she made Oliver’s life a living hell. She would scream at him every time she was him and I tried to keep them separate but she would demand I abandon him because she’s my GM. In the end I had no choice but to leave him with my friend temporarily because she was so unbearable.

Next was washing clothing, she demanded I wash all her clothing by hand and she had a washing machine but she would scream “you’re lazy!” at me if she catches me using it. She also wanted restaurant quality meals and throw sandwiches and cereal on the ground if she didn’t like it.

Finally she didn’t believe I worked because I work online (I’m an accountant) and she would yell at me during the middle of meeting for ignoring her when I told her I needed 30 min of peace to attend meeting. My boss told me many times to get her to stop doing that but she never listens.

She has diabetes that isn’t managed well and I tried to get her on a healthy diet but she screams and yells at me when she doesn’t get what foods she wants which cause huge sugar fluctuations which causes her ulcers on her feet to get worse and weep. It was hard to get Appointments to the doctor so I had to clean them and I am not qualified. When I persisted though the yelling and screaming her ulcers to maker her eat healthy her ulcers would get much better and start healing but in the end I gave up and let her eat anything she wanted so she would shut up but it made her blood sugars worse and her ulcers worse which I had to deal with.

So after almost 2 years of hell I got out and moved away. My GM is so mad because she expected I stay there looking after her until she passes. I told my mom and aunt I wasn’t doing that and they begged me to guilty me with the fact she was going to die alone at a nursing home.

I feel like a terrible person because I didn’t feel any guilt I just didn’t care after dealing with her for 2 years

GUY’S FIANCEE DOESN’T WANT TO CONTRIBUTE FINANCIALLY AFTER ENGAGEMENT

0

My [26M] fiancée [25F] doesn’t want to contribute financially anymore after our engagement
We’ve met in college 7 years ago. When we first started going out to dates she would reject my attempt to pay the bills in full and insist we should split or each pays for what he ordered. I wasn’t expecting that because in Morocco it’s usually the guys who pay for the dates but since she insisted I said okay.

She would do it for regular dates (restaurant, coffeeshop, parks…) and also when we started going out for vacations. For example if she didn’t have money with her and I paid for something no matter how cheap it is she would give that amount when we next met.

Last summer we were on a vacation and in the last day of the vacation I had to cancel the flights because of an expected family business in the city we were visiting. We stayed for 3 more days and I’ve paid for both our hotel rooms and new plane tickets. Next time we met she gives me the money for the plane ticket and her hotel room but I refused to take them since it was because of me that we had to stay for more days than planned. But still she didn’t accept my refusal and I insisted that I take the money.

Even when talking about scenarios in the future she would still split the costs. When we were in a retail store and we saw a refrigerator, washing machine, dishwasher pack and we agreed that it was a good deal she says “And it’s only cost 13000 each!!!” (the total price was 26000). Also, when talking about our future kids and discussing names and how are we going to raise them, when we started talking about schools she says “I know a school close to work. I’ve heard it’s good and it’s only 2000 per month so it’s 1000 each, and that includes the bus and lunch fees”

We got engaged last December and have the wedding in the summer. In the last two months we’ve started shopping for furniture and appliances for the apartment and I’ve noticed that she expects me to pay a much higher percentage than her in pretty much everything. She even refuses to pay anything for the TV because she doesn’t watch it.

Whenever I try to bring the subject up she ignores me or get defensive/dismissive whether by pretending she is tired, changing the subject, busy by work or trying to sweet talk me. We’ve had some pretty heated argument over the years but we could always sit and talk face-to-face and try to tackle the problems as a team, something that she can’t do when I bring this subject.

It’s not like she is struggling financially. She has a well paying job and she doesn’t provide for her parents (nor do they need her too) and she still buys very expressive stuff. Paying her share wouldn’t even affect her financially or downgrade her lifestyle.

I don’t have any problem to be the sole financial provider in our relationship but this sudden 180 degree change is something that I can’t understand especially coming from someone with her principles.

I’ve told my best friend about this and he says that I should cancel the wedding and run as far as possible from her because if she changed this much after the engagement who can say how much she’ll change after the wedding.

I don’t what to do or how to approach this any differently than what I tried by talking to her and at this point I don’t even know if I am with the same person I’ve been with all this time.