30.3 C
Singapore
Tuesday, April 28, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 2681

MAN WHO RESIGNED NEEDS GF TO “FIGHT HIS BATTLES” WITH HR

0

A brief background – Im a senior manager and preparing to take over from one of the directors and take on their role.

Three months ago, I accepted the resignation of one of my staff members (29m), wished them well and prepared their exit interviews with HR. I had been having problems with him for a 6 months period. I’d given him a pay rise (2% increase to his salary), however, he had claimed this was not enough and he was looking to at least go up by 10%.

I had previously told him to put together a case that showcased why he was entitled to more pay. I would review it and make a decision. It’s worth noting that I do this with all my staff and we discuss formally pay-related queries and this exercise allows me to see this from my staff’s point of view.

Instead of doing as I asked, the staff member began posting reviews about the company and why we are bad to work for, including how we do not value colleagues and will not pay them for additional work (which is not true for my team).

As the colleague had raised other issues with HR, which he also commented on the reviews, we knew where this had come from. As this was supposed to be an anonymous review, we couldn’t bring this up with him.

As he hadn’t got a further pay rise on the back of his conversations with me, he decided it would be in his best interest to do minimal work, resulting in me taking on some of his workloads along with another member of my staff, this was so the profitability of the business didn’t drop.

Now to the AH issues

The day after I accepted the resignation of my staff member, I got a message on Facebook from his GF, telling me how much of an AH I was as I’d ruined their chances of buying a house as I’d accepted his resignation.

I clarified that I hadn’t fired him, he had resigned of his own will.

It turns out, he had handed in his resignation, thinking I would have offered him more money to stay. He didn’t have another job to go into.

He too, called me an AH, reported me to HR for not offering him extra money to keep him on. Of course, HR did nothing of this. He worked his notice and left the company on his leave date.

Yesterday, I got a message, asking if I would give him his job back. I explained why I wouldn’t give him his job back and told him we were not currently recruiting for my team and made a comment that there were always jobs in the call centre he could apply for.

He called me an AH, told me I had ruined his life and he couldn’t get another job.

I really don’t see myself as the AH here, I’m attempting to ensure the company I work for isn’t damaged, and the childish behaviour of “I’ll hand in my notice so I get a payrise” really doesn’t sit well with me. I’d rather my staff feel like they have earned what they get and feel like they’re growing, not just getting handouts.

BROTHER PLAY STOCK UNTIL BANKRUPT & DIVORCED PUSHED BLAMES ON WIFE

0

My brother is in the middle of a very angry divorce.

He’s living at our parent’s house right now because he can’t afford a place on his own. The divorce is completely his fault. He blew money on stocks and bitcoin and other expensive stuff and took out loans and lines of credit in secret. He didn’t tell his wife and went so far as to show her false statements.

It didn’t work as well as it he thought because she figured it out and is divorcing him. But their house has been taken away by the bank and their savings were wiped. Noth of them applied for bankruptcy because my brother got them into massive debt on stocks and other wild out of control spending and finances.

His wife lost her job because bankruptcy is a negative in her industry. She’s living with her parents too and both of them are relying on legal aid and parents to help pay the legal fees for the divorce.

Normally I strive to ignore my brother but lately, he’s been saying it’s not his fault because the stock market is rigged and his wife should have paid more attention (he actively hid from her). The last time he said I said the entire divorce is his fault and he should apologize for destroying his wife’s life. He wasn’t pleased about it and the next time I saw him he spent the whole time trying to pick a fight with me.

He’s tried to get our parents involved too all because of how upset he is for me not agreeing with him.

Here is what netizens think:

 I believe this is financial infidelity and it’s 100% his fault. If he’d been sharing his financial decisions with her and they both decided to do it and then landed flat on their faces, that’s different. But he made this choices and now he’s trying to blame her for his mistakes.

I’m a day trader and invest in things here and there after my research. That’s not way to make money in crypto or any other market (the way your brother did)

The problem with a rule like that is that, in the very likely event he continues to poor-mouth his ex, the parents have to either go back on their word or throw away the perfectly calibrated support they’ve designed for their foolhardy but hopefully redeemable son.

HUGE SCARY FIRE ON WEST COAST HIGHWAY, MOBILE CRANE BURN UNTIL FRONT HALF MELTED

0

On the morning of Tuesday, September 5th, a huge fire broke out along the West Coast Highway, blocking off 2 lanes on the road.

The Inferno Unleashed

Social media became ablaze with footage of the incident, revealing the magnitude of the fire that engulfed the entire front of the mobile crane, with thick black smoke billowing into the sky.

One TikTok video, captured from the perspective of a passerby in a lorry, offered a glimpse into the unfolding disaster.

As the camera drew nearer, it became painfully evident that the fire had ravaged the crane beyond recognition. The fire had burned the front half of the mobile crane and melted that portion into an unrecognisable wreck, with the driver’s seat charred into an unrecognizable shell.

The Heroic Response

Promptly responding to the scene, SCDF firefighters began combating the raging flames. In another video posted on Facebook, they could be seen in action, utilizing hoses from a firetruck to combat the inferno.

The firefighting operation was so intense that it necessitated the closure of two entire lanes on the road. Traffic came to a standstill, with only one lane slowly allowing vehicles to pass. On the opposite road, the firetruck commandeered a lane, highlighting the gravity of the situation.

It took several minutes, but the firefighters eventually gained the upper hand. As the flames subsided, a white powder, presumably from their dampening efforts, blanketed the road.

Miraculously, No Injuries Reported

The SCDF confirmed that they received an alert about the fire near 71 West Coast Highway at approximately 7:30 a.m. on that Tuesday morning. The fire involved a crane truck, and the firefighters, with their water jets, managed to quell the blazing tempest.

Amidst the chaos and destruction, there were no reported injuries. Investigations into the fire are currently underway.

@rayhanmd86420

mobile Crane got fire on west Coa st highway

♬ Fire – Scooter

BOSS GIVES WIFE EXTRA MATERNAL LEAVE, BUT EMPLOYEE DON’T HAVE

0

I own a company, and my wife has a senior executive-level position at it. 14 months ago, she gave birth to our son. We elected to have a C Section and she went on maternity leave a month before she was scheduled for it.

My wife expected that 3 months would be more than enough. However, after giving birth, and having agreed that we would only be having one child together ( I already had 3 daughters), my wife was exceptionally adamant about not missing a moment of our son’s formative moments because she knew that he’d only be a baby for so long.

When the time came when she should have gone back to the office, I didn’t have the heart to refuse her when she said she needed more time. After giving birth, she joined a mom-specific life coaching program and still sees a life coach regularly. She also volunteered for underprivileged kids.

After a year had flown by people started asking my wife when she was coming back. Unbeknownst to them, my wife had discussed the fact that she had some light abdominal separation and wanted a tummy tuck, after which she was itching to get back to work. Around that time, another employee at the company, ” Mary”, had gone on maternity leave.

Around a month ago, we decided to go for it and the surgery went perfectly. My wife was advised to take at least two weeks off from work, but her doctor said to take 4. However, the other day, my wife asked me for around two more weeks before she officially went back to work because more rest after surgery couldn’t hurt. I agreed and we announced that she would be resuming her duties on February 1st.

Mary spent 5 weeks after giving birth at home before returning to the office. Yesterday, after only a few days back at the office, she asked her manager if she could take more time off, begging for at least a week. The manager in question brought this up with me, and I told him to deny Mary her request. The reason is that while my wife’s duties could be taken up by others, Mary’s team was borderline understaffed and her customer service position required her to be there at work. One person leaving is tough on the rest.

When I went to personally tell Mary this, she looked very upset. She angrily said that my wife has been gone for a year and that the nurse she sees blames the stress and body pains caused by coming back so early for her struggles in breastfeeding. I apologized but reiterated that it was a busy season for the customer service team and that perhaps we could discuss her getting more time off down the line.

When I told my sister about this encounter, she said I was being a jerk for giving my wife special treatment.

Do you guys think Im wrong for denying Mary’s request after having just allowed my wife an extra two weeks?

VIVIAN & SHANMUGAM SERVING LEE HSIEN YANG COURT PAPERS FOR DEFAMATION VIA FB MESSENGER

0

Singapore’s Minister of Law and Home Affairs, K. Shanmugam; and Minister of Foreign Affairs Vivian Balakrishnan, have reportedly filed a lawsuit against Lee Hsien Yang for defamation in the High Court.

Both ministers have previously responded publicly back in July, to “defamatory statements” made by Lee Hsien Yang and sent lawyers’ letters to him for accusing them of “acting corruptly and for personal gain by having Singapore Land Authority (“SLA”) give us preferential treatment by illegally felling trees without approval, and also having SLA pay for renovations to 26 and 31 Ridout Road”, which they said were “false”.

They asked him to apologise, withdraw his allegations and pay damages, failing which they will proceed to sue him, which they have since done so.

With Lee currently in the United Kingdom and the two minister plaintiffs in Singapore, they have decided to serve Lee’s court papers for defamation via Facebook Messenger on the basis that it is impractical to serve it to him in person, according to The Straits Times.

The two ministers are at the moment seeking a court order to acknowledge that the papers have been served to Lee via messenger in a PDF format.

Back in 2016, the High Court previously said that plaintiffs are allowed to serve their court papers via Skype, Facebook or message boards online if the defendant can’t be reached in person.

Recap

Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam and Foreign Affairs Minister Vivian Balakrishnan have taken a decisive step against Lee Hsien Yang, accusing him of defamation. The dispute revolves around false allegations made by Mr. Lee concerning Ridout Road, which Lee has since been issued with a POFMA order.

Ministers Responded with Legal Action

On 27th July, Lee Hsien Yang received a POFMA (Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act) order for his Facebook post, which contained certain claims about Ridout Road. The ministers, Shanmugam and Balakrishnan, assert that the statements made by Mr. Lee are false and defamatory.

Mr. Lee accused the ministers of acting corruptly for personal gain by allegedly receiving preferential treatment from the Singapore Land Authority (SLA). According to him, the SLA allowed the ministers to fell trees illegally without proper approval and that the SLA paid for renovations the 26 and 31 Ridout Road properties rented by the ministers.

In response to these serious accusations, K Shanmugam and Vivian Balakrishnan decided to take legal action against Lee Hsien Yang. On 27th July, they sent lawyers’ letters to Mr. Lee, demanding an apology, withdrawal of the allegations, and payment of damages, which will be donated to charity. The ministers have asserted that the allegations are entirely false and damaging to their reputation and integrity.

Joint statement by K. Shanmugam and Vivian Balakrishnan

[Defamatory statements by Lee Hsien Yang]

Minister Shanmugam/Vivian and I have sent lawyers’ letters to Lee Hsien Yang for defaming us.

Lee Hsien Yang has accused us of acting corruptly and for personal gain by having Singapore Land Authority give us preferential treatment by illegally felling trees without approval, and also having the SLA pay for renovations to 26 and 31 Ridout Road. These allegations are false.

We have asked him to apologise, withdraw his allegations and pay damages, which we will donate to charity.

If he does not do so, we will sue him.

Lee Hsien Yang’s original post

CORRECTION NOTICE:

This Facebook post contains false statements of fact relating to the 26 Ridout Road and 31 Ridout Road matter, and to SPH Media Trust. For the correct facts, click here: https://www.gov.sg/article/factually250723

Trust in the PAP has been shattered.

PM Lee has recently said that “high standards of propriety and personal conduct, together with staying clean and incorrupt, are the fundamental reasons Singaporeans trust and respect the PAP.”

Trust has to be earned. It cannot simply be inherited. PM Lee Hsien Loong’s failure of leadership has squandered that trust.

Two ministers have leased state-owned mansions from the agency that one of them controls, felling trees and getting state-sponsored renovations. Two Temasek companies have committed serious corruption offences – Keppel and the former Sembcorp Marine. SPH Media, an entity being given almost a billion dollars of taxpayers monies, has fraudulently inflated its circulation numbers. A cabinet minister has been arrested for corruption. Yet again, the speaker of Parliament has resigned, over a scandal which the PM knew about for years but did not disclose.

Wei Ling and I stated in June 2017 that “We do not trust Lee Hsien Loong as a brother or as a leader.” These latest facts speak volumes. Hsien Loong’s regime does not deserve Singaporeans’ trust.

POFMA direction previously issued to Lee Hsien Yang

Issuance of Correction Direction under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act to Lee Hsien Yang

On 23 July 2023, Mr Lee Hsien Yang published a post on his Facebook page, which made untrue statements that:

a) The State paid for the renovations to 26 Ridout Road and 31 Ridout Road because the properties were leased by Ministers K Shanmugam and Vivian Balakrishnan.

b) Trees at 26 Ridout Road and 31 Ridout Road were allowed to be felled because the properties were leased by Ministers Shanmugam and Balakrishnan.

c) SPH Media Trust fraudulently inflated its circulation numbers.

The Minister for Culture, Community and Youth and Second Minister for Law Edwin Tong has instructed for a Correction Direction, under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA), to be issued to Mr Lee Hsien Yang. Mr Lee Hsien Yang will be required to carry the correction notice, stating that the Facebook post contains false statements of fact.

Clarifications on the False Statements

Firstly, Mr Lee Hsien Yang made an untrue statement that the State paid for the renovations to 26 Ridout Road and 31 Ridout Road because the properties were leased by Ministers Shanmugam and Balakrishnan. The identity of the tenants had no bearing on the decision on the works to be carried out on the properties. The post
omits important information that the works done were in keeping with the Singapore Land Authority’s (SLA) practice, and were assessed to be necessary in the circumstances, as explained by Second Minister for Law Edwin Tong in Parliament on 3 July 2023.

a) SLA invests a significant amount in maintaining conserved properties, which include 26 Ridout Road and 31 Ridout Road. SLA has spent similar, or even larger, amounts on other Black and White bungalows, consistent with conservation requirements (see Factually article in paragraph 6).

b) Most of the costs incurred for 26 Ridout Road and 31 Ridout Road were for works that external consultants had determined to be necessary, in light of the condition of the properties and to comply with the relevant conservation requirements. The remaining costs were incurred as part of the usual works done before the
commencement of a tenancy to ensure that the property is habitable.

Secondly, Mr Lee Hsien Yang made the statement that the trees at 26 Ridout Road and 31 Ridout Road were allowed to be felled because the properties were leased by Ministers Shanmugam and Balakrishnan. This is untrue. The identity of the tenants had no bearing on the felling of the trees at the properties. All decisions to fell trees with a girth size of more than one metre were made following inspections by independent arborists, and safety issues were identified. Where approval was required for any trees to be felled, such approval was obtained from the National Parks Board (NParks). The reasons for the felling of the trees at both properties have been explained by the Second Minister for Law Edwin Tong in Parliament on 3 July 2023.

Thirdly, Mr Lee Hsien Yang also made the statement that SPH Media Trust fraudulently inflated its circulation numbers. This is untrue. The overstatement of circulation numbers happened when the media business was under SPH Limited – a listed company. This was before SPH Media Trust was incorporated. When SPH Media Trust took over SPH Limited’s media business, it discovered, reported, and investigated the circulation issue. The Government’s funding agreement to build up public service media capabilities was signed with SPH Media Trust, and not SPH Limited. The funding quantum was based on SPH Media Trust’s transformation needs, and not the circulation numbers.

Publication of Correction Notice

As required by the Correction Direction, Mr Lee Hsien Yang must publish correction notice on the said post on his Facebook page. The correction notice will provide a link to the Factually article, which lays out the facts and clarifications on the matter, at the following link: https://www.gov.sg/article/factually250723.

MINISTRY OF LAW
25 JULY 2023

GUY MENTIONS HE SAW A FRIEND’S SIS ‘OYSTER’, GETS INTO TROUBLE

0

A guy shared a story of how he once told a friend that he saw another of their friend’s sister’s ‘oyster’ by accident while chilling together at his house.

His friend then blurted out the whole thing to their mutual friend who then confronted him about the whole matter angrily.

He has since made up with his friend but ever since the incident, he feels very awkward when he bumps into his friend’s sister.

Here is the story

“This incident happened a few years ago and it is still stuck in my mind even until today.

I was at a friend’s house, lets call this friend V. I was chilling on the sofa after doing some work together and his sister, lets call her A, comes out of her room and sits down next to me.

A is 4 years older than me and V.

She was wearing a sports top with FBT shorts as she had just finished her workout and I was watching TV while she was looking at her phone.

She suddenly yelled out something and I looked at her phone but I accidentally saw half of her ‘oyster’ as it was exposed because of her sitting position which made the shorts pulled up.

I got a shock as this was the first time that I saw one in real life, we were only 18 at that point of time.

I stood up and excused myself to get a glass of water in the kitchen to calm myself down.

The next day I told my friend, lets call him J about the incident and he told V.

V was so angry and he called me immediately to give me a piece of his mind and I apologised profusely and explained that it was an accident.

Months passed and he had forgiven me by that time and I still hangout at his place but every time I see his sister, I get reminded of what happened months back and still feel embarrassed.”

Image source: Unsplash.com

PLAY DRINKING GAME, LOSER NEEDS TO KISS, GUY THOUGHT HE KISS GIRL BUT KISS GUY

0

A guy shared a story of how he went to a party a few years ago and was playing a drinking game which he lost.

As part of the forfeit, he had to kiss a girl and being overconfident, he asked the girls in the group if there was anyone who would like to kiss him, thinking that it is better to play a ‘reverse uno’ card to put him up high to sell.

However, none of the girls volunteered and he ended up having to kiss a guy.

Here is the story

“It happened 4 years ago while i was at a party. We played a drinking game, i don’t quite remember what we were playing but i remember that as a result of the game i had to tell them who in the room i’d want to kiss and if that person accepted, we’d kiss. Since they don’t have to accept, there is opportunity for awkward moments.

I don’t remember the name of the girl who came up with the idea of this game, but i really regret participating. Only a loser can come up with a game that can have such a socially devastating outcome.

I was really scared of being rejected infront of all those people, so in my infinite drunken wisdom i thought that if i reverse uno card them, they would have to show who would want to be kissed by me.

Being the smoothest in the house i said very overconfidently “any volunteers?”.

Unsuprisingly, no one said absolutely anything.

So now instead of being publicly rejected by 1 girl, all the girls at the party rejected me at ones.

I died hard inside, and the amount of cringe everyone felt in that living room was astronomical. Everyone was just staring at me and i felt extremely awkward and pressured to do something.

I tried to solve the situation by making it a bit comical, so i turned to try and kiss my bro, hoping he would see the fun in it to get a laugh out of that terrible situation.

You see, we had kissed before at a previous party when we got the prompt “kiss the person to your right or take 3 shots”, something like that.

When we kissed that time it was all in good fun and everyone got a good laugh out of it because we did it with no hesitation.

That was the comical thing about it, no hesitation “kiss your bro” instead of drinking.

At this party i was hoping he would realize what i was trying to do. I only managed to add to the awkwardness since the situation we were in was completely different than before.

He immediately dodged backwards to avoid me, but i persisted and managed to give him a smooch. He looked at me and went “what the???”

So now I had gotten multi-rejected and violated my friend.

No one thought it was funny, my friend was rightfully angry at me and i felt awkward, cringeworthy and awful.

Looking back, all i had to do was say: “Ayy ‘friends name’, wanna kiss bro?”, to which he would have said “god no” which would be pretty comical.

I would also have avoided the awkwardness of being denied a kiss by one of the girls there.

After some time i apologised to my friend, and now we can look back at that situation with a good laugh.”

Image source: Unsplash.com

MAID ALLEGEDLY NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE A PHONE OR ACCESS TO INTERNET

0

A netizen shared how a close friend of hers hired a maid but refused to let her have a mobile phone or access to the internet and wifi.

Here is the story

Is it normal for helpers in singapore to not own a handphone and not have access to internet/wifi?

I have a close friend who recently gave birth and got a helper to help her with the baby. She told me that the helper is not allowed to have a mobile phone, nor is she allowed to have any access to internet and wifi.

I also used to intern for a family business who had a helper, and that helper also was not allowed to own a handphone.

Of course in the end she keeps a handphone in secret, cause come on.. who can survive without a phone in today’s day and age? How are they going to keep in touch with their family?

I wonder if this is normal, I personally find it ridiculous.

Netizens comments

  • Actually every new helper will get a new sim card from MOM.

So that’s the indirect way of saying yes, they should have their own mobile phones.

But a number of employees felt that their helpers always get distracted with their phones and don’t do their work well – that is true in some cases.

Personally I don’t restrict my helper – I think she carries two phones at anytime – one is a local line and the other her country’s line. Where she goes, the phone goes.

I told her so long as the phones don’t interfere with her work, I don’t really care. It has been three years. Can’t say she’s fantastic but she does as she’s told and sometimes above my expectations.

  • Report your close friend to MOM, this is not funny

36 Y.O WOMAN ANNOYED ON PEOPLE ASKING HER “WHY SHE IS SINGLE”

0

I (36-year-old single female) get asked this question a lot and since it comes from co-workers, extended family, friends of friends and now Chinese New year is coming then responding rudely by saying “non of your darn business sweety” still didn’t seem to work (not anymore lol).

I try to keep good relationships with those around me for a number of reasons, but this question just makes me angry. especially since the reason why I’m single is pretty traumatic and so is very personal. they feel sorry for me I can see it because they’d list all my good traits then say it’s a shame that no man is willing to ‘win’ it. WTF?

Unfortunately, I get caught off guard a lot by people (especially women) asking this question but since I can’t control the fact that they ask (I really wish they’d just leave me the heck alone) I decided to use this method that I came up with very recently.

For example, if a woman asks why I’m still single I’d just tell her “because I still haven’t met your husband/boyfriend yet. while acting somewhat naughty in the moment. so far it seemed to shut them up. it’s kind of passive-aggressive, yes. but I just feel some sort of power doing it.

Well, a few weeks ago, my sister introduced me to her boyfriend’s sister and once she sits down she asks “how old are you? I tell her and she gasps and goes on to ask why are you still single?” I look at her and say “it’s because I still haven’t met your boyfriend yet” (she has a boyfriend yay her) in the slu*ttiest tone I could muster while also pulling “the duck face” pose.

She looks at me in utter shock then puts her coffee down while my sister stares at me like WT?!?!. 

The conversation gets awkward and minutes later she gets up saying she wasn’t feeling well and leaves quietly. my sister shouts up at me asking why on earth would I say something like that and I start arguing with her about how this woman was a snoop.

She told me to get over myself and “act my age” and stop being childish which she assumed is the reason why I’m single and will always be “cause no man wants to be with such a nutjob”. her boyfriend said I upset his sister and is expecting apologies from me because of what I said to her.

Here are what netizens think:

  • That’s exactly how life works. Don’t ask personal questions. It’s not anybodys business why she’s single. Her business is hers and she can answer repetitive and prying questions any way she wants. Just because it makes someone feel uncomfortable doesn’t matter. It’s the same thing when people start asking “why haven’t you had kids yet?”. None of anyone’s business period. Don’t ask any questions if you’re not prepared for any answer.
  • It’s a totally inappropriate question to be asking someone you just met/don’t know well. I (39m) used to get asked that same question, and I answered it similarly
  • Are you dating? When are you going to get married? Why haven’t you been promoted yet? Well that’s no kind of home to raise a child in! Why aren’t you pregnant yet? What, you’re only having one child?

NEIGHBOUR FLIRTING WITH WOMAN’S HUSBAND, BUT HE DOESN’T THINK SO

0

A netizen shared how she thinks her neighbour has been flirting with her husband but her husband doesn’t seem to think so.

Here is the story:

My neighbour has been flirting with my husband – help!

I find the way my neighbor talks to my husband very flirtatious. She would text my husband instead of me when she needs help, for instance, to collect her delivery parcels when no one is at her home.

I wfh while my husband doesn’t. So isn’t it more convenient to text me instead?

We are both on talking terms with her, and I also speak to her more than my husband does. I mentioned this to my husband but he said he doesn’t find her flirty.

Sometimes she sends him good morning gifs which I find is so weird. We have a neighbors’ group chat and I don’t see her wishing others a good morning there?

My gut feeling tells me I should just tell her to text me instead of my husband but I also don’t want to risk damaging our good relations.

My husband also tells her to contact me but of course, she doesn’t, and would rather ask him for help first.

Our floor of neighbors are pretty close and on very good terms. We have a few units on our floor and we often buy food/snacks for one another throughout the years.

During CB we group buy food often so we sort of kept the tradition of group ordering since.

Am I overreacting?