31.8 C
Singapore
Saturday, April 4, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 2866

GIRL BUYING FOOD WITH DAD, GOT SCOLDED BY RACIST UNCLE AT MAXWELL FOOD CENTRE,

0

Are Older Singaporeans racist towards Indians? If so, why?

We were at Ann Siang road shopping for some clothes. A really pretty navy blue dress caught my eye and asked the store clerk for that dress. He told me it’s 98 SGD which is okay, not too bad.

I said OK to the price and asked him if he had the dress in my size. He would ask me again,”Are you SURE that you want the dress, it’s 98 SGD. Very expensive.” I agreed once again.

He gave me the dress in my size and and then I proceeded to make the payment. I have 3 credit cards and 1 debit card with SGD on it.

I did not approve any of the credit cards for international transaction in case of theft and one of the credit cards has the same colour as the debit card and it’s quite easy to mix up the two.

I gave him the credit card and he told me that the payment was denied. I asked him to try once again and the transaction failed once again.

This is when I realise that I handed him the wrong card and apologise. He gives it to me and tells me,”I told you it was 98 dollars but you didn’t listen.” And proceeds to go to keep the dress back.

I stop him and give him the correct card to make the payment and left quickly. I was quite irritated at that point but didn’t say anything because I don’t like confrontations.

My family and I were at Maxwell Food Center. We went to multiple places to get food from because we wanted to try EVERYTHING. My dad and I queued up at Tian Tian to get some Chicken Rice.

We bought the ticket and my dad queued up at the pick up line. When he got the food, I went to help him to pick it up as we most likely would have more than 2 trays.

A man standing in the queue started screaming at me (he must’ve thought I’m cutting the line which is fair) but quieted down when he saw me help my dad.

As we were passing by, we heard the same man say Indians are so stupid and don’t know how to follow rules. Like???????? I did nothing to you man, and you even saw me help my dad, that comment was so unnecessary.

GUY ASKS WHY POOR PEOPLE CAN’T EVEN FEED THEMSELVES STILL WANT TO HAVE KIDS

0

Why do some people choose to have children even when they are emotionally irresponsible or do not have the financial means?

As per the title, why do some people still choose to have children when they can’t even care for themselves emotionally and financially?

I come from a very big family and the adults never once provided me with enough financial and emotional support as far back as I can remember. I do feel fortunate to be alive to enjoy living now but looking back, it was a struggle to even live. From the beginning, I never had enough to eat and I never had a caring parent. I’m the type that doesn’t let my past define me but it’s very sad to hear that I am not the only one especially when I talk to people much younger people both online and around me.

Personally, I find it unethical to bring a child into the world knowing that they will suffer a lack of basic necessities and opportunities. Having a child is also a moral obligation to provide for their physical, emotional, and psychological needs from the time they are born and sometimes, unfortunately until the moment they die.

I find irresponsible parenting very very serious as it results in emotional neglect, which can lead to long-term emotional scars and developmental challenges for the child. Like myself, I have met other people who have had to go through this.. People should know better these days on the impact it can have on themselves and the child if they are unfit or not ready to be a parent.

What’s worse is the excuses that are usually given… Like “I need the child to provide for me in my golden years”. Or to” please my parents and relatives or to please my partner’s parents with a grandchild”. Like omg, what in the world messed their heads up so badly for them to think of those things as a priority. I find this kind of thinking ethically questionable as it neglects essentials aspect of what it means to be a parent in the first place.

Perhaps, some people might think my “standard” of being a parent is too high.. If I decided to become a parent, I would make sure my children would never have a thing to worry about any sort of finances and be someone who teaches what it means to be human, not take things for granted and always look at another person’s values.

Like it’s easy for me to say when I am not a parent yet but I really mean it when I say I won’t change my stance because these are the “standards” that I put on myself long ago. I think it will be crucial for me to always try my best and max it out to the best of my ability because I know I am responsible for another person’s life and possibly their entire life.

If my child needs a six-digit figure for a prestigious uni or to fulfil their dreams or for a medical treatment, I will make sure I will wring myself dry to provide for them and eat less meals everyday if that is what it will take. That’s what being a parent means to me, putting them first before putting me first, no matter what shit I need to go through. It may not be feasible if I were to have too many children too, so I might just only have one or two.

I also want them to be able to say that even if their old man wasn’t the richest, he was someone who always was there for them emotionally, is remembered as a good family man and never once said anything about taking care of him when he got old. I really expect nothing in return if I had children and I will plan in advance to retire based on my savings alone.

That’s the kind of parent I want to be. I want them to have a fulfilling childhood with lots of fun, things to eat and places to go to. I want them to grow up with at least with a “decent” quality of life, be able to explore different opportunities in education and be outstanding adults who know right from wrong.

What do you guys think? My family was of the sort that could never provide for me financially or emotionally in the first place. I feel very bad for people who had to grow up living in similar households. Furthermore, if someone is really that poor or really can’t handle having a child, it might be better to give the child up to someone who can provide for them. It’s happened around me and I am happy for them because they are happier

M’SIA BUS BEATS RED LIGHT @ WOODLANDS THEN GETS STUCK AFTER MOUNTING KERB

On Tuesday morning, a Malaysian factory bus was observed beating a red light at a traffic junction along Woodlands Avenue 12 before mounting the kerb at the side of the road.

The incident was recorded by what appears to be a motorcyclist who was nearby at the time and shared on the Facebook page of SG Road Vigilante.

Potential penalties

It is an offence to beat a red light in Singapore.

Drivers found guilty of failing to conform to traffic light signals face a composition fine of $400 for light vehicles and $500 for heavy vehicles.

They also face 12 demerit points and if a driver accumulates 24 or more demerit points within 24 months, their license will be suspended.

Netizens’ comments

  1. Some allowances should be given to the heavy vehicle in a counter a traffics control junction as these big moving body needed little big longer in turn especially a sharp corner .
    A traffic police officer need to consider the cases before summon him
  2. Impose a BAN entry for this Vehicle n Driver for dangerous driving offences
  3. And MOE want to increase quota for foreign drivers to ferry children.Well done.I clap for you
  4. Why do they behave like this in sg?
    No offence to Malaysian friends. But if you drive like this in Malaysia, don’t bring your unsafe habits to sg. Yes Singaporeans like to follow rules, that’s why we are safe here.

Other similar news

Another driver was seen in a viral video back in April beating a red light on the road and almost taking the lives of a father and child who were crossing the road at the time.

TikTok user @frangaroo posted a video of the incident, showing the van trying to beat the red light at a traffic junction in Serangoon North, just as a pedestrian who was carrying a child was crossing the road.

The van narrowly avoided running over the pedestrian and stopped just in time to prevent a collision.

@frangaroo New traffic lights at Ang Mo Kio Ave 3 from Hougang Ave 2 towards the junction of Serangoon North Ave 1 / 3. #ltasg #sgroadvigilante @Land Transport Authority @Bad Driving Singapore 🇸🇬 ♬ original sound – 🕷Daycore ver.🕷

SIAO LANG TRIES TO OPEN DOOR WHILE PLANE STILL FLYING, TESTS POSITIVE FOR DRUGS

0

A 19-year-old South Korean man exhibited bizarre behavior during a flight from the Philippines to South Korea, attempting to open the aircraft’s door mid-flight

Approximately one hour into the red-eye flight from Cebu to Seoul, the South Korean man began acting strangely, causing concern among the crew members and fellow passengers.

Sensing the need for close monitoring, the staff promptly moved him to the front row, nearer to the exit door.

While seated in his new position, the man expressed discomfort, complaining of pressure on his chest. Suddenly, and without warning, he made a dash towards the emergency door, attempting to open it.

The quick response of the cabin crew proved vital in averting a potential disaster.

Reacting promptly to the man’s attempt to open the aircraft door, the vigilant cabin crew immediately subdued him. Employing a lasso rope and tie wraps, they effectively restrained him, ensuring the safety of all passengers for the remainder of the journey.

Thanks to the crew’s timely intervention, the door remained closed throughout the incident. This crucial action prevented any damage to the plane and safeguarded the well-being of the 180 passengers on board. Jeju Airlines later confirmed that none of the travelers suffered injuries during the ordeal.

Upon landing at Incheon Airport in Seoul on Monday, June 19, the staff promptly handed over the perpetrator to the local police at 7:30 am. The seriousness of the offense called for further legal actions.

The man now faces an accusation of violating the Aviation Security Act. An arrest warrant has been issued, marking the commencement of legal proceedings against him.

Following the man’s apprehension, an investigation by the Incheon Airport police took place. Noting his abnormal behavior, the authorities conducted a drug test and the results came back positive, indicating the presence of drugs in the man’s system.

While being transported to his arrest warrant hearing on Tuesday, June 20, the man spoke incoherently to the media. When questioned about his motive for attempting to open the door, he simply stated, “I felt I was being attacked.” His puzzling response added another layer of complexity to an already baffling incident.

To ascertain the type and quantity of drugs consumed by the perpetrator, the police have sent his hair and urine samples to the National Forensics Service.

SCALPER RESELLS TIX FOR WHOLE SECTION OF COLDPLAY’S S’PORE CONCERT FOR $300K

0

Coldplay announced on 12 June that they would be performing at the Singapore National Stadium for 4 nights in January next year, before adding 2 more shows due to the overwhelming demand, and they sold out all six of their shows.

Following this, a scalper on Carousell posted a listing selling tickets for the entire Section 117 of the show, of 520 seats from rows A to Z, for $300,000.

He said that those who buy the tickets from him will be like having their own “VIP club”, and not have to worry about squeezing in with other fans coming to watch the show.

Here is what he said

Managed to buy the whole of section 117, rows A to Z, total 520 seats, like having your own VIP club liddat. Don’t need to worry about squeezing or queueing with strangers or getting jostled like sardines.

Confirm suitable for class or company gathering, can even bring your whole kampung along plus you can bring your ah ma, ah gong, ah boy, ah girl, ah everything! Shiok man, better than any enhanced experiences.

Eh, who else can say they chop chop attend concert whole section one ah? Price boh bian, can negotiate lah. Imagine bragging to your kakis, “Eh, you know what? I attended a concert as a whole section leh!” Confirm they jaw drop till like MRT gantry stuck one.

Only sell the whole section, cannot buy one-by-one, like power-buying in bulk, you know? So, if you want to impress your kaypoh relatives or show off to your siam-di-diam friends, this is your chance!

Don’t miss this once in a lifetime experience!

Clarified that listing was just “satire”

The Carouseller then added a disclaimer at the bottom of his listing, saying that “Unfortunately the above is a piece of satire and yes… section 117 dosent even exist. Hopefully it brought a good laugh to your day. On the contrary, I am actually looking to buy standing tickets preferably on the 23/26 Jan.”

Source: madkitty on Carousell.

POLICE INVESTIGATING HOUGANG KOPITIAM EVENT WHERE UNCLE 1 SHOT TAH 2 BEERS

A video previously emerged online showing an event taking place at a coffeeshop along Hougang where a man was seen drinking two bottles of beer at one go, as the crowd erupted into cheers.

The Singapore Police Force is reportedly investigating the event for violating certain regulations, according to Shin Min Daily News.

M’sian Getai singer

The Hougang coffee shop event took place on June 12 and quickly gained attention as the video of the performance went viral online.

Among the crowd of onlookers, a Malaysian getai singer, known by his stage name Weizong (黑人伟宗), stood out by chugging two bottles of beer simultaneously while delivering a live vocal performance.

He later received two $50 notes that were “pasted” onto his beer-soaked cheeks as he continued with his vocal performance, and at the end was given tissues to wipe himself off and received a red packet for his perfromance.

Weizong, a popular getai singer, was invited along with other performers to entertain the crowd during the coffee shop’s anniversary celebration.

Despite the entertainment value of the event, it came under scrutiny as it seemingly violated certain regulations and the police are conducting an investigation into the incident.

The person in charge of organizing the event, Mr. Lim, disclosed that the organizers had obtained a license to host the getai performance before the event took place.

Mr. Lim theorized that the high number of spectators present on that day might have prompted the authorities to intervene.

In an interview with Shin Min, Mr. Lim expressed his perspective, stating that they were probably reported to the authorities because there were too many people at the kopitiam that day, which affected other patrons who were dining at the time. However, it wasn’t possible for them to chase away the guests who came over to cheer for the performers.

@leanhtuan2020

Nhỏ giờ mới gặp thần nhậu😁😁😁

♬ nhạc nền – Lê Tuấn_36🇻🇳❤️🇸🇬
@leanhtuan2020 Trả lời @TANG GO ♬ nhạc nền – Lê Tuấn_36🇻🇳❤️🇸🇬

GRAB RETRENCHES 1,000 WORKERS, CEO: “WE’RE NOT DOING THIS AS SHORTCUT TO PROFITABILITY”

0

In a recent announcement, Grab Holdings, Southeast Asia’s leading ride-hailing and food delivery app based in Singapore, revealed its decision to cut 1,000 jobs, which accounts for approximately 11% of its workforce.

Grab’s CEO, Anthony Tan, emphasized the need for change in response to the fast-paced evolution of technology, citing generative AI (artificial intelligence) as a prime example.

As technology progresses at a breakneck speed, the cost of capital has risen, directly impacting Grab’s competitive landscape. Tan views this workforce reduction as a strategic realignment that enables the company to adapt to the ever-changing business environment.

According to Tan, Grab aims to combine its scale with nimble execution and cost leadership to provide sustainable, affordable services and penetrate the masses more effectively.

In a screenshot circulating online of Tan’s letter sent to the employees, he said that Grab is not doing this as a “shortcut to profitability” and that they have been “consistent in managing costs tightly in all areas” over the years.

Following the announcement of the job cuts, Grab’s stock saw a premarket surge of 4.7%, with earlier gains reaching as high as 5.6% following a Bloomberg News report on the matter.

Additionally, Grab’s strong revenue growth is evident, with a 130.3% increase in the first quarter of this year compared to the same period last year. In February, the company provided an optimistic revenue forecast for 2023 and accelerated its timeline for achieving profitability.

Grab’s reduction in workforce is not an isolated incident in the Southeast Asian tech industry. Indonesian tech firm GoTo undertook a similar cost-cutting measure in 2022, laying off 12% of its employees.

In March of the same year, GoTo further downsized its workforce by 600. While GoTo’s incoming CEO plans to lead the company temporarily and depart after improving profitability, Grab’s strategic reorganization aligns with its long-term vision for sustained growth.

COMFORT DELGRO CHARGING EXTRA 70¢ FOR RIDE BOOKINGS ON THEIR CDG ZIG APP FROM JULY

0

ComfortDelGro announced via a statement on Facebook that with effect from 1 July next month, they will be implementing an additional 70 cents “platform fee” for all rides booked on their CDG Zig app.

Netizens and customers were up in arms and expressed their disappointment at the company for the perceived price increase and questioned if the money will be going to the drivers or the company.

Comfort Delgro’s statement

[Enhancing Our CDG Zig App Services]

Thank you for using our CDG Zig App services. It is our privilege to be of service to you.

We have been regularly enhancing our CDG Zig App with more services such as merchant deals, restaurant reservations and food takeaways, electric vehicle charging points and even private bus charters.

To continue to enhance the quality of our services to you, we will be introducing a platform fee of 70 cents per ride booked on the CDG Zig App from 1 July 2023. This also applies to limousine transfers made through the CDG Zig App.

More information about the platform fee will be available on our website soon.

We look forward to offering you a better overall customer experience.

Thank you for your continuous support.

Netizens’ comments

  1. The apps is not that great @ worth of 70 cents apps fee per booking. And why need pay extra when other add extra few cents get rider protections.
  2. Don’t enhance la! The more you enhance, the worst it gets!! For a start, put back the regular route, point A to point B as favourite!!
  3. Please list the enhancements we are expecting with this fee. Thank you.
  4. Thanks for informing, will delete the app by end of June. U lost a customer.
  5. What addition 0.70 per booking..! All go into CDG pocket with lousy app
  6. About to praise ComfortDelGro for sustaining and providing reliable rides but overall is just the same pattern after all. 
  7. I alway use zig to book taxi..now got to pay platform fee like grab…money go to driver or company??

HOUSEFLY CAMOUFLAGED INSIDE COFFEE GRINDER @ TAMPINES LUCKIN COFFEE, SHOP APOLOGISES

0

A housefly was recently spotted by a Facebook user on 19th June (Monday) inside a coffee grinder machine at the Luckin Coffee branch in Tampines 1.

Expressing her disgust, the user shared a post detailing the incident.

In response to the complaint, Luckin Coffee acknowledged the issue and issued an apology, assuring the public that they are taking the matter seriously. They also mentioned that an investigation is currently underway.

The woman’s Facebook post specifically mentioned that she noticed a housefly perched on one of the coffee beans at the Tampines One outlet of Luckin Coffee.

Upon becoming aware of the complaint, Luckin Coffee promptly responded by leaving a comment to address the problem. They expressed gratitude for the user’s feedback and apologized for her unpleasant experience at the Tampines One outlet.

Luckin Coffee emphasized their commitment to food hygiene standards and assured the public of their efforts to rectify the situation. Immediate action was taken by their staff on-site to thoroughly clean all machines and the surrounding area.

The company also mentioned that an internal investigation is currently in progress, and they intend to reach out to the original poster (OP) for further details.

Luckin Coffee apologises

Dear Catherine,

Thank you for sharing this feedback regarding your recent experience at our Tampines 1 outlet. We sincerely apologise for not meeting expectations, and would like to make things right for you.

We would like to reassure you – and everyone in this thread – that luckin coffee takes food hygiene very seriously. Once this was brought to our attention, our staff on ground have promptly taken action to do a deep cleaning of all the machines and the entire area.

At the same time, we are also conducting our investigation, and will be sending you a direct message on Facebook to request for more information. We look forward to your reply.

Thank you.

TOURIST GOT ROBBED OF $27.4K IN THAI HOTEL, MIRROR TURNED OUT TO BE HIDDEN DOOR

0

In a shocking incident in the central province of Kanchanaburi, Thailand, two families fell victim to a thief who targeted their belongings, resulting in a loss of nearly one million baht (or SGD$38,600) in cash and assets, according to a report by Thaiger.

The incident took place at a hotel where the victims had checked in, and their valuables vanished mysteriously. This article will delve into the details of the incident, the victims’ experience, and the subsequent actions taken.

On April 26 of this year, two families arrived at a hotel in Kanchanaburi for a brief getaway. Little did they know that their stay would turn into a nightmare.

The victims, identified as Asana “Por” Kaenkaew and his family, had traveled from the southern province of Songkhla to visit Por’s younger brother in Kanchanaburi.

Upon checking in, they settled into their room without any security concerns, given its proximity to the hotel’s security guard station and the bustling roadside.

The following morning, Por and his wife woke up to a shocking revelation. Their daughter, who would usually wake up during the night, had slept undisturbed.

It was then that they noticed their assets were missing. A gold necklace, gold ring, diamond ring, valuable amulets, and a significant amount of cash, totaling 710,000 baht (or SGD$27,383), had vanished without a trace.

Alarmed by their discovery, Por and his wife hurriedly searched their room and even checked their car, hoping they had misplaced their belongings.

To their dismay, they encountered another victim, Pinyo, staying in the adjacent room, who confirmed that his wallet and 7,000 baht in cash had also been stolen.

As Por and Pinyo joined forces to investigate further, they stumbled upon a startling revelation. Hidden within their rooms were secret doors that were cleverly disguised as mirrors from the inside but revealed their true nature when viewed from the outside.

These doors were equipped with locks on the outer side, suggesting a well-thought-out plan by the thief.

The victims expressed their dissatisfaction with the hotel management, accusing them of failing to disclose the existence of these secret doors during the check-in process.

However, the hotel owner provided a surprising explanation. He claimed that the secret doors were intentionally installed as escape routes for mistresses involved in illicit affairs, providing a controversial twist to the incident.

Frustrated with the lack of progress in their case, Por and his family decided to seek help from Thai media agencies on June 16.

They hoped that media exposure would put pressure on the authorities to investigate the matter more thoroughly and bring the culprits to justice.

Despite the media attention, the hotel management refused to take responsibility for the losses suffered by the victims. They argued that there was no concrete evidence to prove the existence of the stolen assets, attempting to shift the blame onto the victims themselves.

In response, Por highlighted that officers from the Mueang Kanchanaburi Police Station had visited the crime scene, collected evidence such as footprints and fingerprints left on the secret doors and air conditioning compressors, yet failed to provide any updates on the case, leaving the victims in a state of distress and uncertainty.

Images source: โจโฉ on Facebook