It is not possible to answer this question as Food Panda does not publicly disclose salary information for its employees. Each employee’s salary is based on various factors, such as demand and the number amount of jobs completed.

However, a Malaysian man working in Singapore shared his earnings, earning a whopping $432 a day on Food Panda delivery!

“Two Days’ Income of a Food Delivery Driver”

Many friends were curious and asked me how much the driver earns.

Today I will be transparent and open to share with you.

The income for two days is $865.32 (RM 2800),An average of $432.50 (RM 1400) per day.

The job of a food delivery boy is often seen as a menial job, so many people are reluctant to try it.

In fact, food delivery is also a down-to-earth job, not cheating, stealing, stealing, or smuggling, and it is a legitimate income in exchange for hard work.

If you are unemployed and have no income, and your regular income is not enough, food delivery is a part-time job that can fill your stomach or increase your extra income.

Additional conditions:

1) Driving a car in Singapore

2) Singapore citizens or permanent residents(If you don’t have a Singaporean car, you can also deliver food by bicycle or on foot. Relatively speaking, the income cannot be compared with that of driving.)

Here are what netizens think:

• Singapore car oil is also ridiculously expensive, unless you come to Jb to get oil

• hey, let’s change careers

• others thought it was easy to do, but they didn’t know that they had to do it on rainy and hot days. Occasionally, some Sohai people hit their bicycles and drove away immediately, and those who were far away on motorcycles had to push their bicycles back. They didn’t know. How much KM and how much physical strength is exchanged for the hard-earned money

• Let’s go to Singapore to deliver food

• delivers food, what are you waiting for?

Several Singtel users have reportedly been having network issues with their services since 14 December, being unable to call or receive calls on their mobiles, as well as having issues with their WiFi.

Singtel issued a statement on Twitter saying that they “apologise for the inconvenience” and that their engineers are working “urgently” to resolve the issues.

They later updated their statement on 17 December and said that many of the customers who experienced issues have had their services restored gradually.

However, as of 18 December, some users are still reportedly having issues.

Singtel’s statement on Twitter

We regret to inform that some customers may be experiencing issues with their mobile services. Our engineers are investigating and we will provide updates as soon as they become available. We apologise for the inconvenience caused and thank you for your patience.

Mobile services are gradually being restored. Our engineers are working urgently to resolve the issues for the customers who are still impacted. We apologise for the inconvenience caused and will provide updates as soon as they become available. Thank you for your patience.

Netizens’ comments

1. With 5 days of phone down and I happily recontract to SingTel instead of other telco. Did not know singtel is so irresponsible to leave us without service for so many days. At this rate we might as well recontract into another telco since you are not able to fix your systems.
2. (Singtel) Hi there, we regret to learn of this. Please restart your device and/ or reinsert the SIM card to further isolate the issue. If it still persists, kindly head down to our Singtel Shop to perform a SIM replacement.
3. One of the most annoying thing is SingTel technical support staff did not even know that the servers was down till yesterday. Professionalism at it’s best

Singapore Post Limited (SingPost) will be raising postage, package delivery as well as doorstep parcel delivery rates from 1 January 2023 in tandem with the increase in Goods and Services Tax (GST) as well as exceptional inflationary cost increases across manpower, fuel and electricity.

The GST increase was earlier announced in February 2022 by the Ministry of Finance and will be staggered over two years: from 7% to 8% from 1 January 2023, and 8% to 9% from 1 January 2024.

With the increase in GST and significant rise in operating costs, there is an imperative need to moderate the prices of SingPost’s products and services, in order to support the fulfilment of deliveries in a sustainable manner.

Rates of selected domestic mail services to go up between 2 and 10 cents by 2024

SingPost will be adjusting the rates for the following services:

Basic Services (letterbox delivery, no tracking capabilities)

Basic Mail – Standard Regular: The rates for the first two weight steps of 20g and 40g will be raised from 30 cents and 37 cents to 31 cents and 38 cents respectively on 1 January 2023. The associated stamps – 1^st Local and 2^nd Local stamps – will be priced at 31 cents and 38 cents respectively from 1 January 2023.

From 1 January 2024, these two weight steps will be raised to 32 cents and 39 cents respectively.

The adjustments in rates are inclusive of the increase in GST, as well as reflect the exceptional cost increases. The last revision to rates took place nine years ago, in 2014.

Customers holding existing 1^st and 2^nd Local stamps may continue using these stamps after 1 January 2023 and 1 January 2024 without having to top up the difference in postage.

GST is not applied on all other Basic Mail services for the public, including Standard Large and Non-Standard, hence their prices will remain unchanged.

Tracked Services (with tracking capabilities)

1. Tracked Mail, now priced between $2.55 and $3.40, will see an increase from 1 January 2023. There will be an increase of 5 cents for items weighing up to 20g from 1 January 2023, and an increase of 5 cents for the 40g weight step from 1 January 2024. For items weighing up to 100g, 250g and 500g, there will be increases of 5 cents from 1 January 2023 and 1 January 2024 respectively.
2. The Registered Service (Singapore) fee will be revised from $2.24 to $2.27 from 1 January 2023, and to $2.30 from 1 January 2024. This fee is payable on top of the applicable postage rates.
3. Postage-paid products smartpac are delivered to the letterbox and trackable from the time they are posted until delivery. Now costing $2.15 each for smartpac Small and Medium and $3.15 for smartpac Box, there will be an increase of 5 cents from 1 January 2023 for these products. For the smartpac Box, there will be an additional increase of 5 cents from 1 January 2024.
4. The Speedpost Standard delivery fee within Singapore will be revised from $6 to $6.10 from 1 January 2023, and to $6.20 from 1 January 2024.

SingPost committed to serving the needs of our customers

Ms Neo Su Yin, Singapore CEO, SingPost, said: “Singapore offers one of the lowest postage rates in the world for a developed nation. Like our customers, SingPost has also been bearing the impact of inflationary cost increases across manpower, fuel and electricity that have risen significantly. The adjustment in rates will help us maintain our service offerings and high service standards, and enable us to operate sustainably with the GST hike. We remain committed to keeping our postal service relevant in the eCommerce age, bringing value to, and better serving the needs of our customers.”

Minister of Foreign Affairs Dr Vivian Balakrishnan’s grandson was born stillborn, according to a Facebook post by his son Mark Balakrishnan.

Sharing Mark’s lengthy Facebook post about his son’s passing, Vivian quoted Queen Elizabeth II’s quote and said “grief is the price we pay for love.”

Here is Mark’s post

Our third child, Evan, is perfect, without blemish or sin.

He was stillborn on Wednesday. Grief and heartache have overwhelmed us.

Yet, he has given us so much joy as we watched him grow for 35 weeks, as Erin and Ethan sang to him, and as we felt his kicks. He gave us hope as we planned for a future together. He gave us a real, tangible joy that will stay in our hearts.

As his earthly parents, we could not do enough to keep him and bring him up. But he’s now being embraced by the almighty heavenly father, one who can do all the things we couldn’t, and we know he will watch over our baby and hold him tight.

We had one evening to hold him, to be a family, and to tell him we love him. I had one short walk with him, not to the park, but to the mortuary. Still, we got to go as father and son.

Nothing will ever make this ok, and no explanation will ever suffice. Yet, we are at peace with this outcome, and choose to celebrate his life. Our marriage and our love for each of our children continue to grow.

Chances are, it’ll be some time before we see him again. Thankfully, we have grandparents in heaven, especially my Mama, so they are on babysitting duty for the time being.

We will always love you.

Some of you may recall, two months ago I posted about a sink-connection job that never materialised. The contractor, Epi Handyman, took $220 from us, but refused to refund us since there was no job done (ie sink connection). You may search for my previous post in this group for more details.

Anyway, the update is that we had taken this case to the Small Claims Tribunal. On both hearings, the contractor never turned up, though notice was served to the business entity at their registered address. In their absence, the Tribunal made the judgement for us to be awarded the full $220 which we had paid to the contractor, and issued a Money Order.

We had served this Money Order to the contractor and reminded him a number of times in text messages to pay us back, politely. However, it is now past the deadline for the Money Order, and it seems they are just not willing to pay. Messages on WhatsApp have been read but just no response, and they have gone silent on their Facebook page as well. It’s quite likely that they have simply abandoned this business name and set up another new business, and will just not pay us back.

The next step is to enforce the Money Order, which means to start civil proceedings in court. As the amount is just $220, it may not make much sense to incur more expenses just to recover this amount. But, there’s a sense of indignance – is this how the rogue players in the market get around the law, just by refusing to pay up, and hoping that the claimant will just drop the case?? If anyone has suggestions how to get this guy to pay us back, please let us know.

PS: For folks who may suggest going to CASE, I’ve checked their website and likely need to incur upfront cost of $50 thereabout for membership registration and etc. We’ve already spent $ on lodging this case in the Small Claims Tribunal, so it’s likely that spending more on such administrative expenses would erode whatever amount we are supposed to claim back.

PS: To meet the group rules I need to submit some proof that the event has occurred. This is the accordion pipe that the contractor insisted on installing under my sink, and which we said no to. I have a previous post on this event in this group, which I can’t tag here, but please do a search.

To admin, sorry, I think I can’t post court documents on a public platform but feel free to contact me for it if you want to see proof.

An impatient man who could wait for his food at Mr Prata located at Block 742 Bedok Reservoir Road used a knife to stab 1 diner and slashed another.

The incident began after 46-year-old Imran Othman got impatient as his food was not served yet and he began shouting at the workers of the shop and punched a glass wall.

Two fellow diners tried to calm him down but they became his targets instead.

One of the diners started to shout vulgarities at Imran and Imran called him out of the shop to a staircase near the block.

The moment they reached the staircase, Imran pulled out a knife and stabbed the diner. The 2nd diner who tried to stop Imran got slashed instead.

Imran was eventually caught and sentenced to 3 years 5 months and two weeks jail.

Background

46-year-old, Imran Othman was previously charged in court on 29 June 2022 for voluntarily causing hurt by a dangerous weapon.

On 24 June 2022, the Police were alerted to an alleged stabbing incident at Block 742 Bedok Reservoir Road. The victim’s wife called for assistance after the victim returned home and expressed that he was feeling dizzy.

Through follow-up investigations and with the aid of images from Police and CCTV cameras, officers from Bedok Police Division established the identity of the man and arrested him on 27 June 2022. Substances believed to be controlled drugs were allegedly found in his possession during the arrest.

The man was charged in court on 29 June 2022 with voluntarily causing hurt by a dangerous weapon punishable under Section 324 of the Penal Code 1871.

The offence carries a punishment of imprisonment for a term of up to seven years, a fine, caning, or a combination of such punishments. He will also be investigated for suspected drug-related offences.