28.3 C
Singapore
Sunday, May 17, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 3684

VAPE FACTORY EXPOSED, STAFF TEST EACH OF THE VAPE WITH THEIR MOUTH BEFORE SELLING

Despite strict rules in the enforcement of vape, some people are still unable to get their hands of it.

Although there are quite an amount of health problems that could be associated with vaping, there are still many who continue to do so.

But this video you are about to see will completely change your opinion.

A vape factory in Malaysia was exposed on social media, after a video of workers inhaling vape on each of the devices before selling went viral.

The workers were seen going from one vape to the other to ensure that it is working.

The video was captioned with the text:

A video of a vape factory went viral on social media. Netizens; “This is what Quality Check (QC) looks like”

Full Video Loading…

E-VAPORISERS ARE STRICTLY PROHIBITED IN SINGAPORE

It is an offence under the Tobacco (Control of Advertisements and Sale) Act to sell, possess for sale, import or distribute e-vaporisers and their related components. Any person who is convicted is liable to a fine of up to $10,000, or imprisonment of up to 6 months or both for the first offence, and a fine of up to $20,000 or imprisonment of up to 12 months or both for the second or subsequent offence. In addition, since 1 February 2018, it is also an offence to possess, purchase or use e-vaporisers and their related components. The penalty is a fine of up to $2,000 per offence.

From 2018 to 2021, HSA had prosecuted 70 persons for selling e-vaporisers and their related components. The highest fine meted out so far was $99,000 for the illegal sale of these prohibited items. There was also a case where the offender was sentenced to 1 week’s imprisonment and a fine of $61,000 for selling e-vaporisers and their related components.

WIFE SAYS STRUGGLE TO LOSE WEIGHT GAINED DURING COVID, HUSBAND SAY IF DIVORCE SURE LOSE WEIGHT

0

During covid, I gained weight and have struggled with depression since.

My work is very stressful and in many instances increased my feelings of depression of which my husband doesn’t want to listen to. I have never wanted to have my husband be part of my get-healthy plans because I don’t want an incredibly personal relationship to judge me for not following through.

In the last two months, I have started cooking at home again. In the last two weeks, I made a mental shift and started going on 5km hikes over the weekends and working out again.

Tonight after not eating anything all day, I ate dinner (two bowls of lettuce with light Italian dressing, and roast beef on a single bun). Because I had fasted for 20 hours I then had some Ramen and a curry puff.

I walked 13000 steps at work and then worked out doing intense cardio yoga for 40 minutes and my husband shamed me for eating the Raman and the hot pocket after dinner. When I told him that was uncalled for he told me that he was mad because if we got divorced I would have no problem losing weight.

I was dumbfounded and did not know what to respond.

I don’t know if he is saying it for real or taunting me to quickly lose weight, or is he finding a woman outside that is not fat?

TENANT WANTS TO SECRETLY SUBLET TO EARN EXTRA, ROOMMATE WANTS TO SABOTAGE

0

Two months ago I moved to Singapore for work and moved in with this guy that was mutual friends with one of my old coworkers.

I have had zero issues with him as an actual person to live with, he’s a nice enough guy and keeps things relatively clean. However, in the past month, he’s been at the apartment less and less. Earlier today he stopped by and told me that the reason he’s been around less is that he is planning on moving in with his girlfriend and has already begun packing.

I don’t have an issue with that by itself, it’s been nice having the place pretty much to myself lately. The problem I have is that he also mentioned that one of his coworkers is looking for housing and that he is planning on subleasing to them, but since our the contract language lease is pretty murky about subleasing he said he is gonna do it under the table and just have his coworker pay him the cost of rent and he will continue to make all payments to the landlord.

I am a little annoyed about this because I did not sign a lease to live with this other person, and while I have not read the entire lease yet, I would think he would probably have to OK it with me in advance before making such a change (if he’s even allowed to sublease, which doesn’t seem to be the case), and if nothing else I feel like it would just be common courtesy for him to ask me about this before just dropping it all on me out of the blue.

A part of me really wants to contact my landlord and fill him in on this situation as I am 99% sure that subleasing is not allowed, but I hate being a snitch. The proposed new roommate also happens to be an old acquaintance of one of my good friends and she did vouch for this girl as a good person and said I wouldn’t have any gripes rooming with them for the remainder of my lease.

I will admit that a big part of my reasoning of wanting to report my current roommate is that I have really enjoyed the quiet apartment as of late, but I also think it’s pretty crappy of my roommate to just drop this on me without consulting me about it beforehand. Although my friend vouching for this girl is making me consider just taking this one on the chin, I am still leaning towards messaging my landlord about this situation.

Should I tell my landlord?

WOMAN PAYS COLLEAGUE $50 A MONTH TO FETCH HER TO WORK, KPKB WHEN SHE LATE

0
Is it too much to ask my coworker to get me to work on time?

So I 27f have been carpooling with my 43f colleague to work. We literally live in the same building so it just made sense to carpool to work because we were both going.

I gave her between 50 and 100 dollars every month as a thank you and for petrol (sometimes 50 because its split with another colleague sometimes).

At first, it was fine. We would leave at 8:20 and get to work at 9 and leave work at 6. Over time she started leaving later and later. 8:30, 8:40, and then one day she asked to leave at 8:50. Which means we were getting to work later and later and we would have to stay later as well. My colleague is a senior at our company so she has more flexibility with her hours. I, on the other hand, am an intern who is being evaluated on work performance before becoming a permanent member of the company.

I recently asked my boss if i could stay and he said he needed to evaluate me and that evaluation included attendance. I started dropping hints to my colleague saying it would be nice if I could get home on time and that I would rather get home early than leave late and she just shrugged it off.

Finally i just straight up asked her if we could leave at a decent time so I could make it to work by 9. She replied saying she didn’t know why i cared so much and if she told the boss I did a good job I shouldn’t be worried. But I told her that I’m really just trying to cover my ass here because if I lose this job it’ll be really hard for me to get another one. The next day she said we would leave at 8:20 but she was clearly upset with me.

I know I’m messing up her schedule and she’s doing me a big favor by giving me a ride (it takes 2 hours to get to our job by public transit), but is it too much to ask to just come into work and leave work on time?

REVERSING DRIVER HITS MOTORCYCLE, DENIES WHEN CONFRONTED & TRIED TO FLEE

0

A netizen shared a video showing a Hyundai Elantra hitting a parked motorcycle while reversing into a parking lot at an open carpark.

The incident happened on 14 November at about 9am, at an open carpark in Bukit Batok East Avenue 4, and was caught on the dashcam of the netizen who shared the video.

He said that the driver had hit the motorcycle while reversing, and denied it when being confronted by the camcar who captured the incident.

The offending driver then allegedly tried to flee the area but was purportedly stopped by the camcar driver, before alighting from his car to “pick up the motorcycle and put it back at the same spot”.

The OP also said that the driver never left any note or his particulars behind on the motorcycle.

Here is what he said

I witnessed an incident whereby a car was reversing and had hit a stationary motorcycle which caused it to fall off to the floor.

The mentioned motorist tried to flee the area but i managed to stop him. He was angry towards me when I prompted him that he had “langgar” the motorbike.

“What langgar! I never langgar anything” He then reversed his vehicle, came out and picked up the motorbike and put it at the same spot.

He never left any of his particulars on the motorbike. Ive written a note and left it on the motorbike too

LITTERBUGS TO DO CWO IN MORE CROWDED PLACES, TO MAKE THEM FEEL MORE “PAISEH”

0

NEA Increases Visibility Of Corrective Work Order Sessions

18 Nov 2022

Corrective Work Order sessions expand to city areas of Singapore

Singapore, 18 November 2022 – From 2017 to 2021, the National Environment Agency (NEA) issued an average of 27,200 tickets for littering and high-rise littering. Over the same period, the number of Corrective Work Orders (CWOs) issued to offenders was about 10,200.

No. of tickets issued for littering and high-rise littering

YearTotal number of Littering Tickets Issued
2017About 33,100
2018About 39,200
2019About 28,700
2020About 19,400
2021About 15,500
AverageAbout 27,200

2          Littering commonly occurs in neighbourhood centres, areas around hawker centres, MRT stations, and shopping malls. The majority of littering offenders are male and fall within the age group of 18 to 35 years old.  Ground surveys show that cigarette butts consistently top the list of littered items.

3          NEA’s anti-littering enforcement regime takes strict enforcement action against those who litter, with fines comprising a composition sum of $300 for the first offence, while high-rise littering offenders are sent to court. Offenders prosecuted in court may be issued a fine and sentenced to perform CWO. Introduced in 1992, the CWO requires recalcitrant offenders to clean public areas for a minimum of three hours, up to a maximum of 12 hours. This regime serves to increase recalcitrant offenders’ awareness of the impact of littering, as well as experience the difficulties faced by cleaners.

4          Under the Environmental Public Health Act (EPHA) 1987, the maximum fine for a littering offence is $2,000 for the first court conviction, $4,000 for the second conviction, and $10,000 for the third and subsequent convictions.

Corrective Work Order Sessions at City Areas

5          To further drive home the impact of littering, NEA has introduced CWO sessions at city areas for the first time from this month. They were held at the Chinatown and Tanjong Pagar areas on 15 and 17 November 2022 (photos of the CWO sessions are in the Annex). NEA will continue to put up informative standees around locations identified for CWO sessions, to highlight an ongoing session to raise public awareness of CWO. NEA officers conduct targeted enforcement at littering hotspots, and at areas where large number of individuals congregate.

6          “Everyone has a part to play in upholding high standards of cleanliness and public health in Singapore. NEA will continue with its educational and enforcement efforts, to encourage members of the public to exercise social graciousness and take personal ownership in keeping Singapore clean”, said Mr Tony Teo, Group Director of Environmental Public Health Operations at NEA.

~~ End ~~

ANNEX

Images from a Corrective Work Order (CWO) sessions at city areas of Singapore

50 Y.O MAN CHARGED WITH THE MURDER OF MISSING 27 Y.O WOMAN, WHO WAS FOUND DEAD @ BEACH RD

0

50-year-old Caleb Joshua Chai Shanmugam, is being accused of killing 27-year-old Rachael Ang Qi Ying at a ground floor unit at 2 Beach Road, on 9 November at about 7pm.

Ang was reportedly missing for 4 days before being found dead at the shop in Beach Road, where she was pronounced dead at the scene by paramedics.

Shanmugam and Ang were co-directors of a renovation company called Smart Click Services, which is registered to an address at Peninsula Plaza and the two were listed as directors from 1 October 2021, according to The Straits Times.

The police were alerted to a case of unnatural death on Sunday, and identified the 50-year-old in connection to the case after a missing person report was made on 10 November.

Shanmugam had left for Malaysia on 10 November and the Singapore police then sought the help of the Royal Malaysia Police, and he was then arrested in JB and handed over to the Singapore Police.

He is being represented by Suang Wijaya and Sophia Ng from the Eugene Thuraisingam law firm and he was charged at Changi General Hospital with murder.

His case has been adjourned to 25 November, and if convicted, he faces the death penalty.

11 Y.O BOY HIT BY CAR IN SENGKANG, 61 Y.O DRIVER ASSISTING POLICE WITH INVESTIGATIONS

0

A 61-year-old driver is assisting the police with investigations after an 11-year-old boy who was crossing the road, was hit by a car in Sengkang, according to Shin Min Daily News.

The accident happened on 16 November at about 2.38pm, along Compassvale Drive.

A resident who lived nearby, Mr Xu, spoke to SMDN and said that he heard cries and later found out that a boy was lying on the road with blood on his face.

Passers-by went over to help him and an ambulance arrived at the scene after about 5 to 10 minutes, and he was then conveyed to the hospital.

Xu said that there was a red car that was parked nearby, and the driver of the car alighted from the vehicle to check on the situation and that there were no passengers in his car at the time.

It is believed that the boy was crossing the road to take the bus at the time near the accident site.

The Singapore Police Force confirmed that an 11-year-old boy was conveyed to KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital conscious, and that a 61-year-old man is assisting the police with their investigations.

S’PORE MAN RAPED DISABLED DAUGHTER FOR 3 YEARS, SENTENCED TO 23 YEARS IN JAIL

0

A 58-year-old man in Singapore was sentenced to 23 years imprisonment on Thursday after pleading guilty to 2 counts of rape and one count of assault by penetration.

He had assaulted and raped his intellectually disabled eldest daughter for 3 years, starting in 2017 until his arrest in 2020.

The Straits Times reported that the man’s first assault started in 2017 when he made the victim (then 29) perform oral intercourse on him before raping her, and telling her not to tell her mother.

Then in 2019, he told the victim “let’s have fun” before raping her as she was coming out of the bathroom.

His wife was waiting for her daughter in the corridor on 8 July 2020 after realising that she wasn’t home yet by 11.45pm, and she saw her husband lifting the daughter’s shirt up at the staircase landing.

The man then apologised immediately and released the daughter, asking his wife for forgiveness.

The wife then went to her younger daughter and told her about what happened, and the latter then asked her sister about the incident, and her sister said she encountered their father at the corridor.

She added that he was holding his phone in one hand while lifting her shirt with the other.

The younger sister then took her father’s phone while he was sleeping and found evidence of his crimes, including video(s) of her sister undressing.

The victim then said that their father had entered the bathroom while she was still inside, where he told her to undress while he filmed her.

The victim’s mother and sister then filed a police report and the man was then arrested later that day, on 10 July 2020.

GUY GOES CRAZY ON PAID DATE AFTER SHE REJECTS HIM FOR “SPECIAL SERVICES”

0

A video appeared on social media of a voice recording of a man who went berserk after his paid date refuses to provide him for “special services”.

He said: “I TELL U I GIVE YOU MONEY LEH TO SPEND TIME ON DINNER, I PAY MONEY LEH!

Here is what the victim said:

I went on a paid date and my male client was extremely aggressive. He asked me for sexual services but I told him that this platform does not offer that kind of services; just friendly dates, and he got aggressive.

This went on for quite sometime before the video was taken. He drove me to some ulu place and did not let me out of the car. I was ready to jump out of the moving car because I was that scared. I was shaking the entire time and was contacting my agent on text.

Worst of anti got victim-blamed by my agent. My agent called me after I finally got out of the car and asked me “what did you do to trigger him?”

Note that at this point of time I was already shaking with fear, crying, and still feeling unsafe and not an ounce of empathy was expressed by my agent.

Full Video of the incident:

Here are what netizens think:

  • Also, why you do this kind of risky side gig? Better to not be in this kinda situation in the first place. Also, if you really must, meet at public place and then u leave yourself. Dont put yr fate into his hands and follow him wherever he might take u.
  • Says a lot about a man who can not control his own anger. The agent also one kind. Name and shame the agent and the company.
  • You got a very scary job dear…hope you can manage to get a better one. Stay safe 
  • I’d spend the money on petrol rather than someone to talk to
  • Not saying what the guy did is wrong, but she clearly put herself in this risk when taking up this job. If you dont want to deal with this or mentally cant handle ot, why even bother getting this free money. Some cases for rape, for example, girls go out at night to a dangerous place/in an unsafe country and expect themselves to be safe but in the end, they were taken advantage of. However, they were the one who put themselves at the risk of it in the first place, both parties are ar fault. You can’t expect every human being in the world to be sweet and caring people, reality is that there are real cunts out there.