Enforcement Operation Targets Non-Compliant Active Mobility Devices
This week, a significant enforcement operation was conducted across the island, resulting in the impounding of 78 non-compliant active mobility (AM) devices. This initiative is part of ongoing efforts by the Land Transport Authority (LTA) to mitigate the increasing number of fire incidents associated with these devices in residential areas.
The LTA has the authority to take action against non-compliant Power-Assisted Bicycles (PABs) and Personal Mobility Devices (PMDs). According to Rule 3 of the Road Traffic (Power-Assisted Bicycles Approval) Rules 2004, it is illegal to possess non-compliant PABs, and the LTA is empowered to impound such devices from any location. Furthermore, Section 45 of the Active Mobility Act allows the LTA to confiscate devices found on public paths, including HDB common corridors and stairwells, that pose a danger to other users.
Notification and Registration Requirements
Owners of the impounded registered devices will receive notices regarding the enforcement action taken. It is crucial for PABs and e-scooters to be registered with the LTA. Those with unregistered devices are encouraged to reach out to the LTA for verification and further investigation.
Legal Consequences for Non-Compliance
A reminder to all users: it is essential to purchase and utilize devices and parts, including batteries, only from original manufacturers or authorized retailers. The use of non-compliant devices is a serious offense, with penalties that may include fines of up to $10,000, imprisonment for up to six months, or both.
For more information, individuals can refer to the Be Device-Safe info pack available at Be Device-Safe.
Community Feedback and Suggestions
The community has expressed a range of opinions regarding the enforcement operations. Some residents, like Philip Soh, have called for increased nighttime enforcement, highlighting that many non-compliant riders operate after dark. Others, such as Irwan Shah, suggest that enforcement should extend to shops selling modified parts for PMDs.
Wendy Lim emphasized the need for the LTA to also address traffic rule violations by PMD users on roads, while James Teo pointed out the potential dangers posed by modified devices, which can lead to serious accidents.
Henry Lim noted that the 78 devices impounded represent only a small fraction of the total number of non-compliant PABs and PMDs in circulation, urging continued enforcement efforts to enhance safety in public spaces.
Conclusion
The LTA’s recent operation is a step towards ensuring safer public areas and housing estates. However, community members are advocating for more frequent and comprehensive enforcement actions to address the ongoing issues posed by non-compliant active mobility devices. The collaboration between the LTA and the public is essential in creating a safer environment for all road users.