28.3 C
Singapore
Saturday, June 20, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 2334

DEAD BODY OF 58 Y.O WOMAN FOUND IN HDB FLAT @ POTONG PASIR, BODY ALREADY ROTTING

0

In a somber incident, a 58-year-old woman was discovered dead in her Potong Pasir flat after neighbours reported a foul smell emanating from her unit, according to Shin Min Daily News. The incident unfolded on Friday night, around 10 pm, leaving the community in shock and prompting police investigations.

Neighbours Raise the Alarm

The tragic discovery occurred when neighbours on Potong Pasir Avenue 1 detected a foul odor permeating from the second-floor unit where the woman resided. Concerned about the unusual smell and unable to establish contact with the occupant, they decided to alert the police.

Reports indicate that the deceased, a 58-year-old Chinese woman, lived alone in her second-floor flat at Block 118. Residents expressed their surprise at the sudden demise, noting that while she appeared healthy, no friends or relatives were observed visiting her.

Upon arriving at the scene, reporters found the police cordoning off the corridor outside the flat for evidence collection. The air carried a putrid smell, leaving a solemn atmosphere in the vicinity. Neighbours shared their shock and sadness, lamenting the passing of an elderly resident without the knowledge of friends or family.

Insights from Neighbours

One resident, Ms Cao, a 41-year-old hawker stall assistant, described the deceased as friendly, often exchanging greetings and chats with neighbours. However, the absence of visitors and sudden death surprised those who knew her. Another neighbour, Mr Chen, aged 60, revealed detecting a bad smell a couple of days before the discovery, initially attributing it to potential rotting food.

In response to the incident, the Singapore Police Force (SPF) received a report of an unnatural death at the location. Upon reaching the scene, they found the 58-year-old woman, believed to have collapsed at home. Despite paramedics pronouncing her dead at the scene, preliminary investigations have ruled out foul play. However, the case remains under active investigation.

MAN GETS $50 FOR CLOSING $50K SALES FOR BANK, IF INSURANCE AGENT AT LEAST $10K

0

As a banker, I have always prided myself on my ability to close deals and bring in big sales for my bank. So, when I was offered a $50 commission for closing a $50,000 sales deal for the bank, I was initially ecstatic. However, as I started to think about it more, I couldn’t help but feel a sense of disappointment and even a little resentment towards the bank.

Don’t get me wrong, I understand that the bank is a business and they need to make a profit. But, in this situation, it felt like the bank was taking advantage of my hard work and only giving me a tiny fraction of what I had earned for them. It made me wonder, if I was an insurance agent, would I have been paid a fairer commission for a similar sales deal?

As a banker, I am responsible for helping clients with their financial needs, whether it be opening a savings account, applying for a loan, or investing in a certificate of deposit. My job is to build relationships with clients and offer them the best products and services that our bank has to offer. This requires a lot of time and effort, and when I finally secure a big sales deal, it feels like a huge accomplishment.

So, when I was told that my commission for a $50,000 sales deal was only $50, I couldn’t help but do the math in my head. If I were to have sold ten of these deals in a month, which is a reasonable goal for a successful banker, I would only make $500 in commissions. That’s barely enough to cover my expenses and certainly not enough to justify the hard work and dedication I put into my job.

On the other hand, if I were an insurance agent, my commission for a $50,000 sales deal would be significantly higher. According to industry standards, insurance agents typically earn a commission of 10% – 15% of the total premium paid by the client. This means that for a $50,000 sales deal, an insurance agent would earn at least $5,000 to $7,500 in commissions. That’s a huge difference compared to the measly $50 commission I received as a banker.

This huge disparity in commissions between bankers and insurance agents made me realize that the bank was taking advantage of my hard work and not valuing it as much as they should. It also made me think about the motivations behind the bank’s decisions. Are they just being greedy and trying to save money by paying their employees low commissions? Or do they genuinely believe that bankers don’t deserve a fairer share of the profits they bring in?

As a banker, I am constantly reminded of the importance of building strong relationships with clients and providing them with the best financial solutions. However, when the bank takes all the earnings from my hard work, it becomes challenging to maintain that motivation. It also makes me question the bank’s priorities and whether they truly value their employees and their contributions to the company.

In conclusion, if I were an insurance agent, I would have been paid at least 100 times more than what I earned as a banker for the same sales deal. This realization has left me feeling disappointed and even a little resentful towards the bank. It is my hope that banks will start to recognize the hard work and dedication of their employees and provide them with fairer compensation for their efforts. After all, a happy and motivated workforce is crucial for the success of any business.

SFA DIRECTS SONG FISH TO RECALL CRAYFISH & HALF SHELL SCALLOP

0

According to the Singapore Food Agency (SFA), they detected the presence of cadmium in crayfish and half shell scallop (imported by Song Fish Dealer Pte Ltd) at levels exceeding the maximum limit for cadmium stated in the Singapore Food Regulations.

As a precautionary measure, SFA has directed Song Fish Dealer Pte Ltd to recall the implicated products. The recall is ongoing.

Take note:

Based on levels detected, once-off consumption of the affected products is unlikely to be of food safety concern. However, long-term intake of high levels of cadmium may cause renal dysfunction, bone demineralisation and increased risk of cancer in the lung, endometrium, bladder, and breast.

Consumers who have consumed the implicated products and have concerns about their health should seek medical advice.

Consumers may contact their point of purchase for enquiries.

Here are the products description:

WIFE’S SISTER HARASSES RELATIVE FOR MONEY CAUSE SHE CAN’T AFFORD A CONDO

0

“I met my wife in NTU, her sister is 2 years older than her also NTU.

I really hate her sister, she recently bought a condo when she cannot afford it and took money from their relative to pay.

I was thinking why would you do that, if you cannot afford it just live in a normal hdb flat.

She is a typical freeloader, goes to restaurant and expects people to pay for her food.

It’s just a mentality of being spoilt, why would you choose an expensive restaurant to eat and not pay for your own share.

I’m okay to pick up a bill after anybody usually, but the irks of the sister always choosing restaurant and after finishing her food she just walks off and expect me to pick up the tab.

Not even a thank you!

Can anyone tell me how to stop this spoilt attitude of her? Their parents are also the same, they go to the restaurant and order expensive food ie steak and lobsters, while I just settle for a cheaper noodle.

I am just glad that my wife is not like her sister.”

Here are what netizens think:

  • Marriage is ugly business. If you are that concerned better don’t marry and get them as family. Otherwise learn to embrace them like your own. Then you won’t feel so frustrated. If you marry her you will spend a lifetime nursing buried hate and distaste that will surface from time to time. Suffering becomes self courted.
  • Don’t say her until so bad. She is only bad if U directly ask her to treat U and she doesn’t. Some people are like that.
  • Marrying self entitled person will give you lifetime sufferings. Also your kids will suffer at the hands of their self entitled parent for more than 20yrs from birth. Self entitled people should be banned from marriages and parenthood.

WOMAN LOSES $60,000 TO “MAN” HE MET ON DATING APP, CAUSE SHE ITCHY DOWNSTAIRS

0

I met someone named Arno on the CMB app on June 15, 2023. We had normal conversations, and on June 18, he asked to switch to WhatsApp and shared that his name is Weijie. Everything seemed fine, and he would talk about his daily life and family. He claimed to have studied a double degree in Business Management and Food Sciences at the University of Sydney. He originally hails from Malaysia but moved to Singapore seven years ago with the intention of becoming a permanent resident by the end of the year.

He mentioned having an aunt who is a doctor in Singapore and stated that he runs his own company located at Aljunied Road. He also mentioned living at Ascentia Sky, Alexander View.

During our conversations, he mentioned being a close friend of David Chen, the co-founder of Sea Group, and through his connections, he could invest in private equity involving HDB projects and more. A week after chatting on WhatsApp, he suddenly informed me that he needed to urgently go to Kuala Lumpur as his grandma had fallen and hit her head. Despite this, he asked for my help to visit an HDB BTO worksite and take some photos so that he could confidently invest $500,000 in the project. Later that evening, he told me that he managed to get David’s help to grant access to an app called SoftUni, which could only be downloaded through a link he provided, and via VPN since the app isn’t available on the Apple Store in Singapore. The app registration required my legal name and NRIC.

Three successful investments were made for projects recommended by Weijie, and funds were returned to me through withdrawals. However, in the latest investment on June 30, 2023, he informed me that my funds were frozen due to an incorrect password entered during the withdrawal process, even though I’m certain I didn’t make a mistake. I reached out to customer service for resolution and was told that I needed to transfer the same amount of investment before my account could be unfrozen and my password changed. At this point, I became convinced it was a scam and did some research on scam alerts, finding similar modus operandi. Furthermore, I confirmed that the photos Weijie had sent of himself actually belonged to an individual named Felix Go (@helixgo on Instagram).

This has been an expensive lesson for me, but I want to urge everyone to be cautious when receiving photos from individuals, as they could be stolen from someone else. Also, don’t be fooled by apps that may appear legitimate but are actually scams.

40 Y.O WOMAN ARRESTED AFTER KILLING 4 Y.O GIRL IN RIVER VALLEY CRASH, WAITED AT SCENE FOR POLICE

0

In a heartbreaking incident on January 23, tragedy struck Institution Hill in River Valley as a road accident claimed the life of four-year-old Zara Mei Orlic. The police have since arrested a 40-year-old woman under suspicion of careless driving causing death, according to Shin Min Daily News.

Unfolding Events

The unfortunate incident occurred around 4:55 pm, sending shockwaves through the local community. Preliminary reports suggest a collision between a car and a pedestrian, with young Zara Mei Orlic identified as the victim.

The woman behind the wheel of the involved car was taken into police custody on the grounds of suspected careless driving leading to the tragic death of the young girl.

Upon receiving reports of the accident, the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) swiftly responded to the scene. Zara Mei Orlic, unconscious after the collision, was promptly transported to the hospital for medical attention.

Despite the efforts of medical professionals, the young girl succumbed to her injuries. Police investigations are currently underway to ascertain the circumstances surrounding the accident. The details of the collision and the events leading up to it are being thoroughly examined to determine the facts of the case.

Devastated Family

According to a report by Mothership; Zara, accompanied by her younger sister and the family’s helper, was on her way home from school, crossing Institution Hill in River Valley.

Humming a song, Zara’s innocent routine took a devastating turn when she was struck by a car, despite the desperate screams of their helper, who was just two steps behind, urging the driver to stop.

A resident nearby, alerted by the sound of the impact, captured the heartbreaking scene on video, showing the helper wailing while cradling Zara in her arms.

Zara’s father, Nick Orlic, shared the heart-wrenching details of that tragic day. Despite being only five minutes away, he arrived to witness a scene that no parent should ever experience.

In his own words, Nick described the initial shock, believing his daughter might not survive. Despite a faint pulse, Zara’s injuries proved extensive.

An ambulance arrived approximately ten minutes later, rushing Zara to the hospital. Despite the medical team’s efforts, the doctors conveyed the devastating news to Nick — the injuries were not survivable.

Zara’s father pleaded for continued efforts, asking them to wait for his wife, who was rushing to the hospital. Unfortunately, Zara succumbed to her injuries shortly after her mother’s arrival.

MAN VS FAMILY @ SENTOSA, KENA WHACK & KEEPS ASKING “WHY YOU F- MY MOTHER”

0

In the digital age, moments of tension and confrontation often find their way onto social media platforms, and a recent video circulating on Facebook has captured the public’s attention. The footage documents a heated altercation between a family and another driver on the road, leaving viewers both captivated and disturbed.

The Singapore Police Force are also aware of the incident and are investigating the altercation between the two MPV drivers, according to TODAY.

The Video’s Mysterious Beginning

The video kicks off without any context, plunging viewers directly into the midst of a confrontation. The camera person, seemingly aggrieved, approaches another vehicle to address an issue not immediately apparent to viewers. The lack of initial context leaves room for speculation about what might have triggered the unfolding drama.

As the camera person confronts the occupants of the other car, tensions escalate rapidly. The driver of the second vehicle responds with offensive language, scolding the camera person with a vulgar phrase involving their mother. This sparks visible anger in the camera person, who, in turn, repeatedly questions the other driver, “Eh, why you [expletive] my mother?”

The situation quickly takes a physical turn when the other driver, his fist clenched, exits his vehicle. A punch is thrown, connecting with the camera person and sending them sprawling onto the ground. The camera person, now on the receiving end of the physical altercation, begins screaming wildly, adding a disturbing layer to the unfolding scene.

Social Media Reaction

Within hours of being shared on Facebook, the video garnered significant attention, with thousands of views, comments, and shares. The online community, always ready to offer opinions, has been actively engaging in discussions about the incident. Speculation about the motives of both parties and debates on who might be at fault have fueled the online conversation.

The video raises numerous questions, and concerns have been voiced about the dangers of such confrontations escalating into physical violence. Viewers, lacking the full context, are left to interpret the incident based on the limited information provided by the video.

You can watch the full video here, as well as the POV from the other driver here.

Cameraman Makes Public Statement

WOMAN’S BF REFUSES TO POST PHOTO OF HER ON HIS SOCIAL MEDIA

0

My SO (m37) won’t post pic with me (f35) even after 2.5 years of relationship.

I have a wonderful and loving relationship with my SO. He is just wonderful and this is the best relationship I’ve ever been in.

I have no other complains and this leads me to think I am being picky with this specific complaint. He has never posted a picture of us together….

we’ve done sooo many cool and fun things and he has never posted a picture of us (although he’s posted pictures of things we were doing and places we were at like vacations etc).

It bothers me because he does have many pictures of himself, some pictures with his parents and he used to have a picture with 3 of his friends, one of them being a girl.

I know this is stupid, I really do, but I can’t help to feel like after 2.5 years I am not good enough to post a picture of us even on one of those statuses that delete after 24hrs.

I’ve met all his friends, his whole comunity, his family (distant and immediate). The first time I posted a picture of us together on my Instagram he texted his best friends saying “I made it to her story!” So he obviously sees it as an important thing.

I have told him this bothers me but he just brushes it off. It’s lead me to delete all the pictures I had of us on my IG just to not feel like an idiot.

When i ask about it, he says he is a private person. In all fairness he has not posted a picture since we met but he has posted statuses… idk.

Am I being crazy?

SENIOR RESEARCHER FROM A*STAR AGENCY ALLEGEDLY MOLESTED 29 Y.O WOMAN @ CLARKE QUAY

0

In a shocking turn of events, a senior research engineer at the Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A*Star), Vuong Dao Nghe, 40, has been accused of molesting a 29-year-old woman at Clarke Quay. This incident, is alleged to have occurred around 2.15 am on August 20, 2023, according to The Straits Times.

A*Star, in a statement issued on January 26, emphasized their commitment to the highest standards of conduct and integrity. The organization expressed a stern view towards staff breaching these standards and assured that appropriate action would be taken. However, due to the ongoing legal proceedings, detailed comments on the case were withheld.

Legal Proceedings

Vuong Dao Nghe’s case has been adjourned to February 21, marking a critical juncture in the ongoing investigation. The Singaporean engineer is one among more than 10 men charged with molestation on January 23 in unrelated incidents.

Three of the accused men faced charges related to incidents within Marina Bay Sands. Al Amin, 41, allegedly molested a 27-year-old woman at the Ce La Vi club around 2.40 am on October 12, 2023. Jephthah Goh Poh Khang, 29, faced accusations of molesting a 25-year-old woman at the Marquee Singapore nightclub shortly before 5.20 am on November 25, 2023. Furthermore, on January 1, 2024, July Izaak, 30, allegedly molested a 31-year-old woman at the Avenue Singapore lounge.

Police’s Press Release

11 men, aged between 21 and 67, will be charged in court on 23 January 2024 for their suspected involvement in separate cases of molestation.

The cases are as follows: 

  1. On 7 April 2023, a 67-year-old man allegedly molested a 14-year-old girl at a stall along New Bugis Street. The man was subsequently arrested at scene by Police officers who attended to the incident. The man will be charged with three counts of outrage of modesty under Section 354(1) of the Penal Code 1871.
  2.  On 18 April 2023, a 24-year-old man allegedly molested a nine-year-old girl outside a residential unit along Tampines Street 83. A Police report was lodged on 23 April 2023. Through swift follow-up investigations, Police officers identified the man and arrested him within an hour of the report. The man will be charged with one count of outrage of modesty of a person below 14 years of age under Section 354(2) of the Penal Code 1871.
  3. On 6 August 2023, a 48-year-old man allegedly molested three different women, aged between 18 and 40, in the vicinity of Orchard Road. He also allegedly choked another 20-year-old woman’s neck and shoved her backwards. The man was detained at the scene and subsequently arrested on the same day. The man will be charged with three counts of outrage of modesty and one count of criminal force under Section 354(1) and Section 352 of the Penal Code 1871.
  4. On 20 August 2023, a 40-year-old man allegedly molested a 29-year-old woman at a club along River Valley Road. A police report was lodged on the same day.  The man will be charged with one count of outrage of modesty under Section 354(1) of the Penal Code 1871.
  5. On 1 September 2023, a 57-year-old man allegedly molested a 32-year-old woman near the junction of River Valley Road and Nathan Road. A police report was lodged on the following day. Through extensive follow-up investigations and ground enquiries, the Police managed to establish the man’s identity and arrested him on 18 September 2023. The man will be charged with one count of outrage of modesty under Section 354(1) of the Penal Code 1871.
  6. On 11 September 2023, a 55-year-old man allegedly molested a 31-year-old woman at a coffee shop along Kelantan Lane. He also allegedly punched and kicked her. The man was subsequently arrested at scene by Police officers who attended to the incident. The man will be charged with one count of outrage of modesty and one count of voluntarily causing hurt under Section 354(1) and Section 323 of the Penal Code 1871 respectively.
  7. On 7 October 2023, a 38-year-old man allegedly molested a 18-year-old woman at a residential unit along Balestier Road. A Police report was lodged on the following day. The man will be charged with three counts of outrage of modesty under Section 354(1) of the Penal Code 1871.
  8. On 12 October 2023, a 41-year-old man allegedly molested a 27-year-old woman at a club along Bayfront Avenue. The man was subsequently arrested at scene by Police officers who attended to the incident. The man will be charged with one count of outrage of modesty under Section 354(1) of the Penal Code 1871. 
  9. On 12 November 2023, a 21-year-old man allegedly molested a 26-year-old woman along Serangoon Road. The man was subsequently arrested at scene by Police officers who attended to the incident. The man will be charged with one count of outrage of modesty under Section 354(1) of the Penal Code 1871. 
  10. On 25 November 2023, a 29-year-old man allegedly molested a 25-year-old woman at a club along Bayfront Avenue. The man was subsequently arrested at scene by Police officers who attended to the incident. The man will be charged with one count of outrage of modesty under Section 354(1) of the Penal Code 1871.
  11. On 1 January 2024, a 30-year-old man allegedly molested a 31-year-old woman at a club along Bayfront Avenue. The man was subsequently arrested at scene by Police officers who attended to the incident. The man will be charged with one count of outrage of modesty under Section 354(1) of the Penal Code 1871.

The offence of outrage of modesty under Section 354(1) of the Penal Code 1871 carries an imprisonment term which may extend to three years, a fine, caning, or any combination of such punishments.

The offence of outrage of modesty of a person below 14 years of age under Section 354(2) of the Penal Code 1871 carries an imprisonment term which may extend to five years, a fine, caning, or any combination of such punishments.

Outrage of modesty cases remain a key concern for the Police. The Police treat all reports seriously and will spare no effort to conduct investigations thoroughly and expeditiously, which includes identifying and tracing the suspects through follow-up investigations and with the aid of Police cameras and CCTV footage if they are unknown to the victims. The Police may also place the suspects under arrest for investigations and may prosecute them in court subsequently. The Police have zero tolerance towards sexual offenders who threaten the personal safety of those in the community, and offenders will be dealt with sternly in accordance with the law. 

The Police will continue to work closely with various stakeholders, such as public entertainment outlets, and the community, to prevent and deter molestation cases. The Police would also like to urge members of the public to remain vigilant and to report the matter to the Police immediately, if they witness an incident of molestation, or are aware of someone being a victim of molestation.

PUBLIC AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
SINGAPORE POLICE FORCE
22 January 2024 @ 4:00 PM

BF IN HIS 30s STILL NEED MOTHER TO WAKE UP IN MIDDLE OF NIGHT TO COOK LIKE HIS MAID

0

I recently moved to another country with my boyfriend and we are in our 30s. I used to live alone before coming to this new country, but my bf always lived with his mom.

She is adorable but I have never agreed on the way she treated him: she cooked, clean, store his clothes in the wardrobe and make his bed (Every day).

He used to wake her at midnight to cook dinner if she did not leave something served and even prepare his office outfit when he had to go to the office. He always was sure about that ‘his mom lived with him’ since he paid the rent, but he never was in charge of any of the paperwork or functions of the house (even supermarket).

Since we moved together, is being a challenge. I am finishing a PhD, working in a multinational company and being in charge of the house facilities.

As I am used to be independent for me is not a big deal, but we have some improvements in our relationship since he is more and more involved in (his & his mom words) “woman’s tasks”. Notice: he always lived with his mom even his parents get divorced 10 years ago and she always treated him like this. No girlfriend before me.

Baby steps like going to the supermarket together or him making his own breakfast have been happening in the last 6 months and he has opened his mind and being more adult.

I am going on a 2 months trip and this the first time ever he is going to live alone and be independent in a daily live task.

I am very happy because I know this opportunity will be very good for him and even he is expecting it. But, the other night I heard his momma planning to move the same country as us and I saw this old experience back again in our lifestyle.

Of course he did not mention it to me as (from what I heard) is a 3-year plan, but I am expecting him to bring this into a conversation at any time. I know she is not going to live with us but of course will take any opportunity to join us at any event.

She is very intense and I am scared that she will try to be again ‘his maid ‘ and he will allow it. If he would ask I would say “no” and no reasons because I know he would not like my reasons (he never say any bad on her &his behavior) but even if he insist I am willing to not continue with the relationship because my mental health is in the game.