25 C
Singapore
Wednesday, April 22, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 2734

M’SIA NEW BALANCE RECALLS SHOES THAT CONTAIN PIGSKIN, OFFER FULL REFUNDS & EXCHANGE

0

In a recent development that has stirred conversation and concern, New Balance Malaysia has taken the proactive step of temporarily removing one of its shoe models from shelves.

This move comes after the discovery that a portion of the product is made from pigskin material, an issue that holds particular significance in the context of Malaysia’s predominantly Muslim population.

New Balance, acknowledging its oversight, promptly took ownership of the situation. The brand openly admitted that it had not effectively communicated the material composition to its customers.

In response to the revelation, New Balance Malaysia made the decision to temporarily remove the specific shoe model from its shelves.

Furthermore, New Balance Malaysia extended a comprehensive solution to its customers who had purchased the contentious shoe.

The brand offered a full refund or the option to exchange the product for an alternative.

New Balance Malaysia’s official statement

Official Statement from New Balance Malaysia

New Balance Malaysia has received several queries regarding the material composition of shoes with style number U990TA4, and, after a thorough investigation, we can confirm that a small part of the shoe contains pigskin material.

Accuracy and transparency are critical to our team at New Balance, and we sincerely apologise to any customer who received inaccurate information from our team We take full responsibility for this lapse in communication and are committed to providing a satisfactory solution for our affected customers.

For all customers who have purchased the U990TA4 from New Balance Malaysia, Crossover, and ATMOS KL, whether in-store or through the website, we will honour product exchange or a full refund at any New Balance store within Malaysia (except Factory Outlets) effective immediately and valid up to three (3) months. Our store teams will be available to assist you with this process.

We have also recalled and ceased the sale of U990TA4 and have informed our partners and distributors to implement the same measures until the labelling is updated.

Our customers’ trust and satisfaction are of utmost importance to us, and we will work diligently to regain your confidence.

Once again, we extend our sincerest apologies for this oversight. Thank you for your understanding and continued support.

Best regards, New Balance Malaysia

GEORGE GOH TELLS TAN KIN LIAN – FOCUS ON YOUR OWN CAMPAIGN, DON’T LOSE YOUR DEPOSIT

0

As the race for the presidency heats up, the political landscape is abuzz with discussions surrounding the clash of opinions between former NTUC Income CEO Tan Kin Lian and fellow presidential hopeful George Goh.

During the launch of his presidential campaign, Tan Kin Lian hinted at an intriguing proposition. He suggested that if both he and George Goh ended up qualifying for the election, one of them should voluntarily step down to avoid splitting the votes.

The idea behind this proposal was to consolidate the support for a “non-establishment” candidate, enhancing their collective chances against more traditional opponents.

However, George Goh made it clear that he disagreed with the notion of one candidate urging another to withdraw from the race. In his view, the presidential election is a significant event that demands a serious approach, and it is not the place for advising others to step aside.

During a recent walkabout on August 16th, George Goh reiterated his stance. He advised Tan Kin Lian to concentrate on his own campaign and take steps to ensure that he does not lose his deposit, according to a report by Channel NewsAsia.

Goh emphasized that every candidate should prioritize their own efforts rather than attempting to influence their rivals’ decisions.

Here is what George Goh said

Here is a summary of my media interview I just gave at Bukit Panjang Hawker Centre today:

I would like to make one final comment about Mr Tan Kin Lian and what he has been saying. Running for the Presidential Election is a serious matter. Each candidate should focus on their campaign, get ready, and let the voters decide. It is true that the rules make it more difficult for an independent candidate to prepare for his campaign without knowing if he will be eligible but I have all my campaign materials ready. As an entrepreneur, I move forward confidently and don’t complain.

I read with interest what Mr George Yeo said in his interview about his book. He said he was asked by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong to run for the 2011 Presidential Elections. This is similar to what I read about Mr S.R Nathan where he said that it was Mr Lee Kuan Yew who suggested for him to run. It seems this is how the establishment works.

This is why Independence is important. I am not told by anyone to run, and I do not change my mind if someone else tells me not to. I made up my mind since 2017, and continue to put myself forward without the endorsement and support of a huge machinery. To me, this is the mark of a truly independent candidate.

WANTED MAN ON THE RUN FOR 3 DAYS AFTER BOAT QUAY SLASHING CASE, ARRESTED @ ANCHORVALE

0

A 21-year-old man who had been on the run from the police following a slashing case that took place on 13 August at Read Crescent Road, has since been arrested 3 days later on 16 August.

He was arrested on 16 August at about 3.20 pm, along Anchorvale Link after his whereabouts were established by police officers from the Central Police Division.

The other two suspects who were allegedly involved in the slashing case were earlier arrested on 13 August, on the same day as the incident.

The trio were rounded up following a fight that allegedly broke out at Read Crescent on 13 August at about 6.15am, where a victim was slashed deeply on his head.

The victim didn’t know the trio, who purportedly fled the scene after the attack.

The two men who were arrested on the same day as the incident were earlier charged in court on 15 AUgust with affray; while the third man who was arrested on 16 August will be charged in court today with voluntarily causing hurt with a dangerous weapon.

S’pore police’s earlier statement

The Police have arrested two men aged 19 and 20 for their suspected involvement in a case of affray.

On 13 August 2023 at about 6.15am, the Police were alerted to a case of fight where a victim was purportedly slashed on his head along Read Crescent Park. The victim sustained a deep laceration on his forehead and was conscious when conveyed to the hospital.

Preliminary investigations revealed that the victim had an altercation with three unknown male persons. During their dispute, a fight ensued between them where one of the assailants allegedly used a knife to attack the victim. After the fight, the three assailants fled. A knife believed to be used to attack the victim was recovered and seized as case exhibit.

Through ground enquiries and with the aid of images from Police cameras, officers from Central Police Division established the identities of the two men and arrested them on the same day after the incident was reported.

The two men will be charged in court on 15 August 2023 with an offence of affray under Section 267B of the Penal Code 1871. The offence carries an imprisonment term of up to one year, or fine of up to $5,000, or both.

The Police are looking for another man shown in the image below to assist with investigations. Anyone with information is requested to call the Police Hotline at 1800-255-0000 or submit information online at www.police.gov.sg/i-witness. All information received will be kept strictly confidential.

The Police have zero tolerance towards acts of violence and blatant disregard of the law. We would spare no effort to apprehend such offenders and deal with them in accordance with the law.

PUBLIC AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
SINGAPORE POLICE FORCE
14 August 2023 @ 11:55 PM

$1 BILLION IN CASH & ASSETS SEIZED & 10 ARRESTED IN S’PORE’S BIGGEST RAID ON MONEY-LAUNDERING

0

𝗧𝗘𝗡 𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗘𝗜𝗚𝗡 𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗔𝗟𝗦 𝗧𝗢 𝗕𝗘 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗥𝗚𝗘𝗗 𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘𝗦 𝗜𝗡𝗖𝗟𝗨𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗚𝗘𝗥𝗬 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗠𝗢𝗡𝗘𝗬 𝗟𝗔𝗨𝗡𝗗𝗘𝗥𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛 𝗔𝗡 𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗠𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗗 𝗩𝗔𝗟𝗨𝗘 𝗢𝗙 𝗔𝗕𝗢𝗨𝗧 𝗢𝗡𝗘 𝗕𝗜𝗟𝗟𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗜𝗡 𝗖𝗔𝗦𝗛 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗩𝗔𝗥𝗜𝗢𝗨𝗦 𝗔𝗦𝗦𝗘𝗧𝗦 𝗦𝗘𝗜𝗭𝗘𝗗, 𝗙𝗥𝗢𝗭𝗘𝗡 𝗢𝗥 𝗜𝗦𝗦𝗨𝗘𝗗 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗛𝗜𝗕𝗜𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗢𝗙 𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗔𝗟 𝗢𝗥𝗗𝗘𝗥𝗦

The Police have arrested ten persons, aged between 31 and 44, for their suspected involvement in offences of forgery and/or, money laundering, and resistance to lawful apprehension. Twelve other persons are assisting with investigations and eight other persons are currently wanted by the Police. These persons are believed to have connections amongst themselves. All the persons involved are neither Singapore Citizens nor Permanent Residents.

The Police received information of possible illicit activities including the use of suspected forged documents that were used to substantiate the source of funds in Singapore bank accounts. Through extensive investigations and follow-up from intelligence – including the analysis of Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) – the Police identified a group of foreign nationals suspected to be involved in laundering the proceeds of crime from their overseas organised crime activities including scams and online gambling.

On 15 August 2023, more than 400 officers from the Commercial Affairs Department, the Criminal Investigation Department, Special Operations Command and the Police Intelligence Department conducted simultaneous raids at multiple locations island-wide, including residences such as Good Class Bungalows (GCB) and condominiums, leading to the arrest of the ten persons.

Prohibition of disposal orders were issued against 94 properties and 50 vehicles, with a total estimated value of more than S$815 million, as well as multiple ornaments and bottles of liquor and wine. The Police also seized more than 35 related bank accounts with a total estimated balance of more than S$110 million for investigations and to prevent dissipation of suspected criminal proceeds. Cash, including foreign currencies, amounting to more than S$23 million, more than 250 luxury bags and watches, more than 120 electronic devices such as computers and mobile phones, more than 270 pieces of jewelleries, two gold bars, and 11 documents with information on virtual assets.

All ten persons will be charged in court on 16 August 2023. The case facts are as follows:

a) A 40-year-old male Cypriot national was arrested at his residence at a GCB along Ewart Park. He was also found in possession of other foreign passports believed to be issued by the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and Cambodia. During the arrest, when the Police identified themselves to the man outside his bedroom and ordered him to open the door, the man allegedly jumped out of the second-floor balcony of the GCB and was found by the Police to be hiding in a drain. He was conveyed conscious to the hospital as he sustained injuries arising from the jump. The Police seized cash of more than S$2.1 million and other foreign currencies, and issued prohibition of disposal orders for 13 properties and five vehicles with an estimated value of more than S$118 million, as well as multiple ornaments and bottles of liquor and wine. The Police also froze four related bank accounts with a total balance of more than S$6.7 million. The man will be charged with one count of resistance to lawful apprehension under Section 225B of the Penal Code. One other person is assisting with investigations.

b) A 42-year-old male Turkish national was arrested at his residence at a GCB along Bishopsgate. He was also found in possession of a foreign passport believed to be issued by PRC and Vanuatu. The Police seized close to S$720,000 in cash and other foreign currencies, one electronic device, 36 luxury watches and bags, and issued prohibition of disposal orders for four properties and three vehicles with an estimated value of more than S$29 million, as well as multiple bottles of liquor and wine. The Police also froze two related bank accounts with a total balance of more than S$1.18 million and other foreign currencies. The man will be charged with one count of using a forged document under Section 471 punishable under Section 465 of the Penal Code. One other person is assisting with investigations.

c) A 44-year-old male PRC national and a 43-year-old female PRC national were arrested at their residence at a bungalow along Pearl Island at Sentosa Cove. The man was also found in possession of a foreign passport believed to be issued by St Kitts and Nevis and the woman was found with other foreign passports believed to be issued by the Dominican Republic and Turkey. The Police seized cash of more than S$7.6 million and other foreign currencies, and issued prohibition of disposal orders for nine properties and five vehicles with an estimated value of more than S$106 million. The Police also froze a related bank account with a total balance of more than S$22 million and other foreign currencies. The man and woman will each be charged with one count of forgery for the purpose of cheating under Section 468 of the Penal Code.

d) A 41-year-old male Cambodian national was arrested at his residence at a GCB along Nassim Road. He was also found in possession of a foreign passport believed to be issued by PRC. The Police seized cash of more than S$777,000 and other foreign currencies, 11 electronic devices, 33 luxury bags and watches, 75 pieces of jewelleries, and issued prohibition of disposal orders for seven properties and six vehicles with an estimated value of more than S$76 million. The Police also froze three related bank accounts with a total balance of more than S$2.4 million. The man will be charged with one count of using a forged document under Section 471 punishable under Section 465 of the Penal Code. One other person is assisting with investigations.

e) A 35-year-old male Ni-Vanuatu national was arrested at his residence at a GCB along Third Avenue. He was also found in possession of a foreign passport believed to be issued by PRC. The Police seized more than S$1.4 million in cash and other foreign currencies, 95 pieces of jewelleries, 69 luxury bags and watches, 22 electronic devices, two gold bars, and issued prohibition of disposal orders for 13 properties and four vehicles with an estimated value of more than S$120 million. The Police also froze six related bank accounts with a total balance of more than S$20 million and other foreign currencies. The man will be charged with one count of money laundering under Section 54(1)(c) punishable under Section 54(5)(a) of the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act (CDSA). One other person is assisting with investigations.

f) A 33-year-old male Cambodian national was arrested at his residence at a condominium along Leonie Hill Road. He was also found in possession of other foreign passports believed to be issued by PRC and the Dominican Republic. The Police seized cash of close to S$600,000 and other foreign currencies, 23 pieces of jewelleries, six luxury watches, 11 documents with information on virtual assets, and 12 electronic devices, and issued prohibition of disposal orders for one property and three vehicles with an estimated value of more than S$12.6 million. The Police also froze two related bank accounts with a total balance of more than S$28,000 and other foreign currencies. The man will be charged with one count of money laundering under Section 54(1)(c) punishable under Section 54(5)(a) of the CDSA. One other person is assisting with investigations.

g) A 34-year-old male Cypriot national was arrested at his residence at a condominium along Paterson Hill. He was also found in possession of other foreign passports believed to be issued by PRC and Cambodia. The Police seized cash of more than S$2.2 million, 11 electronic devices, 35 luxury watches and bags, 51 pieces of jewelleries, and issued prohibition of disposal orders for one property and two vehicles with an estimated value of more than S$23 million. The Police also froze five related bank accounts with a total balance of more than S$1.7 million and other foreign currencies. The man will be charged with one count of money laundering under Section 54(1)(c) punishable under Section 54(5)(a) of the CDSA. One other person is assisting with investigations.

h) A 31-year-old male PRC national was arrested at his residence at a condominium along Tomlinson Road. He was also found in possession of a foreign passport believed to be issued by Vanuatu. The Police seized cash of close to S$112,000 and other foreign currencies and three electronic devices, and issued probation of disposal order for one vehicle with an estimated value of more than $300,000. The man will be charged with money laundering under Section 54(1)(c) punishable under Section 54(5)(a) of the CDSA. One other person is assisting with investigations.

i) A 31-year-old male Cambodian national was arrested at his residence at a GCB along Lewis Road. He was also found in possession of a foreign passport believed to be issued by PRC. The Police seized cash of more than S$600,000 and other foreign currencies, 11 electronic devices, 16 luxury bags and watches, 11 pieces of jewelleries, and issued prohibition of disposal orders for two vehicles with an estimated value of more than S$580,000, as well as multiple bottles of liquor and wine. The Police also froze eight related bank accounts with a total balance of more than S$10 million and other foreign currencies. The man will be charged with one count of money laundering under Section 54(1)(c) punishable under Section 54(5)(a) of the CDSA. One other person is assisting with investigations.

j) Four other persons are assisting with Police investigations. The Police seized cash of more than S$6.7 million and other foreign currencies, 60 luxury bags and watches, more than 20 pieces of jewelleries, more than 50 electronic devices and issued prohibition of disposal orders for 29 properties and 15 vehicles with an estimated value of more than S$227 million. The Police also froze one bank account with a total balance of more than S$2.8 million.

k) Eight other persons are currently wanted by the Police.

Police investigations are ongoing. More assets may be seized, bank accounts frozen, or prohibition of disposal orders issued, in the course of investigation.

If convicted, the offence of money laundering for individuals under Section 54 of the CDSA 1992 is punishable with imprisonment for up to 10 years, or a fine of up to $500,000, or both. The offence of forgery for the purpose of cheating under Section 468 of the Penal Code 1871 is punishable with imprisonment of up to 10 years and the offender shall also be liable to a fine.

The offence of using a forged document under Section 471 punishable under Section 465 of the Penal Code is punishable with imprisonment of up to four years, or fine, or both. The offence of resistance to lawful apprehension under Section 225B of the Penal Code is punishable with imprisonment of up to one year, or fine, or both.

DRUNKARD HUSBAND DRINK UNTIL NO MONEY, NEED WIFE BUY FOOD FOR HIM

0

My husband of 4 years and I work at the same place and get basically the same paycheck ($4k plus). He has a lot more bills than I do because of fines he has to pay monthly and his car insurance is extremely high. So usually I have like $900 after paying my bills and he has like maybe $240ish after all of his half and his other bills.

Just to break it down- we go halves on ALL household stuff- including grocery. But his car and fines is 100% his responsibility and my car is 100% mine.

So on Friday, we pay all of our bills per usual and his buddy asks to go hang out with him. I’ve seen this before and forewarned him ahead of time that he needs to be cautious on spending because I wasn’t covering things when he runs out of money (the last couple of times he went out with buddies he dropped like $140 for food and drinks and I ended up having to pay for his petrol for the next week and he does this at least once a month, sometimes twice).

He said that his buddy was covering dinner and paying for petrol because he was driving a bit over an hour to get him so it wasn’t an issue. Alright, no problem.

Well, he gets home on Saturday morning around maybe 4ish via taxi and tells me he was too drunk. And then he tells me that he spent $80 at the bar and that the food cost him almost $60 and his friend never gave him money because he “forgot”.
So $140 not including the petrol cost.

I went with him to get his car later, wasting $30 on a taxi. At this point, he only has $40 left. Which he used for petrol for work. Well, he ended up asking me to get him food for lunch (we have food at the house but he “doesnt like bringing that stuff” because it’s “not an easy meal”.

So he wanted me to buy snacks and sandwich stuff as well as buy him body wash and toothpaste because he ran out. It would be one thing if this man had cheaper taste but he doesn’t. He is materialistic.

So the body wash he gets is almost $18, the toothpaste he gets is almost $15 and his sandwiches consists of easily 8 pieces of meat (top of the line ham and roast beef) and two pieces of cheese per sandwich. So collectively this would have cost me nearly $60 and once again wouldn’t have any money left over for myself.

I wanted to get my hair done for my sister’s wedding next weekend and I wouldn’t have the money for it if I did this for him AGAIN. So I told him no. I warned him beforehand and he still went out and spent a ton of money. He says I’m stingy because he “would do this for me”.

Which is up for debate because who knows if he actually would- as I’ve ALWAYS been good with money and never needed his help so who knows.

GUY NEVER INTERACT WITH GIRLS BEFORE, GIVEN UP ON FINDING A GF

0

A guy shared how he was in an all boys school all his life and never had the opportunity to meet girls and now he has given up on finding a girlfriend.

Here is the story:

“I was in an all boys school all my life. So obviously never had the opportunity to meet girls. Then come to poly, I was still relatively looking the same as I was before (nerdy looking, overweight) so girls never showed interest anyway, I’ve had 3 friends who are girls who all shared the same sentiments that women in general don’t go for nice guys, but more of the opposite.

Since poly till now, I have changed. Look different. Dress different. Lost weight. Put myself out there on online dating apps, and literally nothing. Lack of matches. The matches I get, either don’t respond or they’re looking to get their egos boosted.

I keep reading all this stuff about other guys going on dates with women, and how they’re expected to pay for everything, or how men are supposed to pick up hints from women *if* they are interested. I just find that so childish that men are expected to pay for everything in a day and age that ‘people vouch for gender equality.’

Anyways, all my classes are online. Which means I still haven’t socialised / interacted with women.

I’ve completely given up. It’s just never enough as a man. You can be the best version of yourself, and you’ll still struggle. It’s not worth the trouble and stress.”

GUY LIVED WITH MOTHER IN HAUNTED HOME, EVIL SPIRIT PRETENDED TO BE HIS DOG

0

A netizen recounted a story about how he lived with his mother and experienced paranormal activity, with an evil spirit pretending to be his dog.

Here is the story:

“My mother attracted evil.

After my parents divorced when I was a teenager, I lived with my mother. I experienced lots of paranormal happenings.

Several times when I was reading in my bed, the room would start to feel really “icy.” Next, it would feel as if something/somebody that hated me was staring at me.

When I got that feeling, I would leave the room and come back an hour later. Sometimes during the day, I would see a shadow figure sneaking along my bedroom walls.

Something in the flat was pretending to be my dog. I went into my room and heard a deep growl from under the bed.

My dog wasn’t capable of making a noise that deep. It sounded like either a really big dog or a man doing his best dog impersonation.

Other times, my dog would whimper and pace in the room next to mine but wouldn’t come when called, as if he was afraid of something in the hallway.

When I moved in with my father, the paranormal activity stopped.”

Editor’s note: So is your mother still living there with the evil spirit?

SICK MOTHER ASKED SON FOR MONEY FOR THE FIRST TIME, BUT HE DOESN’T WANT TO GIVE HER

0

A netizen shared how his parents always beat him when he was growing up. But recently, his mother asked him for money for the first time and he was reluctant to give it to her.

Here is the story:

“My parents used to hit me a lot.

If I did something wrong, if they are angry about something or someone, … they hit me. Sometimes, I woke up and already get yelled at, I don’t even know why. If my mom hit me in the afternoon because I did something wrong, by the time my dad was home around 6~7pm, she told him what I did, and he too will hit me. There are countless times when I sit in a table with them for dinner in tears while they continue to yell at me, I didn’t even dare to pick up the spoon to eat anything, I just sit there and cry.

They hit me with everything they can grab, broomstick, belt, plastic chair, comb, … even a pan. They hit me in the face, hands, legs, … everywhere I can’t cover. There are even times my mother strips me of all my clothing and pushes my head in a big barrel of water. I still have nightmares until this day, I’m 28 now.

My mom used to say she will never need a single cent from me, she will never count on me for anything, and how much of a disappointment I am. Even as a kid, I always want to run away, but I can’t, I didn’t have money or anything.

I hate them to the bone. I used to swear to myself that I will never give them back anything.

For the past 10 years, I make my own money, and buy everything I want but never had as a kid. My parents also change since I make my own money, and they don’t have anything to control me anymore.

A week ago, my mother was sick and have to stay in the hospital for 2 days. They call me and told me that they need money. It was the first time my parents ask me for money. I have the money, I just don’t know should I do it or not. My girlfriend told me that I should because after all, they are my parents. After a lot of back and forth in my head for a while, I send them the money, but deep down in my heart, I don’t want to.

I don’t know what I did was right or wrong, I don’t know how I feel now. I wish they just said they love me just once, things would have been different now.

If you have kids or someone you love, please don’t hurt them, tell them how much you love them every day.”

Editor’s note: At the end of the day, she’s still your mother isn’t she?

WOMAN WANTS TO GO TO WORK WHEN HER FAMILY TESTED POSITIVE FOR COVID

0

A netizen shared how her mother’s colleague intends to go to work despite her family testing positive for covid.

Here is the story

The colleague claims that she keeps getting negative results on her ART, but she’s already unwell and in close contact with the rest of her family who’s Covid+. :—/

This colleague sits right behind my mum. I know it’s a matter of sooner or later but I’m still worried for my mum who has numerous health issues.

Does anyone know if there’s any way to stop this colleague from going to work? Or to report her for going to work despite being unwell and showing symptoms?

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!

For reference, my mum and her colleague work in a childcare center but they don’t really handle children there.

Netizens’ comments

  • There’s nothing to report as she is not violating any government issued protocols.

Your mum should inform the school principal.

  • Who do you plan to report to though?

Are you able to prove that the ART self test she did are fake?

Your best bet is to force that colleague to go see a Dr and get a healthcare-administered ART and MC

  • falls under protocol 3, nothing wrong so long as she did her ART prior to leaving home.

HOMELESS FRIEND CAME TO STAY KPKB THAT HOMEOWNER HAVING “FUN TIME” WITH WIFE

0

My wife is my best friend, we game together, we hike together, we play dnd with our friends once a week together and we’re expecting our first kid soon, overall I’m over the moon. Obviously, though, we spend a lot of time together so I guess I could see how maybe my perspective is skewed on what’s “appropriate” so I’m posting here.

A few months ago one of our mutual friends fell on hard times. His long term partner kicked him out, he’s been laid off almost a year at this point etc., he asked if he could stay in our guest room for a few weeks, wife and I agreed. A few weeks turned into a few months, no big deal but we are getting a bit antsy to have our space back. We told him he needs to be out in two months though because we’d like a little “baby moon” before our child gets here.

Since my wife and I got together we’ve been a daily intimate kind of couple, also through pregnancy.

Well, last night our friend tripped the shut off in his bathroom (it has one of those moisture shutoff things, you don’t need to reset the breaker but reset on the plug) and came up to ask us how to get the lights back on. I guess he was right outside our door and listening to see if we were still awake and heard us.

This morning he “sat us down” and said he was really uncomfortable to know we were doing that while he’s in the house. I pointed out to him that some days he doesn’t leave the house at all (most days if we are being honest) so it’s kind of inevitable, his room is right across. He then said for the next two months he will go for a walk once a week so “we can if we must” I told him that wouldn’t work because it’s a daily thing.

He then got very upset and demanded to know if it was true we’d done this everyday for the three months he’s been living here and said with my wife’s “condition” he wouldn’t have expected that. He then went on to say we are both perverted for doing that while he is here and that we violated his consent. I told him to find a new place to stay then.

He told some people about the exchange and while most people have said he’s being childish others have also said me kicking him out 2 months earlier than we last said over it is extreme.