A netizen shared how he has a stable girlfriend and that they are planning for their future together, such as applying for a BTO flat and wedding.
But then he revealed that he cheated on her with another guy that he met from a camp, he slept with him and is still keeping in touch with him.
Here is the story
“I knew this guy from a camp last year, but only started chatting more recently. He is stocky and has a charismatic smile.
Last week, we chatted in my room till midnight. Suddenly, we looked into each other’s eyes and kissed. The passionate kisses led us to s-x, eventually. I can’t stop thinking of him ever since that day.
We are still in touch daily and our conversation has escalated to another level.
However, I am attached with a stable girlfriend who has started working. We are planning for our future together, such as applying for BTO and wedding.
As much as I want to marry my girlfriend and have a family together, I don’t want to lose my friendship with the guy.
It is selfish but I hope my girlfriend can accept him unknowingly as one of my closest friends from uni.”
IRAS said in a press release on 1 December that the annual values of HDB flats will be revised upwards by 4 to 6 percent starting on 1 January 2022.
This will see most people who are living in three-room flats, as well as those living in bigger units, paying a higher property tax.
The revision in the annual value of HDB flats will be in line with the increase in market rentals and is part of IRAS’ annual review of properties to determine the amount of tax payable.
65 percent of three-room flat owners will pay an additional property tax of between $8.80 to $14.40 per year.
Owners living in 4-5 room and executive flats will pay between an additional $21.60 to $26.40 annually.
The annual value of HDB flats were last revised in 2017, and IRAS said that with the rising market rents of HDB flats this year, the annual values will need to be revised upwards.
Property owners who face financial difficulties can approach IRAS for help in coming up with a suitable payment plan before 31 January.
A video emerged online showing a motorcyclist falling off his motorcycle at a traffic junction during a red light.
The rider was seen waiting at a traffic light at the road junction when he inexplicably lost balance and fell off his motorcycle.
The bike also collapsed onto the ground, with the contents of the motorcycle’s box spilling out onto the road, as the rider remained lying on the ground.
The motorcyclist then sat himself up and remained seated on the road in a daze.
The kind camcar driver then alighted from his car and went to the aid of the stricken rider, helping him to lift his motorcycle back up (which by the way is very heavy).
They then put his things back into his motorcycle box before the driver went back into his car.
A man who travelled from Malaysia into Singapore via the land VTL tested positive upon his arrival on 30 November, according to Shin Min Daily News.
According to a witness, there was a commotion at the waiting area when everyone was waiting for their Covid-19 test results after arriving in Singapore.
The bus reached Singapore at around 8.15pm in the evening after departing from the Larkin Sentral Bus Terminal in Johor Bahru.
Told to isolate himself
She said that one of the workers was panicking and yelling at the medical personnel, and a male traveller was instructed to segregate himself from the others.
The medical personnel then told her that the man had tested positive for the coronavirus.
The man was believed to have been travelling by himself and was not believed to have interacted and mingled with the other passengers.
According to a Police media releaase, 7 men between the ages of 37 and 53 were arrested, and 45 others are under investigations for illegal gambling activities.
The Police conducted an island-wide operation in Singapore which includes Marsiling Road, Norris Road, Bendemeer Road, Beach Road, Sago Lane, New Market Street, and King George’s Avenue.
Cash, mobile phones, and gambling paraphernalia were seized amount each of the locations.
Penalties
Under Section 7 of the Common Gaming Houses Act, the offence of gaming in a common gaming house carries a fine of up to $5,000, a jail term of up to six months, or both. The offence of being the owner or occupier or of which he/she has the use temporarily or otherwise thereof keeps or uses a place as a common gaming house under Section 4(1)(a) of the Common Gaming Houses Act carries a fine of not less than $5,000 and not more than $50,000, and a jail term of up to three years.
Under the Remote Gambling Act, any person involved in unlawful remote gambling shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $5,000, imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or both. Any person involved in providing unlawful remote gambling service for another shall be liable on conviction to a fine not less than $20,000 and not more than $200,000, or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years or to both.
We have our fair share of relationships but some are just unhealthy.
A man shared his story online after he was told by his new girlfriend to pay for everything.
Here is the story:
Just got into a somewhat new relationship we just planned some travel plans. Not trying to be cheap, but in previous relationships any holiday trips overseas with my exs we pay our own airplane tixs but of course when it comes to hotels and dining I will gladly cover it. (married then different story lah i feel.
if married i got no prob paying :/) This gal however expected me to pay her full travel expense. I am not poor that after paying for it will make it a life-changing decision or something, neither am i rich that i like throw money out of the window and don’t bat an eyelid.
Not that i don’t “treasure” her, nor want to have the whole dumb “fair payment scheme” but i don’t get the whole self entitlement when she makes just as much as i do.
Just wondering through this conf poll what do you guys do in your relationships?
What do you guys think?
Is it time for him to start looking for someone new or should he just tell the girl straight to the face?
Sometimes finding a perfect partner is more difficult than it seems. Everyone has different values and some are just overboard.
A 3-year-old girl was recently attacked by a Serangoon resident’s pet peacock, resulting in the child suffering severe injuries to her face that required stitches.
The incident happened on 28 November near Tavistock Park at Serangoon Gardens.
The mother of the 3-year-old girl, Kris Chan, shared the incident on her Facebook, as she recounted how the pet peacock charged out of the house and attacked her little girl.
Here is her Facebook post in full:
“Some of you would’ve seen my IG/FB stories a few days ago and known of the tragic incident that happened to our little girl last Sunday. Many thanks to all who reached out to us and expressed your concern.
Sorry, we’ve not been able to respond to each and every query as it’s been a trying and tiring few days for us.
Below are more details and follow-up of what happened. Appreciate it if anyone can help us with the relevant legal advice and what we can do to get due justice.
Peacock charged out of house and attacked girl
28.11.2021
Hubby brought our 2 kids to Haus Park Playground and was walking back via Tavistock Ave. There’s a house at the junction near Tavistock park with a peacock and other poultry as pets. Kids will always stop and take a look.
That day was no different. The gate was wide open and the peacock was inside. Our girl stood outside the gate and looked in.
Suddenly the peacock charged out and attacked her aggressively. My husband rushed to protect her but it was too late and he was also attacked by the peacock resulting in scratches all over his arms as well as scrapes on his hands and legs from the tussle.
We rushed to the hospital and were told the wound is too deep. My 3yo little girl needed to be put under general anesthesia in order to open up the wound for cleaning and stitching.
The stitched area is more than 3cm long. On a 3yo little girl’s face. It was a traumatic and upsetting night for all of us.
30.11.2021
After being discharged and resting yesterday, my husband went in the morning to the house to look for the owners of the peacock. Only the wife was there and she admitted to knowing about the incident.
She took our number and said her husband will call back. We waited until 7 pm and still no calls so my husband again went to the house only to find them all in.
Says little girl provoked peacock
This is what we took away from the talk:
* They say their CCTV shows my husband and the kids stopping outside their gate looking in
* They say they’ve consulted lawyers and AVS and all agreed it’s NOT THEIR FAULT as the peacock is free to roam around within their compounds and my girl was staring at the peacock thus provoking it.
* No apology from them at all as it appears they do not think they need to take any responsibility.
* They’ll decide how much to compensate us after the bill comes if any at all.
My questions now are:
* The attack happened OUTSIDE the gate, not within his compounds. At no point did they go inside the gate. The peacock charged OUT, how is that not their fault?
* Are they saying looking is an offense and that my girl being attacked is her fault? She was just standing there looking and not doing anything else.
Wild Animals and Birds Act
* My understanding is under the Wild Animals & Birds Act, “owners must ensure that the peacock is kept within a bird-proof cage or enclosure with a fine wire mesh netting to prevent it from contacting any bird, poultry or animal outside the enclosure”. This was obviously not the case as the peacock was roaming freely. I’m sure many Serangoon Gardens residents who passed that area near Tavistock park/ drove past the exit to AMK Ave 3 will be able to attest to this fact in the past. So what’s this about his claim that AVS saying he’s at no fault?
* What does it mean he’ll decide how much to compensate? Do we get to decide how much we pay the doctors? Do we get to decide how bad my daughter’s scar will be?
* He said he has CCTV recording of the incident from both his place and his neighbor’s. When we asked for a copy of the recordings, he said he needs to “consult his lawyers”. And when we asked again via WhatsApp the next day he said he’ll only give next week when face to face. If he’s so sure he’s not at fault why the reluctance?
* My husband tried to record the convo discreetly so he can have a record of what was said and to show me later but the owner saw and got very agitated and defensive and insisted he deletes with mention of lawyers yet again.
We’re the victims here and we’ve not even begun to talk of lawyers with him but he’s the one that seems to keep insinuating he has a whole legal team behind him? Is he trying to intimidate us into silence?
If he doesn’t have a guilty conscience is that even necessary?
This happened to our beautiful little girl and we’re merely looking for a sincere apology, reasonable compensation, and proper closure to this traumatic incident.
That doesn’t seem too much to ask, is it? Our original intention was for an amicable settlement as we’ve no wish to drag out this painful incident unnecessarily.
But faced with such irresponsible attitudes and unfair claims, we feel proper justice is due to our little girl and to us.
Police report made
We’ve made a police report but were told that this is not a criminal offense and it falls under the purview of AVS.
Apparently, if it’s a dog that bit someone it’s a criminal offense but not when the perpetrator is a bird???
I fail to understand the logic but that’s supposedly the law in Singapore. We’re still waiting for AVS to give us a call.
Photos below of the aftermath of the incident and what it’s done to our little girl.
I’ve set the post to public so please feel free to help and share it with whoever can help us. Thanks.”
Facebook: Kris Chan
Disclaimer: The views presented in this article contain numerous allegations and do not represent the views of Singapore Uncensored, reader discretion is advised.
Huang Jian, a 52-year-old Singaporean woman, was charged with under-declaring her rental income from 3 properties and obstructing the tax authorities from carrying out their investigative duties.
She was also charged with providing incorrect information in a bid to reduce the tax that she had to pay.
She was then ordered to pay fines and penalties of $13,960 for her offences, as well as other offences.
Convicted of 4 charges
Huang was convicted of omitting rental income from her income tax returns without a reasonable excuse, where she was fined $4,500 and a penalty of $5,700.
She was also convicted of providing incorrect information to the controller of income tax without reasonable excuse, under the Income Tax act – she submitted an incorrect bank statement in an attempt to support her claim for mortgage loan interest deduction to reduce her taxes.
She was subsequently fined $1,500 and a penalty of $1,459.
She was also convicted of constructing IRAS officers from their duties and fined $800 under the Income Tax Act.
What happened?
$55,965 worth of rental income were omitted by Huang in her Income Tax returns for the Years of Assessment from 2009 and 2012 – meaning she evaded $2,850 in taxes from more than 10 years ago.
Huang was uncooperative with the IRAS officers, who served an in-person notice to her, requesting her tax information in September 2016.
She locked herself in her bedroom and refused to comply, before throwing the documents out of her window.
