28.9 C
Singapore
Saturday, July 25, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 4212

GIRL SIGNED $170+ STARHUB LINE FOR CHEAPER IPHONE, THEN CAN’T AFFORD THE BILLS

0

A netizen shared how she signed up for the most expensive Starhub mobile plan in order to buy the iPhone Pro Max 13 at a cheaper price, and she ended up not being able to afford the bill for it and has to ask her mother for money to pay it.

Here is what she said

For context, I am a 19-year-old girl still studying in Poly, and I’m working part time as a F&B server on the weekends, earning about $8/hr.

Ever since I was in secondary school, I have been using the Samsung Galaxy S6 that my mother bought for me under a cheaper plan with Starhub, for about $50/month which my mum pays for, using it until I started Poly.

I told her one day that I want to get a new phone after my Starhub contact expired, and wanted the Iphone 13 Pro Max.

But it was really expensive, the phone was $989 for a Starhub plan with 30GB, and monthly bill of $65, which was slightly more than my expired plan.

The other option was a Starhub plan that costs $55 per month for 15 GB, which is about the same as my old plan, but the phone could cost $1369.

My mum refused to get it for me and said that she didn’t have the money to spend like that, so I told her to transfer ownership of the plan to my name and I would sign up for the Starhub line myself.

I told her that I will pay for the phone and the Starhub bill myself since I’m working part time on the weekends and have some money.

She said okay, and I then signed up for the 120gb per month Starhub plan at $155 per month (with another $18 in add ons), and used my savings to buy the phone at $209.

I was so happy with my purchase.

However, the first two months I couldn’t afford to pay the bill and had to ask my mum for help. I make about $400++ from my part time job and after minusing my daily expenses for food and etc at school, I simply don’t have enough to pay for the bill.

I am starting to regret my decision, but my Starhub contract runs for 22 more months and I can’t terminate it without paying the penalty fee.

I don’t know what to do now, my mum is really stressed out with the extra financial burden that I am laying on her, please someone gimme advice.

MAN SAYS CANNOT GET LOAN, RENTING A HDB SEEMS LIKE A MORE VIABLE OPTION

0

Many people will think that with CPF it is better to buy than to rent. But for self-employed and single people, it is a totally different story.

It is more difficult to secure a loan with a bank for individuals who are buying an HDB as a self-employed person compared to an employed person.

I went to a bank with my income tax report stating that I am earning over 6 figures for continuously 3 years but the bank is only willing to loan me $70,000 to buy a 4-room flat. My friend who is making $2.5k a month manage to secure a loan of over $250,000 from the bank and I find it ridiculous.

I did the math and figured I could buy something small, and live without much reno. Money is tight, but I can pay my bills on time.

Previously, I rented overseas and feel like it’s a waste of money if you can afford the downpayment to buy and have financial stability – a month’s rent is almost a month’s mortgage. It’s also much harder to save up the downpayment if such a big chunk of change is going to rent.

I also have a very high need to control my living space because of my background so renting didn’t give me the sense of security I needed.

That being said, even the cheapest 3-4 rooms at non-matured estates go for almost half a million easy.

If you dunno where you want to stay or whether you’ll get married or be ok moving back in with your family then renting may be the better option since it’s much more flexible, and won’t wipe out your savings.

It seems like renting a HDB is a more viable option for now.

MAN PAID $1.7K FOR INVESTMENT COURSE BY “FAMOUS EXPERT”, LEARNED NOTHING & LOST $12K

0

A netizen shared how he paid about $1.7k for an investment course by a “famous investment coach” in Singapore, where he learned nothing.

He shared that almost everything that the coach taught him at the investment course could be found on YouTube for free, and he also lost about $12k in Forex trading.

Here is what he said

“Throughout my 2 years in NS, I managed to save about $10k to $12k by the time I ORDed, and wanted to grow that money through investments.

I knew nothing about investments at the time, and the only thing I knew was *name redacted*, a famous investment expert in Singapore, I’m sure you have heard of him.

So I paid about $1.7k to attend one of his investment courses, where there was a free 3.5 hour seminar about the basics of forex trading and investments in general.

He then later invited us to the “advanced classes” of his investment course that ran for about 4 days, and he said there was a “one time promotional fee” of $1.7k, and that the usual fee was $2k.

And to be honest, personally, I feel like I learned nothing throughout the whole 4 days of the investment course. Half the time he appeared to be talking to himself. Anyway, I later went online and found the same things that he was teaching, was availalable for free on YouTube.

Everything that he taught in the investment course could be found on YouTube, and I could’ve saved that $1.7k…

Anyway long story short, I lose the whole of my NS savings through Forex trading, and I do have some other money in Crypto, but they are in the red now, so my losses could be even worse.”

MAN SAYS ONLINE GURUS OFFERING “INVESTMENT COURSES” ARE ALL SCUM/SCAM

0

Instagram ‘traders’ who sell ‘ investment courses’ are the scum of the Earth.

Seriously. These people don’t even make money from trading options, they make money by selling courses and the occasional photoshop screenshot. I’m talking about people like A Investments.

Complete scams and snake oil salesmen. They sell a ‘dream’ by posting pictures of luxury items, exotic cars and travelling that they achieved by trading options when really they achieved that by suckering hundreds if not thousands of people or more.

If these guys could consistently net money from day trading options, they would have their own hedge fund or manage 9-10 figure portfolios instead of selling discord group chats or investment courses for $9.99.

The classic idea of not making money by digging for gold but by selling the shovel to the gold digger.

It’s disgusting – it’s one thing wanting to educate people on responsible finance and investing – it’s another thing teaching people who have ZERO knowledge of financial markets about bull like technical analysis and day trading options.

I’m a firm believer that if you aren’t the type that knows how to conduct your own research outside of your confirmation bias and self-educate at the minimum, you are going to lose money trading options.

All of it. These guys are just setting people up to lose money. I’m blown away these people don’t get knocked out of business with lawsuits. Is it really as simple as just saying “not financial advice”?

So, what are your takes on these new Instagram/YouTube ‘investors’? There are very few guys I think are actually good – such as MeetKevin and he doesn’t even really do anything other than voice his opinion on the markets and news for the day.

TAXI DRIVER FIRED AFTER DELIBERATELY DROPPING PREGNANT WOMAN AT WRONG LOCATION

0

A pregnant woman who travelled via a ComfortDelGro cab with her two children ended up at the wrong location after a Taxi driver deliberately dropped them at the wrong place and showed them attitude.

The woman’s husband booked a taxi for his wife to Yishun but the taxi driver dropped them off at Toa Payoh after an argument.

Following the story that went viral, ComfortDelgro has responded to the complaint against their Taxi driver and has fired the taxi driver.

Background:

At 9.54pm, I booked a cab for my wife and 2 kids who were at Marsiling to come back home to Yishun using the Comfort Delgro app. A few minutes later, the cab driver, LIM CHYE BENG, called to inform that he has reached the location.

When my wife and kids were walking towards the cab, he lighted his cigarette and told to wait inside the cab while waiting for him to finish smoking. It took him more than 5 minutes to finish smoking before he started driving.

Go via long route

Since it’s not a fixed fare, my wife instructed the driver her preferred route (BKE – SLE – Mandai). However, he suggested via CTE, but my wife declined as it was clearly out of the way. The driver then continued to drive. In the car, my wife was busy handling two sleepy toddlers without being aware of the journey. When the driver reached the expressway, the driver drove passed SLE going towards PIE.

Feeling something was off, my wife checked the map and told the driver “Uncle, I say Yishun. Why you want to go towards Toa Payoh?”. The driver was defensive and lied saying “No, in front there is Mandai” when it was clearly heading towards Lornie Rd/Braddell.

Deliberately drops her off at wrong destination

He then asked my wife “Usually how much you travel from Marsiling to Yishun?”. After my wife said it’s less than $20, he started to get angsty and showed attitude. To my wife’s horror, the driver said “Like that I drop you off at Toa Payoh. You go take another cab, I don’t want to drive you! I wanna go back home I stay at Toa Payoh. You are wasting my time and petrol”.

Being heavily pregnant, my wife began to have panic attacks and have series of shortness of breath. So she called me and I told her to put on speaker for me to talk to the driver. When on speaker, I ordered the driver to send my wife and kids back to Yishun but the driver just refused to do so.

Without any sympathy, the driver just alighted my wife and kids at Toa Payoh and refused to send back to Yishun despite him being in the wrong and knowing that my pregnant wife were with 2 sleepy toddlers. After my wife and kids alighted the cab, it took her awhile to accept what was really happening. She was in shocked and emotionally distressed. It took her awhile before she called the customer service line to lodge a complaint.

The customer service officer asked what happened as she typed the the whole thing. When my wife paused to take a breath, the officer budge in and asked why didn’t she take the offer for $20. She said “Since the driver offered you $20, why are you still crying?”. My wife replied that she has not fully tell the whole situation. Only after my wife explained the whole thing, the the officer started to acknowledge my wife’s traumatic experience.

This is utterly disgusting and resulted in a traumatic experience especially for my wife and kids. Not only the driver was rude, he was inhumane to drop at a place that was far from the actual destination despite knowing that my pregnant wife was with 2 toddlers who were crying from this whole situation. What kind of human does that?! In addition, poor service from Comfort DelGro.

Now my wife have trouble sleeping, have series of panic attack and shortness of breath. Who is gonna be responsible for all this?? I want a full refund and an explanation to this with a follow up action on the driver!!!

MAN ALLEGEDLY ASSAULTED BY LOANSHARKS HARASSERS AT CLARK QUAY, 3 ARRESTED

0

The Police have arrested three men, aged 24 and 43, for their suspected involvement in a case of loanshark harassment causing hurt.

On 19 August 2022 at about 7.05pm, the Police were alerted to a case of loanshark harassment at the vicinity of Clark Quay, where a male victim was allegedly assaulted by three men in relation to a loan he had taken from a loanshark.

Through follow-up investigations and with the aid of images from Police cameras, officers from Tanglin Division and Criminal Investigation Department established the identities of the three men and arrested them on 20 August 2022.

The three men will be charged in court on 22 August 2022. Under the Moneylenders Act 2008, first-time offenders found guilty of loanshark harassment causing hurt shall be punished with imprisonment term of up to five years, a fine between $5,000 and $50,000, and caning of between five and eight strokes.

The Police have zero tolerance towards loanshark harassment activities. Those who deliberately cause annoyance and disruption to public safety and security, will be dealt with severely in accordance with the law.

Members of the public are advised to stay away from loansharks and not to work or assist them in any way. Members of the public can call the Police at ‘999’ or the X-Ah Long Hotline at 1800-924-5664 if they suspect or know of anyone who could be involved in loansharking activities.

3 MEN & 1 WOMAN ARRESTED, PHISHING SCAMS TARGETING BANK CUSTOMERS

0

The Police have arrested three men and a woman, aged between 34 and 46, for their suspected involvement in a series of bank phishing scams targeting bank customers.

In August 2022, the Police received several reports of bank phishing scams targeting bank customers. In this latest variant, the victims received unsolicited SMSes stating that their bank accounts had been suspended temporarily and they were advised to reactivate their accounts by clicking an embedded URL link.

Upon clicking on the link in the SMS received, the victims were directed to a spoofed Internet banking log-in page, where they keyed in their credit card details and One-Time Passwords (OTPs), which were received on their mobile phones.

Victims later realised that they had been scammed when they discovered unauthorised transactions made from their bank accounts.

Between 18 and 19 August 2022, officers from the Police Intelligence Department and Commercial Affairs Department mounted an island-wide operation and arrested three men and one woman suspected to be part of a transnational syndicate perpetrating bank phishing scams in Singapore.

Preliminary investigations revealed that the four persons were allegedly involved in sending mass SMS messages to more than 100 random phone users in Singapore to deceive victims to provide their credit card details via spoofed bank websites. The fraudulently obtained credit card details were then used to make fraudulent purchases. One victim had fallen prey to this scam variant, suffering a total loss of about $940.

These four individuals are believed to be working with overseas syndicate members and were planning to perpetrate more similar phishing scams in Singapore.

The three men and one woman will be charged in Court 4A on 20 August 2022 with the offence of abetment by conspiracy to access a computer with intent to commit an offence under Section 4(3) read with Section 12 of the Computer Misuse Act 1993.

The offence carries a fine not exceeding $50,000, imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years, or both.

52 Y.O INVESTIGATED FOR CHEATING, “PRE-PAYMENT FOR GOLF SETS”

0

Between April and August 2022, the Police received several police reports concerning the failure to deliver goods and services from a business.

The suspect had purportedly told the victims to trade in used golf sets to purchase brand-new golf sets at a discounted price. Pursuant to this agreement, the victims traded in their used golf sets along with pre-payment for brand-new golf sets. Subsequently, the victims did not receive their golf sets.

Through extensive investigations, a 52-year-old man was identified as the suspect and investigations are ongoing against him for the offence of cheating.

Anyone found guilty of Cheating under Section 420 of the Penal Code 1871 may be punishable with an imprisonment term which may extend to 10 years, and a fine.

The Police have zero tolerance towards such criminal acts and will not hesitate to act against those who blatantly disregard the law.

23 Y.O WOMAN ARRESTED FOR LOAN SHARK HARASSMENT AT TAMPINES

0

The Police have arrested a 23-year-old woman for her suspected involvement in a case of loanshark harassment.

On 20 August 2022, the Police were alerted to a case of loanshark harassment along Tampines Avenue 5 where a residential unit was splashed with unknown liquid and a debtor’s note was placed on the floor. Through ground enquiries and with the aid of images from Police cameras, officers from Bedok Police Division established the identity of the woman and arrested her on the same day. One mobile phone was seized as a case exhibit.

The 23-year-old woman will be charged in court on 22 August 2022. Under the Moneylenders Act 2008, first-time offenders found guilty of loanshark harassment shall be punished with imprisonment of up to five years, a fine between $5,000 and $50,000, and caning of up to six strokes.

The Police have zero tolerance against loanshark harassment activities. Those who deliberately cause annoyance and disruption to public safety and security, will be dealt with severely in accordance with the law.

Members of the public are advised to stay away from loansharks and not to work with or assist them in any way. The public can call the Police at ‘999’ or the X-Ah Long hotline at 1800-924-5664 if they suspect or know of anyone who could be involved in loansharking activities.

WOMAN ALIGHTED FROM CAR IN MIDDLE OF ZEBRA CROSSING, POINTS MIDDLE FINGER AT DRIVER BEHIND

A video emerged online showing a woman alighting in the middle of a zebra crossing, outside what appears to be Ang Mo Kio Hub.

The white Toyota that the woman was in, came to a sudden halt right on the zebra crossing, resulting in the car behind stopping as well.

The camcar then honked at the woman for alighting on the zebra crossing, and the irate woman then turned around to stare at the camcar driver.

She was seen gesturing at the camcar driver, before pointing a middle finger.

Netizens comments

  • For those who say it’s just a few seconds, nothing wrong was done and close one eyes. I only hope the traffic police and LTA are as liberal and lenient as you think they are.
    This is what the LTA website has stated.
    You are aware of the following :
    Violation 1: Stopping a vehicle in a manner such that it causes unnecessary obstruction to other road users . Fine: $70
    Violation 2: Stopping a vehicle in a zebra-controlled area Fine: $120
    Anytime I would agree with you but we don’t come up with the rules, the government did.
  • Because of that middle finger pointing, send the video to TP
  • wrong means wrong. What’s up with all these “close 1 eye” and “give and take” comments?
  • Just forward the video recording to LTA and CC a copy to Traffic Police.
  • These are the type of people who can’t be told that they’re doing things wrong.
  • Pls report these ppl who like to use their middle finger! Let the driver go and explain to TP and pay for his/her passenger mistake.