31.1 C
Singapore
Wednesday, July 8, 2026
Ads
Home Blog Page 4046

NETIZEN “BLACKLIST” AIRLINES AS HE WORRIES OF SAFETY STANDARDS

0

Airasia is on my black list. I believe that it’s an airline with low safety standards and poor training.

Aircrash of Air Asia 8501 was caused by incompetency of captain and poor communication between captain and first officer. Their training is very poor on communication when their flight crew comes from all over the world. One pilot was pulling up and the other pilot is pushing down, which cancelled inputs to the plane, as the plane fall from the sky.

They also have quite a few incidents of runway excursions and burst tyres. These are largely attributed to pilot mistakes and poor cockpit resource management. And you see these categories of incidents most common in low end airlines in Africa and former CIS countries.

All Air Asias are the same as the same technical and management services are delivered across the different Air Asias. They are set up in this way for ring-fencing liabilities and assets that help in aircraft financing arrangements and they get different ICAO codes and treated differently from being the same airlines when they fight for airport slots and routes.

The only LCC I like is Jetstar. Their products are higher quality and they have solid engineering team backed by Qantas. They are always on time too.

My dad is a pilot and we do not fly Air Asia for all the reasons you said above. Especially now after years of limited revenue and high cost cutting it’s more risky than before. I have a work trip to a neighbouring country soon and the cheapest fare was Air Asia, I’m topping up the difference to fly Scoot. You can fly many times and nothing goes wrong. You can fly one time and nothing goes right. I fly multiple times a month for work and I’m super particular. Paying a little more for safety and service (when something doesn’t go right) is always worth it for me

COUPLE GOES MIAMI FOR HOLIDAY THEN KENA “KAREN” MANAGERS

0

So my husband rented a beautiful hotel room for us on my birthday in a beach in Miami.

Said room was a large studio and had two tvs so it was obviously designed for guest to also have guest.

Well at 9:30pm on a Sunday night 3 hotel staff (one not even in uniform) came knocking on our door saying that we need to keep it down because our neighbours filed a noise complaint. The hotel was pretty empty and they placed another family next to us which we though was weird but whatever however, we said okay and that our family was leaving.

Then the employee proceeded to go on about how she will call the police. Again, our family was leaving. It became escalated when I asked why she was threatening police presence. I then stepped away from the door and allowed someone else to speak with her. But later, when I asked the manager if the protocol was followed they said no and they don’t need to. The reason I am upset is that we are Asian.

So calling the police unnecessarily could have escalated the situation in a dangerous way. Today I was speaking to the GM of the hotel and I want to know if I’m maybe taking this too far.

I also want to add when we went to the manager and told them that she threatened police presence the employee that came to our room said we were lying then we insisted we weren’t she tried to say she wasn’t comfortable having us stay there that night and that we needed to find somewhere else.

When we asked if the hotel they were moving us to was comparable to that one she said no.

MAN CHARGED $58 FOR 4 PIECES OF DURIAN AT WOODLANDS PASAR PALAM

0

Buying a durian nowadays are not as simple as it seems.

Sometimes there are sellers out there will want to earn a quick buck by charging ridiculous amounts just to ripped off that one customer.

However, thanks to social media many people are aware of such dirty sales tactics. But there are still victims.

A woman recently posted on Facebook after her dad paid $58 for a mere few pieces of durians.

Here is what the netizen said:

My dad bought this at Woodlands Vista Point Pasar Malam durian Stall. 1 KG $38, paid $58 for these. (as per photo below) Really get cheated right? Too much already..

Hope everyone be aware of this durian stall at Vista Point pasar Malam

Here are what netizens think:

  • I buy durian only when it season = cheaper. Most durian seller can’t b trusted & they very bad temper.
  • Durian price is shout by seller and mark up to cover rental and overhead cost . Just like most of the things around us that we buy. Some will feel ok with the price and Some will not. $38 is a marketing click bait pricing to test market then mark up from there. This is how it works.
  • The seller get from supplier also by per kg and it include those that has less flesh. The problem with buying durian is it includes the shell which is more heavy than the flesh itself thus customers will feel shortchange when they get less flesh than they expected. Usually, you have to buy a few to average out the risk.
  • The same thing happen to Jackfruit where at times there is less flesh compare to the skin ratio. For this case, the seller cuts a few jackfruits to average out the losses and the buyer are not short change as the cut fruit is pack with the same weight.

GAIN CITY FAILS TO FULFIL AIRCON INSTALLATION AND CHARGES WOMAN

0

A woman posted a Facebook post stating that she was charged for a product by Gain City that was not fulfilled and even though she informed the staff to cancel the charges, the charges went through.

She then stated that she has to pay for the mistakes of Gain City.

Here is the story:

Gain City YOUR MISTAKE, I PAY.

Ordered a system 1 aircon via your web and was told that unable to install and will proceed for a refund. okay.. It’s ok to cancel order and go ahead with the refund.

BUT TO MY HORROR, payment was still being processed because your internal staff did not communicate! CS / admin side Only received information the moment we made a fuss about the transaction that they couldn’t install the aircon. Opt for 6 months installment, So now i need to pay first then you all will refund at 4-6 weeks time frame?! Is your staff’s mistake right? I need to pay first?

And spoke to one of the staff and was told by him ” oh, purchasing over the internet is like this” So now its internet’s fault? or your staff trying to say that Gain City’s web is such a failure! Just click to buy and pay then that’s it. Or is that how you guys earn money?

No wonder Gain City always delete the bad comments / review, please dig up more guys! they have tons of horrible reviews!!!

Here are what netizens think:

  • I agree. Gain city actually recommended a very bad aircon to my parents. And then now keep servicing non stop
  • Buy from audiohouse instead

HUSBAND SUDDENLY ASKED FOR DIVORCE REASON BEING WIFE IS NOT AMBITIOUS

0

I knew my husband since I was 20 and we were together for 10 years before we got married.

We moved into our BTO straight after we got married and has been staying there for close to 3 years now.

We don’t ever quarrel and nothing seems to be of issue but recently he asked me for a divorce. He said that he is very sian of our current standard of living and cannot stand it that I’m not ambitious enough. He complained about how at our age, some of his friends have already changed multiple cars and upgraded to a condo while he’s still stuck in a four-room flat and squeezing with the morning crowd just to get to work.

I wasn’t offended by his words because I really am not ambitious. I’m very content leading a simple life and don’t see the point of working so hard when honestly I already have enough money to retire if I continue to lead this simple life. What I feel most offended by is when I asked him why he did not raise this issue during our 13 years of relationship, he said it won’t matter because I won’t change and I shouldn’t force myself to change just because of him.

Am I that sort of an unreasonable and uncooperative partner to him? How can he just assume things like that without even asking me about it?

I can feel that he’s very adamant about the divorce and he said that he wouldn’t mind buying over my share of the house so I don’t have to continue paying the mortgage.

I can still stay in the house until I have enough money to move out on my own. If I want to keep the house, then he’ll sell his shares to me and move back to his parent’s place until he finds a new place. I have until the end of the week to think over his proposal and give him a reply.

This news is so sudden that I still have thoughts of it being just a bad dream.

I don’t know if it’s just me in shock that I don’t feel sad about us separating but I am very stunned to the extent that I honestly don’t know what I should be doing right now.

FOOD DELIVERY RIDER CRASHED INTO “GIVE WAY” SIGN @ BEDOK NORTH AVE 3, OUCH

A video emreged online showing a food delivery rider crashing into a “give way” along Bedok North Avenue 3, as he was making a left turn.

He then remained laying under the sign unmoving, as another food delivery rider parked his bike at the side to go and check on the stricken rider.

The incident was captured on the dashcam of another motorist who was in the vicinity at the time.

Here is what the OP said

After dropping someone off & I headed straight back here to see if I can do any help or assist, but that guy went missing already. Leaving a few things behind.

Hope he’s not seriously injured & also not drunk

Netizens’ comments

  1. the sign never give way. wtf
  2. Maybe he set wrong destination on GPS and was just following it blindly
  3. Something might have happened to the rider, maybe unwell or what seeing that the rider didn’t get up at all. Keep your comment to yourself guys. May the rider be ok..
  4. Salute the good Samaritan that got down from his bike to help.

WOMAN GIVING BIRTH, HUSBAND COMPLAINS IT’S “TOO LOUD” & “WHY SO LONG”, KICKED OUT

0

Giving birth was excruciating but his presence made the entire process torturous

Just screaming into the void here. I no longer know the man I married. It’s as if my pregnancy changed him. I had hoped by the time I gave birth he would be back to his old self but he’s gotten worse.

I’ve been home for 4 days and I’ve had maybe 2 hours of sleep each night since. Im so exhausted,dirty and emotionally drained.

He argues with me the entire time. He won’t help me in anyway. He complains and whines about everything. He disturbs me, the midwives and nurses while I was giving birth.

He created so much tension and stress, and for no reason at all. He was angry it took long.

He complained I cried too much and was too loud. It got so bad my doctor had him escorted out. He didn’t pick me up, so I had to get a friend to take me home.

I don’t know why he’s so mean and so angry. He wanted this baby and now it’s as if I and the baby are his enemy.

By the time I was visibly pregnant he just started to be an A hole and just never stopped.

I can’t believe that after 7 years of marriage we are done cause I can’t take this. I won’t. I’ve spoken to my parents and they’ll be coming down to help me.

I can’t stay. I can’t take it anymore. As soon as I can walk I’m going back home with them.

24 Y.O WOMAN RENTED CAR TO BUY VAPE FROM JB TO SELL IN S’PORE, JAILED

0

Seventeen Persons Convicted for Illegal Online Sale of Electronic Vaporisers – Total Fines Amount to Over $114,000, Five Received Jail Sentences

The Health Sciences Authority (HSA) has prosecuted 17 persons for selling electronic vaporisers1 and related components in Singapore. They were convicted in Court between the period of February and August 2022, with total fines amounting to $114,500. Five of the 17 persons received jail sentences ranging from 10 to 26 days (refer to Annex A for the details).

2 The convicted persons were aged between 20 and 39. They had purchased the e-vaporisers and related components from overseas and sold them illegally on various local social media and e-commerce platforms. More than $170,000 worth of e-vaporisers and related components were seized (refer to Annex B for photos).

HIGHLIGHTS OF SOME CASES
Youth offender placed under 12-month probation for repeated offences

3 Yang Jing Tao, aged 21 years, was earlier caught selling e-vaporisers on Carousell in 2018. He was issued with a conditional warning under which he was bound to refrain from any criminal conduct for a period of 24 months.

4 Between August and September 2019, Yang committed fresh offences by importing e-vaporiser components. He was prosecuted and placed under supervised probation of 12 months for his offences.

Offender given the highest fine

5 Chelsea Tan Yan Qi, aged 24 years, was caught selling e-vaporisers and related components on Telegram. Her husband and employee assisted in smuggling the illicit products from Johor Bahru (JB) into Singapore. Investigations revealed that Tan and her accomplices would use a rented car to transport her supplies from JB to Singapore. On a few occasions, the e-vaporiser supplier in JB had also assisted to conceal the illegal products in the door panels of the rented car to evade detection.

6 Tan was sentenced to a total fine of $23,000 for selling and offering for sale e-vaporisers and their related components. As she could not pay the fine, she had to serve 50 days of imprisonment in lieu of the fine. Her accomplices have been dealt with separately.

Partners-in-crime who imported and sold prohibited products

7 Benjamin Neo Song Ya, aged 21 years and Lim Jing Jie, aged 23 years, had imported e-vaporisers and their related components from overseas and sold them on Instagram and Telegram.

8 Investigations revealed that Neo provided Lim with some funds for the purchase and import of the illegal products. After the illegal products had been imported, they were stored at Neo’s residence while they advertised and sold them to potential customers.

9 Neo was sentenced to a fine of $16,000 and three weeks’ imprisonment, while Lim was sentenced to a fine of $3,000 and three weeks and five days’ imprisonment for their offences.

E-VAPORISERS STRICTLY PROHIBITED IN SINGAPORE

10 HSA would like to remind the public that it is an offence under the Tobacco (Control of Advertisements and Sale) Act to sell, possess for sale, import or distribute e-vaporisers and their related components. Any person who is convicted is liable to a fine of up to $10,000, or imprisonment of up to 6 months or both for the first offence, and a fine of up to $20,000 or imprisonment of up to 12 months or both for the second or subsequent offence. In addition, since 1 February 2018, it is also an offence to possess, purchase or use e-vaporisers and their related components. The penalty is a fine of up to $2,000 per offence.

11 From 2018 to 2021, HSA had prosecuted 70 persons for selling e-vaporisers and their related components. The highest fine meted out so far was $99,000 for the illegal sale of these prohibited items. There was also a case where the offender was sentenced to 1 week’s imprisonment and a fine of $61,000 for selling e-vaporisers and their related components.

12 HSA conducts active online surveillance and will continue to take strong enforcement actions against those selling e-vaporisers and related components. We also work closely with the Immigration & Checkpoints Authority to monitor and stop illegal imports of e-vaporisers and related components.

13 The public should also not purchase or bring e-vaporisers and related components into Singapore. From 1 February 2018 to 31 December 2021, 6,842 people were caught and taken to task for the possession and use of e-vaporisers and their related components. Information pertaining to the prohibition of e-vaporisers in Singapore is available on HSA’s website.

14 Members of the public who have information on the illegal import, distribution, sale or offer for sale of e-vaporisers can submit a report conveniently using the online form at go.gov.sg/reporttobaccooffences. Alternatively, they can contact HSA’s Tobacco Regulation Branch at Tel: 6684 2036 or 6684 2037 during office hours (9:00am to 5:30pm, Monday to Friday).

HEALTH SCIENCES AUTHORITY
SINGAPORE
26 SEPTEMBER 2022

Source: HSA

DRUNK UNCLE USED CHOPPER TO THREATEN ACQUAINTANCE @ BUKIT BATOK, ARRESTED

0

A 54-year-old man was arrested on 25 September after brandishing a chopper and threatening another person with his at Bukit Batok, according to 8World News.

The man was allegedly intoxicated at the time, and had gotten into an argument with the victim, before he whipped out his chopper and threatened the victim.

He was later arrested by the police later that evening and the chopper was then seized.

The incident reportedly happened between the 54-year-old man and a purported acquaintance after having some drinks.

The police said that they were alerted about the man possessing a chopper at Bukit Batok Street 31 on 25 September at about 7.40pm.

No injuries were reported from the incident, and the man was arrested when the police arrived, who then seized the chopper as evidence.

He was charged in court earlier today (26 September) for possession of an offensive weapon, and if found guilty, he faces a jail term of up to 3 years and caning of up at least 6 strokes.

21 Y.O ARRESTED FOR $350K CHINA OFFICIALS IMPERSONATION SCAM

0

The Police have arrested a 21-year-old woman for her suspected involvement in a case of China Officials Impersonation Scam (“COIS”).

On 20 September 2022, the Police received a report that another 21-year-old woman (“the victim”) had allegedly been kidnapped. Prior to the report, the parents of the victim, who were based in China, received a video of the victim with her hands and legs tied up, with a ransom demand from an unknown person communicating in Mandarin. Following the report, officers from Tanglin Police Division, Criminal Investigation Department, Police Intelligence Department and Commercial Affairs Department conducted extensive searches and investigations to locate the victim. She was eventually found to be safe and sound on 22 September 2022, in a Yishun flat rented by the 21-year-old woman, who was arrested.

Preliminary investigations revealed that the victim had received an unsolicited call from an officer from the Ministry of Health in Singapore who alleged that a phone line registered in the victim’s name was used to cheat people in China. When the victim denied this, the call was redirected to another scammer purporting to be an officer from the “China Police”, who further alleged that a bank account in her name was also found to be involved in money laundering activities in China. To avoid being deported, the scammer deceived the victim into transferring more than $350,000 as “bail money” to bank accounts provided by the scammer. Acting on the scammer’s instructions, the victim also recorded a video of herself being tied up to assist in the purported investigations. Thereafter, the scammer told the victim to cease communication and isolate herself in a “safe house” that the scammer had arranged.

Unknown to the victim, the scammer sent the compromised video to her parents in China and demanded a ransom for her release. Following the report, the Police managed to trace and locate the victim at the unit rented by the 21-year-old woman. Follow-up investigations revealed that the 21-year-old woman had acted on the scammer’s instructions to rent the room for the victim, and handed over a mobile phone with SIM card for the victim to use to communicate with the scammer. Police investigations are ongoing.

From January 2022 to August 2002, a total of 476 COIS cases were reported with losses amounting to at least $57.3 million. The Police would like to highlight that the China Police, INTERPOL and other overseas law enforcement agencies (LEAs) have no jurisdiction to help with any form of investigations without the approval of the Singapore Government. The Police take a serious view against any person who may be involved in scams, whether knowingly or unwittingly, and they would be dealt with severely in accordance with the law.

The Police would also like to advise members of the public to take the following precautions when they receive unsolicited calls, especially from unknown parties, especially those with the “+” prefix which originate overseas:

  • Ignore such calls and the caller’s instructions. No government agency will instruct payment through a telephone call or other social messaging platforms (WeChat or Facebook), or ask you for personal banking information such as your internet banking password;
  • For foreigners receiving calls from persons claiming to be from Police in your home country, call your Embassy/High Commission to verify the claims of the callers;
  • Refrain from giving out personal information and bank details, whether on websites or to callers over the phone. Personal information and bank details such as internet bank account usernames and passwords, OTP codes from tokens, are useful to criminals.
  • Do not make any funds transfer if the caller is of dubious identity.
  • Call a trusted friend or talk to a relative before you act. You may be overwhelmed by emotion and err in your judgment.
  • If in doubt, always hang up the call and check with the Singapore Police Force.

PUBLIC AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
SINGAPORE POLICE FORCE
24 September 2022 @ 3:10 PM