A dog owner has been updating her Facebook constantly in order to seek details of her missing dog, The dog was last seen in the Choa Chu Kang.
The dog is in need of constant medication, if you have seen the dog please contact the Facebook user.
Sher is giving a $500 reward for the dog.
UPDATE – LAST SEEN ON 3 FEB, 4AM PLUS AT CCK BLK 213]-SHE IS RESTING AT THE BICYCLE AREA
Ac reading engaged
We have searched but couldn’t find her.
1. She is in drain, is a wet drain, have light but did not shine on her. She had a short fall instead of a big fall.
2. From 202 CCK Ave 1 staircase down from level 2, she saw a blue and white wall on the right and make a right turn.
3. Saw carpark, children playing.
4. Saw red brick, bushes, drain, red brick – should be somewhere at the rubbish chute area (we searched 3 around the area but no sight on her).
5. The drain has black ants, cricket sound, car sound.
6. Red pavement (attached below)
7. She said she crossed the road, got cars and she shun.
8. When morning she walks, but she saw people she hides. When communicating with AC, Miffy is lying down. She said the place she is lying down is just nice for her size.
We walked and find all the drains till now still no sight of her. Would like to seek more help to search for her with us.
Valentine day is originally a Roman festival that pairs men and women together by lottery. However, modern society and marketing have changed the festival into forcing men to spend extravagant amounts of money to please a woman.
The traditional festival today is nothing but an expensive dinner and used as a new way for your partner to judge how much you are willing to spend for your significant other. If you fall in the group of thinking valentine day is very important, you are an “animal on a farm” being manipulated and herded around by nothing but marketing.
Many are using Valentine day to show off on Instagram to compare themselves with others. Superficial people indeed.
Here is a story of a girl who has been brought up marketing like a “farm animal”
Hi all! With Valentine’s Day around the corner, what do you think of your boyfriend suggesting to celebrate over dinner at Sushiro (a pretty affordable sushi chain in sg). Would it be considered as a lack of effort in planning as we are both working adults and it’s our first Valentine’s Day celebration in our 3 years of dating…
What should I do?
Here are what netizens think:
Free food also complain. (You don’t like I go la). Also Sushiro is slightly more expensive than other places like sushi express(I think). Maybe to you it is affordable but to him it is considered expensive? Maybe he saving up for his future with you in it? Maybe you can ask him about his rationale when choosing a place to makan for Valentine’s?Not happy say something, discuss and agree on a place you 2 will be satisfied with( if cannot agree, one of you gotta give in to the other)
By posting this it sounds like you are expecting your bf to do more for Valentine’s day. You could ask your other attached female friends and see what they think of it. You could consider what to counter-suggest to have dinner at some other place and see what your bf thinks. What is important is that both of you are agreeable to how you want to celebrate your first Valentine’s day celebration and it is a lovely and pleasant experience for both of you.[But I would say, it is the thought that counts and you should count yourself fortunate that you two are a couple and can celebrate Valentine’s day together after 3 years of dating. But yes, I understand this Valentine’s day is quite a milestone so do as you please.
Valentine Day has become so commercialized now . Any day can be Valentine day as long as there are love between the couple ! At least it is a decent sushi place , have a meal , chatting and thank you each other for the love and companion .Celebration held in posh restaurants doesn’t equal he loves you more too probably only for Ig show off etc
A Facebook user, Wang Yanzhen, shared how she was charged an additional $5 for her Grab ride.
Here is the story:
This is my first time posting here but thought it is important to let more people know of potentially dishonest practice by certain grab drivers as I think a lot of people may not check their charges after completion of the ride.
I chose a fixed fare rate for my grab ride yesterday & upon completion of the ride, I realized that there’s an additional $5 charge which I understand from grab that it’s usually for the following reasons: additional waiting time if the passenger is late, or if there’s additional stop or change in stop.
In my case, we were early for the ride and waited approx more than 10-15 mins for the driver as it seems from the app he hasn’t dropped off the previous passenger when this ride was allocated to him so we shouldn’t be charged for being late.
Also, we didn’t have any additional stops or changes in location.
Upon chatting with the grab help center, I realized that the $5 is pressed by the driver & it will be refunded to me.
However I think that this should be taken note of by all because the small amounts add up, each ride earns the drivers an extra $5 for individuals who don’t check, 10 rides $50, 100 rides $500 and I think this practice should not be tolerated.
It is also a waste of time for passengers to contact the help center to get back the refund albeit small amount.
Unless it was a genuine one-off error in pressing?? (Which I don’t believe if he has been driving grab for some time, he shouldn’t be pressing wrongly??)
I regret giving a 5 stars feedback to him upon the pop up when the ride is completed (as I usually just press 5 stars and submit for all rides if no major issues, but after that, I realized the incorrect extra charge), and the grab app didn’t allow me to change feedback or rating.
Netizens’ comments
In order to be charged $5, it is either being charged for an Urban Kanga Seat for 1-3 year old child, or pax changed destination within 5 km range.
It is not possible for the driver to accidentally input a $5 charge, so this possibility is out.
It is also a bit illogical for the driver to risk getting a one-star rating plus complaint just for $5. Not to mention that the driver will also know that the money can be clawed back if it’s found to be wrongfully added.
This is a case of either a dishonest driver or a dishonest/ignorant passenger.
Some passengers are not aware that they are charged for child seats or extra distance traveled, hence they may blame the driver.
I am just looking at the matter from different perspectives and not giving my judgment of who is right or wrong.
Hopefully, Grab will investigate properly and not treat any side unfairly.
Following a TikToker’s viral video about the mislabeling on a packet of chicken breast that she purchased from NTUC FairPrice, the supermarket has since responded via a Facebook post.
NTUC said in a statement that they are aware of the “labelling discrepancy on a product from one of our stores”, and that “ensuring product integrity which including accurate labelling, is of paramount importance to us”.
Here is their statement in full:
We are aware of a TikTok video showing a labelling discrepancy on a product from one of our stores.
Ensuring product integrity, which includes accurate labelling is of paramount importance to us.
We have reached out to the customer who posted the video to contact us to aid us in our investigation.
We ask also that customers who find any labelling discrepancy of products to approach our store staff immediately so that we may rectify the issue in a timely manner.
To safeguard the interests of our customers, we have in place a policy where we will honour a full refund or exchange for products that have been inaccurately labelled.
For further queries on this matter, do contact us at our Customer Relations Hotline at 63805858 or through email at [email protected].
A 23-year-old Ukrainian TikToker, Nina Monzolevska, who is residing in Singapore, posted a video about a packet of chicken breast that she bought from NTUC Fairprice.
She alleged that the chicken was mislabeled, as the weight that was labeled on the packet of chicken breast stated 224 grams.
Nina then weighed the chicken breast at home, including the packaging, and she discovered that it only weighed 164 grams.
She then repeated the same experiment twice to make sure there was no mistake.
On her TikTok post, she captioned her video: “FairPrice doesn’t seem that fair anymore.”
Netizens’ comments
Unfair Price is more like it.
NTUC weighing scale weigh the spirit of the chicken.
Next time bring ur personal scale b4 buying…
Part of the chicken flew away.
Most likely paste wrong, could be new worker messing up.
The woman was subsequently pronounced dead at the hospital.
No foul play suspected
The police confirmed the case, saying that the incident happened at 10 Bukit Chermin Road, The Keppel Club.
Based on the preliminary investigations by the police, they do not suspect foul play.
At the time of writing, investigations into the woman’s death are still ongoing.
Keppel Club has an illustrious history and is one of Singapore’s oldest country clubs. The club has a swimming pool that operates daily from 7 in the morning to 9 at night.
A driver who was purportedly the victim of a hit & run accident, took to Facebook to appeal for eye-witnesses and video footage of what happened.
The incident happened at an open carpark at Block 322 Clementi Avenue 5.
Here is his post
“Dear All,
I am appealing for eye-witnesses and in-vehicle video of a hit and run on a parked vehicle that happened at an open carpark next to Clementi MRT Station in front of Blk 322 Clementi Ave 5.
Place: Open carpark lot 303 in front of Blk 322 Clementi Ave 5, next to Clementi MRT Station.
Time: 4Feb2022 between 1pm to 3.30pm on the same day.
Please kindly reach out to me if you happen to be around the area and have seen or taken pictures or video of the other vehicle. It will be very much appreciated.
Thanks & happy new years”
Persons with information relating to the incident can contact the driver here.
A video emerged online showing a Toyota Prius, Transcab taxi driving dangerously and recklessly on the road.
The taxi was seen driving behind a motorcycle with a pillion rider at the back, before accelerating while trying to overtake the bike, almost hitting the motorcyclist.
The two vehicles later met again at a road junction, and the taxi once again accelerated and cut off the motorcyclist, this time coming even closer to hitting the motorcycle.
The motorcyclist braked to avoid a collision and the motorcycles wobbled a bit as a result, as the taxi driver then drove off as though nothing happened.
The incident happened on 5 February at about 4.22pm, along Yishun Central.
Potential penalties
Drivers who drive in a manner that is dangerous to the public are guilty of an offence under section 64(1) of the Road Traffic Act (RTA).
Persons found guilty face a jail term of up to 1 year and/or a $5,000 fine.
If the driver causes hurt, he faces a jail term of up to 2 years and a fine of $10,000.
If the driver caused grievous hurt, he faces a jail term of between 1 to 5 years and disqualified from driving for at least 8 years.
If the driver’s actions caused death, he faces a jail term of up to 2 to 8 years and disqualified from driving for at least 10 years.
A video emerged online showing a group of PMD riders riding illegally on the road.
The errant riders were seen riding in a group of 6, which is more than the allowed limit of 5, as well as riding on the road without a helmet on.
The PMDs that they are riding on are also not allowed to be on the roads – PMDs are only allowed on
Potential penalties
Riding PMD on the road
Under the Active Mobility Act, it is an offence for PMDs to be used on roads, footpaths and/or pedestrian-only paths – PMDs are only allowed to be used on shared paths (cycling paths).
Offenders caught riding their PMDs on the roads, footpaths and/or pedestrian-only paths, face a fine of up to $2,000 and/or a jail term of up to 3 months.
Repeat offenders face a fine of up to $5,000 and/or a jail term of up to 6 months.
Riding without helmet
It is mandatory for all cyclists to wear helmets when riding on roads. Those caught riding bicycles and power-assisted bicycles on roads without wearing a helmet can be fined up to $1,000 and/or jailed up to three months upon conviction for the first offence.
Riding group size
from 1 Jan 2022, a new regulation will also kick in – cycling groups must not exceed the maximum length of 5 bicycles (or ten cyclists when riding two abreast where permitted). Errant on-road cyclists will also face a higher composition fine of $150 with effect from 1 Jan 2022.”
